Zone1 It is not Twiiters job to make a safe space for Karen's of any stripe.

[justoffal]

Twiiter is whaaaat? Unsafe?
Lol....OMG what a bunch of lolipop licking pubescent milquetoasts. Twitter's job is to make money... not to create safe space. With one of the world's largest audiences and therefore potential consumer bases the Karens can all boycott to their heart's content. Musk is ready for that...

Jo

 

[Esdraelon]

Let the butt-hurt choke on it...!

 

[shockedcanadian]

Twiiter is whaaaat? Unsafe?
Lol....OMG what a bunch of lolipop licking pubescent milquetoasts. Twitter's job is to make money... not to create safe space. With one of the world's largest audiences and therefore potential consumer bases the Karens can all boycott to their heart's content. Musk is ready for that...

Jo

They've made it their job to silence Whistleblowers though, buckling to pressure and B.S from the Canadian Creepy Ones.

Extremely disappointing. America and your police agencies are destroying Americas reputation by following and trusting Canadian agencies I assure you. If some of us could express in detail what we know, you would realize how much harm you are doing to your own global Goodwill.

Alas, for some of us in regards to Twitter, it's "meet the new boss, same as the old boss".

 

[The T]

Twiiter is whaaaat? Unsafe?
Lol....OMG what a bunch of lolipop licking pubescent milquetoasts. Twitter's job is to make money... not to create safe space. With one of the world's largest audiences and therefore potential consumer bases the Karens can all boycott to their heart's content. Musk is ready for that...

Jo

ABSOLUTELY, As Trump EXPOSED the Radical Left, and the DEEP STATE Government...SUCK IT UP. This present government is OUT OF CONTROL and UnConstitutional.

 

[1srelluc]

The leftists thought they found a "safe space" over on Mastodon but immediately started canceling or banning each other.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

It would be one thing if Twitter was just some independent company... they could act against Conservatives and manipulate algorithms to their hearts content.

However, Twitter is used by media, culture, and even politicians to make decisions and represent people.. so when Twitter acts against Conservatives, bans non-violent people, demonetizes or shadow bans popular Conservative channels, and manipulates what is "trending" or is seen.. without explanation whatsoever as to how or why... They are performing social engineering in the name of Democrat/leftist political activism. They manipulated the New York Post story about Hunter Biden, they actively participated in defending Biden and changing the election. That's a power that needs to be exposed... and we're seeing the dirty laundry coming out. This will be a learning moment for society... you can't trust big tech to value unobjective free speech. They need to make their coding transparent so we know if they're stacking the deck or not.

 

[Coyote]

Twiiter is whaaaat? Unsafe?
Lol....OMG what a bunch of lolipop licking pubescent milquetoasts. Twitter's job is to make money... not to create safe space. With one of the world's largest audiences and therefore potential consumer bases the Karens can all boycott to their heart's content. Musk is ready for that...

Jo

What if making money means creating civil spaces?

 

[citygator]

Customer feedback. Heed it or don’t. Only twitter is antagonizing it’s customers.

 

[progressive hunter]

What if making money means creating civil spaces?

the topic isnt about civil spaces its about safe spaces,,

and elon is doing what previous owners of twitter failed to do and making it a civil space where all voices are heard,,

 

[Coyote]

the topic isnt about civil spaces its about safe spaces,,

and elon is doing what previous owners of twitter failed to do and making it a civil space where all voices are heard,,

Safe spaces is like Truth Social. Civility is what Twitter tried to do but the extreme right couldn’t tolorate having their right to spew on private property in any way abridged.

If Elon Musk is making it “civil” it is an abysmal and chaotic failure.

 

[progressive hunter]

Safe spaces is like Truth Social. Civility is what Twitter tried to do but the extreme right couldn’t tolorate having their right to spew on private property in any way abridged.

If Elon Musk is making it “civil” it is an abysmal and chaotic failure.

the documents elon just released proves everything you just said is wrong,,,

cant wait til his next round of releases,,,

 

[Coyote]

the documents elon just released proves everything you just said is wrong,,,

cant wait til his next round of releases,,,

Mmmh….don’t think so.

How is he making it “civil”?

 

[progressive hunter]

Mmmh….don’t think so.

How is he making it “civil”?

what you think doesnt mean shit in light of the real facts elon released,,,

to you civil is not seeing anything from anyone you disagree with,,,

 

[candycorn]

What if making money means creating civil spaces?

Something you would do well to remind your fellow moderators of from time to time....

 

[candycorn]

the topic isnt about civil spaces its about safe spaces,,

and elon is doing what previous owners of twitter failed to do and making it a civil space where all voices are heard,,

You do know he banned Kanye.

So he isn't doing that exactly.

What he is doing is trying to show the previous braintrusts in the worst light possible. Given the way that most people feel about the CEO's of large corporations, one would think it would be easier. Instead, he's looking worse than they are.

Looks like he knew before many that they may go down the drain.

 

[SweetSue92]

Safe spaces is like Truth Social. Civility is what Twitter tried to do but the extreme right couldn’t tolorate having their right to spew on private property in any way abridged.

If Elon Musk is making it “civil” it is an abysmal and chaotic failure.

There is nothing "civil" about suppressing stories that are detrimental and damaging to ONE political party. In fact, that's the very opposite of "civil", and it frankly disgusts my deeply American principles. Especially since govt entities were involved in it.

I would hope that almost all Americans would be similarly disgusted, but my faith in this nation is all but gone, frankly.

 

[forkup]

the topic isnt about civil spaces its about safe spaces,,

and elon is doing what previous owners of twitter failed to do and making it a civil space where all voices are heard,,

Actually it is. The topic is whether content moderation should happen. In other words if twitter has a right or a need to limit what a person can say. For instance making the conversation "civil".

Here's the thing. Twitter creates revenue "money" by exposing it's customers to advertising. This is by far their greatest money maker.

If your claim is that twitter not just can't, but shouldn't or even, doesn't have the right to limit what is permissible on their platform you are taking away their possibility to decide for themselves what is on that platform. For instance posting a Swastika, Star of David hybrid that Kanye just posted.

It is not inconceivable, it is even likely that a platform that allows these kinds of things will lose customers. This will make it less attractive to advertisers. Or advertisers might decide for themselves that they do not want to be associated with a platform that is filled with that. I can make similar examples of posting porn, or simply spam.

I'm perfectly willing too accept that you find this acceptable or a small price to pay to be on a completely free speech platform. I however don't believe that is a majority opinion. Or for that matter a winning business model.

I'm also not smart enough to say what exactly is the correct amount of moderation. I can guess though that the answer is somewhere in the middle. Which is what the previous owners did. Something that Musk disagrees with, and something that by all accounts has cost the company he bought, quite a lot of add revenue.

 

[forkup]

There is nothing "civil" about suppressing stories that are detrimental and damaging to ONE political party. In fact, that's the very opposite of "civil", and it frankly disgusts my deeply American principles. Especially since govt entities were involved in it.

I would hope that almost all Americans would be similarly disgusted, but my faith in this nation is all but gone, frankly.

What if these stories consists of stuff that violates normal terms of service? Like for instance porn? Or a dick pick taken of someone's laptop and posted on twitter without consent?

Would you consider that "civil"?

 

[citygator]

Twitters job is to make money off of you. Up to them to consider how many people want to interact. A conservative alternative never flew because it degrades into racism and conspiracies. A liberal or more balanced alternative would likely fly very well.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

There is nothing "civil" about suppressing stories that are detrimental and damaging to ONE political party. In fact, that's the very opposite of "civil", and it frankly disgusts my deeply American principles. Especially since govt entities were involved in it.

I would hope that almost all Americans would be similarly disgusted, but my faith in this nation is all but gone, frankly.

So, if FoxNews or OANN chooses not to run a story that is negative towards the Repubs, you are deeply disgusted?

If the Gateway Pundit does not run a story that is negative about Trump, are you deeply disgusted?