Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald J. Trump spent hours at his house with one of Mr. Epstein’s victims.

it wasn't a rape conviction liar the Jury found no such thing, on appeal a single Judge stated an opinion not a finding of fact backed by a conviction
That's what Trump argued, and the court of appeals said that Trump did indeed commit "rape" as is commonly understood in law.
 
That's what Trump argued, and the court of appeals said that Trump did indeed commit "rape" as is commonly understood in law.
Provide a link (ask someone if you are too stupid to know how) to Trump’s conviction for the following statute:


NY Penal Law § 130.35: Rape in the First Degree​

 
it wasn't a rape conviction liar the Jury found no such thing, on appeal a single Judge stated an opinion not a finding of fact backed by a conviction
Trump appealed based on the judgement being excessive for "sexual abuse" for which the jury charged, because of a quirk in New York Penal laws definition of rape.
But the jurys judgement, was fully consistent with an award for rape. And agreed that was what the jury's award was predicated on. And the appeals court upheld their judgement.
 
That's not a rape conviction It's civil vs criminal

Sit down

O.J. Simpson was exonerated of the double murder of Brown and Goldman.

But the civil court found him liable for murder. For that, the jury had to find that O.J. did what he was accused of. Even if he could not be criminally punished for it.

Understand now?
 
O.J. Simpson was exonerated of the double murder of Brown and Goldman.

But the civil court found him liable for murder. For that, the jury had to find that O.J. did what he was accused of. Even if he could not be criminally punished for it.

Understand now?

You're blabbering. Trump was never convicted of rape. Sit the **** down
 
Yes, it says 'involvement and relationship', i.e. were they part of a prostitution ring, getting paid, managing it, partaking in it, etc..

That would be illegal.

...you seriously belive Clinton and Summers had nothing better to do than to pimp?

That is some desperate straw grasping.
 
O.J. Simpson was exonerated of the double murder of Brown and Goldman.

But the civil court found him liable for murder. For that, the jury had to find that O.J. did what he was accused of. Even if he could not be criminally punished for it.

Understand now?
I suppose. But it's a little like claiming your favorite football team is the best, after they just lost a game. Games are how we decide which teams are best. Criminal trials are how we decide whether someone is guilty of committing a crime.
 
15th post
Trump appealed based on the judgement being excessive for "sexual abuse" for which the jury charged, because of a quirk in New York Penal laws definition of rape.
But the jurys judgement, was fully consistent with an award for rape. And agreed that was what the jury's award was predicated on. And the appeals court upheld their judgement.
Rape has a criminal code. You are bleating about a civil trial, Dumbass.
 
O.J. Simpson was exonerated of the double murder of Brown and Goldman.

But the civil court found him liable for murder. For that, the jury had to find that O.J. did what he was accused of. Even if he could not be criminally punished for it.

Understand now?
Was he convicted of murder?

Let me help you out with your Google search:

You are looking for a conviction under California Penal Code 187.

GO!
 
When Trump gets convicted in "tennis" court, you might have a point.

Until then stick to the legal definition when talking about law.

When Trump gets convicted of rape you might have a point.

Until then, all you have is lies, liar.

:dance: :dance: :dance:
 
When Trump gets convicted of rape you might have a point.

Until then, all you have is lies, liar.
He's a troll, so...


1763392183916.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom