Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Wrong. Unlike you, I know something about the law. You don’t. That’s why you ignorantly deny that “fraud” (both civil and criminal) absolutely do require victims.No, you did not understand it or you would not be making the victim argument.
See the top of page 8 of the summary judgement.
It's gibberish to you because it is longer than a tweet.
Wrong again.
Read the summary judgement.
See posts 39 and 40.Wrong. Unlike you, I know something about the law. You don’t. That’s why you ignorantly deny that “fraud” (both civil and criminal) absolutely do require victims.
I’m sorry that your ignorance can’t be cured.
That is absurd. And circular. Disgorgement requires fraudulent conduct. But there is no such thing as “fraud” (civilly or criminally) without a “victim.”This is the precedent which establish no victim is necessary to prosecute for fraud: People v. Ernst & Young LLP, 980 N.Y.S.2d 456 | Casetext Search + Citator
However, where, as here, there is a claim based on fraudulent activity, disgorgement may be available as an equitable remedy, notwithstanding the absence of loss to individuals or independent claims for restitution ( see Applied Card Sys., 11 N.Y.3d at 125–126, 863 N.Y.S.2d 615, 894 N.E.2d 1). Disgorgement is distinct from the remedy of restitution because it focuses on the gain to the wrongdoer as opposed to the loss to the victim ( id. at 125, 863 N.Y.S.2d 615, 894 N.E.2d 1). Thus, disgorgement aims to deter wrongdoing by preventing the wrongdoer from retaining ill-gotten gains from fraudulent conduct.
I’m not the one in need of getting caught up. Sadly, you are impervious to getting educated despite your urgent need for it.See posts 39 and 40.
I hope this FINALLY catches you up.
Ivanka Trump takes the stand today to testify about her part in securing loans for daddy from Deutsche Bank using fraudulent financial statements.
After US banks no longer wanted to deal with Crooked Donald, he had to go to the known money-laundering Deutsche Bank.
The Trump boys were shouting that daddy never defaulted on any of his loans, which is a lie. Crooked Donald defaulted on $640 million of loans from Deutsche, yet they kept loaning him money. That's very suspicious considering they are a bank known for money-laundering for Russian oligarchs.
Also, what's up with Ivanka's face? It looks bizarre. Something is wrong with her cheeks and chin. Botox? Surgery? Something.
Ivanka Trump testifies about her connection to the Deutsche Bank loans for multiple Trump properties
I’m not the one in need of getting caught up. Sadly, you are impervious to getting educated despite your urgent need for it.
This isn't the trial, Shitty Lawyer. The trial is over and the judge ruled GUILTY, partly based on these fraudulent financial statements.Ok …
Wrong. Using allegedly fraudulent financial statements.
One little accurate adjective changes the meaning of your otherwise dishonest claim.
You either didn't read it and are lying, or you have a serious bias filter which prevents you from comprehending it.
Why do you persist in your ignorance? This stubborn adherence to a delusion is the hallmark of Trump's submissive cucks.I’m not the one in need of getting caught up. Sadly, you are impervious to getting educated despite your urgent need for it.
Ivanka Trump takes the stand today to testify about her part in securing loans for daddy from Deutsche Bank using fraudulent financial statements.
After US banks no longer wanted to deal with Crooked Donald, he had to go to the known money-laundering Deutsche Bank.
The Trump boys were shouting that daddy never defaulted on any of his loans, which is a lie. Crooked Donald defaulted on $640 million of loans from Deutsche, yet they kept loaning him money. That's very suspicious considering they are a bank known for money-laundering for Russian oligarchs.
Also, what's up with Ivanka's face? It looks bizarre. Something is wrong with her cheeks and chin. Botox? Surgery? Something.
Ivanka Trump testifies about her connection to the Deutsche Bank loans for multiple Trump properties
That one went so high over his or her head in left field, you just hit another homer.Ok …
Wrong. Using allegedly fraudulent financial statements.
One little accurate adjective changes the meaning of your otherwise dishonest claim.
Way to go!
Ivanka Trump takes the stand today to testify about her part in securing loans for daddy from Deutsche Bank using fraudulent financial statements.
After US banks no longer wanted to deal with Crooked Donald, he had to go to the known money-laundering Deutsche Bank.
The Trump boys were shouting that daddy never defaulted on any of his loans, which is a lie. Crooked Donald defaulted on $640 million of loans from Deutsche, yet they kept loaning him money. That's very suspicious considering they are a bank known for money-laundering for Russian oligarchs.
Also, what's up with Ivanka's face? It looks bizarre. Something is wrong with her cheeks and chin. Botox? Surgery? Something.
Ivanka Trump testifies about her connection to the Deutsche Bank loans for multiple Trump properties
So the Democrat is framing a witness before she testifies. Are they sending the DOJ another "hint" about Soros- and Silicone Valley-funded prizes?Ivanka Trump Greeted By Chants Of ‘Crime Family’ As She Enters Courthouse
Good. She is a member of the Trump Crime Family!
Gfy.So go offer your legal services pro bono Perry Mason.
You poor thing. I guess your propagandists have neglected to tell you Trump has already been found culpable. This trial is to determine how big his fine will be and whether or not he gets to continue to operate any businesses in Florida.That one went so high over his or her head in left field, you just hit another homer.
Well, you can thrash around on the floor and scream til you're blue, but reality is much different from your persistent ignorance.Gfy.
I’m posting on a message board.
I realize truth and actual facts offend you.
But, frankly, your widdle feelings mean nothing.
The fact is, fraud always requires a victim. In NY AG’s suit against Trump, there are none. Ergo, you shithead, there is no fraud.
The judge is a hack and his determinations are destined to be reversed on appeal.
You don’t like that? Tough shit.
Why do you persist in your ignorance? This stubborn adherence to a delusion is the hallmark of Trump's submissive cucks.
Wrong, again, failed human. As you always are.This isn't the trial, Shitty Lawyer. The trial is over and the judge ruled GUILTY, partly based on these fraudulent financial statements.
This is just determining the punishment.
I am trying to lead you out of your ignorance. The real question is why you’re so adamant in remaining so ignorant.Why do you persist in your ignorance? This stubborn adherence to a delusion is the hallmark of Trump's submissive cucks.
