It's Not The Scandal, It's Your Response That I'm Interested In

"Your blaming democrats for a disaster that was not of there making."

I didn't.


You should read it again.
My interpretation is valid. I am free to interpret it anyway that I see it. Just because you didn't use the word blame does not mean that it was not your intention. You say your intrested in the response. Well that was a response

words are always interpreted
just becaue the speaker is trying to be vague on purpose doesn't change anything unless the listener allows it.
 
using the passive to call attention to something without directly criticizing .

So your intentionally being vague about the topic you brought up

Still it was a valid interpretation

Yeah if your boyfriend says that there is love in the air.

You can say you didn't say that you were blaming democrats but you know what people say is always interpeted. Its up to the speaker to be clear.

Yeah you can interpreted anyway you want. It could be the right interpretation or it could be the wrong.
This is your quote:

"Your blaming democrats for a disaster that was not of there making."

I did no such thing, as I proved.

I use language with the precision of a UN translator. Possibly because it is not my first language.


You should do the same.



Several minutes ago I called WINS 1010 newsroom for also a careless use of language: they said that Trump "threatened" to make Canada our 51st state.......he did no such thing.
 
My interpretation is valid. I am free to interpret it anyway that I see it. Just because you didn't use the word blame does not mean that it was not your intention. You say your intrested in the response. Well that was a response

words are always interpreted
just becaue the speaker is trying to be vague on purpose doesn't change anything unless the listener allows it.
Do you have a first language?

You appear not to know the meaning of "blamed".

I can help.

"assign responsibility for a fault or wrong."


No, words are not "interpreted." Another word you seem unable to understand.

They have meanings. We use dictionaries for same.



On Wednesday, June 6, 1928 the Oxford English Dictionary was completed.
In The Meaning of Everything, Simon Winchester explains the work....you might benefit from the book. And the dictionary.
 
Do you have a first language?

You appear not to know the meaning of "blamed".

I can help.

"assign responsibility for a fault or wrong."


No, words are not "interpreted." Another word you seem unable to understand.

They have meanings. We use dictionaries for same.



On Wednesday, June 6, 1928 the Oxford English Dictionary was completed.
In The Meaning of Everything, Simon Winchester explains the work....you might benefit from the book. And the dictionary.
I used the word blame

Mistake in thinking that I care about my typing skills.
 
Do you have a first language?

You appear not to know the meaning of "blamed".

I can help.

"assign responsibility for a fault or wrong."


No, words are not "interpreted." Another word you seem unable to understand.

They have meanings. We use dictionaries for same.



On Wednesday, June 6, 1928 the Oxford English Dictionary was completed.
In The Meaning of Everything, Simon Winchester explains the work....you might benefit from the book. And the dictionary.
You should take your own advise

words are interpreted language

 
Last edited:
I used the word blame

Mistake in thinking that I care about my typing skills.

But do you care about your capriciousness turning into an insult?

It's a question of character.
You should take your own advise

words are interpreted language

You are wrong again.

AI Overview

While the
First Amendment of the US Constitution protects freedom of speech, it doesn't give you the right to interpret words in a way that is binding on others, particularly in legal or official contexts.
Here's why:
  • Shared Meaning: Language relies on shared understanding. For effective communication, words need to have generally agreed-upon meanings within a community or context. If everyone interpreted words entirely as they wished, communication would break down.
  • Context: The meaning of words is often heavily influenced by their context.
  • Formal Interpretation: In situations like legal proceedings, courts have the authority to determine the official interpretation of laws and texts.
  • Authorial Intent: When interpreting texts, especially important documents like the Bible, understanding the author's intended meaning is crucial.
  • Limitations of Subjectivity: While personal interpretation exists, it is limited. Your brain likely won't allow you to simply decide that "cat" means "gorilla" if you've associated "cat" with the feline creature your entire life.
In summary:
You can internally interpret words however you want. However, your personal interpretation may not be considered correct, particularly when there are established and official interpretations, like in the legal system. The ability to interpret words in a way that binds others, like within the government and judiciary, is not granted by personal preference.




 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom