it's not just Deplorable Donald, President Reagan should've been impeached for Iran Contra & other scandals, my friends. The GOP protected St Reagan!

1. I'm not aware of anything in the neocon ideology that would be particular hostile to the idea of a foreigner being on the site, being part of the conversation.

2. And in the context of the Cold War, respect for the national sovereignty of other nations, was to be ignored. By both sides. The Sandinistas were communists and allies of the Soviet Union, who were happy to support them, in their struggle, to take over, while Carter was President, doing nothing.

1) You not being aware doesn't mean people are not hostile. There are a number of people who are regularly hostile
2) Non of the US business what goes on inside Nicaragua. The better question is 'why did the Sandinistas come about in the first place?' The party was not formed in a vacuum. They are socialists, not communists. There is a difference. And they have been voted in in the past 3 elections. The 17 years previous to that they were not in power. I'm glad Carter did nothing.
 
So when the smoke cleared from the Reagan terms as president 225 of Reagan's appointees were charged with unethical or criminal wrong doing. It may be the record for a president.
All of whom were also lifer swamp things.

The Swamp hated both Nixon and Reagan.

Are we beginning to see a pattern here?
:auiqs.jpg: :iyfyus.jpg: You got your presidents mixed up dude.:auiqs.jpg:Put the names carter and kennedy in there in place of those war monger mass murderers in your post then becomes accurate.

the swamp loved those evil bastards Nixon and Reagan.Nixon for expanding the war in Vietnam with his illegal bombing of Cambodia murdering women and children as well as sabotaging Johnson’s Paris peace talks to end the Vietnam warplus his most biggest crime against humanity they loved him for taking us off the gold standard.

they loved Reagan as well because once carter got out of office who they hated immensely for not starting any wars for them,They were dancing and giving each other high fives when Reagan got in office because his first act he did thst had them dancing and partying,was firing Carter’s CIA director Stansfield Turner who immediately cleaned house cleaning up the corruption of the CIA firing all CIA covert operators and dismantling CIA covert wars.

Reagan fired him and replaced him with CIA director William Casey who got the ball rolling again for the CIA getting the CIAback to running covert wars again and once the elite got their boy Reagan in,he made them happy men getting the war machine rolling again starting wars for them once again.Reagan ran the most corrupt administration ever at the time having more people indicted than any other president previously combined making the swamp very happy.:auiqs.jpg:

Your interpretation of all that is completely wrong. Stansfield Turner was an incompetent bungler who knew nothing about covert operations and almost destroyed the CIA making the conduct of foreign policy a major problem for the U.S. for years.s

And the CIA does not wage wars and never has.
:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
Another shill from langley thst has penetrated this site.you can brainwash others with your lies but they don’t work on me son.
 
1. I'm not aware of anything in the neocon ideology that would be particular hostile to the idea of a foreigner being on the site, being part of the conversation.

2. And in the context of the Cold War, respect for the national sovereignty of other nations, was to be ignored. By both sides. The Sandinistas were communists and allies of the Soviet Union, who were happy to support them, in their struggle, to take over, while Carter was President, doing nothing.

1) You not being aware doesn't mean people are not hostile. There are a number of people who are regularly hostile
2) Non of the US business what goes on inside Nicaragua. The better question is 'why did the Sandinistas come about in the first place?' The party was not formed in a vacuum. They are socialists, not communists. There is a difference. And they have been voted in in the past 3 elections. The 17 years previous to that they were not in power. I'm glad Carter did nothing.


1. I sure there are. That does not mean it has anything to do with the neo-con ideology.

2. Why have you not mentioned the interference of the Soviet Union in the internal affairs of Nicaragua?
 
Ronnie's boiz didn't keep him up to date as to where Osama B Ollie North was.
Ironically , he was left in the dark and Nancy's astrologist couldn't see it.
I know.
He was near Bijagua in Guanacaste. Killer runways !
 
1. I'm not aware of anything in the neocon ideology that would be particular hostile to the idea of a foreigner being on the site, being part of the conversation.

2. And in the context of the Cold War, respect for the national sovereignty of other nations, was to be ignored. By both sides. The Sandinistas were communists and allies of the Soviet Union, who were happy to support them, in their struggle, to take over, while Carter was President, doing nothing.

1) You not being aware doesn't mean people are not hostile. There are a number of people who are regularly hostile
2) Non of the US business what goes on inside Nicaragua. The better question is 'why did the Sandinistas come about in the first place?' The party was not formed in a vacuum. They are socialists, not communists. There is a difference. And they have been voted in in the past 3 elections. The 17 years previous to that they were not in power. I'm glad Carter did nothing.


1. I sure there are. That does not mean it has anything to do with the neo-con ideology.

2. Why have you not mentioned the interference of the Soviet Union in the internal affairs of Nicaragua?
Soviets just as bad.
 
1. I'm not aware of anything in the neocon ideology that would be particular hostile to the idea of a foreigner being on the site, being part of the conversation.

2. And in the context of the Cold War, respect for the national sovereignty of other nations, was to be ignored. By both sides. The Sandinistas were communists and allies of the Soviet Union, who were happy to support them, in their struggle, to take over, while Carter was President, doing nothing.

1) You not being aware doesn't mean people are not hostile. There are a number of people who are regularly hostile
2) Non of the US business what goes on inside Nicaragua. The better question is 'why did the Sandinistas come about in the first place?' The party was not formed in a vacuum. They are socialists, not communists. There is a difference. And they have been voted in in the past 3 elections. The 17 years previous to that they were not in power. I'm glad Carter did nothing.


1. I sure there are. That does not mean it has anything to do with the neo-con ideology.

2. Why have you not mentioned the interference of the Soviet Union in the internal affairs of Nicaragua?
Soviets just as bad.


Just as bad, BUT, people like you, wanted for US to let them run rampant though the Third World, overthrowing governments and setting up totalitarian states as allies in the Cold War, with the intention of world conquest.


Because you are anti-American. And generally pro-Soviet.
 
So when the smoke cleared from the Reagan terms as president 225 of Reagan's appointees were charged with unethical or criminal wrong doing. It may be the record for a president.
All of whom were also lifer swamp things.

The Swamp hated both Nixon and Reagan.

Are we beginning to see a pattern here?
:auiqs.jpg: :iyfyus.jpg: You got your presidents mixed up dude.:auiqs.jpg:Put the names carter and kennedy in there in place of those war monger mass murderers in your post then becomes accurate.

the swamp loved those evil bastards Nixon and Reagan.Nixon for expanding the war in Vietnam with his illegal bombing of Cambodia murdering women and children as well as sabotaging Johnson’s Paris peace talks to end the Vietnam warplus his most biggest crime against humanity they loved him for taking us off the gold standard.

they loved Reagan as well because once carter got out of office who they hated immensely for not starting any wars for them,They were dancing and giving each other high fives when Reagan got in office because his first act he did thst had them dancing and partying,was firing Carter’s CIA director Stansfield Turner who immediately cleaned house cleaning up the corruption of the CIA firing all CIA covert operators and dismantling CIA covert wars.

Reagan fired him and replaced him with CIA director William Casey who got the ball rolling again for the CIA getting the CIAback to running covert wars again and once the elite got their boy Reagan in,he made them happy men getting the war machine rolling again starting wars for them once again.Reagan ran the most corrupt administration ever at the time having more people indicted than any other president previously combined making the swamp very happy.:auiqs.jpg:

Your interpretation of all that is completely wrong. Stansfield Turner was an incompetent bungler who knew nothing about covert operations and almost destroyed the CIA making the conduct of foreign policy a major problem for the U.S. for years.s

And the CIA does not wage wars and never has.
:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
Another shill from langley thst has penetrated this site.you can brainwash others with your lies but they don’t work on me son.

I've never even been to Langley. I'm a 53 year old history teacher and football coach. I never even met President Reagan or VP George H.W. Bush.
 
Reagan not only violated the Arms Export Control Act and the National Security Act but also his own stated policy against dealing with terrorists. he also broke the cardinal rule of covert operatives, he began to believe his own cover. he persuaded himself that he had not been trading arms for hostages, but that he had merely tried to establish a friendly relationship with Iranian "moderates"



Trading arms for hostages? Iran released its hostages right before Reagan took office--they were terrified of him.
 
Reagan not only violated the Arms Export Control Act and the National Security Act but also his own stated policy against dealing with terrorists. he also broke the cardinal rule of covert operatives, he began to believe his own cover. he persuaded himself that he had not been trading arms for hostages, but that he had merely tried to establish a friendly relationship with Iranian "moderates"



Trading arms for hostages? Iran released its hostages right before Reagan took office--they were terrified of him.


Yeah,, what this guy doesn't get is that the Iran Hostage Crisis and the Iran Contra Scandal involved two entirely separate incidents. The Iran Hostage Crisis involve the embassy staff taken captive when the Iranians overran the U.S. embassy Nov. 4th, 1979. An act of war by the way.

The Iran Contra Scandal involved several Americans that were taken captive by various groups connected to Iran in Lebanon during the mid to late 1980s.
 
So when the smoke cleared from the Reagan terms as president 225 of Reagan's appointees were charged with unethical or criminal wrong doing. It may be the record for a president.
All of whom were also lifer swamp things.

The Swamp hated both Nixon and Reagan.

Are we beginning to see a pattern here?
:auiqs.jpg: :iyfyus.jpg: You got your presidents mixed up dude.:auiqs.jpg:Put the names carter and kennedy in there in place of those war monger mass murderers in your post then becomes accurate.

the swamp loved those evil bastards Nixon and Reagan.Nixon for expanding the war in Vietnam with his illegal bombing of Cambodia murdering women and children as well as sabotaging Johnson’s Paris peace talks to end the Vietnam warplus his most biggest crime against humanity they loved him for taking us off the gold standard.

they loved Reagan as well because once carter got out of office who they hated immensely for not starting any wars for them,They were dancing and giving each other high fives when Reagan got in office because his first act he did thst had them dancing and partying,was firing Carter’s CIA director Stansfield Turner who immediately cleaned house cleaning up the corruption of the CIA firing all CIA covert operators and dismantling CIA covert wars.

Reagan fired him and replaced him with CIA director William Casey who got the ball rolling again for the CIA getting the CIAback to running covert wars again and once the elite got their boy Reagan in,he made them happy men getting the war machine rolling again starting wars for them once again.Reagan ran the most corrupt administration ever at the time having more people indicted than any other president previously combined making the swamp very happy.:auiqs.jpg:
Reagan's administration was loaded down with swampers by the east coast Rockefeller country club set....That there were so many indicted is a function of that it's always (D)ifferent when you're a crook with an (R) by your name.

They loathed Reagan but worked with him because he was easily rolled, like they did with the budget and amnesty....Iran-Contra was a Bush production from front to back.
 
Reagan's administration was loaded down with swampers by the east coast Rockefeller country club set....That there were so many indicted is a function of that it's always (D)ifferent when you're a crook with an (R) by your name.

Indictment does not mean "guilty". Remember Ray Donovan
 
Reagan's administration was loaded down with swampers by the east coast Rockefeller country club set....That there were so many indicted is a function of that it's always (D)ifferent when you're a crook with an (R) by your name.

Indictment does not mean "guilty". Remember Ray Donovan
Indeed, but the point still stands.

Democrats can literally get away with murder, while anyone who isn't on that team gets the book thrown at them for jaywalking.
 
After we saw president Clinton bomb a defenseless country in Europe to deflect attention from molesting an intern, the crazy left wants to bring up Iran-Contra that was based on alleged violation of a little known amendment added to a defense budget? Surely you jest.
 
After we saw president Clinton bomb a defenseless country in Europe to deflect attention from molesting an intern, the crazy left wants to bring up Iran-Contra that was based on alleged violation of a little known amendment added to a defense budget? Surely you jest.
The war in Yugoslavia was a calculated move to significantly curb a possible Russian forpost in the middle of Europe. It worked out. It had hardly anything to do with the scandal.
 
Reagan not only violated the Arms Export Control Act and the National Security Act but also his own stated policy against dealing with terrorists. he also broke the cardinal rule of covert operatives, he began to believe his own cover. he persuaded himself that he had not been trading arms for hostages, but that he had merely tried to establish a friendly relationship with Iranian "moderates"




People liked Reagan and thought his heart was in the right place. Whereas Trump is a profane, ignorant bully that people find repulsive.
 
After we saw president Clinton bomb a defenseless country in Europe to deflect attention from molesting an intern, the crazy left wants to bring up Iran-Contra that was based on alleged violation of a little known amendment added to a defense budget? Surely you jest.

What defenseless European country did Clinton bomb?
 
LMAO @ Salon.com .....

Only the most Gullible Useful Idiots in our society would read that garbage.

However, it is still very entertaining watching our Snowflake Bed Wetting Leftist friends still crying about Ronaldus Magnus' term some 31 years after it has ended.
you guys are still mad about FDR, and some are mad that Lincoln freed the slaves and the south lost
I thought you said Lincoln was a racist and that FDR hated poor people.....
 
Reagan not only violated the Arms Export Control Act and the National Security Act but also his own stated policy against dealing with terrorists. he also broke the cardinal rule of covert operatives, he began to believe his own cover. he persuaded himself that he had not been trading arms for hostages, but that he had merely tried to establish a friendly relationship with Iranian "moderates"




People liked Reagan and thought his heart was in the right place. Whereas Trump is a profane, ignorant bully that people find repulsive.

Thats what it takes in current day Washington DC with all the globalists. He was just trying to instill American principals back in government
 
Reagan not only violated the Arms Export Control Act and the National Security Act but also his own stated policy against dealing with terrorists. he also broke the cardinal rule of covert operatives, he began to believe his own cover. he persuaded himself that he had not been trading arms for hostages, but that he had merely tried to establish a friendly relationship with Iranian "moderates"




People liked Reagan and thought his heart was in the right place. Whereas Trump is a profane, ignorant bully that people find repulsive.

Thats what it takes in current day Washington DC with all the globalists. He was just trying to instill American principals back in government


Trump is a globalist.. in fact, globalism has been with us since the Bronze Age.
 

Forum List

Back
Top