It saddens me to see the continuation of justice delayed/denied.

[bigrebnc1775]

Georgia appeals court postpones Trump arguments​

Donald Trump’s criminal case in Georgia is now on hold — indefinitely.

The Georgia Court of Appeals announced Monday that it has canceled arguments that were set for next month in the president-elect’s bid to kick Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis off of the case in which he’s charged with conspiring to corrupt Georgia’s 2020 election results.

The one-page order, signed by the clerk of the court, doesn’t explain the decision to scuttle the scheduled Dec. 5 arguments or identify which judges signed off on it. All four of Trump’s criminal cases have now faced delays since his election to a second presidential term.

A spokesperson for Willis and an attorney for Trump did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/18/georgia-appeals-court-postpones-trump-arguments-00190286

trumples would have us believe Fani Willis is corrupt. Alvin Bragg is corrupt. Judge Lewis Kaplan is corrupt. Letisha James is corrupt. Jack Smith is corrupt. Judge Juan Merchan is corrupt. Judge Tanya Chutkan is corrupt. AG Merrick Garland is corrupt. Every member of every grand jury that voted to indict trump and his co-defendants is corrupt. In order for you not to be corrupt your actions must align with trump's wishes. Like Judge Aileen Cannon.

Essentially, they would have us believe anyone involved in the prosecution of trump's alleged and adjudicated crimes is inherently corrupt by virtue of the fact they are involved in the prosecution. How did they come to this conclusion? trump, the defendant, who worked with his co-conspirators to launch a scheme to hold on to power using slates of fake electors, who refused to comply with a subpoena demanding the return of classified documents in his possession, told them to believe it. And obediently, they did.

If you were facing multiple criminal indictments in multiple jurisdictions, but could make those cases go away before being adjudicated, how could you make appear as though justice was served when in fact it was not?

“If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell.”

Numbnuts they had nothing against trump. You've just learned a valuable lesson

 

[LordBrownTrout]

So.......as I said.........you believe prosecutions of trump are by their nature corrupt. Do you believe in his infallibility? Is it impossible for him to have refuse to comply with a legally issued subpoena?

Nope, he should comply. He has to comply by law. However, when the law is not applied to one person and applied to another ie classified docs, we have a problem. Same as with merchan and then you have another liberal judge, willis, who disregards the law.

 

[berg80]

When boiled down to its essence, the "meat" of the prosecution's case is a phone call where Trump asked the Governor to FIND a couple thousand votes. There is nothing wrong or unusual about this request. Bags of uncounted ballots are often found in post offices, delivery trucks, rest rooms, and polling places, and Trump was merely asking the Governor to pull out all the stops to find any of those ballots that could still be found, knowing that if they were from ANYWHERE BUT ATLANTA, they would benefit the sitting President.

Contrast this to requests in Pennsylvania where the requesting politicians is asking that some more votes be manufactured in Philadelphia, where everyone is a Democrat and half the Black people don't vote - fertile grounds for fraud.

It is a bullshit case, and if allowed to run to its inevitable conclusion, it would be tossed out.

Actually, it was the Sec. of State, not the governor. trump's request amounted to coercion and was highly irregular. Especially after GA had already held 3 recounts. Bags of uncounted.....................WHAT! You know all those accusations are fiction, right?

 

[berg80]

Numbnuts they had nothing against trump. You've just learned a valuable lesson

Well, that's not true. They had enough evidence to indict in the opinion of multiple grand juries.

 

[Votto]

Georgia appeals court postpones Trump arguments​

Donald Trump’s criminal case in Georgia is now on hold — indefinitely.

The Georgia Court of Appeals announced Monday that it has canceled arguments that were set for next month in the president-elect’s bid to kick Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis off of the case in which he’s charged with conspiring to corrupt Georgia’s 2020 election results.

The one-page order, signed by the clerk of the court, doesn’t explain the decision to scuttle the scheduled Dec. 5 arguments or identify which judges signed off on it. All four of Trump’s criminal cases have now faced delays since his election to a second presidential term.

A spokesperson for Willis and an attorney for Trump did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/18/georgia-appeals-court-postpones-trump-arguments-00190286

trumples would have us believe Fani Willis is corrupt. Alvin Bragg is corrupt. Judge Lewis Kaplan is corrupt. Letisha James is corrupt. Jack Smith is corrupt. Judge Juan Merchan is corrupt. Judge Tanya Chutkan is corrupt. AG Merrick Garland is corrupt. Every member of every grand jury that voted to indict trump and his co-defendants is corrupt. In order for you not to be corrupt your actions must align with trump's wishes. Like Judge Aileen Cannon.

Essentially, they would have us believe anyone involved in the prosecution of trump's alleged and adjudicated crimes is inherently corrupt by virtue of the fact they are involved in the prosecution. How did they come to this conclusion? trump, the defendant, who worked with his co-conspirators to launch a scheme to hold on to power using slates of fake electors, who refused to comply with a subpoena demanding the return of classified documents in his possession, told them to believe it. And obediently, they did.

If you were facing multiple criminal indictments in multiple jurisdictions, but could make those cases go away before being adjudicated, how could you make appear as though justice was served when in fact it was not?

“If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell.”

Time to face some facts.

You are stuck in yesterday, a day where Legacy news was respected, a day when people gave a damn about what they said

Yes friend, those days are long gone thanks to them lying to us 24/7.

Time to move on.org.

Stop being so regressive.

 

[JGalt]

Georgia appeals court postpones Trump arguments​

Donald Trump’s criminal case in Georgia is now on hold — indefinitely.

The Georgia Court of Appeals announced Monday that it has canceled arguments that were set for next month in the president-elect’s bid to kick Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis off of the case in which he’s charged with conspiring to corrupt Georgia’s 2020 election results.

The one-page order, signed by the clerk of the court, doesn’t explain the decision to scuttle the scheduled Dec. 5 arguments or identify which judges signed off on it. All four of Trump’s criminal cases have now faced delays since his election to a second presidential term.

A spokesperson for Willis and an attorney for Trump did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/18/georgia-appeals-court-postpones-trump-arguments-00190286

trumples would have us believe Fani Willis is corrupt. Alvin Bragg is corrupt. Judge Lewis Kaplan is corrupt. Letisha James is corrupt. Jack Smith is corrupt. Judge Juan Merchan is corrupt. Judge Tanya Chutkan is corrupt. AG Merrick Garland is corrupt. Every member of every grand jury that voted to indict trump and his co-defendants is corrupt. In order for you not to be corrupt your actions must align with trump's wishes. Like Judge Aileen Cannon.

Essentially, they would have us believe anyone involved in the prosecution of trump's alleged and adjudicated crimes is inherently corrupt by virtue of the fact they are involved in the prosecution. How did they come to this conclusion? trump, the defendant, who worked with his co-conspirators to launch a scheme to hold on to power using slates of fake electors, who refused to comply with a subpoena demanding the return of classified documents in his possession, told them to believe it. And obediently, they did.

If you were facing multiple criminal indictments in multiple jurisdictions, but could make those cases go away before being adjudicated, how could you make appear as though justice was served when in fact it was not?

“If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell.”

Why would you even post threads like these anymore? It's pretty obvious you're not going to change anyone's mind about the election. That's over and done with, and we won.

Wait...I got it. You're so much in need of consolation and accolades from your peers, posting these anti-Trump threads make you appear intelligent and witty to other Trump-haters, right?

That's commonly referred to as "attention whoring", bro.

 

[berg80]

Nope, he should comply. He has to comply by law.

But he didn't comply. An unambiguous violation of the law for which he will never be held accountable.

 

[JGalt]

Mt take on Trump's woes is as follows based on what I can gather from all the reporting: The NY case should have been a tax evasion case not a trumped up election interference case; he was guilty on the classified docs case; the January 6th stuff was nonsense that should have never been pursued; and IDK on the Georgia case because enough of the details have not come out other than he called someone and said something about needing 12K votes.

Trump was referring "12,000 missing votes", not "12,000 more votes."

 

[berg80]

Time to face some facts.

I wish you would.

 

[TimFitz]

I love the taste of dem tears in the mornin'.

Tears are for democracy,and the rule of law.

And tears for the fools who place blind loyalty to the defendant above those things.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

But he didn't comply. An unambiguous violation of the law for which he will never be held accountable.

Naw, this has to do with your orange man hate. You see, I did think there was one charge on the classified docs that he needed to answer for but then when the doj just laughed off corn pops stuffing classified docs in the garage, I really didn't care anymore.

 

[1srelluc]

Tears are for democracy,and the rule of law.

And tears for the fools who place blind loyalty to the defendant above those things.

I suspect yours are, the tears of a clown.

 

[berg80]

Naw, this has to do with your orange man hate. You see, I did think there was one charge on the classified docs that he needed to answer for but then when the doj just laughed off corn pops stuffing classified docs in the garage, I really didn't care anymore.

Talk about an opportunity missed.

Repairing the Rule of Law: An Agenda for Post-Trump Reform​

As the U.S. begins to see the light at the end of the Trumpian tunnel, it is time to begin thinking about the issue of repair. One should not assume the result of the election, but it is nonetheless worth asking the question: What should be done in a post-Trump world to restore the rule of law?

Of Trump’s many excesses, his assault on legal norms has to rank high in terms of damage to fundamental values that form the fabric of America. His attacks on the free press, the independent judiciary and the independence of the Department of Justice have all created significant damage. His abuse of executive discretionary authority has made a mockery of the concept of checks and balances. His gaming of the judicial system has revealed weaknesses in our legal process. His attempts to place himself (and his family and his business interests) above the law have called into question foundational national conceptions of equal justice. In short, President Trump has led a wrecking crew (aided and abetted by William Barr and Mitch McConnell) that has severely damaged American legal norms of behavior.

Trump’s attacks on foundational norms and principles leave policymakers with two choices. Lawmakers and voters can accept that damage and admit the inevitability of American decline, or they can fight to restore and strengthen the country’s legal guardrails. This post is an effort to begin that fight—to identify practical steps that the country can take to reinvigorate the rule of law and the concept of checks and balances.

Repairing the Rule of Law: An Agenda for Post-Trump Reform

What should be done in a post-Trump world to restore the rule of law?

www.lawfaremedia.org

 

[Hollie]

Georgia appeals court postpones Trump arguments​

Donald Trump’s criminal case in Georgia is now on hold — indefinitely.

The Georgia Court of Appeals announced Monday that it has canceled arguments that were set for next month in the president-elect’s bid to kick Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis off of the case in which he’s charged with conspiring to corrupt Georgia’s 2020 election results.

The one-page order, signed by the clerk of the court, doesn’t explain the decision to scuttle the scheduled Dec. 5 arguments or identify which judges signed off on it. All four of Trump’s criminal cases have now faced delays since his election to a second presidential term.

A spokesperson for Willis and an attorney for Trump did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/18/georgia-appeals-court-postpones-trump-arguments-00190286

trumples would have us believe Fani Willis is corrupt. Alvin Bragg is corrupt. Judge Lewis Kaplan is corrupt. Letisha James is corrupt. Jack Smith is corrupt. Judge Juan Merchan is corrupt. Judge Tanya Chutkan is corrupt. AG Merrick Garland is corrupt. Every member of every grand jury that voted to indict trump and his co-defendants is corrupt. In order for you not to be corrupt your actions must align with trump's wishes. Like Judge Aileen Cannon.

Essentially, they would have us believe anyone involved in the prosecution of trump's alleged and adjudicated crimes is inherently corrupt by virtue of the fact they are involved in the prosecution. How did they come to this conclusion? trump, the defendant, who worked with his co-conspirators to launch a scheme to hold on to power using slates of fake electors, who refused to comply with a subpoena demanding the return of classified documents in his possession, told them to believe it. And obediently, they did.

If you were facing multiple criminal indictments in multiple jurisdictions, but could make those cases go away before being adjudicated, how could you make appear as though justice was served when in fact it was not?

“If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell.”

"If you have no legitimate argument, copy and paste from a leftist tabloid."

 

[berg80]

"If you have no legitimate argument, copy and paste from a leftist tabloid."

Please specify what you don't think is legitimate.

 

[Hollie]

I wish you would.

There is comedy gold in being lectured by a retrograde leftist while democrats were counting illegal ballots in direct opposition to a State Supreme Court ruling.

 

[berg80]

There is comedy gold in being lectured by a retrograde leftist while democrats were counting illegal ballots in direct opposition to a State Supreme Court ruling.

Any time you're ready to discuss the topic at hand feel free to start.

 

[Hollie]

Any time you're ready to discuss the topic at hand feel free to start.

The appeals court has ruled. Any time you're ready to offer something more than the tears of a clown, somebody cue up Smokey Robinson, feel free to start.

 

[kyzr]

..yawn, another day, another berg TDS thread...

Earth to berg...Trump won the 2024 election, its over.

 

[berg80]

The appeals court has ruled. Any time you're ready to offer something more than the tears of a clown, somebody cue up Smokey Robinson, feel free to start.

Agree or disagree?

trumples would have us believe Fani Willis is corrupt. Alvin Bragg is corrupt. Judge Lewis Kaplan is corrupt. Letisha James is corrupt. Jack Smith is corrupt. Judge Juan Merchan is corrupt. Judge Tanya Chutkan is corrupt. AG Merrick Garland is corrupt. Every member of every grand jury that voted to indict trump and his co-defendants is corrupt. In order for you not to be corrupt your actions must align with trump's wishes. Like Judge Aileen Cannon.