Jeb Bush slams Donald Trump for saying 9/11 came during George W. Bush’s ‘reign’

[rdean]

Jeb Bush slams Donald Trump for saying 9/11 came during George W. Bush’s ‘reign’
LOL. Jeb Bush is so freaking pathetic. For some reason he really believes that all the bad things his brother did can't be related to him. And now he says that "George Bush kept us save" when 9/11 happened. Well, because of George Bush and his retarded foreign policy 9/11 happened in the first place. More than that he was so weak that he allowed that disaster to happen. Literally the worst president America ever had.

Today's Republicans think he was one of the best ever.

 

[Kosh]

Information on your source:

Heavy, Inc.: Private Company Information - Businessweek

Heavy, Inc. is an online video company. It owns and operates Heavy.com, an online information and entertainment destination for men that offers information in the areas of comedy, entertainment, news, and action videos; and Heavy Men’s Network, a distribution network reaching men worldwide through music, urban lifestyle, gaming, and comedy. The company was founded in 1999 and is based in New York, New York.

Basically you quoted a site that is like the onion..

DIDN'T NOTICE THE 12 LINKS IN THE ACTUAL POST INCLUDING LATIMES,NYTIMES, BLOOMBERG, ABC, ETC HUH?

All left wing mouthpieces.

I'll note your inability to even ATTEMPT to refute a single one of them. Thanks anyways

Why bother? You would never acknowledge it anyway?

LOL, Your surrender noted

You posted far left religious dogma, Noted!

 

[Kosh]

Jeb Bush slams Donald Trump for saying 9/11 came during George W. Bush’s ‘reign’
LOL. Jeb Bush is so freaking pathetic. For some reason he really believes that all the bad things his brother did can't be related to him. And now he says that "George Bush kept us save" when 9/11 happened. Well, because of George Bush and his retarded foreign policy 9/11 happened in the first place. More than that he was so weak that he allowed that disaster to happen. Literally the worst president America ever had.

Today's Republicans think he was one of the best ever.

This from a far left drone that thinks the government should do their thinking for them..

 

[rdean]

Bush was barley transitioned into office when 9/11 happened. Business insider take with a grain of salt. Billy had as much a hand it as Bush. you believe what you want. But billy didn't keep us anymore safe then Bush.

Jan
Feb
March
April
May
June
July
Aug
Sept 11

Just barely.

 

[nuhuh]

Jeb Bush slams Donald Trump for saying 9/11 came during George W. Bush’s ‘reign’
LOL. Jeb Bush is so freaking pathetic. For some reason he really believes that all the bad things his brother did can't be related to him. And now he says that "George Bush kept us save" when 9/11 happened. Well, because of George Bush and his retarded foreign policy 9/11 happened in the first place. More than that he was so weak that he allowed that disaster to happen. Literally the worst president America ever had.

Today's Republicans think he was one of the best ever.

Too think that 9/11 was just one incident in a long list of other tragic mistakes is mind boggling. The mishandling of 9/11 intelligence, Katrina, Iraq, Afghanistan, the ruination of the budget through unnecessary tax cuts, topped with Medicare Part D, and iced at the top with a financial meltdown like no other. Then along comes his brother telling us that George kept us safe while he finishes hiring all of George Bush's advisers.

 

[S.J.]

Information on your source:

Heavy, Inc.: Private Company Information - Businessweek

Heavy, Inc. is an online video company. It owns and operates Heavy.com, an online information and entertainment destination for men that offers information in the areas of comedy, entertainment, news, and action videos; and Heavy Men’s Network, a distribution network reaching men worldwide through music, urban lifestyle, gaming, and comedy. The company was founded in 1999 and is based in New York, New York.

Basically you quoted a site that is like the onion..

DIDN'T NOTICE THE 12 LINKS IN THE ACTUAL POST INCLUDING LATIMES,NYTIMES, BLOOMBERG, ABC, ETC HUH?

All left wing mouthpieces.

I'll note your inability to even ATTEMPT to refute a single one of them. Thanks anyways

Why bother? You would never acknowledge it anyway?

LOL, Your surrender noted

No, just no point in arguing with an idiot.

 

[JonK]

DIDN'T NOTICE THE 12 LINKS IN THE ACTUAL POST INCLUDING LATIMES,NYTIMES, BLOOMBERG, ABC, ETC HUH?

All left wing mouthpieces.

I'll note your inability to even ATTEMPT to refute a single one of them. Thanks anyways

Why bother? You would never acknowledge it anyway?

LOL, Your surrender noted

No, just no point in arguing with an idiot.

True, I'm glad you didn't have an argument to show!

 

[S.J.]

All left wing mouthpieces.

I'll note your inability to even ATTEMPT to refute a single one of them. Thanks anyways

Why bother? You would never acknowledge it anyway?

LOL, Your surrender noted

No, just no point in arguing with an idiot.

True, I'm glad you didn't have an argument to show!

I did, several times, but you, being the dishonest partisan idiot you are, refuse to acknowledge facts when they're shoved down your throat, so what's the point? It's pointless to argue with a dishonest person.

 

[JonK]

I'll note your inability to even ATTEMPT to refute a single one of them. Thanks anyways

Why bother? You would never acknowledge it anyway?

LOL, Your surrender noted

No, just no point in arguing with an idiot.

True, I'm glad you didn't have an argument to show!

I did, several times, but you, being the dishonest partisan idiot you are, refuse to acknowledge facts when they're shoved down your throat, so what's the point? It's pointless to argue with a dishonest person.

So although you NEVER made ANY argument to me (instead CLAIM I wouldn't acknowledge it, instead I'd DESTROY it!) , instead use the usual right wing meme of "partisanship" AS you are shown to be one. Weird

 

[S.J.]

Why bother? You would never acknowledge it anyway?

LOL, Your surrender noted

No, just no point in arguing with an idiot.

True, I'm glad you didn't have an argument to show!

I did, several times, but you, being the dishonest partisan idiot you are, refuse to acknowledge facts when they're shoved down your throat, so what's the point? It's pointless to argue with a dishonest person.

So although you NEVER made ANY argument to me (instead CLAIM I wouldn't acknowledge it, instead I'd DESTROY it!) , instead use the usual right wing meme of "partisanship" AS you are shown to be one. Weird

You destroyed nothing, except any credibility you MIGHT have had.

 

[rdean]

Jeb Bush slams Donald Trump for saying 9/11 came during George W. Bush’s ‘reign’
LOL. Jeb Bush is so freaking pathetic. For some reason he really believes that all the bad things his brother did can't be related to him. And now he says that "George Bush kept us save" when 9/11 happened. Well, because of George Bush and his retarded foreign policy 9/11 happened in the first place. More than that he was so weak that he allowed that disaster to happen. Literally the worst president America ever had.

Today's Republicans think he was one of the best ever.

Too think that 9/11 was just one incident in a long list of other tragic mistakes is mind boggling. The mishandling of 9/11 intelligence, Katrina, Iraq, Afghanistan, the ruination of the budget through unnecessary tax cuts, topped with Medicare Part D, and iced at the top with a financial meltdown like no other. Then along comes his brother telling us that George kept us safe while he finishes hiring all of George Bush's advisers.

George Bush was like King Midas. Only every thing he "touched" turned to shit. It was like a drooling idiot was king. Remember when he fired seasoned lawyers from the Justice Dept and replaced them with tier four Christian college grads? Who does that?

 

[JonK]

LOL, Your surrender noted

No, just no point in arguing with an idiot.

True, I'm glad you didn't have an argument to show!

I did, several times, but you, being the dishonest partisan idiot you are, refuse to acknowledge facts when they're shoved down your throat, so what's the point? It's pointless to argue with a dishonest person.

So although you NEVER made ANY argument to me (instead CLAIM I wouldn't acknowledge it, instead I'd DESTROY it!) , instead use the usual right wing meme of "partisanship" AS you are shown to be one. Weird

You destroyed nothing, except any credibility you MIGHT have had.

You never presented ANYTHING for ME to destroy. Weird perhaps TRY to posit SOMETHING other than the nah, nah, nah garbage the right wing LOVES?

 

[S.J.]

Jeb Bush slams Donald Trump for saying 9/11 came during George W. Bush’s ‘reign’
LOL. Jeb Bush is so freaking pathetic. For some reason he really believes that all the bad things his brother did can't be related to him. And now he says that "George Bush kept us save" when 9/11 happened. Well, because of George Bush and his retarded foreign policy 9/11 happened in the first place. More than that he was so weak that he allowed that disaster to happen. Literally the worst president America ever had.

Today's Republicans think he was one of the best ever.

Too think that 9/11 was just one incident in a long list of other tragic mistakes is mind boggling. The mishandling of 9/11 intelligence, Katrina, Iraq, Afghanistan, the ruination of the budget through unnecessary tax cuts, topped with Medicare Part D, and iced at the top with a financial meltdown like no other. Then along comes his brother telling us that George kept us safe while he finishes hiring all of George Bush's advisers.

George Bush was like King Midas. Only every thing he "touched" turned to shit. It was like a drooling idiot was king. Remember when he fired seasoned lawyers from the Justice Dept and replaced them with tier four Christian college grads? Who does that?

Obama. Only he replaces them with black socialists.

 

[S.J.]

No, just no point in arguing with an idiot.

True, I'm glad you didn't have an argument to show!

I did, several times, but you, being the dishonest partisan idiot you are, refuse to acknowledge facts when they're shoved down your throat, so what's the point? It's pointless to argue with a dishonest person.

So although you NEVER made ANY argument to me (instead CLAIM I wouldn't acknowledge it, instead I'd DESTROY it!) , instead use the usual right wing meme of "partisanship" AS you are shown to be one. Weird

You destroyed nothing, except any credibility you MIGHT have had.

You never presented ANYTHING for ME to destroy. Weird perhaps TRY to posit SOMETHING other than the nah, nah, nah garbage the right wing LOVES?

You're not capable of destroying anything (except yourself). And you've done a fine job of it.

 

[JonK]

True, I'm glad you didn't have an argument to show!

I did, several times, but you, being the dishonest partisan idiot you are, refuse to acknowledge facts when they're shoved down your throat, so what's the point? It's pointless to argue with a dishonest person.

So although you NEVER made ANY argument to me (instead CLAIM I wouldn't acknowledge it, instead I'd DESTROY it!) , instead use the usual right wing meme of "partisanship" AS you are shown to be one. Weird

You destroyed nothing, except any credibility you MIGHT have had.

You never presented ANYTHING for ME to destroy. Weird perhaps TRY to posit SOMETHING other than the nah, nah, nah garbage the right wing LOVES?

You're not capable of destroying anything (except yourself). And you've done a fine job of it.

Again, your dodge noted

 

[S.J.]

I did, several times, but you, being the dishonest partisan idiot you are, refuse to acknowledge facts when they're shoved down your throat, so what's the point? It's pointless to argue with a dishonest person.

So although you NEVER made ANY argument to me (instead CLAIM I wouldn't acknowledge it, instead I'd DESTROY it!) , instead use the usual right wing meme of "partisanship" AS you are shown to be one. Weird

You destroyed nothing, except any credibility you MIGHT have had.

You never presented ANYTHING for ME to destroy. Weird perhaps TRY to posit SOMETHING other than the nah, nah, nah garbage the right wing LOVES?

You're not capable of destroying anything (except yourself). And you've done a fine job of it.

Again, your dodge noted

You realize nobody give a **** what you're saying, don't you?

 

[IsaacNewton]

I didn't ignore 3,000 you ******* hack. The ambassador in Benghazi could have been rescued but U.S. special forces were not permitted to help. Then, they advanced that damn lie about a video when they knew it was a terrorist attack. Hillary's response? "What difference does it make"? You people are despicable.

Then it turns out Benghazi wasn't about the dead it was about the attempt to kill a candidacy. That's the most despicable of all.

No, the cover up by Obama and Clinton was about AVOIDING damage to their political careers. The ***** stood over the caskets of the 4 Americans (who could have been rescued) and assured the families of the victims that they would get the guy who made the YouTube video. What a piece of shit, and you immoral shit heads defend her.

The Republican Select House Committee on Intelligence found no evidence of wrongdoing. So that pretty much washes out your theory. That puts the onus on you to show some responsibility and start reading reports by your own House committee members because to slander people when the evidence points elsewhere pretty much makes you the asshole.

This is the new conservative movement created by Faux News and con-media, aka radio. They are fed lies and they have been conditioned to accept and believe these lies EVEN when faced with absolute evidence from their own party of the contrary.

These people need to feel good about who they are and what they believe more than they need to see reality. So they will reject any facts or evidence that contradicts their narrow self-fulfilling prophecies.

The Republicans have already admitted this whole Ben Gassy bullshit was nothing more than a political pile designed exclusively to harm Hilllary Clinton's political career. Those are the facts.

But cons would have to admit their party and their cohort lies to such a degree and uses the dead bodies of Americans for nothing more than a political football. And they will reject this reality with all they are worth.

I agree completely. The irony of this, had this been done on Obama's shift isn't lost on me and I know this crowd would have rushed Obama's ass right out of office. Yet we know how big a failure it was and that 3,000 Americans died on Bush's watch and I have yet to see the Republican who condemns him for his utterly complete failure.

Bush should have been hanged on his "My Pet Goat" reaction alone could you imagine if that had been Obama? Bush shuddered in his boots at that moment and when America needed a leader there was a period of time there when no one knew what was happening and America could have been under attack and the president was out to lunch.

I agree, anyone over 30 years old knew the minute the Republicans latched on to Ben Gassy and Faux News started covering it nonstop it was all political. And at the expense of the families of the dead Americans. I don't care what someone politics are, to use 4 dead Americans as political fodder like they are doing is so over the top disgusting.

And yes Bush had the look of a child who's daddy had put him in charge of the store for a minute and he had no clue what to do. Aside from the fact that Bush's regime allowed the attack to happen, the worst attack on American soil ever. And conservatives are closed mouth about it. Do they have NO decency or conscience? No morality? Is politics ALL they have? Do they crave power so desperately that ANYTHING is fair game?

Republicans didn't used to act like this to this degree. Its only been since conservative talk radio and Faux News has broadcast nonstop for the last 20+ years that if you don't belong to the Republican side of the ledger then you are a mortal enemy and EVERYTHING you do is wrong and evil. But using the bodies of 4 dead Americans in service to the country as a political meat cleaver is abjectly disgusting.

 

[Stephanie]

So although you NEVER made ANY argument to me (instead CLAIM I wouldn't acknowledge it, instead I'd DESTROY it!) , instead use the usual right wing meme of "partisanship" AS you are shown to be one. Weird

You destroyed nothing, except any credibility you MIGHT have had.

You never presented ANYTHING for ME to destroy. Weird perhaps TRY to posit SOMETHING other than the nah, nah, nah garbage the right wing LOVES?

You're not capable of destroying anything (except yourself). And you've done a fine job of it.

Again, your dodge noted

You realize nobody give a **** what you're saying, don't you?

agree

 

[WheelieAddict]

Trump is a birther, birthers are stupid beyond belief. Jeb's family is a shameful lot and don't think it will be different with this Bush. That family and their cronies set this country back for years. I don't care if you vote dem, rep, green, or libertarian. Never vote for a Bush again. For the good of our country.

 

[Stephanie]

Bush was barley transitioned into office when 9/11 happened. Business insider take with a grain of salt. Billy had as much a hand it as Bush. you believe what you want. But billy didn't keep us anymore safe then Bush.

OVER 8 MONTHS IS BARELY? Dozens of HIGH level warnings went unheeded, not even ONE high level meeting at the white house? lol


More Evidence Indicates the Bush Administration Ignored September 11 Warnings




As the 9/11 Commission noted, "There were more than 40 intelligence articles in the PDBS [Presidential Daily Briefings] from January 21 to September 11 that related to Bin Laden." In a section of the report called "The Drumbeat Begins," the Commission highlights a late June briefing that alerts to the "high probability of near-term 'spectacular' terrorist attacks resulting in numerous casualties … including a 'severe blow' against U.S. and Israeli 'interests' during the next two weeks." But whereas the Commission report describes the threat of attacks worldwide, Eichenwald's exclusive intel specifically cites a domestic threat, one with "dramatic consequences."

However, as Eichenwald writes, the administration was much more concerned with Iraq:

An intelligence official and a member of the Bush administration both told me in interviews that the neoconservative leaders who had recently assumed power at the Pentagon were warning the White House that the C.I.A. had been fooled; according to this theory, Bin Laden was merely pretending to be planning an attack to distract the administration from Saddam Hussein, whom the neoconservatives saw as a greater threat. Intelligence officials, these sources said, protested that the idea of Bin Laden, an Islamic fundamentalist, conspiring with Mr. Hussein, an Iraqi secularist, was ridiculous, but the neoconservatives’ suspicions were nevertheless carrying the day.

On June 29, the CIA insisted, "The U.S. is not the target of a disinformation campaign by Usama Bin Laden." Almost a month later, "the president did not feel the briefings on potential attacks were sufficient, one intelligence official told me, and instead asked for a broader analysis on Al Qaeda, its aspirations and its history. In response, the C.I.A. set to work on the Aug. 6 brief."


More Evidence Indicates the Bush Administration Ignored September 11 Warnings

the nymag?. seriously
why not the national enquire? so they specifically told him that plane were going to be used from our country and slammed into the world trade center building?. . And who was President when they were flying these planes to get the experience to be used in the attacks?
You people will believe you want or need I guess