Sure, like a flu shot prevents the flu?The New York State SAFE Act stops criminals....
^^^^
Proof of the intent I claimed - to prevent exactly what we see here.
And it clearly does not.
Thus, the NY laws are ineffective, and as such, unnecessary.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sure, like a flu shot prevents the flu?The New York State SAFE Act stops criminals....
^^^^
Proof of the intent I claimed - to prevent exactly what we see here.
And it clearly does not.
Thus, the NY laws are ineffective, and as such, unnecessary.
The New York State SAFE Act stops criminals....
^^^^
Proof of the intent I claimed - to prevent exactly what we see here.
And it clearly does not.
Thus, the NY laws are ineffective, and as such, unnecessary.
Besides farmers, would anyone WANT to amass 5,000 lbs, of Ammonium Nitrate in their suburban garage...........for their 'garden"?
"Why didn't NY's gun laws prevent this?"Who claimed he was a law abiding gun owner?
Damned right.They arrested the person... after he committed the crime.
Thus, the law did not "help" as the crime was already committed.
Already did, your opinion about what qualifies as constitutional, doesn't mean squat.Feel free to demonstrate otherwise - else, I accept your concession.
You say that like you think I'm against getting rid of traffic laws.New York speed limit laws...
Legislation (A.1007-A/S.2021-A) will help prevent traffic-related crashes and fatalities by allowing municipalities to reduce speed limits to 25 miles per hour.
Using your logic, the law ineffective, and as such, unnecessary since traffic related crashes and fatalities still happen.
I know.That's true, MY opinion.
You say that like you think I'm against getting rid of traffic laws.
Doesn't change the fact the NY law is ineffective, and thus, unnecessary.
Irrelevant to the point made as it does not change the fact the NY law is ineffective, and thus, unnecessary.I have yet to see you advocate for it.
No, but there are laws regarding its use and amountI could be mistaken but I do not believe there is a constitutional right to have ammonium nitrate.
For the right purpose and handling, they're harmless.It is also a harsh chemical that can harm people even if the owner does not intend for it to do so. The same cannot be said for my guns
Irrelevant to the point made as it does not change the fact the NY law is ineffective, and thus, unnecessary.
Irrelevant to the point made as it does not change the fact the NY law is ineffective, and thus, unnecessary.Every single law on the books is ineffective, and thus, unnecessary using your logic.
Oh' darn, you seem to have glossed over the preface of prevent.New York speed limit laws...
Legislation (A.1007-A/S.2021-A) will help prevent traffic-related crashes and fatalities by allowing municipalities to reduce speed limits to 25 miles per hour.
Using your logic, the law ineffective, and as such, unnecessary since traffic related crashes and fatalities still happen.
No, but there are laws regarding its use and amount
6 U.S. Code § 488a - Regulation of the sale and transfer of ammonium nitrate
For the right purpose and handling, they're harmless.
Just like a car or truck.........harmless ................when it's parked in the driveway.
Glad you agree the law did not help.Damned right.
Nothing here changes the fact your opinion doesn't matter.Already did, your opinion about what qualifies as constitutional, doesn't mean squat.
Courts and the law does.
No, one is for a primary reason, to kill something, the other used for transport.Yep. There sure is.
Yes, a car or truck parked in the driveway is harmless just like my guns are. Are you pushing for laws limiting how many cars a person owns?
See above.Jay Leno has over 180 cars. Should this be illegal?
An often claimed myth that, even if true, carries no meaning as the 2nd amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms because, sometimes, people need to kill other people.No, one is for a primary reason, to kill something...
Hmmmm...............the person was arrested.Glad you agree the law did not help.
Didn't state it did.Nothing here changes the fact your opinion doesn't matter.
-After- the crime was committed.Hmmmm...............the person was arrested.
Indeed.Didn't state it did.
The law and courts "opinion" matter.
From OP link:
Weigand, 41, was being investigated to determine if he stole school property, police said in the documents. While finding stolen school furniture and tools during the search, officers also found nine illegal assault rifles and 91 high-capacity magazines, with 48 fully loaded, they said
Weigand was charged with 11 counts of third-degree criminal possession of a weapon, one count of third-degree grand larceny and three counts of endangering the welfare of a child.
Weigand was accused of recruiting students to help steal about $13,469 of property. On one occasion, students loaded tools and furniture into his car during school day hours, police said.