Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald J. Trump spent hours at his house with one of Mr. Epstein’s victims.

[Care4all]

Ok, I started to read this thread late into the game...got thru page three but that leaves like 11 more pages in the thread to read and I decided to call Uncle, and give up trying to read the rest so if my questions or statements have been asked or answered or discussed...I apologize!

What were Ghislaine and Epstein saying or implying in their convo?

Trump is the dog that didn't bark...didn't rat him out with law enforcement... when he could have?

Are they wondering why he hasn't, when they make mention of him spending hours with an unknown victim at Epstein's house....

-because they think this unknown victim would have spilled their guts out to him about sex with Jeffrey, and being a minor, and how she was lured there and groomed and trafficked, etc? So Trump would have been made aware at that point? Yet didn't rat him out???

I dunno about that...

-or, were they implying that he did spend many hours alone with one of Epstein victims... meaning or implying that Trump hasn't barked (ratted) on Epstein because he had sex with this minor during the hours alone with her and ratting on Jeffrey could bring that out in to the open, about himself? Thus Trump not ratting on Epstein's dirty deeds?

I am not certain on that either...

Lot's of things which are odd and popping up in my head...

As Example:

If either Maxwell or Epstein knew that Trump was fiddling with his minor girls prior to this one incident of spending hours with an Epstein minor victim, Jeffrey and Ghislaine wouldn't be wondering why he was 'the dog, that didn't bark', would they?

They would just already know he didn't talk because he's always been a partner in their crimes, no?

Same with the other email chain with the author Michael Wolff mentioning that Trump had to be aware of Epstein's dirty deeds because he told Ghislaine to stop recruiting their girls from his resort....or something to that effect. This was a 2015 email chain, prior to a first Republican primary debate...

If Trump were involved with the girls, how could he not know Jeffrey was...? None of this makes sense...?

Was the worry by Epstein that Trump would just lie, or that he wouldn't??

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

It"s another far left conspiracy dry hole

 

[sealybobo]

Are there victims accusing Trump of wrongdoing?

One woman said gisallene maxwell introduced her to trump the same way she introduced her to other John’s. And we know trump knew. Plus he was peepin on teen USA nudes. Where there’s smoke

You don’t care. We knew it!

 

[sealybobo]

Ok, I started to read this thread late into the game...got thru page three but that leaves like 11 more pages in the thread to read and I decided to call Uncle, and give up trying to read the rest so if my questions or statements have been asked or answered or discussed...I apologize!

What were Ghislaine and Epstein saying or implying in their convo?

Trump is the dog that didn't bark...didn't rat him out with law enforcement... when he could have?

Are they wondering why he hasn't, when they make mention of him spending hours with an unknown victim at Epstein's house....

-because they think this unknown victim would have spilled their guts out to him about sex with Jeffrey, and being a minor, and how she was lured there and groomed and trafficked, etc? So Trump would have been made aware at that point? Yet didn't rat him out???

I dunno about that...

-or, were they implying that he did spend many hours alone with one of Epstein victims... meaning or implying that Trump hasn't barked (ratted) on Epstein because he had sex with this minor during the hours alone with her and ratting on Jeffrey could bring that out in to the open, about himself? Thus Trump not ratting on Epstein's dirty deeds?

I am not certain on that either...

Lot's of things which are odd and popping up in my head...

As Example:

If either Maxwell or Epstein knew that Trump was fiddling with his minor girls prior to this one incident of spending hours with an Epstein minor victim, Jeffrey and Ghislaine wouldn't be wondering why he was 'the dog, that didn't bark', would they?

They would just already know he didn't talk because he's always been a partner in their crimes, no?

Same with the other email chain with the author Michael Wolff mentioning that Trump had to be aware of Epstein's dirty deeds because he told Ghislaine to stop recruiting their girls from his resort....or something to that effect. This was a 2015 email chain, prior to a first Republican primary debate...

If Trump were involved with the girls, how could he not know Jeffrey was...? None of this makes sense...?

Was the worry by Epstein that Trump would just lie, or that he wouldn't??

And explain a pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Ok, I started to read this thread late into the game...got thru page three but that leaves like 11 more pages in the thread to read and I decided to call Uncle, and give up trying to read the rest so if my questions or statements have been asked or answered or discussed...I apologize!

What were Ghislaine and Epstein saying or implying in their convo?

Trump is the dog that didn't bark...didn't rat him out with law enforcement... when he could have?

Are they wondering why he hasn't, when they make mention of him spending hours with an unknown victim at Epstein's house....

-because they think this unknown victim would have spilled their guts out to him about sex with Jeffrey, and being a minor, and how she was lured there and groomed and trafficked, etc? So Trump would have been made aware at that point? Yet didn't rat him out???

I dunno about that...

-or, were they implying that he did spend many hours alone with one of Epstein victims... meaning or implying that Trump hasn't barked (ratted) on Epstein because he had sex with this minor during the hours alone with her and ratting on Jeffrey could bring that out in to the open, about himself? Thus Trump not ratting on Epstein's dirty deeds?

I am not certain on that either...

Lot's of things which are odd and popping up in my head...

As Example:

If either Maxwell or Epstein knew that Trump was fiddling with his minor girls prior to this one incident of spending hours with an Epstein minor victim, Jeffrey and Ghislaine wouldn't be wondering why he was 'the dog, that didn't bark', would they?

They would just already know he didn't talk because he's always been a partner in their crimes, no?

Same with the other email chain with the author Michael Wolff mentioning that Trump had to be aware of Epstein's dirty deeds because he told Ghislaine to stop recruiting their girls from his resort....or something to that effect. This was a 2015 email chain, prior to a first Republican primary debate...

If Trump were involved with the girls, how could he not know Jeffrey was...? None of this makes sense...?

Was the worry by Epstein that Trump would just lie, or that he wouldn't??

Even the idea, if true, that Trump KNEW what was going on and didn't report it to the police would be enough not just to impeach him, but to throw a person in prison, statutes of limitation notwithstanding.

"The dog that hasn't barked" isn't, I don't think, a reference to "Trump not talking." It references the idea that Trump's name has not yet been mentioned to the lawyers and investigators by Epstein or Maxwell, themselves. As in, what is left unsaid is important.

"I'm 75% there"... this is Epstein saying he is 75% of the way to saying Trump's name to them.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

I don't think it was Virginia...her memoir book was just released and not a word about spending hours with Trump alone at Epstein's house even if only just talking with him...seems to be a lie for certain....

from what Virginia has said in her memoir....was that she had cordially met Trump at Mara Lago, around the week she first worked there and he was nice or friendly....or something to that effect...she did not accuse him of any wrong doing in her memoir, at all...and never mentioned spending hours with him alone at Epstein's house.

Nope...I don't think it can be Virginia, based on her memoir,

and saying it was a dead girl is too convenient and deserves a second look and some well deserved scrutiny...

The redacted name has been unredacted and the individual named was indeed Virginia Guiffre. That is not arguable. Now, who manufactured this record, that's the arguable part. The same ones who made up the fake birthday greetings perhaps.

 

[Rawley]

"They" as in Epstein's email? He's better hurry up and spring Maxwell from Club Fed or she will sing like a "tell-all" canary. Why to do you think he got the child sex trafficker transfered t o Club Fed, after interviewed by Trump's own lawyers?

SO she would talk to the DOJ.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Dershowitz is one of the rapists

In your mind. If he has information and wants to disclose, he should be allowed to disclose.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The redacted name has been unredacted and the individual named was indeed Virginia Guiffre.

No it hasn't. The White House just made the claim that Guiffre is the redacted name.

 

[Rawley]

There are still 100K pages of Epstein files that haven't been released. They will be and everyone is going to be amazed at the number world muckedy mucks that are going to be in those files---and a lot of people are not going to be happy. LOL

SO when Concerned American's vindictive ex-boyfriend called a tip into the FBI saying you were banging 14 y/o's with Epstein, they release the files and your life is irrevocably fucked - you'll say, its OK, it's for the good of the country.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The facts of this latest fabrication is that janjaweed democrats needed something to distract from their complete cave on the CR. They trotted this latest fab out just like they do each and evey time they have a need. Now, it's completely transparent.

 

[Rawley]

So what were they doing IN EPSTEIN’S HOUSE for all those hours?

Coloring?

Dude, the "unnamed" victim is Virginia Giuffre. Who testified under oath that Trump had nothing to do with her.

 

[Concerned American]

SO when Concerned American's vindictive ex-boyfriend called a tip into the FBI saying you were banging 14 y/o's with Epstein, they release the files and your life is irrevocably fucked - you'll say, its OK, it's for the good of the country.

This post ^^^ makes no sense. If you're trying to say that I want everybody affiliated with Epstein convicted, you bet. I want every guilty party discovered and held accountable--no matter who they are. I don't think DJT is going to be in those files and I think the fact that Biden and the democrats didn't release them for four years proves that.

 

[dudmuck]

It"s another far left conspiracy dry hole

 

[frigidweirdo]

There have been hundreds of women who came forward and received a large payday.

Why wouldn't they have done so for Trump?

Well, take Stormy Daniels. Trump paid her off already.

Others might have been threatened. One person already committed suicide over this.

And what we're talking about here is Trump knowing about this.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Stuff like this, is the reason for Trump's Epstein cover up. It wasn't just party pics from before Epstein debacle went mostly public. We are going to find out a lot more, when the investigation is made public. It won't be pretty, after all, they are said to have similar tastes in women, and it probably does extend to little girls.

Yeah, there's something Trump is hiding. Whether it's just he knew, or whether it's much more... if the Dems keep releasing things, Vance could be 48.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Dude, the "unnamed" victim is Virginia Giuffre. Who testified under oath that Trump had nothing to do with her.

Says only the White House, without a shred of evidence presented.

 

[Concerned American]

Yeah, there's something Trump is hiding. Whether it's just he knew, or whether it's much more... if the Dems keep releasing things, Vance could be 48.

The dems had 4 years and owned the DOJ---if Trump was involved it would have been broadcast on every news outlet on earth.

 

[MagicMike]

Whatever, that is the trouble with left loons, they think they know more than they do

Do you often extend the benefit of the doubt to other pedophiles?

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

aaaaannnd ya still got nothing