Jill Biden Thinks It's Un-American To Oppose Porn in School Libraries

[ChristisKing]

Can't talk about Genghis Khan. Then we have to talk about why 2% of the Asian population have his DNA. Same for Tamerlame. Can't talk about Quanah Parker. Can't talk about the Nazis or Rob Roy.

But yet you talk about wanting to allow porn into schools and you still haven't told us why.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

open up X rated movies now, no need to tag them anymore.

YouTube has age restricted content. But these disgusting people want grade school kids reading books about children sucking dicks. It’s ******* nasty.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Piece of shit social conservatives have always been the backbone of book banning movements

Do you support making porn available to MINORS. Yes or no.

 

[ChristisKing]

Do you support making porn available to MINORS. Yes or no.

Here's a tip, if they don't respond the answer is yes.

 

[The Duke]

Just curious why The Duke disliked this post. You don't agree?

That's not allowed here, there, nor anywhere at all anymore on the internet.
Now in AOL private rooms there were NAMBLA put-downs-a- flyin' aplenty!

It's like almost 20% of the repoirtoire taken away!

Anal pirates and plumbers and NAMBLA CEOs n shit!

 

[ChristisKing]

Zincwarrior Point out to us where in Romeo and Juliet it specifically says they fucked. Please and thank you.

 

[two_iron]

Harry Potter was the most challenged book of 21st century but mainly by Christian nuts, ie Right Wing...

Banned Books Week 2021: Harry Potter: The Most Challenged Book of the 21st Century – Toledo Lucas County Public Library – TLCPL

How can a book series be the most challenged in the 21st century, yet the best-selling series of all time? Find out here!

www.toledolibrary.org

Could point out where Cat in the Hat was actually banned?

Your thought leaders couldn't care less about the content - they don't like JJ Rowling's position on chicks with dicks and "people who menstruate", general faggotry, etc.... hmm?

 

[Sixties Fan]

The pro-fascist element will inevitably fall back on religious extremism to make their point.

And as religious bigotry becomes more extreme in certain parts of America, so does racism.

Both are tightly bound to fascist ideals.

Nonsense.

How many grade schools do you think have a bible in their library? I’m betting close to none. But you ******* people want porn in there. Porn has been age restricted since the invention of the printing press. Yet to hear you talk you could check out a Playboy from your school library.

Nobody wants porn for small children.

You have not read those books, you have no idea what they are really about.

You have no idea what you are talking about.

 

[Sixties Fan]

YouTube has age restricted content. But these disgusting people want grade school kids reading books about children sucking dicks. It’s ******* nasty.

You have no idea what is written in those books. And clearly you are never going to read them to find out, in order to give a fair criticism of it.

Nasty is endless attacks over something all of you know nothing about.

 

[MagicMike]

So is banning books in public schools worse than promoting graphic ideas of fornication, oral sex, gay sex, transgenderism, et al. to children in schools?

First of all the OP is fake news.

There is no "pornography" in our school libraries.
Only material that some prudish, throwback to Victorian era (so called) "parents" object to.

Some of it is raw, brutal, realistic, poignant.
All of it is age appropriate....given the world these children are living in in the 21st century.

As a matter of fact, NONE of it is content that isn't readily available in most of these children's homes on basic cable TV service.
Or on their hand-held devices for that matter.

I challenge ANY of these parents who basically just want to make noise about a current political hot-button issue like "parental involvement" in their child's education, to actually DO something proactive if they don't want THEIR children exposed to certain young adult literature.....

Actually write a letter to the school requesting that THEIR CHILD (and only their child) not be allowed to access certain works of literature from the curriculum.

But leave other people's children the fu-k ALONE!

And it's only fair if parents want to be more "involved" in the school.....that schools can also be more involved in the student's hone life.

The schools need to know how these parents are monitoring the content these students are allowed to access away from school.
Movies?
TV?
Internet?

And these parents should be held to the exact SAME standards they are demanding of the schools.

And then, in, ten or fifteen years we can gather data to see which kids have grown up and are doing better in society.

The ones who were raised by uptight, stick-up-the-butt, pro-censorship, 21st century, religiously-regressive PRUDES.......
or the normal ones who were exposed to a stimulating, well-rounded, culturally and age appropriate curriculum.

Taking bets now.

 

[BS Filter]

No Titus, Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, because they have SEX SEX SEX!!! Must ban them.

Pitiful.

 

[ChristisKing]

Evidently you're fine with *******, underage *******, and rape, but if someone mentions a Gayz you MAGAs lose your shit. I wonder why.

What I wonder is why they allow trolls to be moderators.

 

[BS Filter]

You have no idea what is written in those books. And clearly you are never going to read them to find out, in order to give a fair criticism of it.

Nasty is endless attacks over something all of you know nothing about.

Okay, tell us what's in those books. Go ahead.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Okay, tell us what's in those books. Go ahead.

That would be cheating . Borrow it from your local library.

 

[MagicMike]

so you are for seven year olds learning about porn. wow, here's another. looks like they are all stepping out.

Show me a link to an example of seven year olds "learning" porn in school.

Or STFU.

Your choice.

 

[ChristisKing]

Bro they got married when she was 14. That's sick, but it's ok I guess.

Again sex might have been implied, but that's different from actually mentioning it dumbass.

You can't argue the point. I am not modding this thread.

I can't argue the point because you aren't even making one.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Bro they got married when she was 14. That's sick, but it's ok I guess.

Clearly Shakespeare wrote of what happened in those days in Italy and other places. Women were engaged to older men by their families. Especially from wealthy families.

If you are calling Shakespeare sick, then you really do not know anything about anything to write what you did.

It continues to happen to this day in some cultures.

 

[Nostra]

One is under age you perv.

Muzzie men marry off their daughters younger than that today, Simp.

I don't recall you calling them out.

 

[BS Filter]

One is under age you perv.

No, she wasn't underage, yet you have no problem with a school library book about underage boys sucking each other off. You're really one sick hypocritical ******* stupid punk.

 

[Sixties Fan]

No, she wasn't underage, yet you have no problem with a school library book about underage boys sucking each other off. You're really one sick hypocritical ******* stupid punk.

Juliet was not underage? 14 ?