It Was Done on Tobacco. It Can Be Done on Guns.

People who shoot at others for any reason other than self defense are not "good guys"
I've been saying that for years but you keep saying that American soldiers are all heroes. Does this mean that you finally agree with me?
If you are going to tell me what I said use the quote function

I never said any such thing

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 
People who shoot at others for any reason other than self defense are not "good guys"
I've been saying that for years but you keep saying that American soldiers are all heroes. Does this mean that you finally agree with me?
If you are going to tell me what I said use the quote function

I never said any such thing

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Don't be shy. Anyway, here is your chance to be clear. Are they good guys or bad guys?
 
Both depending on the circumstances

Only idiots think the world is black or white

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 
America has a strong (socialist) standing army. There is no longer need for "militia" as stated in the Second Amendment.
You don't understand that the 2nd amendment was meant to protect the citizens from their own government, not for hunting, or target practice
The Founders were intelligent people.
 
In regard to weaponry, killing capacity. More people are killed with bats yearly than atom bombs but that does not mean a bat is more dangerous.

Au contraire! It certainly means that a bat is far more dangerous to me than an atom bomb or 100 atom bombs. Thus far, sane people control the atom bombs, not so someone coming at me with a bat...or a sword!

 
Just as there are a significant number of people who will always hate people of color .. NO ONE wants to disarm America That's just Republican clap trap Just trying to reduce the number of killings something it seems the NRA and Trump don't want to see

 
Just in passing While I like most of Beto's talk if he persists in his no gun talk he has ZERO chance of becoming the Dem rep

With his criminal record and talk on guns, he'll never hold an elective office again unless it is in some wild, far, far, left community.
 
Biden has 40 years worth of experience in government an honest man a good man ,,all the qualities this scum in our WH now doesn't have

HystericallyLaughingmanandboy-Th.gif


SECRET EMPIRES: Joe Biden’s Son’s Firm Struck Billion-Dollar Deal with the Chinese Government 10 Days After Biden Trip to China
by EZRA DULIS 15 Mar 2018

SECRET EMPIRES: Biden, Kerry Sons' Firm Struck Billion-Dollar Deal with Chinese Govt Days After VP Visit

###

If you attack my source, please prove my FACTS wrong at the same time or you are lying.
 
Biden has 40 years worth of experience in government an honest man a good man ,,all the qualities this scum in our WH now doesn't have

Actually, as you know, Joe Biden has FIFTY YEARS of government service, never having had a real job. So, what has he accomplished?
 
Just as there are a significant number of people who will always hate people of color .. NO ONE wants to disarm America That's just Republican clap trap Just trying to reduce the number of killings something it seems the NRA and Trump don't want to see.

I'm sure you'll agree that each of these people hates people of color. Else why would they treat and lead them to deeper poverty and dependence on government [plantation]?

Failed former President Barack Hussein Obama, former First Lady Michelle Obama, Eric Holder, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Rev. Al Sharpton, Minister Louis Farrakhan, Father Pflager, Rev. Jesse Jackson, Sr., Rev. Jesse Jackson, Jr., King Samir Shabazz, Van Jones, Charlie Rangel, Barbara Boxer, Maxine Waters, Sheila Jackson Lee, Andre Carson, Shirley Sherrod, Keith Ellison
 
I answered the question you are too stupid to understand it
No, you are avoiding to answer the question ... not that I blame you because the question places you between a rock and a hard place. BTW, Calling me "stupid" is not the best way to conduct a discussion but if that's all you've got then you go for it! :eusa_dance:

You said ...
Gee criminals shoot people who would have thought?
.. and my reply was ...
Yes. Although most people are shot by "good guys" criminals are responsible for a small percentage as well.
That reply angered you so I asked you if soldiers are good guys or bad guys. But you have no answer to that.

Your problem is that you think of soldiers (American ones) as good guys or heroes despite the fact that they murder more innocent men, women, and children than any other American.

So I just wonder if you care to revise your original statement ...
Gee criminals shoot people who would have thought?
... being as you can't have it both ways. Either "good guys" murder more than anyone else or .... American soldiers are not "good guys" after all. Which is it? Maybe you can answer the question this time? :asshole:
 
I don't have an Ar 15 because I have no use for a small caliber rodent gun.

That said I don't have to justify anything I do to you or anyone else as long as I am not breaking any laws or harming anyone in the process.
as stated, no need for it
I had some idiot that said we don't need cars--hahahaha
comparing cars/POOLS/knives/etc to firearms = hahahahhahhaaha

No I think the question was "Why do you need a car that can exceed the posted speed limits?"

And even that question is irrelevant.

No one has to justify their choice of automobile to you or anyone else.
There are restrictions on cars being “street legal”

And that has nothing to do with the top speed does it?

Why do you need a car than can do 66 MPH?
cars needed--weapons not..this is plain and simple
Weapons, a Constitutional right
Cars? Nope.
 
English grammar escapes you doesn't it?

i-Lqv3tcP-L.jpg
Have you never considered how stupid the 2nd. Amendment is?

FIRST of all, it is only an amendment. Do you know what an amendment is? It is synonymous with "change" or "addition". It is not part of the constitution as it was written ... it is an "add on".

SECONDLY, how in blue blazes can "an addition" claim to be non-infringeable? It is of utmost clarity - by pure definition - that the ability to "amend" is legal. This is so stupid as to say, "I am going to change this and then it will be illegal to change it". Yeah, right. How about, "Heads I win tails you lose". Or let's play basketball: "When I put the ball through the hoop I get a point, when you put the ball through the hoop it doesn't count".
 

Forum List

Back
Top