Its starting ! The seizing of guns.

[bodecea]

From OP link:

Weigand, 41, was being investigated to determine if he stole school property, police said in the documents. While finding stolen school furniture and tools during the search, officers also found nine illegal assault rifles and 91 high-capacity magazines, with 48 fully loaded, they said
Weigand was charged with 11 counts of third-degree criminal possession of a weapon, one count of third-degree grand larceny and three counts of endangering the welfare of a child.
Weigand was accused of recruiting students to help steal about $13,469 of property. On one occasion, students loaded tools and furniture into his car during school day hours, police said.

Obviously a hero to the OP.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Read and learn.

The Debate Over a Bill of Rights

Antifederalists argued that in a state of nature people were entirely free. In society some rights were yielded for the common good. But, there were some rights so fundamental that to give them up would be contrary to the common good. These rights, which should always be retained by the people...

csac.history.wisc.edu

The Bill of Rights was specifically written to articulate the pre-existing nature of the natural rights of mankind.

Really?
Who gave the people "pre-existing rights"?
AND if they had them to begin with, why, even bother?
"Consequently, a bill of rights was not necessary and was perhaps a dangerous proposition. It was unnecessary because the new federal government could in no way endanger the freedoms of the press or religion since it was not granted any authority to regulate either".
Really?
"In no way"?

Rights aren't granted.

Yes, they are.

Things that given by government can be removed by government.

Exactly, like rights.

Rights exist apart from government.

Really?
Then, was the constitution created?

Even in countries places that governments supress the rights of the people...the rights still exist.

Say's who?
Just because some claims you have a "god given or natural right", doesn't make it so.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Yes they do, but they are not part of the Bill of Rights as you claimed for the last day.

Correct.
Not the original 10, also known as the bill of rights.
They are amendments to the constitution, which granted citizen's rights.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

You brought up the shitty reasoning for violating peoples Constitutional rights. I responded.

Why hasn't the 1934, in 89 years been repealed?

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Why hasn't the 1934, in 89 years been repealed?

It should be but the politicians and judges are cowards. It is a tax on a Constitutional right and as bad as when the Government had a pole tax to keep Black people from voting.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

It should be but the politicians and judges are cowards. It is a tax on a Constitutional right and as bad as when the Government had a pole tax to keep Black people from voting.

WOW, in 89 years?
Even since Reagan, both Bush's and Trump?
All those federalist society judges that were appointed?

Almost like Trump's 60 + court cases of election fraud.

 

[M14 Shooter]

They are amendments to the constitution, which granted citizen's rights.

This is a lie.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Why hasn't the 1934, in 89 years been repealed?

Good news. It wont need to be repealed.

Biden's BATFE recent change in the rule for pistol braces has opened up the NFA to judicial scrutiny.
There's not a thing in the NFA34 that can be demonstrated as consistent with this Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.
And while the initial issue revolves around SBRs, it could ALL go.

Thanks, Brandon!!