JQPublic1
Gold Member
- Aug 10, 2012
- 14,220
- 1,544
- 280
The random shooting of cops in Dallas was not justified but the shooter certainly made a statement that cannot be ignored. I have nothing more to add!
It's a myth that we have a problem with police. It's a race-baiting problem.
- Thread starter Clementine
- Start date
Clementine
Platinum Member
- Dec 18, 2011
- 12,919
- 4,859
- 350
- Thread starter
- #62
The left wants instant revenge for the cops and there are few willing to wait for an investigation. On blurry video does not give anyone the right to declare guilt. How many more will die because people think they are above the law? I don't care what point the shooter made. He is a cold-blooded killer.
The department is investigating the shooting by the cop. That is necessary. You don't just declare guilt without looking at all the facts. If you do, a person is likely to avoid prosecution due to a loophole. The idiots are incapable of thinking things through. Some watched one fuzzy video and don't care about any other facts. That is beyond stupid and not how things work.
Here is another video, which shows that the guy's right hand was not being held down. You can see his elbow moving in a way that looks like he may have been trying to grab the gun. If he broke free of the cop's grip, anything could happen. We still can't see what the cop saw, so that is why an investigation is always a must. Unless you want people walking because the cops didn't follow proper procedure, I suggest you wait for them to complete the investigation and make sure they do everything they were supposed to do.
"One of the first items of note in the video is that Alton Sterling’s left hand was clearly restrained and under the control of Officer One. However, Sterling’s right hand is clearly not under control of the officers. In fact, Officer Two’s position would have made it all but impossible for him to effectively control Sterling’s hand. You can see moments where Sterling is moving his elbow, making a pulling motion. Officer Two can be seen fighting Sterling for control of his hand. Then, just before the shots were fired, you can see Officer Two’s hand is empty and clearly not holding Sterling’s hand."
http://usat.ly/29iVy82
There were two officers trying to hold the guy down, not three. And the guy was combative and had his right arm free.
Watch the video.
The department is investigating the shooting by the cop. That is necessary. You don't just declare guilt without looking at all the facts. If you do, a person is likely to avoid prosecution due to a loophole. The idiots are incapable of thinking things through. Some watched one fuzzy video and don't care about any other facts. That is beyond stupid and not how things work.
Here is another video, which shows that the guy's right hand was not being held down. You can see his elbow moving in a way that looks like he may have been trying to grab the gun. If he broke free of the cop's grip, anything could happen. We still can't see what the cop saw, so that is why an investigation is always a must. Unless you want people walking because the cops didn't follow proper procedure, I suggest you wait for them to complete the investigation and make sure they do everything they were supposed to do.
"One of the first items of note in the video is that Alton Sterling’s left hand was clearly restrained and under the control of Officer One. However, Sterling’s right hand is clearly not under control of the officers. In fact, Officer Two’s position would have made it all but impossible for him to effectively control Sterling’s hand. You can see moments where Sterling is moving his elbow, making a pulling motion. Officer Two can be seen fighting Sterling for control of his hand. Then, just before the shots were fired, you can see Officer Two’s hand is empty and clearly not holding Sterling’s hand."
http://usat.ly/29iVy82
There were two officers trying to hold the guy down, not three. And the guy was combative and had his right arm free.
Watch the video.
Last edited:
LoneLaugher
Diamond Member
Who is pretending that cops being shot is justified?
JQPublic1
Gold Member
- Aug 10, 2012
- 14,220
- 1,544
- 280
No one..bu tif you feel a cop is about to take your life, blow his MF ass away before he kills YOU.
LoneLaugher
Diamond Member
You got the wrong guy.
Unkotare
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2011
- 147,154
- 33,446
- 2,180
Clementine
Platinum Member
- Dec 18, 2011
- 12,919
- 4,859
- 350
- Thread starter
- #67
Many times a shooting occurs when police are trying to restrain a suspect and they refuse to cooperate. If the guy had his hand loose and was reaching into his pocket, that would certainly change things. In the video, you see two cops, not three as some have claimed, and the guy is not restrained completely. He was fighting them instead of cooperating.
If a cop feels that a suspect is about to take his life, shouldn't he "blow his MF ass away" before he is killed? Or do you only see one side of this? Anything to support the narrative, eh?
Last edited:
JQPublic1
Gold Member
- Aug 10, 2012
- 14,220
- 1,544
- 280
So if you felt threatened by a cop you wouldn't do what Huey Newton did and defend yourself?
This guy did:
Police think argument led New Mexico sheriff's deputy to kill colleague
Clementine
Platinum Member
- Dec 18, 2011
- 12,919
- 4,859
- 350
- Thread starter
- #69
Are the libs here afraid to watch the latest video available? Sorry if it doesn't support the current narrative.
http://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/nation/2016/07/06/86786692/
http://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/nation/2016/07/06/86786692/
Unkotare
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2011
- 147,154
- 33,446
- 2,180
Clementine
Platinum Member
- Dec 18, 2011
- 12,919
- 4,859
- 350
- Thread starter
- #71
Completely irrelevant to this case. Stick with the topic. You refuse to comment on the latest video that doesn't support what the left has been claiming. Cops are dead over the shabby reporting on this that fed the anger of the radical groups. All the media who fell in line behind the race baiters now have blood on their hands.
Graphic video shows Alton Sterling being shot
LoneLaugher
Diamond Member
**** off.
JQPublic1
Gold Member
- Aug 10, 2012
- 14,220
- 1,544
- 280
Agreed, I don't forsee any confrontation with cops since I know most in my town by name. Having been a cop myself, I know how racist some cops can be and I try to steer clear of that kind. But rogue cops ought to be weeded out before they kill anyone. Good cops know who they are and their silence makes them complicit in anything the bad cop does. That is really all I am sayin'
JQPublic1
Gold Member
- Aug 10, 2012
- 14,220
- 1,544
- 280
YOU CAN"T HANDLE THE TRUTH!
JQPublic1
Gold Member
- Aug 10, 2012
- 14,220
- 1,544
- 280
Wrong link..here is the correct one:
Police think argument led New Mexico sheriff's deputy to kill colleague
Clementine
Platinum Member
- Dec 18, 2011
- 12,919
- 4,859
- 350
- Thread starter
- #76
Your link has no bearing on the current topic and it only proves that cops don't like rogue cops.
JoeMoma
Platinum Member
- Nov 22, 2014
- 23,831
- 11,674
- 950
14 minutes into the video was all I could watch. Very unprofessional! Cop needs to be fired.
Clementine
Platinum Member
- Dec 18, 2011
- 12,919
- 4,859
- 350
- Thread starter
- #78
No, they are not always complicit. Cops I know hate bad cops because they give them all a bad name. In this case, the cop may have been right to do what he did.
That is why an investigation must be completed before the media and the race baiters jump to conclusions. That has happened a lot lately and we end up with more murders over something that didn't happen in the first place.
In this day and age of cell phone video and dash cams, the truth usually gets out and it just takes time. I am sick of media who act more like gossipy idiots than like reporters. They repeat total bullshit that gets violent people riled and then we have even more deaths. Where are the voices of reason (that BLM might actually listen to) telling people to chill the **** out until all facts are known? The race baiters start talking shit and people seek revenge. When the facts do come out in some cases and prove that the initial stories were wrong, it doesn't deter them from flying off the handle the next time. Obama is out there talking about the problem with police and not talking about the problem with those who murder at the drop of a hat and don't care about evidence.
There must be investigations after every incident. Things are not always what they seem and even when they are, it's hard to make charges stick when police blow it by not making sure they crossed all the t's and dotted all the i's. Why are so many too stupid to understand that?
LoneLaugher
Diamond Member
You could make 100 thoughtful, lucid posts and any normal person would still see you as a ******* lunatic. Why not just stop.
JQPublic1
Gold Member
- Aug 10, 2012
- 14,220
- 1,544
- 280
There is an innate distrust of the justice system because of past indiscretions of police officers that supported abuse of minorities. We have seen police abuse up close and un expurgated and that view has never changed since the days of slavery. Ever since I can remember Blacks have borne the brunt of merciless jurisprudence that was too often tainted by racial hegemonic agendas.
Crimes such as learning to read, wanting to vote and having consensual sex with a White woman
were on the books for years. That same system that incarcerates a large number of young Black men for non violent offenses has done more to destroy Black families than anything innate.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
Will David Hearn be convicted of vandalism? (Reflecting pool)- Started by Conservative from Georgia
- Replies: 8
-
It is official, the democrat party has been replaced by communists
- Started by Votto
- Replies: 3
-
-
We Asked AI To Simulate If The U.S. Had A Second Civil War- Started by Doc7505
- Replies: 10
