Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And no matter what the accused is alleged to have done, things have to be done the right way. Or else you get people released on "technicalities". See Weinstein getting one conviction overturned due to improper conduct. No matter the allegation, there is no excuse to break rules.That's not so much the lawyer's fault. Depending on the technicality, the only person to blame is the person responsible for the technicality.
Cops need proper support, and if they are doing their jobs without support from the justice system, then you're going to get a lot of people who deserve to behind bars getting let out due to technicalities. And this deal about selective-prosecutions needs to stop.
Justice isn't justice if it's preordained.
In the end, that’s really all you’re going to have. Trump fucked Stormy and claims to have morals. Enjoy your consolation prize.Well, if that makes you feel better.
I bet you think he didn't really fuck Stormy, either.
Technicalities are in the law books to prevent malfeasance by prosecutors and law enforcement.And no matter what the accused is alleged to have done, things have to be done the right way. Or else you get people released on "technicalities". See Weinstein getting one conviction overturned due to improper conduct. No matter the allegation, there is no excuse to break rules.
In the end, that’s really all you’re going to have. Trump fucked Stormy and claims to have morals. Enjoy your consolation prize.
Technicalities are in the law books to prevent malfeasance by prosecutors and law enforcement.
It's supposed to be difficult to throw someone in prison.
If it was easy then Democrats would be arresting every Republican in America.
What I think is contemptible is a judge that starts screaming at a witness for the Defense who rolled his eyes at him when he says something stupid.And falsified business records to defraud election accountability.
Which is why he will be found guilty.
We send millions of people to prison, most of them for non-violent offenses.
Dershowitz defends murderers and child abusers, finding technicalities to get them off. That's why he's contemptable.
That old bastard can't die soon enough
We are no better than China and Russia or perhaps beneath them, at least we were better back in the days. These days, government approved assassination of citizens, manufacturing fake crimes, psy-ops, evidence planting, truth commission, etc.
What I think is contemptible is a judge that starts screaming at a witness for the Defense who rolled his eyes at him when he says something stupid.
Where the fuck have you been, Islamophobic Twat?It's not even my country anymore. I don't know what it is. Not America.
I no longer care
I'll tell you what. Go ahead and break the law, and find out for yourself.Tell you what, next time you are in court, you try rolling your eyes, muttering shit, and talking back to the judge, and let me know what happens.
I'll tell you what. Go ahead and break the law, and find out for yourself.
I can tell from my own time as a member of a jury that if a judge started acting the way this judge was acting, people would be doing much more than rolling their eyes.
And if they had televised this trial, America would be really pissed off about what was going on in that courtroom.
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!Unlike Trump, I obey the law. The few times I've been in court (nothing more serious than a traffic violation) I've been respectful of the court and got treated fairly.
I think they'd be more upset about Trump sleeping in court and acting disrespectfully. I think they'd be more horrified by the conduct of Trump's lawyers with the slut-shaming.
And falsified business records to defraud election accountability.
Do they? Most people think Trump broke the law.Most Americans realize how unfair this trial is.
And when it comes to slut-shaming, Stormy Daniels didn't have to bring up unrelated issues to the root charges in the indictment in an attempt to inflame the jury against the defendant.
Stormy Daniels didn't have to bring up unrelated issues to the root charges in the indictment in an attempt to inflame the jury against the defendant. She didn't have to bring up old sex stories in court that had no bearing on the case. It's clear the judge allowed this because he's prejudiced against Trump. Fact is Stormy Daniels has almost no bearing on the charges contained in the indictment. Who she fucked isn't the issue, moron. The trial is over documents and how they were filed in accordance with the law.
Nobody believes that they made 34 "mistakes" in filing these.Or potentially incorrectly accounted business records to keep Stormy quiet. Well known people and companies use NDAs daily to keep away from bad publicity. Trump was well know well prior to his run for president. It stands to reason that he would want to keep Stormy quiet for reasons not related to his campaign, which is perfectly legal. He paid her with his own money, just in the form of a legal expense. Slap on the wrist and move on.
Because that's what defense attorneys do. Democrats want a judicial system that doesn't allow a defense at all. The prosecution puts on their case and that's it.I'm sorry, OJ, Claus and Epstein were all awful people who avoided the consequences of their actions because shyster lawyers like Dershowitz manipulate the law to subvert justice.
Why do you think this is a good thing?
