Jack Smith’s days outside of jail may be numbered.😎

Lose your argument and change the topic....

Mikey does Mikey.
I understand if you can't answe the question Delldud.
Let me ask you this....why are you more concerned with the legal hair splitting on Jack Smith's appointment than you are with the mountain of evidence Smith uncovered of Donald Trump's crimes?
Maybe a bit of bait and switch distraction so you don't have to talk about the REAL thing?
 
I understand if you can't answe the question Delldud.
Your article is a hypothetical discussion. No court issued opinion.

Let me ask you this....why are you more concerned with the legal hair splitting on Jack Smith's appointment than you are with the mountain of evidence Smith uncovered of Donald Trump's crimes?
Your boy withdrew from the case.

The mountain of evidence was never adjudicated.............. :206:
 
Oh. So now you are an election denier 🙄
Popular Vote by Millions
Massive Electoral vote win
Senate swung for President Trump and Republicans
Congress swung for President Trump and Republicans.
All Swing States
Over 85% of counties swung for President Trump and Republicans.
312>226 FACT 😆
But. But. But. It wasn’t a wipeout
 
I understand if you can't answe the question Delldud.
Let me ask you this....why are you more concerned with the legal hair splitting on Jack Smith's appointment than you are with the mountain of evidence Smith uncovered of Donald Trump's crimes?
Maybe a bit of bait and switch distraction so you don't have to talk about the REAL thing?
He crated crimes and never uncovered one
 
The statute of limitation change was not on a whim or made up by the prosecutor, the statute of limitation extension was WRITTEN IN TO the law the prosecutor charged Trump with breaking,

and written in to the law ....it gave criteria as to when this law's statute of limitation could be extended for a longer time period.

They could not just change it...easy peasy 123.
Yes it was, illegal to prosecute Trump
 
Not at all true. In fact just the opposite.
Isn't he the same Jack Smith who was caught tampering with evidence?

Special counsel Jack Smith’s team acknowledged Friday that some evidence in the prosecution of former President Donald Trump for hoarding classified documents at his Florida home may not be in the same sequence FBI agents found it when they swept into the Mar-a-Lago compound with a search warrant in August 2022.

The concession from prosecutors in a court filing Friday afternoon came after attorneys for one of Trump’s co-defendants asked for a delay in the case because the defense lawyers were having trouble determining precisely where particular documents had come from in the 33 boxes the FBI seized almost two years ago.


So the evidence still stands.
Not at all.

WASHINGTON — Special counsel Jack Smith on Monday filed motions to drop all federal charges against President-elect Donald Trump regarding his mishandling of classified documents and his effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election in the lead-up to the deadly Jan. 6 attack on the U.S Capitol.


Mike, Mike....duck....duck

tumblr_px6xt5WAnC1qe8lb8o1_400.gif
 
The statute of limitation change was not on a whim or made up by the prosecutor, the statute of limitation extension was WRITTEN IN TO the law the prosecutor charged Trump with breaking,

and written in to the law ....it gave criteria as to when this law's statute of limitation could be extended for a longer time period.

They could not just change it...easy peasy 123.
You lack common sense as well as any understanding of law
 
You are correct. Score yourself a win.
After Aileen Cannon was overruled in calling it unconstitutional it hasn't gone anywhere on appeal. So the official legal standing thus far is that Smith's appointment was constitutional. Typical MAGAt Delldud......even when you "win" you lose. :auiqs.jpg:

👍🏼 The Trump haters are so eager to believe their own falsehoods
 
Back
Top Bottom