Billo_Really
Litre of the Band
I already proved it, go troll somewhere else, you fuckin' pussy!Nope
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I already proved it, go troll somewhere else, you fuckin' pussy!Nope
Ya know what, fuck you!
The Dossier was started by a Republican.
![]()
Steele dossier began as Republican project
Two letters in Tuesday's Dispatch referred to the infamous Steele dossier. Both Steve Crane and Tom Broyles cast suspicion on the dossier: Crane by charging that the Democrats bought it from Russia (…www.dispatch.com
Did I say fuck you? I mean to say it again.. FUCK YOU! YOU DON'T OWN LIBS!
I already proved it, go troll somewhere else, you fuckin' pussy!
Ya know what, fuck you!
The Dossier was started by a Republican.
![]()
Steele dossier began as Republican project
Two letters in Tuesday's Dispatch referred to the infamous Steele dossier. Both Steve Crane and Tom Broyles cast suspicion on the dossier: Crane by charging that the Democrats bought it from Russia (…www.dispatch.com
Did I say fuck you? I mean to say it again.. FUCK YOU! YOU DON'T OWN LIBS!
Prove it, asshole!Fuck You.
The Republican was doing opposition research as all politicians do.
That stopped when Candidate Trump became the nominee.
Fresh start -
Dossier born from the mind of Hiliary Clinton.
So you are admitting your argument is a total failure.also fuck you.
Trump isn't guilty of anything except beating Hillary. You know it's true so cease with the charade.Please point out the specific law you are referencing, and explain what bearing a previous case for a different person has any bearing on trump's case.
This isn't about me! And we both know why you are jumping through hoops to make it about me, because you have no valid argument!All of this is simply so beyond your level of intellectual ability that if it wasn't fun to mock you, I would just pity you.
So you are admitting your argument is a total failure.
Yes. Which cleared her, dope.well not now there was one
Oh, I can comprehend a lot. Especially, after 3 big ass beers!As I stated, way above your ability to comprehend.
Oh, I can comprehend a lot. Especially, after 3 big ass beers!
Why thank you! I always did consider myself ambidextrous.I have no doubt that you are as lucid sloshing drunk as you are sober.
Do you want a medal or a chest to pin it on?I provided the link.
yes, and that's why it's relevant to this case....in her case, which was far more damning...that's the pointYes. Which cleared her, dope.
Just an acknowledgement will suffice.Do you want a medal or a chest to pin it on?
There is zero relevance.Of course Clinton's case and others are relevant and certainly something the defense can bring up to the jury to highlight, specially with Clinton, how according to the DOJ, no reasonable prosecutor would have brought the case.
Just an acknowledgement will suffice.
WTF was debunked? Are you saying the meeting at Trump Tower didn't occur? That a Republican didn't start the Dossier? That Carter Page did not spend 2 years in Russia?
So WTF was debunked. Be specific.
sure there is...it's certainly relevant for the jury to hear how a case where someone had an illegal server, with classified material, hidden for years, and where her own lawyers were allowed to review and determine what to turn over, and where she and her staff bleached the server, and destroyed evidence, did not meet the standard to charge, how a case far less damning could be guilty.There is zero relevance.