It's still getting hotter

That must be horrible for you. My sympathies.
Because of the odd retard, I pop to the climate calamity section to check up on them. How many McDonald's breakfasts did you sell this morning?
 
Last edited:
Because of the odd retard, I pop to the climate calamity section to check up on them. How many McDonald's breakfasts did you sell this morning?
I don't have the faintest fuck of an idea what you're on about.
 
So, when the planet is getting hotter, we can all expect more high temperature records and less cold temperature records. And that, of course, is exactly what we've been getting.
 
So, when the planet is getting hotter, we can all expect more high temperature records and less cold temperature records. And that, of course, is exactly what we've been getting.
Depends on where one is. Not all places act the same by large amounts. For instance in 1913 Death Valley hit 134 degrees but never again has this happened. Now it on a hot day is about 7 degrees more chilly.
 
Depends on where one is.
Please reread what I just said Robert. "So, when the PLANET is getting hotter, we can ALL expect more high temperature records and less cold temperature records. And that, of course, is exactly what we've been getting."

Not all places act the same by large amounts.
I never said otherwise. Why don't you address what I actually said?
For instance in 1913 Death Valley hit 134 degrees but never again has this happened. Now it on a hot day is about 7 degrees more chilly.
For instance, the planet as a whole is doing this:

1722339440482.webp


Do you understand that individual locations at specific times differing from this global average behavior does absolutely NOTHING to refute those data? "Depends on where one is" is not even a pertinent response Robert. No matter where one might be, the planet as a whole is doing THIS.
 
Please reread what I just said Robert. "So, when the PLANET is getting hotter, we can ALL expect more high temperature records and less cold temperature records. And that, of course, is exactly what we've been getting."
Wasn't the planet 2C warmer than today with 26 ft higher seas than today with 120 ppm less atmospheric CO2 than today in the previous interglacial period?

And didn't the planet then plunge into another glacial period and temperatures dropped by 12C?
 
"So, when the PLANET is getting hotter, we can ALL expect more high temperature records and less cold temperature records. And that, of course, is exactly what we've been getting."
You are free to if you want. I chatted long ago with Professor Lindzen about the word average and I said to him it does not make sense at all. He suggested the word medium.
I would explain but believe this amounts to a pissing match and frankly I am not interested. Such as you demanding I assign your words to the term lie. I see what you try to do as add more information. I can name a liar but why call him out? Here is the progress in total. I think this is being truthful. You came to this topic loaded with fear. I got here with no fear. I have not changed. And you have not changed. Fear does nobody a bit of good. My super tiny impact on this planet can't be measured. Maybe you have lunged out and did a lot of damage. But you need to tell us all what huge damage it would be done by you.
 
You are free to if you want.
Free to do what?
I chatted long ago with Professor Lindzen about the word average and I said to him it does not make sense at all.
A real meeting of peers there, eh.
He suggested the word medium.
Did he suggest a definition? Average has one.
I would explain but believe this amounts to a pissing match and frankly I am not interested.
A pissing match with who about what?
Such as you demanding I assign your words to the term lie.
Robert, YOU assigned my words to the term lie. You just lack the balls to say which ones.
I see what you try to do as add more information.
When you look at what you just wrote, do you see a complete and intelligible sentence there?
I can name a liar but why call him out?
To show you have some principles. To show you're not a coward. To show that YOU aren't the liar.
Here is the progress in total. I think this is being truthful. You came to this topic loaded with fear. I got here with no fear. I have not changed. And you have not changed.
Back when we first met, I thought there was a good chance of teaching you what's actually happening in the world. I see now that I grossly overestimated both your intellect and your character.
Fear does nobody a bit of good.
It keeps people alive.
My super tiny impact on this planet can't be measured.
You seem to have already measured it when you characterized it as "super tiny". You've got a vote, Robert. It's entirely possible that your vote could be a tie breaker on some enormously important decision.
Maybe you have lunged out and did a lot of damage. But you need to tell us all what huge damage it would be done by you.
You need to retake English 101. I have no idea what you're trying to say.
 
Last edited:
We have seen recently in this thread postings showing trends in the occurrence of both high and low temperature records around the planet. High temperature records have been increasing in numbers while low temperature records have been decreasing. This is taking place concurrently with rising global temperatures, so it should surprise no one. But it does supply an independent verification of the data sets. Recently, we have the added tidbit of a new record set, Sunday, 21 June, for the highest average global temperature in recorded history. With the advantage of hindsight, I now know that some will not be impressed with a record within only "recorded history" when there are 4.5 billion years in which the planet had some sort of average temperature and I guess we shouldn't be all that impressed with a global average ov 17.6C when bounced against a planet covered head to toe with boiling magma. However, just FYI, for purposes of meteorology and climate science, recorded history is considered that span of time during which sufficiently accurate and sufficiently widespread data are available. All those nerds in their white coats and ivory towers came up with 1850. That is 174 years back or a span of roughly 63,510 days (they didn't give me a month, day, hour, minute, second or anything else, those stingy bastards). That goes back, my calculations indicate, further back than your parents, your grandparents or your great grandparents. And, if we are NOT getting steadily warmer, it is an exceedingly rare ocurrence. Picking one, specific, random day in 63,510 days to be the hottest ever is equivalent to throwing heads 17 times in a row. Give it a shot and then get back to me. DON'T lose count. Of course, if, as all the world's scientists tell us, the world is getting steadily hotter, the odds of last Sunday being the hottest ever is nothing to get a woody ah-boot. In fact, it's kinda unavoidable, in'nt it.

So, there's a fair number of you folks that claim to believe anthropogenic (man-made) global warming is a "HOAX". "It's a LIE". Folks believe it ISN"T actually taking place. I'd like to talk to such folks. I'd really like to hear why they believe such things. I'd really like to hear a conceivable chain of events that could have produced the current temperature data record out of thin air. If anyone would like to give it a serious go, I can promise to do my very best on this occasion to withhold my usual bitter vituperation. Whether that's good enough, only time will tell.


That’s what occurs as ice ages end.
 
Ice ages? And how would you know? The last time an ice age ended was 260 million years ago.
Why do you hate science?
 
Why do you hate science?
Do you believe the Little Ice Age was an actual ice age or are you making a joke?
 
When the Co2 FRAUD discusses "ice ages" they do not even have a clue what actually is an ICE AGE....


 
What occurred to end the little ice age?

Warming, Dufus.

Warming that began around 1850, long before the industrial age.
Resumption of heat circulation from the Atlantic to the Arctic which is a critical region for extensive continental glaciation.

Studies agree that an initial export of Arctic sea-ice into key convective regions of the North Atlantic weakened ocean convection. Reduced convection may have weakened the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC)4,5,6,7 and/or the subpolar gyre (SPG) circulation strength4,7,8, leading to a reduction in poleward heat transport, ultimately reinforcing sea-ice expansion through a positive feedback3,4,5,6,7,8.

 
Back
Top Bottom