Jerusalem Isn't the Capital of the Jews

[dani67]

Whatever "split" you perceive, or I perceive for that matter...

Fact remains that Israel illegally occupies territory that is clearly NOT theirs! If it belonged to Israel then, think about it, words like "Occupied" and "Annexed" would not come into the equation!

All terms introduced by the palestinian faction in addition to them claiming its "their land" or "palestinian land" Its not. It was unclaimed territory after the expiration of the mandate. Its last legal standing was under that mandate. It went up for grabs when the mandate expired. Now if the palestinians had DECLARED a state in that area at that time then you might have a viable *****. But since they didn't and Jordan grabbed it in direct violation of their treaty with the British then it was an occupation. When Israel landed it after fending off the Jordanian advance, then it because a security zone.

I'm sure Israel will annex it eventually, but not before it squashes violent palestinian activities. Once the palestinians earn the trust of the Israeli's then I'm sure they will be welcome back into polite society

Wow, you need to take yourself off and learn some history before you can have any sensible conversation here...

Let me just throw this one into the mix....

What "legal standing" does the sky wizard hold who chose Jews as THE people to invade the 'holy land'?

The Jews were there before it was even called the "holy land". When suggesting people study history I suggest you place yourself on that list.

Wow, want to post some links proving your belief of the timeline?

Try reading a Bible someday. It's among the earliest written historical accounts of that geographic region and they don't mention Muslims at all. In fact no Muslim inhabits the entire area until two thousand years after the earliest known Jewish settlement. That is what is known as history. It's found in books and scholarly articles written in "JOURNALS". You can find those in "LIBRARIES". They are big buildings that are FILLED with books.

I suggest you find one and start reading...

are you f kidding me?

bible is for 2000 years ago.
islam is for 1400 years ago.
mohammad did born 600 years after jesus.are you educated?

 

[Boston1]

Whatever "split" you perceive, or I perceive for that matter...

Fact remains that Israel illegally occupies territory that is clearly NOT theirs! If it belonged to Israel then, think about it, words like "Occupied" and "Annexed" would not come into the equation!

All terms introduced by the palestinian faction in addition to them claiming its "their land" or "palestinian land" Its not. It was unclaimed territory after the expiration of the mandate. Its last legal standing was under that mandate. It went up for grabs when the mandate expired. Now if the palestinians had DECLARED a state in that area at that time then you might have a viable *****. But since they didn't and Jordan grabbed it in direct violation of their treaty with the British then it was an occupation. When Israel landed it after fending off the Jordanian advance, then it because a security zone.

I'm sure Israel will annex it eventually, but not before it squashes violent palestinian activities. Once the palestinians earn the trust of the Israeli's then I'm sure they will be welcome back into polite society

Wow, you need to take yourself off and learn some history before you can have any sensible conversation here...

Let me just throw this one into the mix....

What "legal standing" does the sky wizard hold who chose Jews as THE people to invade the 'holy land'?

The Jews were there before it was even called the "holy land". When suggesting people study history I suggest you place yourself on that list.

Wow, want to post some links proving your belief of the timeline?

Try reading a Bible someday. It's among the earliest written historical accounts of that geographic region and they don't mention Muslims at all. In fact no Muslim inhabits the entire area until two thousand years after the earliest known Jewish settlement. That is what is known as history. It's found in books and scholarly articles written in "JOURNALS". You can find those in "LIBRARIES". They are big buildings that are FILLED with books.

I suggest you find one and start reading...

They don't mention Arabs either. Interestingly enough the main languages of that time were Greek Hebrew and Chaldean. The Arabic language wasn't even around then. Pretty sure it dates to about the fifth or sixth century

 

[aris2chat]

All terms introduced by the palestinian faction in addition to them claiming its "their land" or "palestinian land" Its not. It was unclaimed territory after the expiration of the mandate. Its last legal standing was under that mandate. It went up for grabs when the mandate expired. Now if the palestinians had DECLARED a state in that area at that time then you might have a viable *****. But since they didn't and Jordan grabbed it in direct violation of their treaty with the British then it was an occupation. When Israel landed it after fending off the Jordanian advance, then it because a security zone.

I'm sure Israel will annex it eventually, but not before it squashes violent palestinian activities. Once the palestinians earn the trust of the Israeli's then I'm sure they will be welcome back into polite society

Wow, you need to take yourself off and learn some history before you can have any sensible conversation here...

Let me just throw this one into the mix....

What "legal standing" does the sky wizard hold who chose Jews as THE people to invade the 'holy land'?

The Jews were there before it was even called the "holy land". When suggesting people study history I suggest you place yourself on that list.

Wow, want to post some links proving your belief of the timeline?

Try reading a Bible someday. It's among the earliest written historical accounts of that geographic region and they don't mention Muslims at all. In fact no Muslim inhabits the entire area until two thousand years after the earliest known Jewish settlement. That is what is known as history. It's found in books and scholarly articles written in "JOURNALS". You can find those in "LIBRARIES". They are big buildings that are FILLED with books.

I suggest you find one and start reading...

are you f kidding me?

bible is for 2000 years ago.
islam is for 1400 years ago.
mohammad did born 600 years after jesus.are you educated?

jews and christians were there first

 

[Humanity]

Whatever "split" you perceive, or I perceive for that matter...

Fact remains that Israel illegally occupies territory that is clearly NOT theirs! If it belonged to Israel then, think about it, words like "Occupied" and "Annexed" would not come into the equation!

All terms introduced by the palestinian faction in addition to them claiming its "their land" or "palestinian land" Its not. It was unclaimed territory after the expiration of the mandate. Its last legal standing was under that mandate. It went up for grabs when the mandate expired. Now if the palestinians had DECLARED a state in that area at that time then you might have a viable *****. But since they didn't and Jordan grabbed it in direct violation of their treaty with the British then it was an occupation. When Israel landed it after fending off the Jordanian advance, then it because a security zone.

I'm sure Israel will annex it eventually, but not before it squashes violent palestinian activities. Once the palestinians earn the trust of the Israeli's then I'm sure they will be welcome back into polite society

Wow, you need to take yourself off and learn some history before you can have any sensible conversation here...

Let me just throw this one into the mix....

What "legal standing" does the sky wizard hold who chose Jews as THE people to invade the 'holy land'?

The Jews were there before it was even called the "holy land". When suggesting people study history I suggest you place yourself on that list.

Wow, want to post some links proving your belief of the timeline?

Try reading a Bible someday. It's among the earliest written historical accounts of that geographic region and they don't mention Muslims at all. In fact no Muslim inhabits the entire area until two thousand years after the earliest known Jewish settlement. That is what is known as history. It's found in books and scholarly articles written in "JOURNALS". You can find those in "LIBRARIES". They are big buildings that are FILLED with books.

I suggest you find one and start reading...

"Try reading a Bible someday."... Been there, done that... Greatest fiction book ever written...

"It's among the earliest written historical accounts of that geographic region"... I'll take an ounce of whatever it is you are smoking dude!

"they don't mention Muslims at all"... Shame on you... And a USMB Mod as well... You need to learn the difference between religions and peoples!

"That is what is known as history"... the ONLY 'history' in the bible is that it was written a long, long time ago... Centuries AFTER most events took place!

Ah yeah, "LIBRARIES", I remember those, used them a lot when I did my PHD at Oxford University...

Should I be reporting a mods post for off topic trolling?

 

[Boston1]

While I'm awaiting a phone call lets just have some fun with this nonsense about an occupation.

Lets look at 242

Quote
United Nations Security Council Resolution 242(S/RES/242) was adopted unanimously by the UN Security Council on November 22, 1967, in the aftermath of the Six-Day War. It was adopted under Chapter VI of the UN Charter.[1] The resolution was sponsored by Britishambassador Lord Caradon and was one of five drafts under consideration.[2]
End Quote

So the resolution was adopted under chapter VI, so lets look at chapter VI

Quote
Chapter VI of the United Nations Charter deals with peaceful settlement of disputes. It requires countries with disputes that could lead to war to first of all try to seek solutions through peaceful methods such as "negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, resort to regional agencies or arrangements, or other peaceful means of their own choice." If these methods of alternative dispute resolution fail, then they must refer it to the UN Security Council. Under Article 35, any country is allowed to bring a dispute to the attention of the UN Security Council or the General Assembly. This chapter authorizes the Security Council to issue recommendations but does not give it power to make binding resolutions; those provisions are contained Chapter VII.[1][2][3]
End Quote

So now that we've established that the Israeli's are legally in the mandated area its also clear that the dispute under article VI is to be settled diplomatically between parties. Although an argument can be made to say that the palestinians don't represent a legal party in that they are not a state but instead an invention of negotiating table somewhere in the early 20th century in an effort to whittle away at zionist intentions to buy a national homeland if one could not be secured through diplomatic means.

As for the question of occupation. Now that we understand why israel is in legal governance of the disputed territories, lets look at that occupation thing again

If Israel is occupying the mandated area, who's land are they occupying ?

See
There is No "Occupation" - Take A Pen

Danny Ayalon: Israel's Right in the 'Disputed' Territories - WSJ

Articles: Israeli Settlements Are Not Illegal - American Thinker

Provide a link so that everyone can "understand" why YOU believe that Israel in legal governance of disputed territories...

The ONLY country who believes that this is "legal governance" is Israel...

That is why EVERY country, that is not a zionist country, why EVERY organisation, that is not a zionist organisation quite clearly states that territories are "illegally occupied"...

Did you bother to check out what the Supreme Court of Israel says about it? I quote.... "Belligerent occupation"

Pretty funny when you ignore the links provided and then ask me to provide links

Kinda makes me wonder what your smoking and if there is any left ;--)

 

[montelatici]

Whatever "split" you perceive, or I perceive for that matter...

Fact remains that Israel illegally occupies territory that is clearly NOT theirs! If it belonged to Israel then, think about it, words like "Occupied" and "Annexed" would not come into the equation!

All terms introduced by the palestinian faction in addition to them claiming its "their land" or "palestinian land" Its not. It was unclaimed territory after the expiration of the mandate. Its last legal standing was under that mandate. It went up for grabs when the mandate expired. Now if the palestinians had DECLARED a state in that area at that time then you might have a viable *****. But since they didn't and Jordan grabbed it in direct violation of their treaty with the British then it was an occupation. When Israel landed it after fending off the Jordanian advance, then it because a security zone.

I'm sure Israel will annex it eventually, but not before it squashes violent palestinian activities. Once the palestinians earn the trust of the Israeli's then I'm sure they will be welcome back into polite society

Wow, you need to take yourself off and learn some history before you can have any sensible conversation here...

Let me just throw this one into the mix....

What "legal standing" does the sky wizard hold who chose Jews as THE people to invade the 'holy land'?

The Jews were there before it was even called the "holy land". When suggesting people study history I suggest you place yourself on that list.

Wow, want to post some links proving your belief of the timeline?

Try reading a Bible someday. It's among the earliest written historical accounts of that geographic region and they don't mention Muslims at all. In fact no Muslim inhabits the entire area until two thousand years after the earliest known Jewish settlement. That is what is known as history. It's found in books and scholarly articles written in "JOURNALS". You can find those in "LIBRARIES". They are big buildings that are FILLED with books.

I suggest you find one and start reading...

That flies in contravention of the Covenant of the League of Nations. Article 22, which states:

ARTICLE 22.
To those colonies and territories which as a consequence of the late war have ceased to be under the sovereignty of the States which formerly governed them and which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation and that securities for the performance of this trust should be embodied in this Covenant.

The best method of giving practical effect to this principle is that the tutelage of such peoples should be entrusted to advanced nations who by reason of their resources, their experience or their geographical position can best undertake this responsibility, and who are willing to accept it, and that this tutelage should be exercised by them as Mandatories on behalf of the League.

The character of the mandate must differ according to the stage of the development of the people, the geographical situation of the territory, its economic conditions and other similar circumstances.

Certain communities formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire have reached a stage of development where their existence as independent nations can be provisionally recognized subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a Mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone. The wishes of these communities must be a principal consideration in the selection of the Mandatory."

It doesn't say anything about peoples that were inhabiting Europe have any rights to the stated territories.

And the Covenant states that if any agreements antecedent to the signing of the Covenant that were in conflict with the Covenant, such as the Balfour Declaration were to be abrogated. Surely, taking land from the inhabitants who are mentioned in Article 22 and giving it to Europeans was inconsistent with the Covenant, hence:

"ARTICLE 20.
The Members of the League severally agree that this Covenant is accepted as abrogating all obligations or understandings inter se which are inconsistent with the terms thereof, and solemnly undertake that they will not hereafter enter into any engagements inconsistent with the terms thereof.

In case any Member of the League shall, before becoming a Member of the League, have undertaken any obligations inconsistent with the terms of this Covenant, it shall be the duty of such Member to take immediate steps to procure its release from such obligations."

 

[Humanity]

While I'm awaiting a phone call lets just have some fun with this nonsense about an occupation.

Lets look at 242

Quote
United Nations Security Council Resolution 242(S/RES/242) was adopted unanimously by the UN Security Council on November 22, 1967, in the aftermath of the Six-Day War. It was adopted under Chapter VI of the UN Charter.[1] The resolution was sponsored by Britishambassador Lord Caradon and was one of five drafts under consideration.[2]
End Quote

So the resolution was adopted under chapter VI, so lets look at chapter VI

Quote
Chapter VI of the United Nations Charter deals with peaceful settlement of disputes. It requires countries with disputes that could lead to war to first of all try to seek solutions through peaceful methods such as "negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, resort to regional agencies or arrangements, or other peaceful means of their own choice." If these methods of alternative dispute resolution fail, then they must refer it to the UN Security Council. Under Article 35, any country is allowed to bring a dispute to the attention of the UN Security Council or the General Assembly. This chapter authorizes the Security Council to issue recommendations but does not give it power to make binding resolutions; those provisions are contained Chapter VII.[1][2][3]
End Quote

So now that we've established that the Israeli's are legally in the mandated area its also clear that the dispute under article VI is to be settled diplomatically between parties. Although an argument can be made to say that the palestinians don't represent a legal party in that they are not a state but instead an invention of negotiating table somewhere in the early 20th century in an effort to whittle away at zionist intentions to buy a national homeland if one could not be secured through diplomatic means.

As for the question of occupation. Now that we understand why israel is in legal governance of the disputed territories, lets look at that occupation thing again

If Israel is occupying the mandated area, who's land are they occupying ?

See
There is No "Occupation" - Take A Pen

Danny Ayalon: Israel's Right in the 'Disputed' Territories - WSJ

Articles: Israeli Settlements Are Not Illegal - American Thinker

Provide a link so that everyone can "understand" why YOU believe that Israel in legal governance of disputed territories...

The ONLY country who believes that this is "legal governance" is Israel...

That is why EVERY country, that is not a zionist country, why EVERY organisation, that is not a zionist organisation quite clearly states that territories are "illegally occupied"...

Did you bother to check out what the Supreme Court of Israel says about it? I quote.... "Belligerent occupation"

Pretty funny when you ignore the links provided and then ask me to provide links

Kinda makes me wonder what your smoking and if there is any left ;--)

Selective reading or comprehension difficulties?

Your links are from zionist sources...

How about you post a list of countries that state that the Israeli occupation is LEGAL....

Even the Israel supreme court does not support your claims OR links!

 

[dani67]

Wow, you need to take yourself off and learn some history before you can have any sensible conversation here...

Let me just throw this one into the mix....

What "legal standing" does the sky wizard hold who chose Jews as THE people to invade the 'holy land'?

The Jews were there before it was even called the "holy land". When suggesting people study history I suggest you place yourself on that list.

Wow, want to post some links proving your belief of the timeline?

Try reading a Bible someday. It's among the earliest written historical accounts of that geographic region and they don't mention Muslims at all. In fact no Muslim inhabits the entire area until two thousand years after the earliest known Jewish settlement. That is what is known as history. It's found in books and scholarly articles written in "JOURNALS". You can find those in "LIBRARIES". They are big buildings that are FILLED with books.

I suggest you find one and start reading...

are you f kidding me?

bible is for 2000 years ago.
islam is for 1400 years ago.
mohammad did born 600 years after jesus.are you educated?

jews and christians were there first

mandela must captured white people land in sout africa after apartaid?
mexican was in new mexico state before white people..

+
i dont care most palestinis too
if i must chooce between arab and jewish.i chooced jewish

isis flag in palestine

 

[westwall]

All terms introduced by the palestinian faction in addition to them claiming its "their land" or "palestinian land" Its not. It was unclaimed territory after the expiration of the mandate. Its last legal standing was under that mandate. It went up for grabs when the mandate expired. Now if the palestinians had DECLARED a state in that area at that time then you might have a viable *****. But since they didn't and Jordan grabbed it in direct violation of their treaty with the British then it was an occupation. When Israel landed it after fending off the Jordanian advance, then it because a security zone.

I'm sure Israel will annex it eventually, but not before it squashes violent palestinian activities. Once the palestinians earn the trust of the Israeli's then I'm sure they will be welcome back into polite society

Wow, you need to take yourself off and learn some history before you can have any sensible conversation here...

Let me just throw this one into the mix....

What "legal standing" does the sky wizard hold who chose Jews as THE people to invade the 'holy land'?

The Jews were there before it was even called the "holy land". When suggesting people study history I suggest you place yourself on that list.

Wow, want to post some links proving your belief of the timeline?

Try reading a Bible someday. It's among the earliest written historical accounts of that geographic region and they don't mention Muslims at all. In fact no Muslim inhabits the entire area until two thousand years after the earliest known Jewish settlement. That is what is known as history. It's found in books and scholarly articles written in "JOURNALS". You can find those in "LIBRARIES". They are big buildings that are FILLED with books.

I suggest you find one and start reading...

That flies in contravention of the Covenant of the League of Nations. Article 22, which states:

ARTICLE 22.
To those colonies and territories which as a consequence of the late war have ceased to be under the sovereignty of the States which formerly governed them and which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation and that securities for the performance of this trust should be embodied in this Covenant.

The best method of giving practical effect to this principle is that the tutelage of such peoples should be entrusted to advanced nations who by reason of their resources, their experience or their geographical position can best undertake this responsibility, and who are willing to accept it, and that this tutelage should be exercised by them as Mandatories on behalf of the League.

The character of the mandate must differ according to the stage of the development of the people, the geographical situation of the territory, its economic conditions and other similar circumstances.

Certain communities formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire have reached a stage of development where their existence as independent nations can be provisionally recognized subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a Mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone. The wishes of these communities must be a principal consideration in the selection of the Mandatory."

It doesn't say anything about peoples that were inhabiting Europe have any rights to the stated territories.

And the Covenant states that if any agreements antecedent to the signing of the Covenant that were in conflict with the Covenant, such as the Balfour Declaration were to be abrogated. Surely, taking land from the inhabitants who are mentioned in Article 22 and giving it to Europeans was inconsistent with the Covenant, hence:

"ARTICLE 20.
The Members of the League severally agree that this Covenant is accepted as abrogating all obligations or understandings inter se which are inconsistent with the terms thereof, and solemnly undertake that they will not hereafter enter into any engagements inconsistent with the terms thereof.

In case any Member of the League shall, before becoming a Member of the League, have undertaken any obligations inconsistent with the terms of this Covenant, it shall be the duty of such Member to take immediate steps to procure its release from such obligations."

The last time I checked the League of Nations was extinct so I should care about what that useless organization had to say why?

 

[Indeependent]

new york is the capital of the jews.
jewish are king of usa.they ruling usa.
king of media.king of bussiness.king of politic.king of everything
jews are your boss

It's called education...try it sometime.

 

[Indeependent]

new york is the capital of the jews.
jewish are king of usa.they ruling usa.
king of media.king of bussiness.king of politic.king of everything
jews are your boss

Jews make up around 2% of the population and most orthodox and conservatives tend to stay within jewish communities and neighborhoods, some even have their own buses that they pay for.
Jews are also philanthropists and have financed hospitals and charities that serve all people.
They are far from kings of business and finance. A few have become successful in both but it is a small number of the total successful business owners or CEOs.
They get good educations and work hard to get where they are.
Around a third of jews are seniors with fixed incomes or living near or below poverty lines. Hardly a population in control of the US.

Your anti-semitism is showing

1: they are more than 2%.but you dont know .for example john kerry is jewish(race no religious )
2: politic:
.for example.ipec party is one of the most powerfull lobbyist in your congress
or
Barack Obama Administration:
its very very long list
.Jews in the Barack Obama Administration | Jewish Virtual Library


3:
in media:
do you know who is
Rupert Murdoch?
Gerald Levin, CEO and Director of AOL Time Warner
Michael Eisner, Chairman and CEO of the Walt Disney Company
Edgar Bronfman, Sr., Chairman of Seagram Company Ltd
Edgar Bronfman, Jr, President and CEO of Seagram Company Ltd and head of Universal Studios
Sumner Redstone, Chairman and CEO of Viacom, Inc
Dennis Dammerman, Vice Chairman of General Electric
Peter Chernin, President and Co-COO of News Corporation Limited
Those seven Jewish men collectively control ABC, NBC, CBS, the Turner Broadcasting System, CNN, MTV, Universal Studios, MCA Records, Geffen Records, DGC Records, GRP Records, Rising Tide Records, Curb/Universal Records, and Interscope Records.
4: yes .they are smart in bussiness.most italian mafia group use jewish Counselor
most powerfull mafia terror group was jewish gang
you can watch mob and the new york documentary.
5: im not anti-semitism .i never see jewish in my life. i never talk with them.
how i can be anti_semitism?
i just telling fact to you.

Great grandfather from 19th century austria that Kerry only recently found out about.

Jewish linage is passed through the female among the jews.

15 or so out of hundreds of major corporation with thirty or more board members each. How does that make America ruled by jews?
Facts? Exaggerating a handful into a ruling class in the country. Businesses are are single own and run conglomerates with infinite power. If jews work hard they should not be hired in top position in the US?

And the hundreds of muslim men and women owning or running major businesses and financial institutions? Muslims in politics, military, lobby groups, entertainment, media, head of NGOs and other leadership positions? They don't "rule" america?

Christians by far far out number both, so why would you assume jews have any more power than christians or muslims in the US?

If Kerry had no knowledge of his austrian relative, why is there any reason to mention it now, as if a drop of jewish blood has any influence on his career or politics?

and the jewish popuation in the US is about 1.7%

Muslims make up around 1% of the US population

97% of American are neither jewish or muslim, so why do you assume jews run the US?

Nazis believe a drop of jewish blood made one a jews, no matter their faith. Nazi propaganda was that jews were taking over the world. Nazi propaganda was jews control all the money and banks. So who fed you the nazi lies and why do you feel a need to post them here?

And I actually thought that you were 'educated'...

Let me ask you a question....

Why do you think that 'Jews' have been driven out of virtually every country in the world throughout the course of history?

Gee, why HAVE Jews been kicked out of so many inhumane, totalitarian cesspools?
Because they believe in Human Rights?
Nah! That can't be why!

 

[Indeependent]

Funny how the killing of Palestinians by the Israelis is the Palestinian's fault, while the killing of Jews is the perpetrator's fault. Zionist logic at its best.

Please document these killings.
Oh, I forgot...I've asked you to do this at least 5 times before and you haven't.

 

[Indeependent]

new york is the capital of the jews.
jewish are king of usa.they ruling usa.
king of media.king of bussiness.king of politic.king of everything
jews are your boss

Jews make up around 2% of the population and most orthodox and conservatives tend to stay within jewish communities and neighborhoods, some even have their own buses that they pay for.
Jews are also philanthropists and have financed hospitals and charities that serve all people.
They are far from kings of business and finance. A few have become successful in both but it is a small number of the total successful business owners or CEOs.
They get good educations and work hard to get where they are.
Around a third of jews are seniors with fixed incomes or living near or below poverty lines. Hardly a population in control of the US.

Your anti-semitism is showing

1: they are more than 2%.but you dont know .for example john kerry is jewish(race no religious )
2: politic:
.for example.ipec party is one of the most powerfull lobbyist in your congress
or
Barack Obama Administration:
its very very long list
.Jews in the Barack Obama Administration | Jewish Virtual Library


3:
in media:
do you know who is
Rupert Murdoch?
Gerald Levin, CEO and Director of AOL Time Warner
Michael Eisner, Chairman and CEO of the Walt Disney Company
Edgar Bronfman, Sr., Chairman of Seagram Company Ltd
Edgar Bronfman, Jr, President and CEO of Seagram Company Ltd and head of Universal Studios
Sumner Redstone, Chairman and CEO of Viacom, Inc
Dennis Dammerman, Vice Chairman of General Electric
Peter Chernin, President and Co-COO of News Corporation Limited
Those seven Jewish men collectively control ABC, NBC, CBS, the Turner Broadcasting System, CNN, MTV, Universal Studios, MCA Records, Geffen Records, DGC Records, GRP Records, Rising Tide Records, Curb/Universal Records, and Interscope Records.
4: yes .they are smart in bussiness.most italian mafia group use jewish Counselor
most powerfull mafia terror group was jewish gang
you can watch mob and the new york documentary.
5: im not anti-semitism .i never see jewish in my life. i never talk with them.
how i can be anti_semitism?
i just telling fact to you.

Great grandfather from 19th century austria that Kerry only recently found out about.

Jewish linage is passed through the female among the jews.

15 or so out of hundreds of major corporation with thirty or more board members each. How does that make America ruled by jews?
Facts? Exaggerating a handful into a ruling class in the country. Businesses are are single own and run conglomerates with infinite power. If jews work hard they should not be hired in top position in the US?

And the hundreds of muslim men and women owning or running major businesses and financial institutions? Muslims in politics, military, lobby groups, entertainment, media, head of NGOs and other leadership positions? They don't "rule" america?

Christians by far far out number both, so why would you assume jews have any more power than christians or muslims in the US?

If Kerry had no knowledge of his austrian relative, why is there any reason to mention it now, as if a drop of jewish blood has any influence on his career or politics?

and the jewish popuation in the US is about 1.7%

Muslims make up around 1% of the US population

97% of American are neither jewish or muslim, so why do you assume jews run the US?

Nazis believe a drop of jewish blood made one a jews, no matter their faith. Nazi propaganda was that jews were taking over the world. Nazi propaganda was jews control all the money and banks. So who fed you the nazi lies and why do you feel a need to post them here?

Tell me why we have 3 jews on the Supreme court if there are so few Jews. And tell me why this is a Judeo Christian nation, when Israel got their state. Aipac and the Jewish think tanks abound. There are more Jews in the US that we know of. Many hide the fact. Funny how an Iranian knows that, and yet most Americans don't. Explain why with such a small amount of Jewish pop in the US , a politician who says anything anti Israel is not a politician long. On a good note, the jewish influence is dying in the US.

It's called education...try it sometime.

 

[Roudy]

new york is the capital of the jews.
jewish are king of usa.they ruling usa.
king of media.king of bussiness.king of politic.king of everything
jews are your boss

Wow, King David and Jesus were New Yorkers, who woulda thunk?

im talking about now.

Arabic Islam is Iran's boss. They invaded Iran and destroyed it's language, culture, and history, and shoved their religion down the people's throats by force. It's truly sad what Islam has done to a great nation.

sorry for bad english
semitic christian is west country boss. They invaded west country and destroyed it's language, culture, and history,and blah blah blah...............its the same
its happened everywhere.in sout america.in east asia.in every where
your compare is wrong
when we talking about jews.we are talking about race and community.no just idiology or religious

You realize you have a picture of an ancient Persian king who, over 2500 years was still more civilized that the Arab barbarians that invaded and destroyed Iran.

 

[Roudy]

new york is the capital of the jews.
jewish are king of usa.they ruling usa.
king of media.king of bussiness.king of politic.king of everything
jews are your boss

Wow, King David and Jesus were New Yorkers, who woulda thunk?

Nah, there was no New York....

But most are European these days!

Wow, I coulda sworn I saw Jesus shopping for a new Armani yamaka on 5th avenue.

 

[dani67]

new york is the capital of the jews.
jewish are king of usa.they ruling usa.
king of media.king of bussiness.king of politic.king of everything
jews are your boss

Wow, King David and Jesus were New Yorkers, who woulda thunk?

im talking about now.

Arabic Islam is Iran's boss. They invaded Iran and destroyed it's language, culture, and history, and shoved their religion down the people's throats by force. It's truly sad what Islam has done to a great nation.

sorry for bad english
semitic christian is west country boss. They invaded west country and destroyed it's language, culture, and history,and blah blah blah...............its the same
its happened everywhere.in sout america.in east asia.in every where
your compare is wrong
when we talking about jews.we are talking about race and community.no just idiology or religious

You realize you have a picture of an ancient Persian king who, over 2500 years was still more civilized that the Arab barbarians that invaded and destroyed Iran.

Iran: We Saved the Jews Three Times; Netanyahu Should Learn History
read more: Iran: We saved the Jews three times; Netanyahu should learn history - Diplomacy and Defense

http://www.thestarofthemagi.com/howcyrussavedthejews.htm

 

[Roudy]

new york is the capital of the jews.
jewish are king of usa.they ruling usa.
king of media.king of bussiness.king of politic.king of everything
jews are your boss

Jews make up around 2% of the population and most orthodox and conservatives tend to stay within jewish communities and neighborhoods, some even have their own buses that they pay for.
Jews are also philanthropists and have financed hospitals and charities that serve all people.
They are far from kings of business and finance. A few have become successful in both but it is a small number of the total successful business owners or CEOs.
They get good educations and work hard to get where they are.
Around a third of jews are seniors with fixed incomes or living near or below poverty lines. Hardly a population in control of the US.

Your anti-semitism is showing

1: they are more than 2%.but you dont know .for example john kerry is jewish(race no religious )
2: politic:
.for example.ipec party is one of the most powerfull lobbyist in your congress
or
Barack Obama Administration:
its very very long list
.Jews in the Barack Obama Administration | Jewish Virtual Library


3:
in media:
do you know who is
Rupert Murdoch?
Gerald Levin, CEO and Director of AOL Time Warner
Michael Eisner, Chairman and CEO of the Walt Disney Company
Edgar Bronfman, Sr., Chairman of Seagram Company Ltd
Edgar Bronfman, Jr, President and CEO of Seagram Company Ltd and head of Universal Studios
Sumner Redstone, Chairman and CEO of Viacom, Inc
Dennis Dammerman, Vice Chairman of General Electric
Peter Chernin, President and Co-COO of News Corporation Limited
Those seven Jewish men collectively control ABC, NBC, CBS, the Turner Broadcasting System, CNN, MTV, Universal Studios, MCA Records, Geffen Records, DGC Records, GRP Records, Rising Tide Records, Curb/Universal Records, and Interscope Records.
4: yes .they are smart in bussiness.most italian mafia group use jewish Counselor
most powerfull mafia terror group was jewish gang
you can watch mob and the new york documentary.
5: im not anti-semitism .i never see jewish in my life. i never talk with them.
how i can be anti_semitism?
i just telling fact to you.

The irony in this "list" is that the opposite team has drawn up an exact same endictment of Obama's "secret Muslim brotherhood" ties with members of his administration.

It's all conspiracy theory: The Jewish Media: The Lie That Won’t Die

Neo Nazi Jews, all Jews, all the time. You give us five minutes....

 

[Roudy]

Wow, King David and Jesus were New Yorkers, who woulda thunk?

im talking about now.

Arabic Islam is Iran's boss. They invaded Iran and destroyed it's language, culture, and history, and shoved their religion down the people's throats by force. It's truly sad what Islam has done to a great nation.

sorry for bad english
semitic christian is west country boss. They invaded west country and destroyed it's language, culture, and history,and blah blah blah...............its the same
its happened everywhere.in sout america.in east asia.in every where
your compare is wrong
when we talking about jews.we are talking about race and community.no just idiology or religious

You realize you have a picture of an ancient Persian king who, over 2500 years was still more civilized that the Arab barbarians that invaded and destroyed Iran.

Iran: We Saved the Jews Three Times; Netanyahu Should Learn History
read more: Iran: We saved the Jews three times; Netanyahu should learn history - Diplomacy and Defense

http://www.thestarofthemagi.com/howcyrussavedthejews.htm

Yes of course they did, because they were a great civilization before the Arab savages invaded and shoved their religion and culture down their throats. Iranian Jews are more Persian than the Muslim Iranians. They go back over 2500 years, while the Muslims have Arab blood in them.

True story.

 

[dani67]

Wow, King David and Jesus were New Yorkers, who woulda thunk?

im talking about now.

Arabic Islam is Iran's boss. They invaded Iran and destroyed it's language, culture, and history, and shoved their religion down the people's throats by force. It's truly sad what Islam has done to a great nation.

sorry for bad english
semitic christian is west country boss. They invaded west country and destroyed it's language, culture, and history,and blah blah blah...............its the same
its happened everywhere.in sout america.in east asia.in every where
your compare is wrong
when we talking about jews.we are talking about race and community.no just idiology or religious

You realize you have a picture of an ancient Persian king who, over 2500 years was still more civilized that the Arab barbarians that invaded and destroyed Iran.

Iran: We Saved the Jews Three Times; Netanyahu Should Learn History
read more: Iran: We saved the Jews three times; Netanyahu should learn history - Diplomacy and Defense

http://www.thestarofthemagi.com/howcyrussavedthejews.htm

iranian jewish

 

[Roudy]

new york is the capital of the jews.
jewish are king of usa.they ruling usa.
king of media.king of bussiness.king of politic.king of everything
jews are your boss

Jews make up around 2% of the population and most orthodox and conservatives tend to stay within jewish communities and neighborhoods, some even have their own buses that they pay for.
Jews are also philanthropists and have financed hospitals and charities that serve all people.
They are far from kings of business and finance. A few have become successful in both but it is a small number of the total successful business owners or CEOs.
They get good educations and work hard to get where they are.
Around a third of jews are seniors with fixed incomes or living near or below poverty lines. Hardly a population in control of the US.

Your anti-semitism is showing

1: they are more than 2%.but you dont know .for example john kerry is jewish(race no religious )
2: politic:
.for example.ipec party is one of the most powerfull lobbyist in your congress
or
Barack Obama Administration:
its very very long list
.Jews in the Barack Obama Administration | Jewish Virtual Library


3:
in media:
do you know who is
Rupert Murdoch?
Gerald Levin, CEO and Director of AOL Time Warner
Michael Eisner, Chairman and CEO of the Walt Disney Company
Edgar Bronfman, Sr., Chairman of Seagram Company Ltd
Edgar Bronfman, Jr, President and CEO of Seagram Company Ltd and head of Universal Studios
Sumner Redstone, Chairman and CEO of Viacom, Inc
Dennis Dammerman, Vice Chairman of General Electric
Peter Chernin, President and Co-COO of News Corporation Limited
Those seven Jewish men collectively control ABC, NBC, CBS, the Turner Broadcasting System, CNN, MTV, Universal Studios, MCA Records, Geffen Records, DGC Records, GRP Records, Rising Tide Records, Curb/Universal Records, and Interscope Records.
4: yes .they are smart in bussiness.most italian mafia group use jewish Counselor
most powerfull mafia terror group was jewish gang
you can watch mob and the new york documentary.
5: im not anti-semitism .i never see jewish in my life. i never talk with them.
how i can be anti_semitism?
i just telling fact to you.

Great grandfather from 19th century austria that Kerry only recently found out about.

Jewish linage is passed through the female among the jews.

15 or so out of hundreds of major corporation with thirty or more board members each. How does that make America ruled by jews?
Facts? Exaggerating a handful into a ruling class in the country. Businesses are are single own and run conglomerates with infinite power. If jews work hard they should not be hired in top position in the US?

And the hundreds of muslim men and women owning or running major businesses and financial institutions? Muslims in politics, military, lobby groups, entertainment, media, head of NGOs and other leadership positions? They don't "rule" america?

Christians by far far out number both, so why would you assume jews have any more power than christians or muslims in the US?

If Kerry had no knowledge of his austrian relative, why is there any reason to mention it now, as if a drop of jewish blood has any influence on his career or politics?

and the jewish popuation in the US is about 1.7%

Muslims make up around 1% of the US population

97% of American are neither jewish or muslim, so why do you assume jews run the US?

Nazis believe a drop of jewish blood made one a jews, no matter their faith. Nazi propaganda was that jews were taking over the world. Nazi propaganda was jews control all the money and banks. So who fed you the nazi lies and why do you feel a need to post them here?

If jews work hard they should not be hired in top position in the US?
no its not.they are smart.they are great bussinessman..
smart people always ruling normal people.2% jewish are ruling other american
because they have most powerfull weapon.media
i dont said that its bad.

iran regime hate israel.and jewish media make propganda for iranian people.


Nazi propaganda was jews control all the money and banks
i dont like nazi too
germany misey in world war 1 wasnt just for jews
but There is no smoke without fire

people hate moslem now in usa.all of moslem isnt terrorist.
but most terrorist basterd are moslem.

I think Dani Kooni is jealous of Jewish success, what else is new.