They did a great job mentioning WTC7 in the 9/11 commission.
They also didn't mention WTC 3, 4, 5 or 6. What's your point? It wasn't a target in the attack.
PhysicsExist said:
We could of learned a lot about the first fire that took down a steel high rise at freefall, dont you think?
That's not the job of the 9/11 commission, dipshit! That is the job of the NIST.

You're too dumb to even know who was suppose to be investigating what! No WONDER you're so easy to fool!
That's pretty funny coming from a retard that doesn't even understand who is suppose to investigate what.
This isn't a game. This is very serious. Why do you think I spend so much time on it? I don't like what you fuckheads are doing, so I am going to make your lives miserable by exposing all your lies and dishonesty. That's not a game and frankly, I wish I didn't have to do it. But when shit for brains assholes want to use the deaths of three thousand Americans to push treason on everyone else, I feel people should stand up for the truth and expose you fucks for the slime you are.
PhysicsExist said:
The truth is getting stronger and stronger, more and more people here are realizing you and others are just a nuisance, and cannot address or even accept the facts.
I've been hearing that for almost nine years now. Still nothing. You're as impotent now as you were back then. Little dicks can't produce.
PhysicsExist said:
The facts of freefall for 2.25 seconds proves NIST is lying about a collapse due to 'office fires'.
Wrong yet again, pukeface. They've explained it quite well. Sorry fucks like you just aren't bright enough to spell NIST, much less understand what they write. The fact you have .053% of all architects and engineers in the US pretending they know better than the other 99.947% should tell you something, but like I've already said.... you're a bunch of dumbfucks.