It’s Time to Formally Declare America A Christian Nation.

[bodecea]

Ladies and gentlemen, it’s time to formally declare America a Christian nation.

If some of the framers intended to separate Church and state (which is not 100% certain), then it’s time to correct that mistake. it’s time for a Constitutional Amendment to declare Christianity the official belief of the United States. Here’s why:

The intent of any such separation was to prevent any single denomination from dominating or punishing members of another through government. The idea was to be religion-neutral. Noble enough. But the framers made a few critical miscalculations: They incorrectly assumed:

1. That “good” laws and “Christian” laws could be separated. They can’t. There is 100% overlap. You can’t have laws that help the people without them being Christian laws.
2. That a belief vacuum is possible in our laws. It isn’t, because the opposite of religion isn’t nothing; it’s atheism.

That’s right. When you attempt to ban Christian laws, you only allow atheist laws.

Examples:
Forcing Christian groups to pay for abortions and birth control for their employees.
Forcing Christian florists, photographers, and bakers to participate in gay weddings.
Distributing condoms in government schools to teens and preteens, suggesting that sex among these immature and obviously unmarried students is morally acceptable.
Using taxpayer funds to pay for abortions abroad.
Banning the Ten Commandments from government buildings (while flying the rainbow flag).
Banning the Nativity Scenes from government buildings.
Government sanction of Kwanzaa celebrations (a made-up racist ‘holiday’).
Disallowing references to Christmas in the public schools.
Teaching Critical Race Theory (which divides people and promotes hate).
Allowing gay marriage.

This is why the left screeches so loudly about “keeping religion out of government”. It’s because they know their atheism gets free reign if it doesn’t have to compete against Christianity.

The solution is two part: First, BAN atheism and atheistic views from being promoted by all media outlets. We’ve had such decency laws before. Hollywood enacted such standards in 1934 (that have since been repealed, unfortunately). Get rid of all the immoral trash in the movies and TV. Disallow the leftwing media from promoting atheist Marxism and other atheist policies. Then, secondly promote a Constitutional Amendment to make Christianity the official belief of the land. Then we end the abortion debate, the race-baiting issue, and the anti-capitalist pro-socialist issue once and for all. The country would once again be following God’s plan, church attendance would rise again, couples would marry instead of cohabitating, the gay marriage ruling would be repealed, families would stay together and be stronger, children would grow up in two-parent homes, so there would be far less crime. And best of all, ALL Marixst atheist disinformation would be stifled, and our children would stop being poisoned by it.

Let’s do it NOW!!

 

[alang1216]

Leftwingers always mess up the 'No True Scotsman" argument. It applies only on circumstances you can't help, such as race or ethnicity. It does not apply to beliefs, as beliefs are a choice. If I say "No practicing Catholic believes abortion is acceptable", that is a valid statement, and the NTS label is not applicable..

Thanks for your clarification, unfortunately it is 100% wrong. Look it up.

Your question about how do we ensure only true Christians are in power is you can't, as humans are fallible. But I could ask the same question about leaders of irreligious regimes: "How do we know they are good people". The answer is they pretty much never are. But you make the Constitution Christian, so you will at least have a strong starting point. Right now we are starting with a premise of atheism, which as we are finding out, is a disaster.

So after 250 or so years of a premise of atheism, you think this country is a disaster and the Constitution needs to be radically rewritten? This country is not a disaster but I agree the Constitution needs updating, just not your way. I'd like to see the country more inclusive and less divided and what you propose would have exactly the opposite effect.

 

[AsherN]

My choice would be Catholicism, the religion founded by Jesus. Jesus' teaching supersedes the OT teaching. I always notice atheists don't want any part of discussing Jesus' perfect teachings of love and peace.

Except that Jesus was born and died a Jew. Xtianity did not come until much later.

 

[Mashmont]

it's been political since its inception.

ions ago - only priests & higher could have a bible.

first born sons were destined to enter the seminary...

& the pope/vatican is chock full of riches.

& i didn't even mention the child diddling cover ups.

You do realize the vast majority of pedophilia is done by the irreligious, right? And as for the RCC wealth, you're counting the many priceless works of art done as gifts of God that can't really be sold, such as the Sistine Chapel. It's as silly as saying the president is rich because he owns the White House. But I understand. When you have an anti-religion bigoted view, details and truth are irrelevant

 

[rightwinger]

You do realize the vast majority of pedophilia is done by the irreligious, right

 

[Mashmont]

Except that Jesus was born and died a Jew. Xtianity did not come until much later.

Jesus was the first Catholic Priest. He said the First Mass.

 

[AsherN]

Jesus was the first Catholic Priest. He said the First Mass.

You may want to look back at history...

 

[Mashmont]

Thanks for your clarification, unfortunately it is 100% wrong. Look it up.


So after 250 or so years of a premise of atheism, you think this country is a disaster and the Constitution needs to be radically rewritten? This country is not a disaster but I agree the Constitution needs updating, just not your way. I'd like to see the country more inclusive and less divided and what you propose would have exactly the opposite effect.

Well, considering 50 short years ago, both parties sought to build up America, and now one of them wants to destroy it from the ground up by eradicating capitalism, increasing dependency, eliminating police departments, encouraging all means of sexual perversion, killing little babies in the womb, and waging war against Christianity, the answer is things have indeed changed, rather suddenly. Most of the Constitution is well-written, but this glaring error needs to be changed before we become the USSR.

The notion of 'inclusiveness' IS code for intentional division. It's yet another tactic by the Marxist left, and you're falling for it. Get rid of atheism and Marxism, and all this blather about every little offense being racist goes away. Do you really believe the post-George Floyd riots united anyone? Do you really believe they were intended to?

 

[Mashmont]

You may want to look back at history...

I read the Bible cover to cover. Jesus did in fact preside over the First Mass. It was called the Last Supper.

 

[Mashmont]

Post silly emojis when you can't refute. That's what the left does.

 

[Mashmont]

Thanks for your clarification, unfortunately it is 100% wrong. Look it up.

You're wrong: To be a practicing Catholic, you cannot accept abortion. This is a clear and accepted definition.

This fallacy does not occur if there is a clear and accepted definition of the group and what it requires to belong to that group, and this definition is violated by the arguer. For example:

1. “No vegetarian eats meat.”
2. “Well, my friend says she is a vegetarian but she still eats meat.”
3. “But no true vegetarian eats meat.”

This is not a fallacy because being a vegetarian, by definition, is the practice of abstaining from the consumption of meat; if she consumes meat, she is not really a vegetarian. Thus, this fallacy can only occur in a situation where the definition can be redefined due to a lack of clear understanding or agreement of the criteria.

No True Scotsman Fallacy - Definition and Examples - Fallacy In Logic

Fallacy in Logic: Learn everything you need to know about critical thinking, logical fallacies, and cognitive biases.

fallacyinlogic.com

 

[Zincwarrior]

Well, considering 50 short years ago, both parties sought to build up America, and now one of them wants to destroy it from the ground up by eradicating capitalism, increasing dependency, eliminating police departments,

I missed the part of the Bible where Jesus was an unfettered capitalist.

encouraging all means of sexual perversion, killing little babies in the womb, and waging war against Christianity,

I missed the part where there is a war against Christianity. Where are the gulags we've sent all the priests to?

the answer is things have indeed changed, rather suddenly. Most of the Constitution is well-written, but this glaring error needs to be changed before we become the USSR.

Mmm so under your enlightened rewrite it will be required to study the teachings of Jesus the Capitalist?

The notion of 'inclusiveness' IS code for intentional division. It's yet another tactic by the Marxist left, and you're falling for it. Get rid of atheism and Marxism, and all this blather about every little offense being racist goes away.

Mmm... Jim Crow was put in by religious capitalists.

 

[Moonglow]

Orthodox splintered from the Roman Catholics. Why would you go with the spinoffs? I go with the one Jesus founded.

The Coptics?

 

[BreezeWood]

It’s Time to Formally Declare America A Christian Nation.​

in fact that notion has been in effect since they put themselves on the dollar bill, unconstitutionally with the unlawful consent of the supreme court - that threat should be removed and the op put in jail for treason by their formal declaration.

 

[Mashmont]

Predictably, the atheists don't want to give up that chokehold they have on the US Government.

 

[FA_Q2]

The Constitution, read it.

And....

The Bible, read it.

"Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's"


Funny that BOTH foundational documents are against the silly assertion of the OP.

 

[FA_Q2]

I contend that our government laws have moved toward representing the atheist belief. Are you good with that?

Give us one atheist 'belief' outside of not believing in a specific god and the law that supposedly represents it.

 

[rightwinger]

I don’t care as long as it is declared a Catholic Nation

The other so called “Christian” religions are not legitimate religions

Catholic is the true Christian religion. The one with actual links to Christ

The others are made up religions like Scientology and Mormons

 

[Mashmont]

I missed the part of the Bible where Jesus was an unfettered capitalist.

Unfettered? Did you just introduce a strawman? Jesus was all for man living up to his potential. But Jesus was decidedly opposed to the confiscation of other people's goods.

I missed the part where there is a war against Christianity. Where are the gulags we've sent all the priests to?

Ah, give them time. But the leftwing media is already crucifying an entire church based on the actions of a few miscreant gay priests 50 years ago who are largely now deceased.

Mmm so under your enlightened rewrite it will be required to study the teachings of Jesus the Capitalist?

The study of Jesus' life would be preferable to the current public school curriculum of studying the life of, say, racist and baby-butcher Margaret Sanger.

Study Shows Public Schools Teaching Margaret Sanger as Women's Hero Instead of Racist Eugenicist - LifeNews.com

American history textbooks are portraying Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger as a heroine for women’s rights while ignoring her racist, eugenic beliefs, according to a new study from the Independent Institute. Thomas Cargill, a professor emeritus at the University of Nevada-Reno...

www.lifenews.com

Mmm... Jim Crow was put in by religious capitalists.

Huh? What makes you think Jesus' teaching included Jim Crow?

 

[PoliticalChic]

You're wrong: To be a practicing Catholic, you cannot accept abortion. This is a clear and accepted definition.

This fallacy does not occur if there is a clear and accepted definition of the group and what it requires to belong to that group, and this definition is violated by the arguer. For example:

1. “No vegetarian eats meat.”
2. “Well, my friend says she is a vegetarian but she still eats meat.”
3. “But no true vegetarian eats meat.”

This is not a fallacy because being a vegetarian, by definition, is the practice of abstaining from the consumption of meat; if she consumes meat, she is not really a vegetarian. Thus, this fallacy can only occur in a situation where the definition can be redefined due to a lack of clear understanding or agreement of the criteria.

No True Scotsman Fallacy - Definition and Examples - Fallacy In Logic

Fallacy in Logic: Learn everything you need to know about critical thinking, logical fallacies, and cognitive biases.

fallacyinlogic.com