Ivermectin works for Covid and Per reviewed study from Peru proves it

If people were self medicating they were not doing so with a doctors approval.
The sanction was because most did not know the dose. The dose is given in two places in this thread. They can no longer fear-monger the dose, but the sanction will remain in place. That is the nazism of it.
 
The sanction was because most did not know the dose. The dose is given in two places in this thread. They can no longer fear-monger the dose, but the sanction will remain in place. That is the nazism of it.
A doctor shouldn't have any trouble finding dosing amounts.

They have no power to sanction.
 
A doctor shouldn't have any trouble finding dosing amounts.

They have no power to sanction.
The sanction was a trickle-down effect that no doctor could do or say much, lest they risked losing their license. Nazism.
 
The sanction was a trickle-down effect that no doctor could do or say much, lest they risked losing their license. Nazism.

The three doctors said their reputations were harmed by the FDA campaign because they promoted ivermectin use. One doctor was suspended from a hospital, while another was fired from a medical school.

“This case has broad implications for protecting the practice of medicine from unlawful interference by the FDA,” the doctors’ attorney Jared Kelson said in a statement. “It’s about ensuring that federal agencies act only within their statutory authority. The FDA crossed a bright line here.”


Federal appeals court revives lawsuit against FDA over COVID-19 ivermectin messaging
 
The three doctors said their reputations were harmed by the FDA campaign because they promoted ivermectin use. One doctor was suspended from a hospital, while another was fired from a medical school.

“This case has broad implications for protecting the practice of medicine from unlawful interference by the FDA,” the doctors’ attorney Jared Kelson said in a statement. “It’s about ensuring that federal agencies act only within their statutory authority. The FDA crossed a bright line here.”


Federal appeals court revives lawsuit against FDA over COVID-19 ivermectin messaging
This Federal Appeals Court report says that the WHO recommends against ivermectin use Since when?

Pre-exposure prophylaxis is the main reason the nazis reacted.

'By the summer of 2020, front-line physicians had discovered another COVID remedy that equalled HCQ in its staggering, life-saving efficacy. Five years earlier, two Merck scientists won the Nobel Prize for developing ivermectin (IVM), a drug with unprecedented firepower against a wide range of human parasites, including roundworm, hookworm, river blindness, and lymphatic filariasis.

That salute was the Nobel Committee's only award to an infectious disease medication in 60 years. FDA approved IVM as safe and effective for human use in 1996. WHO includes IVM (along with HCQ) on its inventory of "essential medicines" -- its list of remedies so necessary, safe, efficacious, and affordable that WHO deems easy access to them as essential "to satisfy the priority health care needs of the population." WHO has recommended administering ivermectin to entire populations to treat people who might have parasitic infections -- meaning they consider it safe enough to give to people who haven't even been diagnosed.'
(RFK Jr., The Real Anthony Fauci, p.37)

Who bought off the WHO? The nazis.
 
Who bought off the WHO? The nazis.
images
 
'Reflecting on that time, Professor Petrovsky believes that bias in the media played a significant role in shaping the public narrative. "It was very clear the left-wing media were only willing to tell one side of the story, and that included Australia's public broadcaster, the ABC, who were only repeating whatever propaganda China was putting out on this issue," he says. "It was maddening to hear the ABC report time and time again that scientists agreed that this virus could only come from a natural animal source.

It was very clear that the issue was heavily politicised and the left-leaning media saw this as a great opportunity to beat up Trump and label him as an idiot for suggesting this virus might have resulted from a lab leak. People think of publicly funded media organisations like ABC as the ultimate truth tellers, but my experience during that time is that this couldn't be further from the truth, whether they were reporting on the origins of the virus or discussing vaccine policy and what were the most promising vaccines out there.
....Professor Muller: "Any suggestion it was from a laboratory engaging in biological warfare was seen as supporting Trump in the election, and this was sufficient to call it a fringe theory or conspiracy theory."'
(Sharri Markson, What Really Happened in Wuhan, p. 176)
 
Big Farmer Gates controls the WHO and is a Xi ally. Xi controls the current absurdity in the White House, whose son has probably tried Chinese fentanyl if not helped disseminate it.
If you remember, Xi made a huge donation to WHO at the beginning of the pandemic.....nothing but praise from Dr.Tedrous.
 
If you remember, Xi made a huge donation to WHO at the beginning of the pandemic.....nothing but praise from Dr.Tedrous.
Yes, this pathological chron is in need of synchrony. Which came first after Obama-Biden's Scientific Advisor, Holdren, suggested to the government the lifting the GoF ban? Xi's bribe to the WHO? Navarro's suggestion to close the border?
 
That Xi has nazi tendencies by bribing the WHO is not far-fetched. That there are German underpinnings to Asian thought, an example beking the Goethe Reading Room in Pyongyang.

Hitler reneged on the non-aggression pact between Germany and Poland, and China reneged on the international pact that was to last 50 years, at timepoint 23 years.

Xi Jinping's China and Hitler's Germany: Growing Parallels
 
We are working to sync the chron. Pottinger was apparently the first to suggest the travel ban.

Navarro meets The Elf
'....a Deputies Committee meeting....Tuesday 28 Jan 2020....Pottinger passed on the information he had gleaned and reminded those gathered about China's cover-up during the SARS epidemic in 2003.....He raised the idea of shutting down travel from China but no one supported this suggestion, dismissing it as absurd.

The public health officials said a travel ban from China would be counterproductive, arguing it would stop the flow of medical equipment, create hysteria and inspire covert travel that would lead to disease spread.

One senior figure responded, "You've got the world's leading infectious disease expert sitting next to you who says it isn't a problem, that we don't need to stop flights from China. Why should we believe you over Fauci?"

The same day that Pottinger told the health officials to ban travel from China, the WHO's Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus met with Xi Jinping for the first time since the outbreak.
....
Navarro had a bolshier and more direct approach than Pottinger. He waltzed straight into the Oval Office and spoke to Trump about banning travel from China. (Trump) told Navarro to go make the case to the Coronavirus Task Force. He did that on Wednesday January 29.
....
Navarro sat down at the table with Fauci opposite him. He had never met Fauci before. Truth be told, he didn't even know who he was when he sat across from him. Their first meeting did not go well. "My first impression of him was an arrogant, smug airhead. Very full of himself. He spoke with such authority but was like, "You don't know what you're talking about, dude," Navarro says.'
(Markson, op cit. pp. 67-70)
 

Forum List

Back
Top