Zone1 Jared Taylor, On Orientals

[Hector12]

Joe needs to pay a visit the Holocaust Museum in DC. Maybe he’d learn something.

I doubt it. his hatred for the most superior race in the world is beyond the range of education.

 

[JoeB131]

I doubt it. his hatred for the most superior race in the world is beyond the range of education.

No race is superior.

I have more sympathy about the Holocaust if the Israelis weren't engaging in the same behavior in Palestine.

You see, I always think Genocide is bad. You only seem to think it's bad when it happens to people you like.

 

[AZrailwhale]

No, Eugenics was debunked as a science 100 years ago.


If there are any left. A lot of Jews are marrying Goyim and being non-religious.



If they don't completely wear out their welcome like they have everywhere else in the world.

If scientific breeding was debunked, how come farm animals are far larger and more productive than they were two hundred years ago? Selective breeding works in all mammals.

 

[AZrailwhale]

A hateful bigot like him is likely unable to learn something.

Not UNABLE, UNWILLING.

 

[Flash]

And when a black person is sees a group is of whites coming toward us on the street, we are wary.

LOL! Yea, right. Like Jessie Jackson you feel relived it ain't Negro thugs.

 

[Flash]

The only thing Negros have to fear about Whites is that the Whites will take their welfare away.

 

[Hector12]

No race is superior.

When I use the word "superior" for a race I mean that the members of that race tend to have characteristics congenial to civilization. The most important of these are intelligence, obedience to the law, and monogamy.

I am aware that intelligent, law abiding, and monogamous people can be found in each of the races, although in different proportions.

The importance of intelligence, obedience to the law, and monogamy can be seen in the different kinds of societies established by Orientals, whites, and Negroes.

 

[Hector12]

If scientific breeding was debunked, how come farm animals are far larger and more productive than they were two hundred years ago? Selective breeding works in all mammals.

Thank you for that comment. I will use it the next time JoeB131 claims that eugenics has been "debunked." As computer technology increases the need for intelligent people while eliminating jobs for unintelligent people, eugenics will become more important than ever.

Unfortunately, the Nazi effort to exterminate the most superior race in existence has discredited eugenics.

Currently, people with IQ's below 100 are more prolific than people with IQ's above 100.

 

[Unkotare]

Not at all.

Judaism isn't true. Mormonism isn't True. Christianity isn't true.

This isn't complicated.

But I'm going to put you on ignore, because you never add anything to the conversation.

Chicken shit.

 

[JoeB131]

If scientific breeding was debunked, how come farm animals are far larger and more productive than they were two hundred years ago? Selective breeding works in all mammals.

So does natural selection, but unless you are going to eliminate all freedom, in who can fuck whom, I don't think you are going to get very far.

 

[JoeB131]

When I use the word "superior" for a race I mean that the members of that race tend to have characteristics congenial to civilization. The most important of these are intelligence, obedience to the law, and monogamy.

I am aware that intelligent, law abiding, and monogamous people can be found in each of the races, although in different proportions.

And that's stupid. God, so many levels of stupid.

For most of human history, Monogamy didn't exist. In fact, early humans were probably like wolf packs, where the Alpha got all the sex and the betas just hung about.

Furthermore, "civilized" humans can be the most Savage. Heck, look at Germany. (And I can say this because I am second gen German American). Despite all the art and literature and technological achievements, when push came to shove, the Germans turned into the biggest savages in the world. Same thing with the Zionists, what they are doing is brutal. It's what happens when you dehumanize ANYONE. Sadly, the Jews took all the wrong lessons.

The importance of intelligence, obedience to the law, and monogamy can be seen in the different kinds of societies established by Orientals, whites, and Negroes.

No, it only shows that when you have affluence, you have more civilization. If you lost everything, you'd either die or turn savage.

Thank you for that comment. I will use it the next time JoeB131 claims that eugenics has been "debunked." As computer technology increases the need for intelligent people while eliminating jobs for unintelligent people, eugenics will become more important than ever.

Well, it was a retarded comment. If you want to look at an example of "Selective breeding" in animals, I give you- dogs. Where through Selective Breeding, Canis Familiaris ranges from the Chihuahua to the Irish Wolfhound. Some bred for selective purposes, some bred for aesthetics.

And here comes the problem. Due to "Selective breeding", many "Pure Bred" dogs are unstable. Part of that is due to inbreeding, part of that is the features favored by humans don't do the dog itself much good.

Problems Common to Purebred Dogs

Nothing is cuter in this world than a puppy, especially one from impeccable lineage. But as many a princess has learned throughout history, keeping it in the family does not always end happily.

www.petmd.com

Unfortunately, the Nazi effort to exterminate the most superior race in existence has discredited eugenics.

No, the fact that they exterminated ANYONE discredited Eugenics. As much whining as I see you and Lisa do about the Holocaust, I never hear you talk about the Roma, Slav, Sinti, Homosexuals, the disabled, Jehovah's Witnesses, Communists, Socialists, Freemasons. None of whom ever start a sentence with, "Hitler did a nasty to my peeps, so I can act like an a-hole."

Nor do you talk about how the Belgians killed 2 million Congolese, the Japanese killed perhaps 20 million Chinese, the Ottomans killed 2 million Armenians, the Cambodians killed 1 million people who weren't into communism, well the list goes on. Man's inhumanity to man seems to be the hallmark of "Civilization".

 

[Unkotare]

The hypocrite bigot ^^^^^^^ leaves out the most important parts AGAIN.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Thank you for that comment. I will use it the next time JoeB131 claims that eugenics has been "debunked." As computer technology increases the need for intelligent people while eliminating jobs for unintelligent people, eugenics will become more important than ever.

Unfortunately, the Nazi effort to exterminate the most superior race in existence has discredited eugenics.

Currently, people with IQ's below 100 are more prolific than people with IQ's above 100.

Eugenics is a bad buzz word with negative connotations. Scientific or selective breeding has no negative connotations.

 

[AZrailwhale]

So does natural selection, but unless you are going to eliminate all freedom, in who can fuck whom, I don't think you are going to get very far.

The Jews have been practicing selective breeding for hundreds of years. Intelligent and successful parents marry their children off to other intelligent and successful children. Every generation gets a tiny bit smarter, but the odds of something like Tay Sachs Disease increase a tiny bit as well. Jewish mommas introduce their children as “my son the doctor” or “my daughter the teacher”.

 

[Hector12]

Nor do you talk about how the Belgians killed 2 million Congolese, the Japanese killed perhaps 20 million Chinese, the Ottomans killed 2 million Armenians, the Cambodians killed 1 million people who weren't into communism, well the list goes on. Man's inhumanity to man seems to be the hallmark of "Civilization".

War Before Civilization: the Myth of the Peaceful Savage (Oxford University Press, 1996) is a book by Lawrence H. Keeley, a professor of archaeology at the University of Illinois at Chicago who specialized in prehistoric Europe. The book deals with warfare conducted throughout human history by societies with little technology. In the book, Keeley aims to stop the apparent trend in seeing modern civilization as bad, by setting out to prove that prehistoric societies were often violent and engaged in frequent warfare that was highly destructive to the cultures involved.[1]

Keeley conducts an investigation of the archaeological evidence for prehistoric violence, including murder and massacre as well as war. He also looks at nonstate societies of more recent times – where we can name the tribes and peoples – and their propensity for warfare.[2] It has long been known, for example, that many tribes of South America's tropical forest engaged in frequent warfare.

Keeley says peaceful societies are an exception. About 90–95% of known societies engage in war. Those that did not are almost universally either isolated nomadic groups (for whom flight is an option), groups of defeated refugees, or small enclaves under the protection of a larger modern state. The attrition rate of numerous close-quarter clashes, which characterize warfare in tribal warrior society, produces casualty rates of up to 60%, compared to 1% of the combatants as is typical in modern warfare. Despite the undeniable carnage and effectiveness of modern warfare, the evidence shows that tribal warfare is on average 20 times more deadly than 20th-century warfare, whether calculated as a percentage of total deaths due to war or as average deaths per year from war as a percentage of the total population.[3] "Had the same casualty rate been suffered by the population of the twentieth century," writes Nicholas Wade, "its war deaths would have totaled two billion people."[4] In modern tribal societies, death rates from war are four to six times the highest death rates in 20th-century Germany or Russia.[5]

One-half of the people found in a mesolithic cemetery in present-day Jebel Sahaba, Sudan dating to as early as 13,000 years ago had died as a result of warfare between seemingly different racial groups with victims bearing marks of being killed by arrow heads, spears and club, prompting some to call it the first race war.[6][7] The Yellowknives tribe in Canada was effectively obliterated by massacres committed by Dogrib Indians, and disappeared from history shortly thereafter.[8] Similar massacres occurred among the Eskimos, the Crow Indians, and countless others. These mass killings occurred well before any contact with the West. In Arnhem Land in northern Australia, a study of warfare among the Australian Aboriginal Murngin people in the late-19th century found that over a 20-year period no less than 200 out of 800 men, or 25% of all adult males, had been killed in intertribal warfare.[9] The accounts of missionaries to the area in the borderlands between Brazil and Venezuela have recounted constant infighting in the Yanomami tribes for women or prestige, and evidence of continuous warfare for the enslavement of neighboring tribes such as the Macu before the arrival of European settlers and government. More than a third of the Yanomamo males, on average, died from warfare.

War Before Civilization - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Hector12]

And here comes the problem. Due to "Selective breeding", many "Pure Bred" dogs are unstable. Part of that is due to inbreeding, part of that is the features favored by humans don't do the dog itself much good.

Pure breeding is a distortion of selective breeding. Pure breeding happens when dogs are bred for winning dog shows, rather than what they were originally bred for, such as hunting, herding sheep, guarding people, and so on.

 

[Hector12]

No, the fact that they exterminated ANYONE discredited Eugenics. As much whining as I see you and Lisa do about the Holocaust, I never hear you talk about the Roma, Slav, Sinti, Homosexuals, the disabled, Jehovah's Witnesses, Communists, Socialists, Freemasons. None of whom ever start a sentence with, "Hitler did a nasty to my peeps, so I can act like an a-hole."

Eugenics, the set of beliefs and practices which aims at improving the genetic quality of the human population,[2][3] played a significant role in the history and culture of the United States from the late 19th century into the mid-20th century.[4] The cause became increasingly promoted by intellectuals of the Progressive Era.[5][6]...

By 1910, there was a large and dynamic network of scientists, reformers, and professionals engaged in national eugenics projects and actively promoting eugenic legislation. The American Breeder's Association, the first eugenic body in the U.S., expanded in 1906 to include a specific eugenics committee under the direction of Charles B. Davenport.[20][21] The ABA was formed specifically to "investigate and report on heredity in the human race, and emphasize the value of superior blood and the menace to society of inferior blood."[22] Membership included Alexander Graham Bell,[23] Stanford president David Starr Jordan and Luther Burbank.[24][25] The American Association for the Study and Prevention of Infant Mortality was one of the first organizations to begin investigating infant mortality rates in terms of eugenics.[26] They promoted government intervention in attempts to promote the health of future citizens.[27][verification needed]

Several feminist reformers advocated an agenda of eugenic legal reform. The National Federation of Women's Clubs, the Woman's Christian Temperance Union, and the National League of Women Voters were among the variety of state and local feminist organizations that at some point lobbied for eugenic reforms.[28] One of the most prominent feminists to champion the eugenic agenda was Margaret Sanger, the leader of the American birth control movement and founder of Planned Parenthood. Sanger saw birth control as a means to prevent unwanted children from being born into a disadvantaged life, and incorporated the language of eugenics to advance the movement.[29][30] Sanger also sought to discourage the reproduction of persons who, it was believed, would pass on mental disease or serious physical defects.[31] In these cases, she approved of the use of sterilization.[29] In Sanger's opinion, it was individual women (if able-bodied) and not the state who should determine whether or not to have a child.[32][33]

Eugenics in the United States - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

-------------

Using the Nazis to discredit eugenics is an example of the Guilt by Association Fallacy. Before the Nazis eugenics was a respectable movement. Unless we return to some sort of eugenics a growing percentage of people will be congenitally unemployable welfare recipients who often supplement their welfare checks with the gains of criminal activity

 

[Hector12]

So does natural selection, but unless you are going to eliminate all freedom, in who can fuck whom, I don't think you are going to get very far.

We can decide to make sterilization a requirement for welfare eligibility. This will not be compulsory sterilization because those who are congenially unemployable can choose to stay off of welfare.

 

[Hector12]

LOL! Yea, right. Like Jessie Jackson you feel relived it ain't Negro thugs.

 

[Hector12]

Jews succeed because they can declare themselves White and join into all that sweet, sweet White privilege.

My white privilege consists of the fact that when people notice that I am walking behind them they do not cross the street. When I walk into a store sales clerks do not watch me suspiciously. My white privilege has been earned by the fact that people have learned that white men are usually safe to be around.