Jan 6 Committee SUBORNED PERJURY.. Stunning Information of Closed-Door Testimony Revealed.

One that supports things like Universal income, in a country where spending has dug a hole unable to get out of in my lifetime, who ran on a democrat ticket, it tells me your a liberal, and like many haven't been able to even tell yourself the truth...

BTW, why is your profile locked to view? What would you possibly have in there to hide?
That really is incredible. I've explained it a thousand times, and that's how your mind perceives it.

Absolutely fucking incredible. This is why I don't bother.
 
October 31 2020
At least 18 people connected to President Trump have been locked up, indicted, or arrested since the real-estate mogul announced his candidacy in 2015.

So, you're proud of the attempt to criminalize your oppositions political stances eh?

I'll just tell ya, American's loath you.
 
That really is incredible. I've explained it a thousand times, and that's how your mind perceives it.

Absolutely fucking incredible. This is why I don't bother.
No, you don't bother because you're such a prolific liar, that when backed into a corner, and exposed, you shrink, and run away like a coward.

Most leftists do...
 
Hurray for Stalinist persecution!!!!!

:rolleyes:
Do all Trumptards use Trump's son's catchphrase? Like little parrots.
Stalinist?
Right out of the republican/Russian playbook.

Russian President Vladimir Putin invoked World War II to justify Russia's invasion of Ukraine, saying in televised remarks last week that his offensive aimed to "denazify" the country — whose democratically elected president is Jewish, and lost relatives in the Holocaust.
 
Thank you for making my point. As I said the moment you can't defend your argument you get aggressive. Oh and by the way. It's NOT technically within the scope of the law. Since Congress doesn't work with the same restrictions as the judiciary awards. But even within those restrictions, the Jan 6th committee is still within bounds.
Within bounds of what exactly? the ability to show themselves as triggered liars, and cowards?
 
  • Thanks
Reactions:Mac1958

Exactly, thanks for making my point loser.
 
No kidding. The Dems were fucked before this, but now they're REALLY fucked. They're losing ten thousand party members A DAY right now.

LOL

Thanks for keeping count, Sparky.
thumbsup.gif
 
Thank you for making my point. As I said the moment you can't defend your argument you get aggressive. Oh and by the way. It's NOT technically within the scope of the law. Since Congress doesn't work with the same restrictions as the judiciary awards. But even within those restrictions, the Jan 6th committee is still within bounds.

The Constitution is the law, dumbass. Congress can do whatever the Constitution says it can.

That still doesn't change the fact that what they're doing is un-American and highly unethical.

Lefties pride themselves on social and cultural change, I find it entirely amazing they not only can't grasp but DONT EVEN PERCEIVE this social dynamic. They're fucking themselves totally right now, they're bleeding voters, they've got 3/4 of the country madder than and lined up against them ...

It was a gigantic strategic blunder to open this can of worms in the first place. It's like airing dirty laundry, no good can come of it.
 
Do all Trumptards use Trump's son's catchphrase? Like little parrots.
Stalinist?
Right out of the republican/Russian playbook.

Russian President Vladimir Putin invoked World War II to justify Russia's invasion of Ukraine, saying in televised remarks last week that his offensive aimed to "denazify" the country — whose democratically elected president is Jewish, and lost relatives in the Holocaust.
So what?

George Soros is Jewish too, and he lost relatives in the Holocaust too.

(Probably turned them over himself). :p
 
You have yet to throw a strike, dumbass. Now go take a bath before I have Guido and Luigi escort you off the field

LOLOL

FFS :eusa_doh:

You're getting used like a condom on this site.
 
The Constitution is the law, dumbass. Congress can do whatever the Constitution says it can.

That still doesn't change the fact that what they're doing is un-American and highly unethical.

Lefties pride themselves on social and cultural change, I find it entirely amazing they not only can't grasp but DONT EVEN PERCEIVE this social dynamic. They're fucking themselves totally right now, they're bleeding voters, they've got 3/4 of the country madder than and lined up against them ...

It was a gigantic strategic blunder to open this can of worms in the first place. It's like airing dirty laundry, no good can come of it.
What you are trying to claim is that when investigating Jan 6th. The committee needs to work within restrictions that are more stringent than in a trial setting.

I'll put your argument in an analogy, and tell me if it sounds right? A teacher overhears 2 children talking that a friend of theirs is getting abused. She reports this to the police. According to your application of hearsay, the police can not act on this information because the teacher didn't hear it from the alleged victim. Would you support such thinking?
Would you consider it unethical to investigate?
 
Last edited:
The Constitution is the law, dumbass. Congress can do whatever the Constitution says it can.

That still doesn't change the fact that what they're doing is un-American and highly unethical.
WTF?
Investigating an attack on the capitol is unethical?
Lefties pride themselves on social and cultural change, I find it entirely amazing they not only can't grasp but DONT EVEN PERCEIVE this social dynamic. They're fucking themselves totally right now, they're bleeding voters, they've got 3/4 of the country madder than and lined up against them ...

It was a gigantic strategic blunder to open this can of worms in the first place. It's like airing dirty laundry, no good can come of it.
Of course.......................in Trumplandia.
Sorry to piss all over your rainbows and daisy's.
 
Within bounds of what exactly? the ability to show themselves as triggered liars, and cowards?
The bounds of what would be done in an actual judicial investigation, not a congressional one. Bounds that are more strict than they are in reality.
 
Yeah, republicans have a long history of criminality.
It's in their DNA.
Trump just brought it to the surface.

NO, American traitors do.
Interesting, so, to you, to hold political opinions that differ, or oppose yours should be a crime that your opponents are jailed for?
 
The bounds of what would be done in an actual judicial investigation, not a congressional one. Bounds that are more strict than they are in reality.
So, if this is to gather evidence of a crime, why is this panel in Congress doing it instead of the DoJ?

Tell me, Is it in the prevue of Congress to investigate crime?
 
So, if this is to gather evidence of a crime, why is this panel in Congress doing it instead of the DoJ?

Tell me, Is it in the prevue of Congress to investigate crime?
One doesn't exclude the other. Neither is your assessment of the situation accurate. Congress isn't investigating a crime as such. What they are investigating is exactly how and why Jan 6th happened, so they can, if need be take legislative steps to prevent it in the future. They have no power to prosecute a crime. They have a different role in what is not just a judicial but also a political issue.

What's happening is that the right is conflating the Jan 6th committee with a jury trial. While the comparison fails both in regard to being a direct analogy and in their understanding of what the actual judicial standards would be if the Jan 6th committee would actually fit in the judicial frame.
 

Forum List

Back
Top