Jewish Lord Carlile suddenly resigns from pro-Israel Law group

You spout off leftist progressive ideology and couch it as Jews attacking Jews. You do this for a reason. :thup:

So.

What I'm posting is just fine.

And.

If you don't like it.

IDGAF
Our conversation can serve no further purpose, goodbye.
 
You spout off leftist progressive ideology and couch it as Jews attacking Jews. You do this for a reason. :thup:
Oh, just remembered here's some Jews attacking Jews in the world's safest place for Jews:

 
You have tendencies and characteristics of passive/aggressive behavior. 🪵


You could not stay away for ten minutes.

People attack people, and Jews are not a bloc.

Many progressives do what you're doing because they want to put them in a bloc... to put them on a list.

That's the leftist strategy.
 
Lord Alex Carlile was - until yesterday - a patron of the UK Lawyers for Israel group.

In yesterday's The Independent he wrote a piece applauding Keir Starmer's decision to withhold some arms export licenses from Israel, then later that day he suddenly resigned from the group and his resignation has not been reported in the press other than in Middle East Eye who interviewed him.

The UK Lawyers group has threatened the British Government with legal action over the weapons sale ban:



This is Zionism in action, Jews and non-Jews alike are targeted by the Israel lobby all the time, in the US, UK and all over the world. You do as you are told or there are consequences, the lobbyists are a parasite with tentacles that spread in every direction.

So no such reports but a supposed "interview" in known fake news machine of the Muslim Brotherhood,
and nothing about targeting, but a Jew normally expressing criticism of the state of Israel.

Another bigmouth OP word laundering followed by irrelevant garbage.

Why do you assume people are stupid?

 
So no such reports but a supposed "interview" in known fake news machine of the Muslim Brotherhood,
and nothing about targeting, but a Jew normally expressing criticism of the state of Israel.

Another bigmouth OP word laundering followed by irrelevant garbage.

Why do you assume people are stupid?

He resigned from the group the very same day the article was published, the article that praised the withdoling of arms from Israel.

You can look and see, he's no longer a patron:

1726001259479.png


He was also listed as a patron at the bottom of the letter that the group sent to the Prime Minister about the disapproval of the arms restrictions.
 
He resigned from the group the very same day the article was published, the article that praised the withdoling of arms from Israel.

You can look and see, he's no longer a patron:

View attachment 1009351

He was also listed as a patron at the bottom of the letter that the group sent to the Prime Minister about the disapproval of the arms restrictions.

Did you find a single picture of him on that page,

or a sourced article, or do you assume

slight of hand will cover your

big Islamist mouth?
 
Last edited:
Did you find a single picture of him on that page,
No because he's resigned, he's no longer a patron. Here's the same page of the site as it stood on the 6th Sept, notice the gentleman at the top left...

1726002988621.png
 
No, because you can't find one, big mouth.
Can't find what? I showed you the picture, he was on the Patrons page on Sep 6 but is not there anymore because he really did resign.

Those of us who understand technology know how to find things, since you've never heard of Wayback Machine, this will look like magic to you:

1726004077769.png


There he is, or rather was...
 
Can't find what? I showed you the picture, he was on the Patrons page on Sep 6 but is not there anymore because he really did resign.

Those of us who understand technology know how to find things, since you've never heard of Wayback Machine, this will look like magic to you:

View attachment 1009378

There he is, or rather was...
Indeed I've searched a recent document and he appears as patron

That doesn't cover the resignation claim, and why the only

source is coming from the Muslim Brotherhood?

This draws more suspicion about the report
being actually the targeting itself, a threat
published online...that can explain
much more than the UK police
hopefully won't need to
later apologize.
 
Indeed I've searched a recent document and he appears as patron

That doesn't cover the resignation claim, and why the only

source is coming from the Muslim Brotherhood?

This draws more suspicion about the report
being actually the targeting itself, a threat
published online...that can explain
much more than the UK police
hopefully won't need to
later apologize.
More hysterical theatrics, it's a perfectly reasonable source:

1726074807620.png
 

Forum List

Back
Top