It’s Official: Democrats Pass Sexless Speech Codes for House of Representatives

[TheGreenHornet]

Incredibly stupid and outrageously repulsive but this is what democrats have come to in America....and it should not be tolerated.

It's Official: Dems Pass Sexless Speech Codes for House of Representatives

Democrats dodged when Republicans spotlighted their unpopular effort to scrub recognition of the male and female sexes from legislation.

www.breitbart.com

 

[pknopp]

Well meaning but pretty stupid. On one hand they argue for the protection of free speech and on the other they restrict speech.

The way to do this properly is to lead by example.

 

[TheGreenHornet]

Well meaning but pretty stupid. On one hand they argue for the protection of free speech and on the other they restrict speech.

The way to do this properly is to lead by example.

Democrats argue for free speech? get real

 

[pknopp]

Well meaning but pretty stupid. On one hand they argue for the protection of free speech and on the other they restrict speech.

The way to do this properly is to lead by example.

Democrats argue for free speech? get real

Republicans have no soap box to stand on here.

 

[BlindBoo]

Yep, to “honor all gender identities by changing pronouns and familial relationships in the House rules to be gender neutral.”, means it's the end of the Republic as we have known it, missy, or dude!

 

[Rye Catcher]

Well meaning but pretty stupid. On one hand they argue for the protection of free speech and on the other they restrict speech.

The way to do this properly is to lead by example.

Democrats argue for free speech? get real

Have the Democrats every put forth a vote to amend the First Amendment? Anyone who watched the hearings this past year in the H. or Rep. saw the Republican's interrupt and attack witnesses who were under oath.

 

[Thinker101]

Well meaning but pretty stupid. On one hand they argue for the protection of free speech and on the other they restrict speech.

The way to do this properly is to lead by example.

Democrats argue for free speech? get real

Have the Democrats every put forth a vote to amend the First Amendment? Anyone who watched the hearings this past year in the H. or Rep. saw the Republican's interrupt and attack witnesses who were under oath.

Gee, you mean like this?

 

[22lcidw]

Well meaning but pretty stupid. On one hand they argue for the protection of free speech and on the other they restrict speech.

The way to do this properly is to lead by example.

Democrats argue for free speech? get real

Republicans have no soap box to stand on here.

If Pelosi really believes that then she is truly crazy. I know she is a mobster princess. But to keep power as to keep pushing this lunacy?

 

[Godboy]

Well meaning but pretty stupid. On one hand they argue for the protection of free speech and on the other they restrict speech.

The way to do this properly is to lead by example.

Democrats argue for free speech? get real

Republicans have no soap box to stand on here.

I dont see republicans limiting anyones speach ever.

 

[Osiris-ODS]

Well meaning but pretty stupid. On one hand they argue for the protection of free speech and on the other they restrict speech.

The way to do this properly is to lead by example.

Democrats argue for free speech? get real

Republicans have no soap box to stand on here.

I dont see republicans limiting anyones speach ever.

You have to forgive pknopp, he's a leftist, and it's leftist law that every debate end with "...but Republicans!"

 

[Meister]

closed duplicate thread