Joe Biden couldn't wait to start issuing unconstitutional orders

[P@triot]

Joe Biden couldn't wait to start issuing illegal/unconstitutional orders. The President of the United States cannot create, abolish, or alter law. And our immigration laws are laws.

Texas Sues Biden Administration Over Deportation Freeze Order

www.theepochtimes.com

 

[miketx]

Clearly they don't care, or he wouldn't be where he is.

 

[P@triot]

Joe Biden couldn't wait to start issuing illegal/unconstitutional orders. The President of the United States does not have the authority to halt private industry.

Joe Biden putting 'Saudi Arabia first' by halting Keystone XL pipeline: Sen. Daines

Sen. Steve Daines, R-Mont., believes President Biden killing the Keystone XL pipeline shows he’s putting "Saudi Arabia first," not American workers.

www.foxnews.com

 

[P@triot]

Clearly they don't care, or he wouldn't be where he is.

Oh I know. The Dumbocrats not only don't care about the US Constitution, they actually hate it. They take glee in violating it.

 

[P@triot]

Note Joe Biden's first order of national security? To focus on Americans. Not Al Qaeda. Not Iran. Not China. Not Russia.

Biden Asked National Intelligence Director to Assess Domestic Extremism

www.theepochtimes.com

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

‘Gilberto Hinojosa, the Texas Democratic Party chair, called Paxton an “embarrassment” to Texas and the office of state attorney general.

“The amount of hatred towards migrant families by Republican leadership is something that never ceases to amaze me,” Hinojosa said in a news release. “Ken Paxton seems to have no problem with grossly wasting taxpayer money to score political points, even though Trump left office without doling out a pardon to the indicted attorney general.”’

Texas AG Ken Paxton sues Biden administration over deportation freeze

AUSTIN — Joe Biden’s presidency was only about 48 hours old when Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued the administration Friday, for going forward with a...

www.dallasnews.com

True.

Also true is the fact that the president has prosecutorial discretion with regard to such matters; a 100-day freeze on deporting unauthorized immigrants is perfectly appropriate and warranted given Trump’s reckless, irresponsible, and lawless immigration ‘policy.’

Biden’s freeze is temporary and perfectly lawful and Constitutional as no deportations have been canceled.

Paxton’s ‘lawsuit’ is devoid of merit and filed in bad faith.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Clearly they don't care, or he wouldn't be where he is.

Oh I know. The Dumbocrats not only don't care about the US Constitution, they actually hate it. They take glee in violating it.

Because they are totally loyal first and foremost NOT to their country....but to an Agenda of Elites and Globalists, and the worship of money and power

Plus there's some true wickedness and evil involved I'm certain.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Joe Biden couldn't wait to start issuing illegal/unconstitutional orders. The President of the United States cannot create, abolish, or alter law. And our immigration laws are laws.

Texas Sues Biden Administration Over Deportation Freeze Order

www.theepochtimes.com

Wrong.

The thread premise is a lie.

Acts of government are presumed to be Constitutional until the Supreme Court rules otherwise (see US v. Morrison (2000)).

As the Court has not ruled concerning Biden’s EOs, his orders are perfectly lawful and Constitutional.

Moreover, Biden’s orders do not create, abolish, or alter law; it’s within a president’s discretion to refrain from enforcing penalties pending review.

 

[Synthaholic]

Clearly they don't care, or he wouldn't be where he is.

Oh I know. The Dumbocrats not only don't care about the US Constitution, they actually hate it. They take glee in violating it.

Cry harder.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Joe Biden couldn't wait to start issuing illegal/unconstitutional orders. The President of the United States cannot create, abolish, or alter law. And our immigration laws are laws.

Texas Sues Biden Administration Over Deportation Freeze Order

www.theepochtimes.com

Wrong.

The thread premise is a lie.

Acts of government are presumed to be Constitutional until the Supreme Court rules otherwise (see US v. Morrison (2000)).

As the Court has not ruled concerning Biden’s EOs, his orders are perfectly lawful and Constitutional.

Moreover, Biden’s orders do not create, abolish, or alter law; it’s within a president’s discretion to refrain from enforcing penalties pending review.

Excuse me but.

You're a moron.

You have NO CLUE what the Constitution is OR...you are one of those wishing to kill it

FYI...The US Constitution SPECIFICALLY ACTS TO LIMIT Government Power. PERIOD

No wonder Communist hate the US Constitution

 

[pknopp]

Immigration is granted to the Federal government by the Constitution. States have no standing here so the suit will get tossed.

 

[SavannahMann]

Joe Biden couldn't wait to start issuing illegal/unconstitutional orders. The President of the United States does not have the authority to halt private industry.

Joe Biden putting 'Saudi Arabia first' by halting Keystone XL pipeline: Sen. Daines

Sen. Steve Daines, R-Mont., believes President Biden killing the Keystone XL pipeline shows he’s putting "Saudi Arabia first," not American workers.

www.foxnews.com

Actually. It is American workers benefiting. Berkshire Hathaway owns among other things railroads that use tank cars to transport the oil right now. This transport would be reduced if the Pipeline was opened. Of course that would also hurt the income of Warren Buffet.

 

[mudwhistle]

Joe Biden couldn't wait to start issuing illegal/unconstitutional orders. The President of the United States cannot create, abolish, or alter law. And our immigration laws are laws.

Texas Sues Biden Administration Over Deportation Freeze Order

www.theepochtimes.com

Democrats are just a pack of criminals intentionally screwing up America daring us to do something about it.
The only reason they're getting away with it is because of the fact that so many Republicans are in on it with them.

 

[harmonica]

..plain and simple-they support/hide/inhibit the law/etc FOR illegals = UNDENIABLY against the constitution

''''''illegal
noun
Definition of illegal (Entry 2 of 2)
sometimes disparaging + offensive
: a person who enters or lives in a country without the documentation required for legal entry or residence''''''

HAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH sometimes '''''disparaging/offensive'''''
YES---the Dems LOVE criminals like:
Floyd
Brown
Garner
ILLEGALS

adjective il·le·gal | \ (ˌ)i(l)-ˈlē-gəl \
Definition of illegal
(Entry 1 of 2)
: not according to or authorized by law''''

 

[White 6]

Note Joe Biden's first order of national security? To focus on Americans. Not Al Qaeda. Not Iran. Not China. Not Russia.

Biden Asked National Intelligence Director to Assess Domestic Extremism

www.theepochtimes.com

You got to admit, Al Qaeda, Iran, China and Russia are not making front line news attacking from within our country with wild eyed mobs and IEDs. Russia once predicted we would fall from within. I would just as soon not prove them right, by ignoring reality. Reality is real, you know, whether it fits your agenda or not.

 

[Synthaholic]

Joe Biden couldn't wait to start issuing illegal/unconstitutional orders. The President of the United States cannot create, abolish, or alter law. And our immigration laws are laws.

Texas Sues Biden Administration Over Deportation Freeze Order

www.theepochtimes.com

This you?

Donald Trump might go down in history as the greatest president of all time

Trump is the greatest president of all time for impeachment by a president, everything else he didn't put his heart into it.

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[P@triot]

You got to admit, Al Qaeda, Iran, China and Russia are not making front line new attacking from within our country with wild eyed mobs and IEDs.

Absolutely astounding that you didn't even realize the irony of your comment. China armed (and stoked) ANTIFA and Black Lives Matters. Delivered massive pallets of bricks each week to cities across the entire nation.

But the left-wing media refused to make it "front line news". However, they couldn't wait to make bullshit propaganda about Americans exercising basic 1st Amendment rights, "front line news".

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

But the left-wing media refused to make it "front line news". However, they couldn't wait to make bullshit propaganda about Americans exercising basic 1st Amendment rights, "front line news".

Agreed.

I always felt that one of the Priorities of Americans who care for their freedom is to figure out how to stop the Leftist Media.
That one tool has done more harm to America than a nuclear attack could have done.

 

[SavannahMann]

You got to admit, Al Qaeda, Iran, China and Russia are not making front line new attacking from within our country with wild eyed mobs and IEDs.

Absolutely astounding that you didn't even realize the irony of your comment. China armed (and stoked) ANTIFA and Black Lives Matters. Delivered massive pallets of bricks each week to cities across the entire nation.

But the left-wing media refused to make it "front line news". However, they couldn't wait to make bullshit propaganda about Americans exercising basic 1st Amendment rights, "front line news".

Im sorry. You think China needed to import Bricks? Seriously? There aren’t any bricks in this country?

 

[White 6]

You got to admit, Al Qaeda, Iran, China and Russia are not making front line new attacking from within our country with wild eyed mobs and IEDs.

Absolutely astounding that you didn't even realize the irony of your comment. China armed (and stoked) ANTIFA and Black Lives Matters. Delivered massive pallets of bricks each week to cities across the entire nation.

But the left-wing media refused to make it "front line news". However, they couldn't wait to make bullshit propaganda about Americans exercising basic 1st Amendment rights, "front line news".

Did not read where China bought and distributed bricks for use by extremist rioters. Was that from Trump's National Secuirty Advisor, CIA, FBI,DHS or Justice Department? As for a news release from China or any other nation, hardly as damaging or dangerous as right wing armed militia groups plotting to intentionally trigger Civil War II, because the first on worked out so well. Maybe if the insurrectionists had just talked sarcastically to the officer laying on the Capital step because he had previously stood in the way of the domestic terrorist attacking the Capital, instead of beating him on the ground with a hockey stick and a trump flag pole while forcing their way into our seat of democracy chanting "Hang Mike Pence" with a gallows they built on the lawn, your theory of breaking news might have taken the news cycle. I guess you have your priorities.