Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Not state sponsored, true, but there is a religious test for office these days which is why we have so many people in office that are clearly not Christian and yet they claim to be.there has never been, nor will ever be a state sponsored religion nor as a litmus test - so says the constitution.
Most of this is just paranoid delusions but I did find the "waging war against Christianity" since you are essentially waging war for Christianity and against non-Christians.Well, considering 50 short years ago, both parties sought to build up America, and now one of them wants to destroy it from the ground up by eradicating capitalism, increasing dependency, eliminating police departments, encouraging all means of sexual perversion, killing little babies in the womb, and waging war against Christianity, the answer is things have indeed changed, rather suddenly. Most of the Constitution is well-written, but this glaring error needs to be changed before we become the USSR.
So you want to go back to the days of Jim Crow, redlining, discrimination in education, jobs, and housing, profiling, etc.?The notion of 'inclusiveness' IS code for intentional division. It's yet another tactic by the Marxist left, and you're falling for it. Get rid of atheism and Marxism, and all this blather about every little offense being racist goes away.
They were intended to highlight the extraordinary number of Blacks, many of them unarmed, killed by police. I think they succeeded.Do you really believe the post-George Floyd riots united anyone? Do you really believe they were intended to?
Take it up with the Pope:You're wrong: To be a practicing Catholic, you cannot accept abortion. This is a clear and accepted definition.
I'm glad you've learned something, you're welcome.This fallacy does not occur if there is a clear and accepted definition of the group and what it requires to belong to that group, and this definition is violated by the arguer. For example:
This is not a fallacy because being a vegetarian, by definition, is the practice of abstaining from the consumption of meat; if she consumes meat, she is not really a vegetarian. Thus, this fallacy can only occur in a situation where the definition can be redefined due to a lack of clear understanding or agreement of the criteria.
- “No vegetarian eats meat.”
- “Well, my friend says she is a vegetarian but she still eats meat.”
- “But no true vegetarian eats meat.”
Ladies and gentlemen, it’s time to formally declare America a Christian nation.
If some of the framers intended to separate Church and state (which is not 100% certain), then it’s time to correct that mistake. it’s time for a Constitutional Amendment to declare Christianity the official belief of the United States. Here’s why:
The intent of any such separation was to prevent any single denomination from dominating or punishing members of another through government. The idea was to be religion-neutral. Noble enough. But the framers made a few critical miscalculations: They incorrectly assumed:
1. That “good” laws and “Christian” laws could be separated. They can’t. There is 100% overlap. You can’t have laws that help the people without them being Christian laws.
2. That a belief vacuum is possible in our laws. It isn’t, because the opposite of religion isn’t nothing; it’s atheism.
That’s right. When you attempt to ban Christian laws, you only allow atheist laws.
Examples:
Forcing Christian groups to pay for abortions and birth control for their employees.
Forcing Christian florists, photographers, and bakers to participate in gay weddings.
Distributing condoms in government schools to teens and preteens, suggesting that sex among these immature and obviously unmarried students is morally acceptable.
Using taxpayer funds to pay for abortions abroad.
Banning the Ten Commandments from government buildings (while flying the rainbow flag).
Banning the Nativity Scenes from government buildings.
Government sanction of Kwanzaa celebrations (a made-up racist ‘holiday’).
Disallowing references to Christmas in the public schools.
Teaching Critical Race Theory (which divides people and promotes hate).
Allowing gay marriage.
This is why the left screeches so loudly about “keeping religion out of government”. It’s because they know their atheism gets free reign if it doesn’t have to compete against Christianity.
The solution is two part: First, BAN atheism and atheistic views from being promoted by all media outlets. We’ve had such decency laws before. Hollywood enacted such standards in 1934 (that have since been repealed, unfortunately). Get rid of all the immoral trash in the movies and TV. Disallow the leftwing media from promoting atheist Marxism and other atheist policies. Then, secondly promote a Constitutional Amendment to make Christianity the official belief of the land. Then we end the abortion debate, the race-baiting issue, and the anti-capitalist pro-socialist issue once and for all. The country would once again be following God’s plan, church attendance would rise again, couples would marry instead of cohabitating, the gay marriage ruling would be repealed, families would stay together and be stronger, children would grow up in two-parent homes, so there would be far less crime. And best of all, ALL Marixst atheist disinformation would be stifled, and our children would stop being poisoned by it.
Let’s do it NOW!!
In what way have our laws moved towards an atheist belief?I contend that our government laws have moved toward representing the atheist belief. Are you good with that?
Why sucsess?this mashmouth character must be a troll making rightwing religious fucktards look even worse. success
true.Why sucsess?
No one agrees with them...
For individuals, yes. But government MUST represent some belief, whether by action or default. Right now they've chosen atheism by default. That is what needs to change.
I contend that our government laws have moved toward representing the atheist belief. Are you good with that?
No, the bible didn't command us to have athiest governments.And....
The Bible, read it.
"Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's"
Funny that BOTH foundational documents are against the silly assertion of the OP.
Well, then why should atheist beliefs supersede Christian beliefs?If by "atheist belief" you mean our laws are not decided by the demands of any religion then, yes, I'm good with that...
This happens every debate on atheism. When confronted, atheists retreat into "All we want to do is mind our own business and believe what we want to". But it never works that way with atheist regimes. They are always the most strident, the most violent, the most evil, as they seek to export their atheist cancer on other states.Give us one atheist 'belief' outside of not believing in a specific god and the law that supposedly represents it.
Well, then why should atheist beliefs supersede Christian beliefs?
Jefferson was an ATHEIST-----Ladies and gentlemen, it’s time to formally declare America a Christian nation.
If some of the framers intended to separate Church and state (which is not 100% certain), then it’s time to correct that mistake. it’s time for a Constitutional Amendment to declare Christianity the official belief of the United States. Here’s why:
The intent of any such separation was to prevent any single denomination from dominating or punishing members of another through government. The idea was to be religion-neutral. Noble enough. But the framers made a few critical miscalculations: They incorrectly assumed:
1. That “good” laws and “Christian” laws could be separated. They can’t. There is 100% overlap. You can’t have laws that help the people without them being Christian laws.
2. That a belief vacuum is possible in our laws. It isn’t, because the opposite of religion isn’t nothing; it’s atheism.
That’s right. When you attempt to ban Christian laws, you only allow atheist laws.
Examples:
Forcing Christian groups to pay for abortions and birth control for their employees.
Forcing Christian florists, photographers, and bakers to participate in gay weddings.
Distributing condoms in government schools to teens and preteens, suggesting that sex among these immature and obviously unmarried students is morally acceptable.
Using taxpayer funds to pay for abortions abroad.
Banning the Ten Commandments from government buildings (while flying the rainbow flag).
Banning the Nativity Scenes from government buildings.
Government sanction of Kwanzaa celebrations (a made-up racist ‘holiday’).
Disallowing references to Christmas in the public schools.
Teaching Critical Race Theory (which divides people and promotes hate).
Allowing gay marriage.
This is why the left screeches so loudly about “keeping religion out of government”. It’s because they know their atheism gets free reign if it doesn’t have to compete against Christianity.
The solution is two part: First, BAN atheism and atheistic views from being promoted by all media outlets. We’ve had such decency laws before. Hollywood enacted such standards in 1934 (that have since been repealed, unfortunately). Get rid of all the immoral trash in the movies and TV. Disallow the leftwing media from promoting atheist Marxism and other atheist policies. Then, secondly promote a Constitutional Amendment to make Christianity the official belief of the land. Then we end the abortion debate, the race-baiting issue, and the anti-capitalist pro-socialist issue once and for all. The country would once again be following God’s plan, church attendance would rise again, couples would marry instead of cohabitating, the gay marriage ruling would be repealed, families would stay together and be stronger, children would grow up in two-parent homes, so there would be far less crime. And best of all, ALL Marixst atheist disinformation would be stifled, and our children would stop being poisoned by it.
Let’s do it NOW!!
Usually Atheists are better educated and believe in facts instead of invisible magical beings.Well, then why should atheist beliefs supersede Christian beliefs?
