Its time...

[candycorn]

Nope, we want to know who's doing what and why.

If we give the Gubmint the right to slice this or that from the reporting they'll bastardize that.

That nonsense they pulled with redacting portions of the Orlando tapes was already going too far and is actually a perfect example of why not.

If you still trust the gatekeepers you're just blind.

They hate the police and they are mentally ill. Gatekeepers? Another tin foil hate moron

Riiight, because the people that control the message aren't exactly that.

If you trust the government to just tell us what they'd like you're a complete idiot.

Watch out for dem black helicopters there....they're everywhere!!!

My, your point is so amazingly awful you've set a record for going completely off the path of actually trying to make one.

Page 2 and your already in 'fuck you' and utter blather territory.

First amendment, dummy. Freedom of the press is covered under it. Go to bed.

Freedom not to devulge the name of the terrorist on their airwaves is part of that. Freedom means doing something or choosing not to do something.

As for telling someone "fuck you", freedom of speech. Feel free to fuck off yourself.

 

[candycorn]

Its time that the executives that own news papers, television, radio, etc... to all come together with some policies concerning rampage shootings:

Just as the number of streakers and exhibitionists dropped off once television stopped showing them at sporting events and the like, I feel the number of attention seeking copy cats will be reduced if the execs got together and pledged not to show their face for a set period of time (if ever), when they do show the face, just show what amounts to a mug shot. Read none of their messages on the air or print none of their messages in the newspaper. If there is a greater threat from a confirmed ISIS member (confirmed by the FBI, or whomever) report that they were a member of ISIS and perhaps part of their diatribe alluding to other attacks if necessary.

Cut off any publicity their group is trying to achieve, cut off them "getting their message out". It may not eliminate all shootings but if it stops one ambush or rampage, it is worth it.

I don't know about you but I didn't care about this motherfucker before today and I care less about him or his views now.

No...you and your buddies shouldnt be able to run under the radar.
You need to be exposed for what you are...terrorist.

He was probably a member of the NRA. Does that make him your buddy? He was a former member of the military which probably means he's a repubican. Another sign he was your buddy. Did you jack him off last night?

Now don't trip your ass up and let it over ride your tiny little brain, you told us blacks do not like Republicans they are democrats. Sorry twit. Keep your stories straight.

WOuld love to see the quote where I said that. Put down your crack pipe.

 

[WillowTree]

Nope, we want to know who's doing what and why.

If we give the Gubmint the right to slice this or that from the reporting they'll bastardize that.

That nonsense they pulled with redacting portions of the Orlando tapes was already going too far and is actually a perfect example of why not.

If you still trust the gatekeepers you're just blind.

They hate the police and they are mentally ill. Gatekeepers? Another tin foil hate moron

Riiight, because the people that control the message aren't exactly that.

If you trust the government to just tell us what they'd like you're a complete idiot.

Watch out for dem black helicopters there....they're everywhere!!!

My, your point is so amazingly awful you've set a record for going completely off the path of actually trying to make one.

Page 2 and your already in 'fuck you' and utter blather territory.

First amendment, dummy. Freedom of the press is covered under it. Go to bed.

Freedom not to devulge the name of the terrorist on their airwaves is part of that. Freedom means doing something or choosing not to do something.

As for telling someone "fuck you", freedom of speech. Feel free to fuck off yourself.

The press will not allow you to hide yer little black terrorists. Deal with it.

 

[candycorn]

Why? does the actions of black democrats committing murder embarrass you? I bet you want to know every name and badge number of the cops you think " shot unarmed black males with their hands up don't shoot". AmIRight?

Not as much as you embarrass humanity.

A). nutjobs who murder police officers deserve no publicity
B). your divisive hate speech is exactly what some of them likely want

They are all members of the party of thugs. You own them.

We'll thanks to Abe Lincoln, nobody can "own" anyone any longer. I know you pine for the old days when you could buy some servants but they're gone and not coming back.

 

[WillowTree]

Why? does the actions of black democrats committing murder embarrass you? I bet you want to know every name and badge number of the cops you think " shot unarmed black males with their hands up don't shoot". AmIRight?

Not as much as you embarrass humanity.

A). nutjobs who murder police officers deserve no publicity
B). your divisive hate speech is exactly what some of them likely want

They are all members of the party of thugs. You own them.

We'll thanks to Abe Lincoln, nobody can "own" anyone any longer. I know you pine for the old days when you could buy some servants but they're gone and not coming back.

Getting desperate huh?

 

[Ridgerunner]

Thanks but no thanks... It has been tried and it was called "Pravda".

 

[Disir]

So, if we all just it all goes away.

I wish life worked that way.

 

[Fueri]

Nope, we want to know who's doing what and why.

If we give the Gubmint the right to slice this or that from the reporting they'll bastardize that.

That nonsense they pulled with redacting portions of the Orlando tapes was already going too far and is actually a perfect example of why not.

If you still trust the gatekeepers you're just blind.

They hate the police and they are mentally ill. Gatekeepers? Another tin foil hate moron

Riiight, because the people that control the message aren't exactly that.

If you trust the government to just tell us what they'd like you're a complete idiot.

Watch out for dem black helicopters there....they're everywhere!!!

My, your point is so amazingly awful you've set a record for going completely off the path of actually trying to make one.

Page 2 and your already in 'fuck you' and utter blather territory.

First amendment, dummy. Freedom of the press is covered under it. Go to bed.

Freedom not to devulge the name of the terrorist on their airwaves is part of that. Freedom means doing something or choosing not to do something.

As for telling someone "fuck you", freedom of speech. Feel free to fuck off yourself.

So asking the press not to report something is an exercise of freedom of the press.

My, you is a smart one.

 

[WillowTree]

She would WANT it reported if the shooter was white.

 

[candycorn]

They hate the police and they are mentally ill. Gatekeepers? Another tin foil hate moron

Riiight, because the people that control the message aren't exactly that.

If you trust the government to just tell us what they'd like you're a complete idiot.

Watch out for dem black helicopters there....they're everywhere!!!

My, your point is so amazingly awful you've set a record for going completely off the path of actually trying to make one.

Page 2 and your already in 'fuck you' and utter blather territory.

First amendment, dummy. Freedom of the press is covered under it. Go to bed.

Freedom not to devulge the name of the terrorist on their airwaves is part of that. Freedom means doing something or choosing not to do something.

As for telling someone "fuck you", freedom of speech. Feel free to fuck off yourself.

So asking the press not to report something is an exercise of freedom of the press.

My, you is a smart one.

Smart enough to know what I wrote; the press barons agreeing not to highlight pieces of shit that murder cops or print their manifestos unless there is something in it about credible intel on future attacks.

Nobody is asking the Press to not report something...just to put the greater good ahead of "being first" with the news.

For an example, 12 hours ago, only this guy's dandruff knew who he was. Today, you guys (with the help of the media) have highlighted the guy way beyond his importance as a human being.

 

[candycorn]

She would WANT it reported if the shooter was white.

Not true. But don't let truth interrupt your delusions.

 

[WillowTree]

She would WANT it reported if the shooter was white.

Not true. But don't let truth interrupt your delusions.

Except the truth is not delusional. If this had been a white shooter you libtards would be all immersed in it, just like you tried to stash this black guy into the Republican Party. Nope! He is yours

 

[candycorn]

So, if we all just it all goes away.

I wish life worked that way.

No Dr...

The incentive to "go out in a blaze of glory" goes away if you take away the glory. As I illustrated, the guys out in Florence Colorado...at Supermax...do you know who they are by and large? Or the guys at Gitmo? I don't know where you live but I'll give a generic example...the guy in your community that murdered his wife in that lover's triangle on the other side of town?

The glory is gone from all of these characters and you don't see people pulling off copycat attacks. Have we had another group of people doing the same type of sniping the pair pulled off in DC? We did in phoenix here but it wasn't based on their actions--it was another fruit cake. Tim McVeigh's accomplice sits in his cell for 23 hours a day and influences nobody. As does the shoe bomber who tried to light his shoes on fire, the idiot who tried to do the same with his underware...

It won't make it go away but a lot of the incentive will be gone if the manifesto is embargoed and not printed in every newspaper in the nation and you stop the 24/7 repeating of the name.

 

[candycorn]

She would WANT it reported if the shooter was white.

Not true. But don't let truth interrupt your delusions.

Except the truth is not delusional. If this had been a white shooter you libtards would be all immersed in it, just like you tried to stash this black guy into the Republican Party. Nope! He is yours

Well, believe what you want regardless of facts. I don't recall saying that we should just report when white folks shoot people.

As for saying he was a republican...hey he was in the military and a gun owner. Sounds like a republicunt to me.

 

[Fueri]

Riiight, because the people that control the message aren't exactly that.

If you trust the government to just tell us what they'd like you're a complete idiot.

Watch out for dem black helicopters there....they're everywhere!!!

My, your point is so amazingly awful you've set a record for going completely off the path of actually trying to make one.

Page 2 and your already in 'fuck you' and utter blather territory.

First amendment, dummy. Freedom of the press is covered under it. Go to bed.

Freedom not to devulge the name of the terrorist on their airwaves is part of that. Freedom means doing something or choosing not to do something.

As for telling someone "fuck you", freedom of speech. Feel free to fuck off yourself.

So asking the press not to report something is an exercise of freedom of the press.

My, you is a smart one.

Smart enough to know what I wrote; the press barons agreeing not to highlight pieces of shit that murder cops or print their manifestos unless there is something in it about credible intel on future attacks.

Nobody is asking the Press to not report something...just to put the greater good ahead of "being first" with the news.

For an example, 12 hours ago, only this guy's dandruff knew who he was. Today, you guys (with the help of the media) have highlighted the guy way beyond his importance as a human being.

The barons? What about the smaller outlets? Foreign outlets?

Putting aside the silly notion that it would actually be a good thing for the press to be, ahem, 'guided' in some way, which it is not, no for-profit news agency is going to let the others report this while they sit on information that's going to come out anyway.

 

[candycorn]

Watch out for dem black helicopters there....they're everywhere!!!

My, your point is so amazingly awful you've set a record for going completely off the path of actually trying to make one.

Page 2 and your already in 'fuck you' and utter blather territory.

First amendment, dummy. Freedom of the press is covered under it. Go to bed.

Freedom not to devulge the name of the terrorist on their airwaves is part of that. Freedom means doing something or choosing not to do something.

As for telling someone "fuck you", freedom of speech. Feel free to fuck off yourself.

So asking the press not to report something is an exercise of freedom of the press.

My, you is a smart one.

Smart enough to know what I wrote; the press barons agreeing not to highlight pieces of shit that murder cops or print their manifestos unless there is something in it about credible intel on future attacks.

Nobody is asking the Press to not report something...just to put the greater good ahead of "being first" with the news.

For an example, 12 hours ago, only this guy's dandruff knew who he was. Today, you guys (with the help of the media) have highlighted the guy way beyond his importance as a human being.

The barons? What about the smaller outlets? Foreign outlets?

Putting aside the silly notion that it would actually be a good thing for the press to be, ahem, 'guided' in some way, which it is not, no for-profit news agency is going to let the others report this while they sit on information that's going to come out anyway.

Okay, lets do it your way. Lets make a movie of the week about the cop killer starring whomever the star du jour is, high light his cause so it can gain a following and make sure you publish all of his literature too. Mass murderers deserve to be heard!!!!

Its nuts that we spend so much time highlighting these creeps

 

[Fueri]

My, your point is so amazingly awful you've set a record for going completely off the path of actually trying to make one.

Page 2 and your already in 'fuck you' and utter blather territory.

First amendment, dummy. Freedom of the press is covered under it. Go to bed.

Freedom not to devulge the name of the terrorist on their airwaves is part of that. Freedom means doing something or choosing not to do something.

As for telling someone "fuck you", freedom of speech. Feel free to fuck off yourself.

So asking the press not to report something is an exercise of freedom of the press.

My, you is a smart one.

Smart enough to know what I wrote; the press barons agreeing not to highlight pieces of shit that murder cops or print their manifestos unless there is something in it about credible intel on future attacks.

Nobody is asking the Press to not report something...just to put the greater good ahead of "being first" with the news.

For an example, 12 hours ago, only this guy's dandruff knew who he was. Today, you guys (with the help of the media) have highlighted the guy way beyond his importance as a human being.

The barons? What about the smaller outlets? Foreign outlets?

Putting aside the silly notion that it would actually be a good thing for the press to be, ahem, 'guided' in some way, which it is not, no for-profit news agency is going to let the others report this while they sit on information that's going to come out anyway.

Okay, lets do it your way. Lets make a movie of the week about the cop killer starring whomever the star du jour is, high light his cause so it can gain a following and make sure you publish all of his literature too. Mass murderers deserve to be heard!!!!

Its nuts that we spend so much time highlighting these creeps

It's not 'my way', unless you think I wrote the first amendment AND invented capitalism (buy my book about that entitled: "Fueri's Very Busy Week")so you can continue throwing nonsense like that out there and I'll continue to ignore those weak attempts to distract from the actual points of fact and point out what a lousy, and completely unworkable, idea this is for a lot of reasons.

 

[Old Rocks]

Why? does the actions of black democrats committing murder embarrass you? I bet you want to know every name and badge number of the cops you think " shot unarmed black males with their hands up don't shoot". AmIRight?

No, they are not 'Black Democrats'. They are 'Black WillowTrees'. They, like you, hate. And act on that hate.

You seem to think that blacks and whites are treated the same in this nation. You really know better. What if a group of blacks, equally armed as the Bundys were, had taken over the Malhuer Game Refuge? You know damned well, the National Guard would have taken in tanks and cleaned them out. That is the reality in this nation.

That some blacks are showing an equal amount of brainless hate, and acting on it, is not surprising. And they must be dealt with the same as any other criminals. But don't lay your kind of hate on those that do not hate.

 

[Old Rocks]

Candy is talking sense this time. She feels the heartbreak of this tragedy. If we are ever going to have a dialogue as is so often talked about we have to highlight the commonality of our humanity. Take a break from the rage, focus on what is important, and cut the person some slack who is momentarily wearing her heart on her sleeve. Good things might come of it.

Thanks but you're way off.

Just don't publicize the guy.

If you don't put the guy front and center, guess what happens, he has no followers. There is a reason those terrorists who go to prison are forgotten about; the Press no longer writes about them or prints any of their asinine speeches. I would imagine that few people know who the shoe bomber is, who Timothy McVeigh's accomplice was, who the underware bomber was (I have forgotten his name), the DC sniper team's names, etc... And, oh yeah, you haven't seen a lot of people lining up to follow in their footsteps.

Sorry,we're going to shine the light of truth on your buddies.

And in that light, we see they are the same as you, only braver. They act on their hate, they don't just spew it on the message boards.

The assholes that kill innocents, simply for revenge, should get their names, their sentences, and the prison or execution place published. What they killed for is irrelevant, since they seldom have rational reasons in the first place.

 

[Ridgerunner]

Smart enough to know what I wrote

Smart enough to explain the use of these 2 words, "four square"? I believe an explanation is in order... Please remember and never forget... inquiring minds want to know...