IT’S A FAKE! Analyst Says Judge Roy Moore Signature Inside Allred's Accuser’s Yearbook Was FORGED

[jc456]

Why the deflection

Were they both pranks or not?

If not, why not?

Of course they’re not the same. Trump was grabbing women by the ***** as a lead in for sex. Franken was goofing off for the camera. It doesn’t make what he did right, but it’s not the same as grabbing who knows how many women by the ***** and trying to sleep with married women.

I got a photo of Frankens “prank”, what you got?

A confession from Trump.

Said to be a prank, just like AF.

But we have a photo.

Again, why is one easily excused as a prank, and the other not?

You seem to be having trouble with this.

I wonder what the prank is. do you get it? I don't.

I thought a prank was like opening a door and a bucket of water is dumped on your head.

 

[Faun]

Pop, y ou and the Moore defenders are toast, just waiting to be buttered and tossed in the trash.

Keep the butter for your other men “friends” Fakey.

WTF?

 

[Faun]

You think adultery is a stupid prank?

Why the deflection

Were they both pranks or not?

If not, why not?

Of course they’re not the same. Trump was grabbing women by the ***** as a lead in for sex. Franken was goofing off for the camera. It doesn’t make what he did right, but it’s not the same as grabbing who knows how many women by the ***** and trying to sleep with married women.

I got a photo of Frankens “prank”, what you got?

A confession from Trump.

Said to be a prank, just like AF.

But we have a photo.

Again, why is one easily excused as a prank, and the other not?

You seem to be having trouble with this.

Said by who? Trump said he was trying to hook up with married women. That’s hardly a prank.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Pop, y ou and the Moore defenders are toast, just waiting to be buttered and tossed in the trash.

Keep the butter for your other men “friends” Fakey.

WTF?

He calls people who show him up fags and homos, etc.

You know the Alt Right type like Pop who are insecure in their manhood.

And WillMunny who will post immediately below. Edit: see, I told you.

 

[WillMunny]

I've always hated that permanently scowling, contorted expression on Gloria Allred's face. She always looks like she sat down on a glowing-red icepick. People like Allred (& Michelle Obama or Kathy Griffin, for that matter) prove my theory that when a person is ugly enough on the inside, it really does biochemically affect the physical body enough that they begin wearing that ugliness on the outside.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The Moore defenders are not just stumbling now but falling on their faces.

Very weak evidence. Unlike this..

Evidence of what? Fingertips touching a flak vest?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The Moore defenders are not just stumbling now but falling on their faces.

Very weak evidence. Unlike this..

I find it funny the expression on his face. He is like look, I could squeeze her boobs and enjoy myself. That is what that look tells me. Not a joke at all. Again, he is just scum and the folks of minnesota get to decide his fate.

No one can squeeze boobs through a flak vest.

 

[bripat9643]

The Moore defenders are not just stumbling now but falling on their faces.

Very weak evidence. Unlike this..

Evidence of what? Fingertips touching a flak jacket?

Here we are again with the theory that unless she's naked, it isn't sexual assault. This comes from the same gang that automatically assumes some accusation by an emotionally disturbed menopausal female about something that supposedely occurred 40 years ago couldn't possibly be false.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The Moore defenders are not just stumbling now but falling on their faces.

Very weak evidence. Unlike this..

Evidence of what? Fingertips touching a flak jacket?

Here we are again with the theory that unless she's naked, it isn't sexual assault. This comes from the same gang that automatically assumes some accusation by an emotionally disturbed menopausal female about something that supposedely occurred 40 years ago couldn't possibly be false.

No boob was touched, dope. It's a stretch to label that as groping. I made no judgement of the woman either, liar.

 

[ABikerSailor]

The Moore defenders are not just stumbling now but falling on their faces.

Very weak evidence. Unlike this..

Evidence of what? Fingertips touching a flak jacket?

Here we are again with the theory that unless she's naked, it isn't sexual assault. This comes from the same gang that automatically assumes some accusation by an emotionally disturbed menopausal female about something that supposedely occurred 40 years ago couldn't possibly be false.

No boob was touched, dope. It's a stretch to label that as groping. I made no judgement of the woman either, liar.

While the picture is crass and in very poor taste, it doesn't really qualify as groping.

Tell ya what...............get your girlfriend to agree to be groped by you. Then, take and place a medium sized phone book (about 1 inch thick) over her breasts and then try to grope her through the phone book.

That is what it would be like to grope someone through a flak vest, which is what the picture with Franken is showing.

Then, remove the phone book, and ask your girlfriend to remove her shirt as well, and then try to grope her over her bra.

That is what Moore allegedly did to that 14 year old.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The Moore defenders are not just stumbling now but falling on their faces.

Very weak evidence. Unlike this..

Evidence of what? Fingertips touching a flak jacket?

Here we are again with the theory that unless she's naked, it isn't sexual assault. This comes from the same gang that automatically assumes some accusation by an emotionally disturbed menopausal female about something that supposedely occurred 40 years ago couldn't possibly be false.

No boob was touched, dope. It's a stretch to label that as groping. I made no judgement of the woman either, liar.

While the picture is crass and in very poor taste, it doesn't really qualify as groping.

Tell ya what...............get your girlfriend to agree to be groped by you. Then, take and place a medium sized phone book (about 1 inch thick) over her breasts and then try to grope her through the phone book.

That is what it would be like to grope someone through a flak vest, which is what the picture with Franken is showing.

Then, remove the phone book, and ask your girlfriend to remove her shirt as well, and then try to grope her over her bra.

That is what Moore allegedly did to that 14 year old.

My wife was convinced he was touching her. I stacked four magazines on her chest and touched my fingertips to them. She couldn't even feel my touch.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Very weak evidence. Unlike this..

Evidence of what? Fingertips touching a flak jacket?

Here we are again with the theory that unless she's naked, it isn't sexual assault. This comes from the same gang that automatically assumes some accusation by an emotionally disturbed menopausal female about something that supposedely occurred 40 years ago couldn't possibly be false.

No boob was touched, dope. It's a stretch to label that as groping. I made no judgement of the woman either, liar.

While the picture is crass and in very poor taste, it doesn't really qualify as groping.

Tell ya what...............get your girlfriend to agree to be groped by you. Then, take and place a medium sized phone book (about 1 inch thick) over her breasts and then try to grope her through the phone book.

That is what it would be like to grope someone through a flak vest, which is what the picture with Franken is showing.

Then, remove the phone book, and ask your girlfriend to remove her shirt as well, and then try to grope her over her bra.

That is what Moore allegedly did to that 14 year old.

My wife was convinced he was touching her. I stacked four magazines on her chest and touched my fingertips to them. She couldn't even feel my touch.

Well, when this picture first came out, my room mate and I were talking about it, and I came up with the phonebook demonstration to illustrate the point for her quite nicely.

And yeah, she even agrees that it's kinda impossible to grope someone through a flak vest.

 

[bripat9643]

The Moore defenders are not just stumbling now but falling on their faces.

Very weak evidence. Unlike this..

Evidence of what? Fingertips touching a flak jacket?

Here we are again with the theory that unless she's naked, it isn't sexual assault. This comes from the same gang that automatically assumes some accusation by an emotionally disturbed menopausal female about something that supposedely occurred 40 years ago couldn't possibly be false.

No boob was touched, dope. It's a stretch to label that as groping. I made no judgement of the woman either, liar.

Having cloths on isn't a defense against sexual assault, moron. The primary accuser against Roy Moore says she had cloths on.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The Moore defenders are not just stumbling now but falling on their faces.

Very weak evidence. Unlike this..

Evidence of what? Fingertips touching a flak jacket?

Here we are again with the theory that unless she's naked, it isn't sexual assault. This comes from the same gang that automatically assumes some accusation by an emotionally disturbed menopausal female about something that supposedely occurred 40 years ago couldn't possibly be false.

No boob was touched, dope. It's a stretch to label that as groping. I made no judgement of the woman either, liar.

Having cloths on isn't a defense against sexual assault, moron. The primary accuser against Roy Moore says she had cloths on.

Well, a flack jacket is a little different than a bra and panites.

 

[bripat9643]

Evidence of what? Fingertips touching a flak jacket?

Here we are again with the theory that unless she's naked, it isn't sexual assault. This comes from the same gang that automatically assumes some accusation by an emotionally disturbed menopausal female about something that supposedely occurred 40 years ago couldn't possibly be false.

No boob was touched, dope. It's a stretch to label that as groping. I made no judgement of the woman either, liar.

While the picture is crass and in very poor taste, it doesn't really qualify as groping.

Tell ya what...............get your girlfriend to agree to be groped by you. Then, take and place a medium sized phone book (about 1 inch thick) over her breasts and then try to grope her through the phone book.

That is what it would be like to grope someone through a flak vest, which is what the picture with Franken is showing.

Then, remove the phone book, and ask your girlfriend to remove her shirt as well, and then try to grope her over her bra.

That is what Moore allegedly did to that 14 year old.

My wife was convinced he was touching her. I stacked four magazines on her chest and touched my fingertips to them. She couldn't even feel my touch.

Well, when this picture first came out, my room mate and I were talking about it, and I came up with the phonebook demonstration to illustrate the point for her quite nicely.

And yeah, she even agrees that it's kinda impossible to grope someone through a flak vest.

Your roomate agrees? Well, then it must be true!

It's hilarious watching all you snowflakes desperately trying to defend Frankenstein.

 

[bripat9643]

Very weak evidence. Unlike this..

Evidence of what? Fingertips touching a flak jacket?

Here we are again with the theory that unless she's naked, it isn't sexual assault. This comes from the same gang that automatically assumes some accusation by an emotionally disturbed menopausal female about something that supposedely occurred 40 years ago couldn't possibly be false.

No boob was touched, dope. It's a stretch to label that as groping. I made no judgement of the woman either, liar.

Having cloths on isn't a defense against sexual assault, moron. The primary accuser against Roy Moore says she had cloths on.

Well, a flack jacket is a little different than a bra and panites.

Can you provide a list of clothing that doesn't allow it to be called sexual assault?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Evidence of what? Fingertips touching a flak jacket?

Here we are again with the theory that unless she's naked, it isn't sexual assault. This comes from the same gang that automatically assumes some accusation by an emotionally disturbed menopausal female about something that supposedely occurred 40 years ago couldn't possibly be false.

No boob was touched, dope. It's a stretch to label that as groping. I made no judgement of the woman either, liar.

Having cloths on isn't a defense against sexual assault, moron. The primary accuser against Roy Moore says she had cloths on.

Well, a flack jacket is a little different than a bra and panites.

Can you provide a list of clothing that doesn't allow it to be called sexual assault?

I do not care what you call it. Touching an adult on the chest through a flack jacket does not equate to feeling up a 14 year old when you are 32. And I think Franken should resign, but the acts are not similar in nature or severity.

 

[bripat9643]

Here we are again with the theory that unless she's naked, it isn't sexual assault. This comes from the same gang that automatically assumes some accusation by an emotionally disturbed menopausal female about something that supposedely occurred 40 years ago couldn't possibly be false.

No boob was touched, dope. It's a stretch to label that as groping. I made no judgement of the woman either, liar.

Having cloths on isn't a defense against sexual assault, moron. The primary accuser against Roy Moore says she had cloths on.

Well, a flack jacket is a little different than a bra and panites.

Can you provide a list of clothing that doesn't allow it to be called sexual assault?

I do not care what you call it. Touching an adult on the chest through a flack jacket does not equate to feeling up a 14 year old when you are 32. And I think Franken should resign, but the acts are not similar in nature or severity.

It's sexual assault, moron, no matter how desperate you are to justify it.

There is no evidence Moore did anything inappropriate. That's the difference between Moore's case and Franken's.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

No boob was touched, dope. It's a stretch to label that as groping. I made no judgement of the woman either, liar.

Having cloths on isn't a defense against sexual assault, moron. The primary accuser against Roy Moore says she had cloths on.

Well, a flack jacket is a little different than a bra and panites.

Can you provide a list of clothing that doesn't allow it to be called sexual assault?

I do not care what you call it. Touching an adult on the chest through a flack jacket does not equate to feeling up a 14 year old when you are 32. And I think Franken should resign, but the acts are not similar in nature or severity.

It's sexual assault, moron, no matter how desperate you are to justify it.

There is no evidence Moore did anything inappropriate. That's the difference between Moore's case and Franken's.

If you think that feeling up a 14 year old is the same as what Franken did, then there is no hope for you, you are just as bad as both of them


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The Moore defenders are not just stumbling now but falling on their faces.

Very weak evidence. Unlike this..

Evidence of what? Fingertips touching a flak jacket?

Here we are again with the theory that unless she's naked, it isn't sexual assault. This comes from the same gang that automatically assumes some accusation by an emotionally disturbed menopausal female about something that supposedely occurred 40 years ago couldn't possibly be false.

No boob was touched, dope. It's a stretch to label that as groping. I made no judgement of the woman either, liar.

Having cloths on isn't a defense against sexual assault, moron. The primary accuser against Roy Moore says she had cloths on.

That picture does not show assault in any way. A flak vest isn't in any way similar to a little girl's panties, dope.