Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 45,258
- 31,849
- 3,545
Well, that's not true. They had enough evidence to indict in the opinion of multiple grand juries.
You don't know how grand juries work.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, that's not true. They had enough evidence to indict in the opinion of multiple grand juries.
Georgia appeals court postpones Trump arguments
Donald Trump’s criminal case in Georgia is now on hold — indefinitely.
The Georgia Court of Appeals announced Monday that it has canceled arguments that were set for next month in the president-elect’s bid to kick Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis off of the case in which he’s charged with conspiring to corrupt Georgia’s 2020 election results.
The one-page order, signed by the clerk of the court, doesn’t explain the decision to scuttle the scheduled Dec. 5 arguments or identify which judges signed off on it. All four of Trump’s criminal cases have now faced delays since his election to a second presidential term.
A spokesperson for Willis and an attorney for Trump did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/18/georgia-appeals-court-postpones-trump-arguments-00190286
trumples would have us believe Fani Willis is corrupt. Alvin Bragg is corrupt. Judge Lewis Kaplan is corrupt. Letisha James is corrupt. Jack Smith is corrupt. Judge Juan Merchan is corrupt. Judge Tanya Chutkan is corrupt. AG Merrick Garland is corrupt. Every member of every grand jury that voted to indict trump and his co-defendants is corrupt. In order for you not to be corrupt your actions must align with trump's wishes. Like Judge Aileen Cannon.
Essentially, they would have us believe anyone involved in the prosecution of trump's alleged and adjudicated crimes is inherently corrupt by virtue of the fact they are involved in the prosecution. How did they come to this conclusion? trump, the defendant, who worked with his co-conspirators to launch a scheme to hold on to power using slates of fake electors, who refused to comply with a subpoena demanding the return of classified documents in his possession, told them to believe it. And obediently, they did.
If you were facing multiple criminal indictments in multiple jurisdictions, but could make those cases go away before being adjudicated, how could you make appear as though justice was served when in fact it was not?
“If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell.”
This is why I would prefer the case be delayed, not dismissed, so that it can be appealed and the voters of American can see how the Democrats came up with bogus cases that have no merit under the law in order to fool gullible voters that Trump is a convicted felon.Your illegal "Lawfare" against Trump won't stand after the appeal process.
Then we see how the DAs do after being indicted for "prosecutorial misconduct"
![]()
Judge's 'disjointed' ruling in Fani Willis case raises more questions, 'avoids the cliff problem,' Turley says
Jonathan Turley warned the Georgia judge's decision to allow Fani Willis to stay on the Trump election case if she fires Nathan Wade 'avoids the cliff problem.'www.foxnews.com
![]()
Buzz Kill: The Trump Conviction Presents a Target-Rich Environment for Appeal
Below is my column in the Hill on the most compelling grounds for an appeal in the Trump case after his conviction on 34 counts in Manhattan. There has been considerable criticism of the defense te…jonathanturley.org
Only millionaires who look like Bill Cosby go to jail.Trump isn't going to jail.
Accept it.
Only millionaires who look like Bill Cosby go to jail.
As I said that's some funny shit how you idiots will believe anything your cult media preaches to you.Prosecutors had enough evidence to indict in the opinion of multiple grand juries. All your spin can't avoid that simple fact.
I have never really trusted the context with what references I have seen to it so I am sticking with my IDK. It is all kind of moot at this point anyway.Trump was referring "12,000 missing votes", not "12,000 more votes."
Yawns. "So what?" in response to be told Pence was safe has zero to do with Shaman sitting at Nancy's desk. He made a speech using teh same sort of rhetoric Biden has used a thousand times. He didn't say "Hang a bulls eye on Nancy's back" when you go own there though at least.My take on your take is I don't think you are familiar enough with the details of the Jan. 6 indictment. Smith makes a compelling case.
I have no problem with a legal defense. Why do you have a problem with a legal prosecution?
Are you in favor of the Senate playing no role in cabinet level confirmations?On the other hand, you are fine with Chuckles Schumer and the democrats hoping to kill the filibuster as a way to make Chuckles king of the Senate. That was a hope to end any pretense of checks and balances, the notion of which you despise.
Is that a denial of the legitimate grand jury proceedings leading to trump's multiple indictments?Funny shit when idiots like you will believe the lies and the shock you show when you find out you were fooled into believing those lies.
Actually, I'd love for trump's cases to work their way thru the system. The public being denied knowing the verdicts in those trials before the election, under normal circumstances, would have ended any hope of his re-election. The abnormal circumstance being The Following's absolute devotion to trump no matter what he did.You obviously have a problem with cases working their way through the judicial system Why do you hate this country?
.
As I said that's some funny shit how you idiots will believe anything your cult media preaches to you.
Actually, I'd love for trump's cases to work their way thru the system. The public being denied knowing the verdicts in those trials before the election, under normal circumstances, would have ended any hope of his re-election. The abnormal circumstance being The Following's absolute devotion to trump no matter what he did.
Actually, I'd love for trump's cases to work their way thru the system. The public being denied knowing the verdicts in those trials before the election, under normal circumstances, would have ended any hope of his re-election. The abnormal circumstance being The Following's absolute devotion to trump no matter what he did.