Jobs report is not good: it may be as low as 140,000 although

[bedowin62]

That's nice...now take a risk and come down from your ivory tower and talk to those mere serfs you are so afraid of and find out the real story. I promise they won't hurt you....as long as you don't say something stupid and piss them off.

What's your point? Those "job creators" having the lowest sustained tax "burden" since before Harding/Coolidge's great depression, aren't giving US a good return on investment???

I'm lost....

You keep attacking the rich and republicans on grounds that if Republicans hold office there are no jobs being crated and if there are rich people less jobs are created.

Where I get lost is you post fake images of massive job losses under Bush and incredible job growth under Obama... Despite the rich being far richer and there being a Republican Senate/House. Yes under Bush it was a Democrat Senate and House and under Clinton it was a Republican Senate and house...

You then called the 1930's depression Harding/Coolidge's despite Hoover and FDR being in power. Also Wilson left Harding with a depression before Harding was elected and it took 18 months to get out of a depression and into a booming economy.

My point is you flip back and forth very quickly on what branches of Government are responsible for a recession, depression or low jobs... You always seem to find a way to blame Republicans and not Democrats, every single time.

I'm not a Republican nor do I defend them, simply pointing out that yer a race baiting, clueless, economically ignorant partisan hack.

Even RW (one of the internet dumbest fucking people) blamed having a Republican house/Senate as the problem... Yet I doubt he blames the House/Senate being Democrat for the 2008 crash.

YES, MORE DISHONESTY FROM THE "MODERATE". SHOCKING



PLEASE GIVE ME ONE POLICY THE DEM CONGRESS DID JAN 2007-JAN 2009 THAT CAUSED DUBYA'S GREAT RECESSION?

NOW GIVE ME A BILL THE GOP GAVE US THAT HELPED OBAMA WITH CREATING JOBS? oops


IF you were HONEST, you'd see that the GOP "job creator" BULLSHIT that taxes HAVE to be GUTTED to create the environment for jobs to be created is a total fukkn lie!

I'M CONSISTENT HOWEVER, PREZ POLICY IS NUMBER 1 ON THE ECONOMY, REGARDLESS OF PARTY IN THE CONGRESS!


Oh right, Harding/Coolidge didn't cheer on the credit bubbles and 3 asset bubbles that Hoover/FDR inherited right? JUST LIKE DUBYA DIDN'T CHEER ON THE SUBPRIME BANKSTER BUBBLE, RIGHT?

LMAOROG

Once again you have done the same thing you have been doing this whole time.

Under Bush the Dems ran on undoing everything Bush had done, and as you provided did absolutely nothing different. Dems didn't even try and stall Bush on a single thing, they lock step supported him. Dems under Bush helped create a bigger bubble, not one bill was aimed at preparing for the crash. Obama was apart of this, only voting to not increase the debt ceiling... What a stand!

Now, under Obama you complain that the GOP is not doing anything, just like the Dems.

Also, just fyi Obama has been running near 2 trillion in deficit spending ever year in office... That's his stimulus/jobs bill right there.

No President in world history has got the Federal reserve spending 80 billion a month to "stimulate" the economy (that also artificially increases tax revenues). All the while Obama was spending 1.4ish trillion for years, and even when the budget was around 500 billion for a moment it was done with fake revenues crated by printed money being injected into the economy while NOT counting that money being created and spent as debt, and it is...

I guess since Dubya started vetoing bills once the Dems took Congress, YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT, AS USUAL

Preparing for the crash? LMAOROG. Grow a fukkn brain dumbass

Obama CUT Dubya's deficits by 2/3rds liar!


SHOW ME ONE TIME AUSTERITY WORKED ANYWHERE DURING A DOWNTURN DUMBFUKK? LOL


I KNOW, LET'S GO BACK TO DUBYA/GOP "JOB CREATOR" POLICIES SINCE THEY WORKED SO WELL RIGHT?

YET ANOTHER IDIOTIC STRAW MAN

we have never had austerity you idiot

 

[Mad Scientist]

Why are you "Evil Conservatives" constantly trying to Talk Down the Economy? This is the Summer and Fall of Recovery.

Bush.
Racism.
Bruce Jenner's Cawk.

 

[Dan Daly]

as for this notion that the labor force participation rate decline is only due to boomers leaving the workforce:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-...xplanation-why-946-million-americans-are-out-

 

[bendog]

CNN is reporting a different number: "At 8:30 a.m. Eastern, the Labor Department will report its latest figures on hiring and unemployment for September.

After employers added a disappointing 173,000 new jobs last month, analysts are hoping that gains will at least top the 200,000 mark as the economy heads into the final quarter of 2015. The jobless rate is expected to hold at 5.1 percent"

The Dems and the Pubs in the House have to work out a jobs bill the Senate and the Pres can support.

The stone walling by both parties has to end.

I wonder if the I/E bank demise played a role.

 

[Clementine]

LOL
ALTHOUGH, although, although, oh brother

they really think they can EXPLAIN away how everyone know this economy and jobs under this regime has SUCKED the whole time he's been office.

if these numbers came out under Bush. OMG

True. When unemployment was around 4.9%, Pelosi and the Dems were having a shit fit and blaming him. Remember when Pelosi asked Bush "Where are the jobs, Mr. President?"

Those who completely gave up are not usually counted and now there are more people than ever who are permanently out of the work force and it's staggering. Over 90,000,000 people are unemployed and a lot of those gave up because they can't find anything. The numbers don't include those who are now working for a fraction of their previous income because the lower paying jobs are all they can find. The number of people on disability is high. I suspect many went that route because they were desperate and the rule for disability was that if a person kept claiming they were disabled, no medical proof was necessary. Nothing makes a liberal more happy than people running to government because they gave up.

If the plan is to tear down the economy to pave the way for socialism, I'd say things are going very well.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The fuks on the far right who are quarreling the numbers either are ignorant or mentally feeble or simply malignant.

 

[bedowin62]

The fuks on the far right who are quarreling the numbers either are ignorant or mentally feeble or simply malignant.

you're a loser; every day you wallow in the cesspool of self-deception and play with your own liberal feces.

 

[Stephanie]

and then they wonder why all these men are out shooting people and things up. THIS IS HORRIBLE. we can't take anymore of the Democrats VOTE THEM OUT in 2016

snip:

Labor Force Participation Rate Hits All-Time Low for American Men
By Susan Jones | October 2, 2015 | 11:34 AM EDT
AddThis Sharing
88.8K114

.insert-box .insert-caption { max-width:240px; } Media (max-width: 240px) { .insert-box .insert-caption { width: 100%; } }
Construction workers in New York. (AP File Photo)
(CNSNews.com) - The labor force participation rate for men hit an all-time low of 68.7 percent in September, the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics reported on Friday.

Last month, according to BLS, the male civilian non-institutional population, consisting of all males 16 or older who are not in the military or an institution was 121,365,000. Of those 121,365,000 men, 83,402,000 participated in the labor force by either holding a job or actively seeking one

all of it here:
Labor Force Participation Rate Hits All-Time Low for American Men

 

[Clementine]

The fuks on the far right who are quarreling the numbers either are ignorant or mentally feeble or simply malignant.

Only mindless sheeple accept the propaganda. The actual number of people unemployed is worse than ever. There are more people than ever who are no longer counted in the statistics. Look around. More people are struggling. Even those working are fearful that they won't make it because the average family budget is already tight and prices keep going up. That means something has got to give or more people will be going without the basics. I know the libs smile because it's likely that millions more will be forced to turn to government programs.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Clementine, you are a sheep, then, an unbalanced ideologue who fears context. Shameful, because you are a smart person.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Why are you "Evil Conservatives" constantly trying to Talk Down the Economy? This is the Summer and Fall of Recovery.

Bush.
Racism.
Bruce Jenner's Cawk.

Wasn't this the seventh summer of recovery?

Clementine, you are a sheep, then, an unbalanced ideologue who fears context. Shameful, because you are a smart person.

No, Clementine is right. You just enjoy ignoring the facts.

 

[JakeStarkey]

LBT has caught the same caravan as Clementine into the wilderness.

 

[Faun]

According to BLS data[8], those in the Not-in-Labor-Force category (those that can work but don’t) has surged consistently since year 2000 by 25.0 million people. Since 2009, the start of the Obama Administration, it grew by 13.2 million. Since 2010, the beginning of the decade, it grew by 9.8 million people. Last 12 months, last quarter and last month Not-in-Labor-Force grew by 1.5 million, 451,000 and 640,000 people, respectively. - See more at: Bureau of Labor Statistics | Jobenomics




do i need to do the math for you left-wingers here?

The not in the labor force group is not abled body folks who don't work. WTF is wrong with you people? You just make shit up because reality doesn't help your agenda.

The not in the labor force group includes many people who are disabled and can't work and many people who are too old to work. And out of the 94 million who are not in the labor force, about 88 million of them don't want to work.

Imbeciles like you are trying to paint people who don't want to work as though they're unemployed because of the job market.

 

[Sallow]

CNN is reporting a different number: "At 8:30 a.m. Eastern, the Labor Department will report its latest figures on hiring and unemployment for September.

After employers added a disappointing 173,000 new jobs last month, analysts are hoping that gains will at least top the 200,000 mark as the economy heads into the final quarter of 2015. The jobless rate is expected to hold at 5.1 percent"

The Dems and the Pubs in the House have to work out a jobs bill the Senate and the Pres can support.

The stone walling by both parties has to end.

September is never a good month for employment.

 

[JakeStarkey]

August, September, and October numbers are often upgraded later.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

LBT has caught the same caravan as Clementine into the wilderness.

Thats funny, Jake.

 

[Dad2three]

Iraq cost 3 trillion. Was it worth it?

No major terrorist attacks in 14 years. You tell me.

Should've just invaded Canada on false premises then, closer and cheaper, same terrorist threat as Iraq was too!!!

 

[Dad2three]

I guess since Dubya started vetoing bills once the Dems took Congress, YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT, AS USUAL

Preparing for the crash? LMAOROG. Grow a fukkn brain dumbass

Obama CUT Dubya's deficits by 2/3rds liar!


SHOW ME ONE TIME AUSTERITY WORKED ANYWHERE DURING A DOWNTURN DUMBFUKK? LOL


I KNOW, LET'S GO BACK TO DUBYA/GOP "JOB CREATOR" POLICIES SINCE THEY WORKED SO WELL RIGHT?

Worked great at my house.

Your HOUSE? LMAOROG. Yes the federal Gov't is JUST like a household budget *shaking head*

 

[rightwinger]

LOL
ALTHOUGH, although, although, oh brother

they really think they can EXPLAIN away how everyone know this economy and jobs under this regime has SUCKED the whole time he's been office.

if these numbers came out under Bush. OMG

True. When unemployment was around 4.9%, Pelosi and the Dems were having a shit fit and blaming him. Remember when Pelosi asked Bush "Where are the jobs, Mr. President?"

Those who completely gave up are not usually counted and now there are more people than ever who are permanently out of the work force and it's staggering. Over 90,000,000 people are unemployed and a lot of those gave up because they can't find anything. The numbers don't include those who are now working for a fraction of their previous income because the lower paying jobs are all they can find. The number of people on disability is high. I suspect many went that route because they were desperate and the rule for disability was that if a person kept claiming they were disabled, no medical proof was necessary. Nothing makes a liberal more happy than people running to government because they gave up.

If the plan is to tear down the economy to pave the way for socialism, I'd say things are going very well.

That was just the start

Bush was on the way to doubling the unemployment rate

Can you imagine if Obama were losing 770,000 jobs a month?

 

[Dad2three]

LOL
ALTHOUGH, although, although, oh brother

they really think they can EXPLAIN away how everyone know this economy and jobs under this regime has SUCKED the whole time he's been office.

if these numbers came out under Bush. OMG

True. When unemployment was around 4.9%, Pelosi and the Dems were having a shit fit and blaming him. Remember when Pelosi asked Bush "Where are the jobs, Mr. President?"

Those who completely gave up are not usually counted and now there are more people than ever who are permanently out of the work force and it's staggering. Over 90,000,000 people are unemployed and a lot of those gave up because they can't find anything. The numbers don't include those who are now working for a fraction of their previous income because the lower paying jobs are all they can find. The number of people on disability is high. I suspect many went that route because they were desperate and the rule for disability was that if a person kept claiming they were disabled, no medical proof was necessary. Nothing makes a liberal more happy than people running to government because they gave up.

If the plan is to tear down the economy to pave the way for socialism, I'd say things are going very well.

COMPLAINING TO DUBYA ABOUT 4.9%? LMAOROG. YOU MEAN WHEN DUBYA INHERITED A 4% UNEMPLOYMENT RATE YET LOST OVER A MILLION PRIVATE SECTOR JOBS IN 8 YEARS?

Even Carter had 9+ million PRIVATE sector jobs in 4 years, Dubya at his PEAK (before the ponzi scheme he cheered on), there was less than 4 million created in 6 years!!!!

Yeah for Dubya/GOP "job creator" economy right Bubba? lol