James Comey Appears to Call For the Assassination of President Trump in Social Media Post – White House Responds

No it's not.
Just because you are ignorant of the fact that it is, doesn't mean it isn't.

To 86 someone definitely means to kill someone in the context of Comey being an infamous underworld figure saying it in the wake of a series of assassination attempts.
 
It’s way more than just “appearing” so. It’s a specific direction of what to do to a specified person
 
Just because you are ignorant of the fact that it is, doesn't mean it isn't.

To 86 someone definitely means to kill someone in the context of Comey being an infamous underworld figure saying it in the wake of a series of assassination attempts.
On another level. Comey should be in jail for being too stupid to exist. It’s remarkable watching the left defend him.
 
Everyone disregarding this are also the same people who would be up in arms had it been said about Kamala during the elections. If you're willing to excuse this, then no, you are not a good person and your opinion on things really don't matter. You have proven to be party over politics and you don't care about anyone outside your own cult.
 
It was a photo of a pickup truck with a decal of Biden tied-up.
Nothing like this
1747429674465.webp
 
It was a photo of a pickup truck with a decal of Biden tied-up.
Nothing like this

Yes. A decal of Biden tied up is clearly a call for violent acts to be committed against Biden.

But it’s okay when Trump threatens the sitting president seeing as how you’ve made it abundantly clear he can’t be prosecuted for anything otherwise it would be considered “political persecution”.
 
Yes. A decal of Biden tied up is clearly a call for violent acts to be committed against Biden.

But it’s okay when Trump threatens the sitting president seeing as how you’ve made it abundantly clear he can’t be prosecuted for anything otherwise it would be considered “political persecution”.
No. A decal that you have not shown was posted by Trump.
 
Yes. A decal of Biden tied up is clearly a call for violent acts to be committed against Biden.

But it’s okay when Trump threatens the sitting president seeing as how you’ve made it abundantly clear he can’t be prosecuted for anything otherwise it would be considered “political persecution”.
What threat? You’re getting hysterical.
 
The term 86 someone has more than one meaning depending on the intent one is mean to have someone killed.
What does "86" mean? White House reacts to James Comey's post
I’m not saying this was Comey’s intent but the man was in law enforcement and director of the FBI. and even he is not stupid enough to not know that or how that was going to look.
 
The legacy media tries, while the MAGA has no morals and will say anything.
Please stop with the moral superiority bullshit. You think it’s moral for a media outlet to use false information to influence a Presidential Election? See CBS and ABC.
 
~~~~~~


xxxxxxxxxx


Who are you going to blame when it never happens?

There’s a million reasons why this would be impossible to successfully prosecute. It’s just silliness. You’re making yourself look foolish.
 
86 doesn't mean murder dumb ass.
If something was done like this by the head of the fbi during Obama's or Biden's terms. They would be in prison. So Comey needs to go, and spend the majority of his life in jail. You cannot deny that.
 
Who are you going to blame when it never happens?

There’s a million reasons why this would be impossible to successfully prosecute. It’s just silliness. You’re making yourself look foolish.
You are making yourself look very panicked
 
Actually the question is whether Comey intended for it to be a threat.

To add another layer, he didn’t even say it, but merely noticed someone else had done so.
No, it is not.

When the authorities come knocking on their door and say, "Did you mean that shit?" Their answer is always going to be no.

It is a crime where you intended for it to be a threat or not.

James Comey, as an ex head of the FBI would immediately take it as a threat and investigate or arrest the offender.

He knew EXACTLY what he was saying.
 
No, it is not.

When the authorities come knocking on their door and say, "Did you mean that shit?" Their answer is always going to be no.

It is a crime where you intended for it to be a threat or not.

James Comey, as an ex head of the FBI would immediately take it as a threat and investigate or arrest the offender.

He knew EXACTLY what he was saying.

SCOTUS disagrees with you and you’re basically contradicting yourself.

You make a big deal to try and point out that Comey “knew” it was a threat, which makes sense because for it to be a crime, he has to mean it.

But earlier you say it doesn’t matter if he means it.

SCOTUS established the precedent in Watts v United States that it had to be a “true threat” which means he has to have meant it as a threat.

Lots of people have said to “86” someone, including right wing agitator Jake Prosobeic who tweeted “86 46”. You can buy merchandise that says 86 46. No one ever went batshit crazy like you weirdos.
 
Back
Top Bottom