Jeb Bush slams Donald Trump for saying 9/11 came during George W. Bush’s ‘reign’

[rdean]

Reagan was worse.

He destroyed our middle class.

HUH??????? Under Reagan, the middle class expanded tremendously and median family income rose substantially. What planet or parallel universe are you talking about?

Ronald Reagan's Record on the Economy and on the Budget

they get their information from all the leftwing hate sites. so you see it's all misinformation, fibs and outright lies. it's shameful and embarrassing they repeat it.

You don't even know what you are talking about. Never did and never will.

 

[jknowgood]

This is the whining Gang of Nitwits who Blame Benghazi on Hillary Clinton Reaction to the mention of Bush by Trump 'don't blame Failure 43"

One bright spot, at least he's not saying don't blame my brother for:

Destabilizing the Middle East

Ignoring Bin Laden

The million Christians who disappeared from Iraq

WMD's not being found

The creation of Isis as a force from the disbanded Iraq military

The trillions wasted in Iraq

The tens of thousands of Americans maimed in Iraq

Not knowing there has been a religious war going on there for the last thousand years.

Wikipedia states the Iraq war cost 1.1 trillion dollars. Not trillions, we liberated the Iraqi people. Also Obama ended it successfully, then he messed it up.

One, it never was successful. Never. As long as there is a religious war going on in the Middle East, it can't be successful.

Cost of caring for Afghanistan, Iraq veterans extends beyond federal government to states

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The federal government has spent $4.4 trillionfighting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and is expected to spend another $600 billion to $1 trillion caring for the veterans in the next 40 years.

=================

I wish right wingers weren't such small thinkers. They will look at one costs and say, "See, it wasn't that much" while totally ignoring all the associated Costs.

The cost of taking care of maimed Americans 40 years into the future.

The cost of rebuilding our depleted military.

The cost of taking care of refugees.

Who knows how much more costs will rise in the future? One thing you can bet, the costs will continue to rise. It's inevitable.

And how many trillions have we spent on people who can work, but won't. Obama and his followers on here bragged how he successfully ended the Iraq war.

 

[Rustic]

This is the whining Gang of Nitwits who Blame Benghazi on Hillary Clinton Reaction to the mention of Bush by Trump 'don't blame Failure 43"

One bright spot, at least he's not saying don't blame my brother for:

Destabilizing the Middle East

Ignoring Bin Laden

The million Christians who disappeared from Iraq

WMD's not being found

The creation of Isis as a force from the disbanded Iraq military

The trillions wasted in Iraq

The tens of thousands of Americans maimed in Iraq

Not knowing there has been a religious war going on there for the last thousand years.

Wikipedia states the Iraq war cost 1.1 trillion dollars. Not trillions, we liberated the Iraqi people. Also Obama ended it successfully, then he messed it up.

One, it never was successful. Never. As long as there is a religious war going on in the Middle East, it can't be successful.

Cost of caring for Afghanistan, Iraq veterans extends beyond federal government to states

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The federal government has spent $4.4 trillionfighting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and is expected to spend another $600 billion to $1 trillion caring for the veterans in the next 40 years.

=================

I wish right wingers weren't such small thinkers. They will look at one costs and say, "See, it wasn't that much" while totally ignoring all the associated Costs.

The cost of taking care of maimed Americans 40 years into the future.

The cost of rebuilding our depleted military.

The cost of taking care of refugees.

Who knows how much more costs will rise in the future? One thing you can bet, the costs will continue to rise. It's inevitable.

Pocket change, compared to that has been wasted on socialist programs.
Up till now and forever????

 

[CowboyTed]

One thing you can be sure of. If 9/11 had occurred on a Democrats watch we would never hear the end of it. 4 dead in Benghazi and it's non-stop, Imagine 3,000!

One thing you can be sure of, if Bill Clinton had killed bin Laden when he had the opportunity there would have been no 9/11 attack.

So much uther horse shit it shows your lack of knowledge....

First Bill Clinton would have to make a military strike on foreign shores on weakish intel. That is an act of war.

Bin laden was only the bag man for 911, the operation cost $400k. They would have other sources for that kind of money.

Bush ignored warnings he has no excuse..

 

[jknowgood]

One thing you can be sure of. If 9/11 had occurred on a Democrats watch we would never hear the end of it. 4 dead in Benghazi and it's non-stop, Imagine 3,000!

One thing you can be sure of, if Bill Clinton had killed bin Laden when he had the opportunity there would have been no 9/11 attack.

So much uther horse shit it shows your lack of knowledge....

First Bill Clinton would have to make a military strike on foreign shores on weakish intel. That is an act of war.

Bin laden was only the bag man for 911, the operation cost $400k. They would have other sources for that kind of money.

Bush ignored warnings he has no excuse..

So when Clinton bombed an aspirin factory. Was that an act of war?

 

[nuhuh]

One thing you can be sure of. If 9/11 had occurred on a Democrats watch we would never hear the end of it. 4 dead in Benghazi and it's non-stop, Imagine 3,000!

One thing you can be sure of, if Bill Clinton had killed bin Laden when he had the opportunity there would have been no 9/11 attack.

So much uther horse shit it shows your lack of knowledge....

First Bill Clinton would have to make a military strike on foreign shores on weakish intel. That is an act of war.

Bin laden was only the bag man for 911, the operation cost $400k. They would have other sources for that kind of money.

Bush ignored warnings he has no excuse..

So when Clinton bombed an aspirin factory. Was that an act of war?

The people in the aspirin factory probably thought so.

 

[jknowgood]

One thing you can be sure of. If 9/11 had occurred on a Democrats watch we would never hear the end of it. 4 dead in Benghazi and it's non-stop, Imagine 3,000!

One thing you can be sure of, if Bill Clinton had killed bin Laden when he had the opportunity there would have been no 9/11 attack.

So much uther horse shit it shows your lack of knowledge....

First Bill Clinton would have to make a military strike on foreign shores on weakish intel. That is an act of war.

Bin laden was only the bag man for 911, the operation cost $400k. They would have other sources for that kind of money.

Bush ignored warnings he has no excuse..

So when Clinton bombed an aspirin factory. Was that an act of war?

The people in the aspirin factory probably thought so.

So Clinton had no problem doing an act of war bombing an aspirin factory, but couldn't do it to kill Bin laden?

 

[nuhuh]

One thing you can be sure of. If 9/11 had occurred on a Democrats watch we would never hear the end of it. 4 dead in Benghazi and it's non-stop, Imagine 3,000!

One thing you can be sure of, if Bill Clinton had killed bin Laden when he had the opportunity there would have been no 9/11 attack.

So much uther horse shit it shows your lack of knowledge....

First Bill Clinton would have to make a military strike on foreign shores on weakish intel. That is an act of war.

Bin laden was only the bag man for 911, the operation cost $400k. They would have other sources for that kind of money.

Bush ignored warnings he has no excuse..

So when Clinton bombed an aspirin factory. Was that an act of war?

The people in the aspirin factory probably thought so.

So Clinton had no problem doing an act of war bombing an aspirin factory, but couldn't do it to kill Bin laden?

Big difference between an aspirin factory and a city and Bin Laden wasn't guilty of a crime yet.

 

[jknowgood]

One thing you can be sure of, if Bill Clinton had killed bin Laden when he had the opportunity there would have been no 9/11 attack.

So much uther horse shit it shows your lack of knowledge....

First Bill Clinton would have to make a military strike on foreign shores on weakish intel. That is an act of war.

Bin laden was only the bag man for 911, the operation cost $400k. They would have other sources for that kind of money.

Bush ignored warnings he has no excuse..

So when Clinton bombed an aspirin factory. Was that an act of war?

The people in the aspirin factory probably thought so.

So Clinton had no problem doing an act of war bombing an aspirin factory, but couldn't do it to kill Bin laden?

Big difference between an aspirin factory and a city and Bin Laden wasn't guilty of a crime yet.

I know the reason he didn't. He didn't have a problem like Lewinsky to deflect from, when he could've killed Bin Laden.

 

[nuhuh]

So much uther horse shit it shows your lack of knowledge....

First Bill Clinton would have to make a military strike on foreign shores on weakish intel. That is an act of war.

Bin laden was only the bag man for 911, the operation cost $400k. They would have other sources for that kind of money.

Bush ignored warnings he has no excuse..

So when Clinton bombed an aspirin factory. Was that an act of war?

The people in the aspirin factory probably thought so.

So Clinton had no problem doing an act of war bombing an aspirin factory, but couldn't do it to kill Bin laden?

Big difference between an aspirin factory and a city and Bin Laden wasn't guilty of a crime yet.

I know the reason he didn't. He didn't have a problem like Lewinsky to deflect from, when he could've killed Bin Laden.

Lewinsky was a big problem for Clinton at that time. On August 17, 1998 Clinton testified before a grand jury about it. and on August 20th, 1998 he bombed the aspirin factory. Republicans of course were quick to blame Clinton for bombing the factory claiming he was trying to divert attention from his testimony.

 

[IsaacNewton]

It is clear, the Republicans are using the dead bodies of 4 Americans as political fodder. It is hideous.

 

[jknowgood]

One thing you can be sure of, if Bill Clinton had killed bin Laden when he had the opportunity there would have been no 9/11 attack.

So much uther horse shit it shows your lack of knowledge....

First Bill Clinton would have to make a military strike on foreign shores on weakish intel. That is an act of war.

Bin laden was only the bag man for 911, the operation cost $400k. They would have other sources for that kind of money.

Bush ignored warnings he has no excuse..

So when Clinton bombed an aspirin factory. Was that an act of war?

The people in the aspirin factory probably thought so.

So Clinton had no problem doing an act of war bombing an aspirin factory, but couldn't do it to kill Bin laden?

Big difference between an aspirin factory and a city and Bin Laden wasn't guilty of a crime yet.

I know the reason he didn't. He didn't have a problem like Lewinsky to deflect from, when he could've killed Bin Laden

 

[jknowgood]

It is clear, the Republicans are using the dead bodies of 4 Americans as political fodder. It is hideous.

Obama lying about their deaths to save his ass is hideous.

 

[rdean]

This is the whining Gang of Nitwits who Blame Benghazi on Hillary Clinton Reaction to the mention of Bush by Trump 'don't blame Failure 43"

One bright spot, at least he's not saying don't blame my brother for:

Destabilizing the Middle East

Ignoring Bin Laden

The million Christians who disappeared from Iraq

WMD's not being found

The creation of Isis as a force from the disbanded Iraq military

The trillions wasted in Iraq

The tens of thousands of Americans maimed in Iraq

Not knowing there has been a religious war going on there for the last thousand years.

Wikipedia states the Iraq war cost 1.1 trillion dollars. Not trillions, we liberated the Iraqi people. Also Obama ended it successfully, then he messed it up.

One, it never was successful. Never. As long as there is a religious war going on in the Middle East, it can't be successful.

Cost of caring for Afghanistan, Iraq veterans extends beyond federal government to states

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The federal government has spent $4.4 trillionfighting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and is expected to spend another $600 billion to $1 trillion caring for the veterans in the next 40 years.

=================

I wish right wingers weren't such small thinkers. They will look at one costs and say, "See, it wasn't that much" while totally ignoring all the associated Costs.

The cost of taking care of maimed Americans 40 years into the future.

The cost of rebuilding our depleted military.

The cost of taking care of refugees.

Who knows how much more costs will rise in the future? One thing you can bet, the costs will continue to rise. It's inevitable.

And how many trillions have we spent on people who can work, but won't. Obama and his followers on here bragged how he successfully ended the Iraq war.

At least Democrats want to give them a chance. Help them with education and health care. It's Republicans who want good paying jobs with zero skills. Who get the most welfare and food stamps. Who want the most expensive healthcare, which is emergency room care.

 

[rdean]

It is clear, the Republicans are using the dead bodies of 4 Americans as political fodder. It is hideous.

Obama lying about their deaths to save his ass is hideous.

What was the lie? Make it good.

 

[rdean]

So when Clinton bombed an aspirin factory. Was that an act of war?

The people in the aspirin factory probably thought so.

So Clinton had no problem doing an act of war bombing an aspirin factory, but couldn't do it to kill Bin laden?

Big difference between an aspirin factory and a city and Bin Laden wasn't guilty of a crime yet.

I know the reason he didn't. He didn't have a problem like Lewinsky to deflect from, when he could've killed Bin Laden.

Lewinsky was a big problem for Clinton at that time. On August 17, 1998 Clinton testified before a grand jury about it. and on August 20th, 1998 he bombed the aspirin factory. Republicans of course were quick to blame Clinton for bombing the factory claiming he was trying to divert attention from his testimony.

Clinton bombed an aspirin factory? Was he Fast and Furious when he did it?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

CNN host destroys Jeb Bush: You blame Hillary for Benghazi but insist brother blameless for 9/11
“It’s what you do after that matters,” Bush insisted.

 

[IsaacNewton]

The Republicans have been having their picnic sitting right under this hornet's nest and along came Trump with his rock and he gave it a gooood whack.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Jeb Bush Falls Apart When Asked Why He Blames Obama For Benghazi But Not W for 9/11

Jeb Bush pulled off an epic face-plant on CNN when he was was asked why he blames President Obama and Hillary Clinton for Benghazi, but doesn't his brother…

 

[IsaacNewton]

He is a weasel, it shows in the video. He dodges answering the question because he can't, just like all cons and Republicans can't answer truthfully. You can't say Hillary is responsible for anything and in the same breath say Bush holds no responsibility.

In essence, the trap they have set themselves destroys Bush's legacy in their minds. He never had a real legacy except failure, but they are forever hopeful aren't they.

Oh Donald, you naughty boy and your penchant for throwing rocks.