Jim Webb to Run as Independent

'white male. NOT in today's DNC'.......?

that's all they got in the DNC......old white males......hey as long as the pantsuit fits.....

poor Webb comes from another time of Democrats......he does not fit in with the commie/socialist left that has taken over the party....
He's NOT the "right kind" of white male. He must apologize for his whiteness and maleness. Of then democrats would DEMAND he burn his guns along with the American flag on his front lawn.



Is this really the silly shit you guys tell each other in the right wing echo chamber?

Laughing....'apologize for his maleness'? Wow.

the white male has been under attack by liberals for quite some time now....

The 'white male' has been under attack by liberals for some time now'....or you equate anything but the most obsequious, servile and reverent attention as an 'attack'?

which begs the question why the DNC only has old white males (& one old white female in a pantsuit) up for nomination......why aren't blacks and hispanics and younger people represented.......like in the RNC....

So which is it? An attack on 'whiteness' and 'maleness'. Or a focus on them. Because your question seems to contradict your premise.

no.....it points out the hypocrisy of the Dims....

Hypocrisy is thinking one thing and saying something else. And the person claiming to speak for what democrats think...

....is you. Who isn't a democrat. Can you see the possible problem with your process?
 
He's NOT the "right kind" of white male. He must apologize for his whiteness and maleness. Of then democrats would DEMAND he burn his guns along with the American flag on his front lawn.



Is this really the silly shit you guys tell each other in the right wing echo chamber?

Laughing....'apologize for his maleness'? Wow.

the white male has been under attack by liberals for quite some time now....

The 'white male' has been under attack by liberals for some time now'....or you equate anything but the most obsequious, servile and reverent attention as an 'attack'?

which begs the question why the DNC only has old white males (& one old white female in a pantsuit) up for nomination......why aren't blacks and hispanics and younger people represented.......like in the RNC....

So which is it? An attack on 'whiteness' and 'maleness'. Or a focus on them. Because your question seems to contradict your premise.

no.....it points out the hypocrisy of the Dims....

Hypocrisy is thinking one thing and saying something else. And the person claiming to speak for what democrats think...

....is you. Who isn't a democrat. Can you see the possible problem with your process?
Apparently, if you ever want to know a liberal or Democrat's opinion on an issue, the best person to ask is some frothing-at-the-mouth wingnut asshole.
 
He's NOT the "right kind" of white male. He must apologize for his whiteness and maleness. Of then democrats would DEMAND he burn his guns along with the American flag on his front lawn.



Is this really the silly shit you guys tell each other in the right wing echo chamber?

Laughing....'apologize for his maleness'? Wow.

the white male has been under attack by liberals for quite some time now....

The 'white male' has been under attack by liberals for some time now'....or you equate anything but the most obsequious, servile and reverent attention as an 'attack'?

which begs the question why the DNC only has old white males (& one old white female in a pantsuit) up for nomination......why aren't blacks and hispanics and younger people represented.......like in the RNC....

So which is it? An attack on 'whiteness' and 'maleness'. Or a focus on them. Because your question seems to contradict your premise.

no.....it points out the hypocrisy of the Dims....

Hypocrisy is thinking one thing and saying something else. And the person claiming to speak for what democrats think...

....is you. Who isn't a democrat. Can you see the possible problem with your process?

yes that is the definition.....and we've seen liberals attacking white males all over the place and yet it seems all they can run for president is old white males for the most part....that's pretty hypocritical in my book....

i am not a dimwit and not speaking for them......i believe in the process of observation and speaking of such observations is quite logical and not hypocritical at all....
 
Is this really the silly shit you guys tell each other in the right wing echo chamber?

Laughing....'apologize for his maleness'? Wow.

the white male has been under attack by liberals for quite some time now....

The 'white male' has been under attack by liberals for some time now'....or you equate anything but the most obsequious, servile and reverent attention as an 'attack'?

which begs the question why the DNC only has old white males (& one old white female in a pantsuit) up for nomination......why aren't blacks and hispanics and younger people represented.......like in the RNC....

So which is it? An attack on 'whiteness' and 'maleness'. Or a focus on them. Because your question seems to contradict your premise.

no.....it points out the hypocrisy of the Dims....

Hypocrisy is thinking one thing and saying something else. And the person claiming to speak for what democrats think...

....is you. Who isn't a democrat. Can you see the possible problem with your process?

yes that is the definition.....and we've seen liberals attacking white males all over the place and yet it seems all they can run for president is old white males for the most part....that's pretty hypocritical in my book....

i am not a dimwit and not speaking for them......i believe the process of observation and speaking of such observations is quite logical and not hypocritical at all....
What "white males" do liberals "attack" simply for being white males? This should be good for a few laughs.
 
I would take him over the other's, but it was clear his candidacy was going nowhere as a Dim.
Which is my point.
Shit, did you watch the debates?
The more irrational those fucks got, the louder the crowd got. "sue gun manufacturers blah blah" RRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

Well they didn't sue gun manufactures . They said they shouldn't be given special protection from suits.

Did YOU watch the debates ?
REALLY? Omalley almost started fuckin crying when talking about that bushmaster suit.
Well, they definitely shouldn't need protection. Only a complete fuckin moron would think they are liable.
If I get hurt by a dui driver, do I have the right to sue chevy and jack daniels? Fuckin stupid bullshit

As you may believe no one would sue the car manufacture the reality is Paul Walker daughter is suing Porsche...

I find it stupid just like someone suing a gun manufacture, but some people are wanting to blame the object and not the individual even if they are completely wrong to do so...

Meadow Walker sues Porsche over father's death - CNN.com

I can see a gun manufacturer being sued for actual defects. If a gun blows up in your hand, you may be due some compensation.

Wouldn't they be protected from that suit ?

Dems are just asking why gun makers get this unheard of protection .
 
the white male has been under attack by liberals for quite some time now....

The 'white male' has been under attack by liberals for some time now'....or you equate anything but the most obsequious, servile and reverent attention as an 'attack'?

which begs the question why the DNC only has old white males (& one old white female in a pantsuit) up for nomination......why aren't blacks and hispanics and younger people represented.......like in the RNC....

So which is it? An attack on 'whiteness' and 'maleness'. Or a focus on them. Because your question seems to contradict your premise.

no.....it points out the hypocrisy of the Dims....

Hypocrisy is thinking one thing and saying something else. And the person claiming to speak for what democrats think...

....is you. Who isn't a democrat. Can you see the possible problem with your process?

yes that is the definition.....and we've seen liberals attacking white males all over the place and yet it seems all they can run for president is old white males for the most part....that's pretty hypocritical in my book....

i am not a dimwit and not speaking for them......i believe the process of observation and speaking of such observations is quite logical and not hypocritical at all....
What "white males" do liberals "attack" simply for being white males? This should be good for a few laughs.
A totalitarian society can only survive if the male population has been gelded, emasculated and disenfranchised. With this natural bulwark against tyranny removed, the elite can centralize power and pursue collectivist tyranny unopposed. This is why men and masculinity are under assault on every level – and why both men and women should join forces to fight back against this common enemy.

The War On Men: 10 Ways Masculinity is Under Attack
 
The 'white male' has been under attack by liberals for some time now'....or you equate anything but the most obsequious, servile and reverent attention as an 'attack'?

So which is it? An attack on 'whiteness' and 'maleness'. Or a focus on them. Because your question seems to contradict your premise.

no.....it points out the hypocrisy of the Dims....

Hypocrisy is thinking one thing and saying something else. And the person claiming to speak for what democrats think...

....is you. Who isn't a democrat. Can you see the possible problem with your process?

yes that is the definition.....and we've seen liberals attacking white males all over the place and yet it seems all they can run for president is old white males for the most part....that's pretty hypocritical in my book....

i am not a dimwit and not speaking for them......i believe the process of observation and speaking of such observations is quite logical and not hypocritical at all....
What "white males" do liberals "attack" simply for being white males? This should be good for a few laughs.
A totalitarian society can only survive if the male population has been gelded, emasculated and disenfranchised. With this natural bulwark against tyranny removed, the elite can centralize power and pursue collectivist tyranny unopposed. This is why men and masculinity are under assault on every level – and why both men and women should join forces to fight back against this common enemy.

The War On Men: 10 Ways Masculinity is Under Attack
Infowars. LOL.

The only people who think "masculinity is under attack" by anything other than an infinitesimal fringe are insecure bedwetters who think they are entitled to get laid.
 
Generally speaking, any lawsuit against a gun manufacturer would be thrown out, unless the gun failed to function as advertised due to a manufacturing flaw, either on a particular gun, or a design flaw of a whole series of guns. Therefore, the most likely lawsuit to win against a gun manufacturer would be if someone was hurt, while trying to shoot a bad guy, because the gun jammed. If the gun fired as it is supposed to, the manufacturer would not be at fault, regardless of who was shot.
 
no.....it points out the hypocrisy of the Dims....

Hypocrisy is thinking one thing and saying something else. And the person claiming to speak for what democrats think...

....is you. Who isn't a democrat. Can you see the possible problem with your process?

yes that is the definition.....and we've seen liberals attacking white males all over the place and yet it seems all they can run for president is old white males for the most part....that's pretty hypocritical in my book....

i am not a dimwit and not speaking for them......i believe the process of observation and speaking of such observations is quite logical and not hypocritical at all....
What "white males" do liberals "attack" simply for being white males? This should be good for a few laughs.
A totalitarian society can only survive if the male population has been gelded, emasculated and disenfranchised. With this natural bulwark against tyranny removed, the elite can centralize power and pursue collectivist tyranny unopposed. This is why men and masculinity are under assault on every level – and why both men and women should join forces to fight back against this common enemy.

The War On Men: 10 Ways Masculinity is Under Attack
Infowars. LOL.

The only people who think "masculinity is under attack" by anything other than an infinitesimal fringe are insecure bedwetters who think they are entitled to get laid.
spoken like a wimpy liberal...
 
Hypocrisy is thinking one thing and saying something else. And the person claiming to speak for what democrats think...

....is you. Who isn't a democrat. Can you see the possible problem with your process?

yes that is the definition.....and we've seen liberals attacking white males all over the place and yet it seems all they can run for president is old white males for the most part....that's pretty hypocritical in my book....

i am not a dimwit and not speaking for them......i believe the process of observation and speaking of such observations is quite logical and not hypocritical at all....
What "white males" do liberals "attack" simply for being white males? This should be good for a few laughs.
A totalitarian society can only survive if the male population has been gelded, emasculated and disenfranchised. With this natural bulwark against tyranny removed, the elite can centralize power and pursue collectivist tyranny unopposed. This is why men and masculinity are under assault on every level – and why both men and women should join forces to fight back against this common enemy.

The War On Men: 10 Ways Masculinity is Under Attack
Infowars. LOL.

The only people who think "masculinity is under attack" by anything other than an infinitesimal fringe are insecure bedwetters who think they are entitled to get laid.
spoken like a wimpy liberal...
Wow, sick burn.
 
Hypocrisy is thinking one thing and saying something else. And the person claiming to speak for what democrats think...

....is you. Who isn't a democrat. Can you see the possible problem with your process?

yes that is the definition.....and we've seen liberals attacking white males all over the place and yet it seems all they can run for president is old white males for the most part....that's pretty hypocritical in my book....

i am not a dimwit and not speaking for them......i believe the process of observation and speaking of such observations is quite logical and not hypocritical at all....
What "white males" do liberals "attack" simply for being white males? This should be good for a few laughs.
A totalitarian society can only survive if the male population has been gelded, emasculated and disenfranchised. With this natural bulwark against tyranny removed, the elite can centralize power and pursue collectivist tyranny unopposed. This is why men and masculinity are under assault on every level – and why both men and women should join forces to fight back against this common enemy.

The War On Men: 10 Ways Masculinity is Under Attack
Infowars. LOL.

The only people who think "masculinity is under attack" by anything other than an infinitesimal fringe are insecure bedwetters who think they are entitled to get laid.
spoken like a wimpy liberal...

Infowars? Really?

Sigh....you're not a truther, are you?
 
yes that is the definition.....and we've seen liberals attacking white males all over the place and yet it seems all they can run for president is old white males for the most part....that's pretty hypocritical in my book....

i am not a dimwit and not speaking for them......i believe the process of observation and speaking of such observations is quite logical and not hypocritical at all....
What "white males" do liberals "attack" simply for being white males? This should be good for a few laughs.
A totalitarian society can only survive if the male population has been gelded, emasculated and disenfranchised. With this natural bulwark against tyranny removed, the elite can centralize power and pursue collectivist tyranny unopposed. This is why men and masculinity are under assault on every level – and why both men and women should join forces to fight back against this common enemy.

The War On Men: 10 Ways Masculinity is Under Attack
Infowars. LOL.

The only people who think "masculinity is under attack" by anything other than an infinitesimal fringe are insecure bedwetters who think they are entitled to get laid.
spoken like a wimpy liberal...
Wow, sick burn.
wow....is that the tough metrosexual speaking up...?
yes that is the definition.....and we've seen liberals attacking white males all over the place and yet it seems all they can run for president is old white males for the most part....that's pretty hypocritical in my book....

i am not a dimwit and not speaking for them......i believe the process of observation and speaking of such observations is quite logical and not hypocritical at all....
What "white males" do liberals "attack" simply for being white males? This should be good for a few laughs.
A totalitarian society can only survive if the male population has been gelded, emasculated and disenfranchised. With this natural bulwark against tyranny removed, the elite can centralize power and pursue collectivist tyranny unopposed. This is why men and masculinity are under assault on every level – and why both men and women should join forces to fight back against this common enemy.

The War On Men: 10 Ways Masculinity is Under Attack
Infowars. LOL.

The only people who think "masculinity is under attack" by anything other than an infinitesimal fringe are insecure bedwetters who think they are entitled to get laid.
spoken like a wimpy liberal...

Infowars? Really?

Sigh....you're not a truther, are you?

so you too like to avoid uncomfortable truths because it wasn't stamped and approved by your liberal hacks in the media.....keep drinking the KoolAid....
 
What "white males" do liberals "attack" simply for being white males? This should be good for a few laughs.
A totalitarian society can only survive if the male population has been gelded, emasculated and disenfranchised. With this natural bulwark against tyranny removed, the elite can centralize power and pursue collectivist tyranny unopposed. This is why men and masculinity are under assault on every level – and why both men and women should join forces to fight back against this common enemy.

The War On Men: 10 Ways Masculinity is Under Attack
Infowars. LOL.

The only people who think "masculinity is under attack" by anything other than an infinitesimal fringe are insecure bedwetters who think they are entitled to get laid.
spoken like a wimpy liberal...
Wow, sick burn.
wow....is that the tough metrosexual speaking up...?
What "white males" do liberals "attack" simply for being white males? This should be good for a few laughs.
A totalitarian society can only survive if the male population has been gelded, emasculated and disenfranchised. With this natural bulwark against tyranny removed, the elite can centralize power and pursue collectivist tyranny unopposed. This is why men and masculinity are under assault on every level – and why both men and women should join forces to fight back against this common enemy.

The War On Men: 10 Ways Masculinity is Under Attack
Infowars. LOL.

The only people who think "masculinity is under attack" by anything other than an infinitesimal fringe are insecure bedwetters who think they are entitled to get laid.
spoken like a wimpy liberal...

Infowars? Really?

Sigh....you're not a truther, are you?

so you too like to avoid uncomfortable truths because it wasn't stamped and approved by your liberal hacks in the media.....keep drinking the KoolAid....

You're citing a conspiracy theory website that sells Koolaid to gullible conspiracy theorists around the country...

....as your sole and primary source.

So do Alex Jones and Paul Joseph Watson do all your thinking for you?
 

Forum List

Back
Top