Hurricanelover
Diamond Member
- Oct 4, 2021
- 3,538
- 4,131
- 1,938
The james webb better find another earth with oceans for what we're paying for it. 

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We've already found hycean planets -- | EarthSkyThe james webb better find another earth with oceans for what we're paying for it.![]()
And Science and Technologies in mostly all ways still expanded in that part of the world more than any other.You believe the Flat Earth was formed 6,000 years ago. 13. 8 million vs. 6,000 is quite a discrepancy.
Nope.Was all.this wasted money done under Biden? How coincidental.
That's not the JWST's job. It is looking at the most distant parts of the universe.. . . well. ..
If it spots a planet destroying comet in time for us to do something about it?
I say it might be worth the investment.
We can always build a nuclear powered spacecraft with constant acceleration. But even at a velocity near the speed of light, it would take four years to reach the nearest star.I dont have a problem with exploring space with unmanned spacecraft but we really need to find out how we can reach speeds that will make real space travel possible.
If we cant crack that nut we aren't going anywhere.
I guess the other option would be suspended animation. But we aren't any closer to that then we are to breaking the speed of light.
Are some of you people reading what you are posting? "Suspended animation" "Speed of light"
"unravelling the universe" it all sounds crazy. How does all that quackery improve our lives here on the Earth.?Many of you grown people need to get your heads examined! We can not exist in space or on any world where there is no water or oxygen.!!
Nah. It's all about curiosity.Exploring space is about protecting the Earth. And humanity.
About This Image
The bright star at the center of NGC 3132, while prominent when viewed by NASA’s Webb Telescope in near-infrared light, plays a supporting role in sculpting the surrounding nebula. A second star, barely visible at lower left along one of the bright star’s diffraction spikes, is the nebula’s source. It has ejected at least eight layers of gas and dust over thousands of years.
But the bright central star visible here has helped “stir” the pot, changing the shape of this planetary nebula’s highly intricate rings by creating turbulence. The pair of stars are locked in a tight orbit, which leads the dimmer star to spray ejected material in a range of directions as they orbit one another, resulting in these jagged rings.
Hundreds of straight, brightly-lit lines pierce through the rings of gas and dust. These “spotlights” emanate from the bright star and stream through holes in the nebula like sunlight through gaps in a cloud.
But not all of the starlight can escape. The density of the central region, set off in teal, is reflected by how transparent or opaque it is. Areas that are a deeper teal indicate that the gas and dust are denser – and light is unable to break free.
Hold on a second... How many trillions of dollars are wasted on religion, every year?I hear that the James Webb space telescope cost 10 billion dollars to make. When will this throwing money away on these space projects end.? We keeps spending money on these Mars rovers, exploring a dead planet, now we have just wasted 10 billion dollars on this James Webb telescope. People are still starving here on Earth, in Afghanistan, and Ethiopia. When will this wasting money in insignificant space exploration going to end? Your thoughts.
How much did we send to the Ukraine to fund a proxy war we have no business in? 50 billion-ish?Your thoughts.
Considering Biden has been in fed-gov for the vast majority of the last 50 years, and the telescope has been in development for about 30 years, I'd say he's as culpable as anyone else.Was all.this wasted money done under Biden? How coincidental.