It is illegal to classify things which shouldn't be

[xyz]

28 CFR § 17.22 - Classification of information; limitations.

The law also states that if there is a doubt, it should be classified in the lower category. It's also expressly illegal to classify in order to hide illegal activity, as well as to hide incompetence.


Opinions | I helped classify calls for two presidents. The White House abuse of the system is alarming.

Trump has put many conversations with foreign leaders in a highly protected server meant for top-secret info, and it is unlikely that all or even most of those discussions contained top-secret into. They could involve foreign election interference as well as deals for his Trump properties, which is illegal and cannot be classified.

 

[miketx]

ROTFLMFAO.

 

[Osiris-ODS]

If people weren't leaking everything that wasn't protected in secured servers--thereby damaging foreign policy by disclosing private conversations with foreign leaders--there wouldn't be any need to do it. He has every right to keep those materials secure from leaks. And that has been consistent with all such transcripts being stored there since the leaks started, not just this one.

 

[the other mike]

Classify this.

 

[Wyatt earp]

28 CFR § 17.22 - Classification of information; limitations.

The law also states that if there is a doubt, it should be classified in the lower category. It's also expressly illegal to classify in order to hide illegal activity, as well as to hide incompetence.


Opinions | I helped classify calls for two presidents. The White House abuse of the system is alarming.

Trump has put many conversations with foreign leaders in a highly protected server meant for top-secret info, and it is unlikely that all or even most of those discussions contained top-secret into. They could involve foreign election interference as well as deals for his Trump properties, which is illegal and cannot be classified.

The president is above it.

 

[xyz]

ROTFLMFAO.

Of course you piss on the law.

 

[miketx]

ROTFLMFAO.

Of course you piss on the law.

No. On liars like you.

 

[xyz]

If people weren't leaking everything that wasn't protected in secured servers--thereby damaging foreign policy by disclosing private conversations with foreign leaders--there wouldn't be any need to do it. He has every right to keep those materials secure from leaks. And that has been consistent with all such transcripts being stored there since the leaks started, not just this one.

The leaks are to alert people of a criminal abusing his power.

 

[pismoe]

28 CFR § 17.22 - Classification of information; limitations.

The law also states that if there is a doubt, it should be classified in the lower category. It's also expressly illegal to classify in order to hide illegal activity, as well as to hide incompetence.


Opinions | I helped classify calls for two presidents. The White House abuse of the system is alarming.

Trump has put many conversations with foreign leaders in a highly protected server meant for top-secret info, and it is unlikely that all or even most of those discussions contained top-secret into. They could involve foreign election interference as well as deals for his Trump properties, which is illegal and cannot be classified.

The president is above it.

----------------------- I think so , little know the President can classify or declassify anything on his whim XYZ .

 

[Wyatt earp]

If people weren't leaking everything that wasn't protected in secured servers--thereby damaging foreign policy by disclosing private conversations with foreign leaders--there wouldn't be any need to do it. He has every right to keep those materials secure from leaks. And that has been consistent with all such transcripts being stored there since the leaks started, not just this one.

The leaks are to alert people of a criminal abusing his power.

Of bidens ?

We agree.


.

 

[xyz]

28 CFR § 17.22 - Classification of information; limitations.

The law also states that if there is a doubt, it should be classified in the lower category. It's also expressly illegal to classify in order to hide illegal activity, as well as to hide incompetence.


Opinions | I helped classify calls for two presidents. The White House abuse of the system is alarming.

Trump has put many conversations with foreign leaders in a highly protected server meant for top-secret info, and it is unlikely that all or even most of those discussions contained top-secret into. They could involve foreign election interference as well as deals for his Trump properties, which is illegal and cannot be classified.

The president is above it.

----------------------- I think so , little know the President can classify or declassify anything on his whim XYZ .

Yes, the POTUS is perfectly capable of breaking the law.

 

[pismoe]

From what I understand the President TRUMP is over and Above any laws on this particular issue of legally doing as he likes with classified info XYZ ,

 

[Wyatt earp]

28 CFR § 17.22 - Classification of information; limitations.

The law also states that if there is a doubt, it should be classified in the lower category. It's also expressly illegal to classify in order to hide illegal activity, as well as to hide incompetence.


Opinions | I helped classify calls for two presidents. The White House abuse of the system is alarming.

Trump has put many conversations with foreign leaders in a highly protected server meant for top-secret info, and it is unlikely that all or even most of those discussions contained top-secret into. They could involve foreign election interference as well as deals for his Trump properties, which is illegal and cannot be classified.

The president is above it.

----------------------- I think so , little know the President can classify or declassify anything on his whim XYZ .

Yes, the POTUS is perfectly capable of breaking the law.

It's not a law for the president

For some reason people can't comprehend we have three branches of government and one is not over the other.

 

[boedicca]

28 CFR § 17.22 - Classification of information; limitations.

The law also states that if there is a doubt, it should be classified in the lower category. It's also expressly illegal to classify in order to hide illegal activity, as well as to hide incompetence.


Opinions | I helped classify calls for two presidents. The White House abuse of the system is alarming.

Trump has put many conversations with foreign leaders in a highly protected server meant for top-secret info, and it is unlikely that all or even most of those discussions contained top-secret into. They could involve foreign election interference as well as deals for his Trump properties, which is illegal and cannot be classified.

Oh, yeah. it would have been much better if he had the documents stored on a homebrewed unsecured server stashed in the bathroom of one of his abodes. And just to be safe, he could have someone bleachbit it, with a cloth or something.

 

[xyz]

28 CFR § 17.22 - Classification of information; limitations.

The law also states that if there is a doubt, it should be classified in the lower category. It's also expressly illegal to classify in order to hide illegal activity, as well as to hide incompetence.


Opinions | I helped classify calls for two presidents. The White House abuse of the system is alarming.

Trump has put many conversations with foreign leaders in a highly protected server meant for top-secret info, and it is unlikely that all or even most of those discussions contained top-secret into. They could involve foreign election interference as well as deals for his Trump properties, which is illegal and cannot be classified.

Oh, yeah. it would have been much better if he had the documents stored on a homebrewed unsecured server stashed in the bathroom of one of his abodes. And just to be safe, he could have someone bleachbit it, with a cloth or something.

How about if he'd stuck it up his ass? You'd like that, wouldn't you?

 

[boedicca]

28 CFR § 17.22 - Classification of information; limitations.

The law also states that if there is a doubt, it should be classified in the lower category. It's also expressly illegal to classify in order to hide illegal activity, as well as to hide incompetence.


Opinions | I helped classify calls for two presidents. The White House abuse of the system is alarming.

Trump has put many conversations with foreign leaders in a highly protected server meant for top-secret info, and it is unlikely that all or even most of those discussions contained top-secret into. They could involve foreign election interference as well as deals for his Trump properties, which is illegal and cannot be classified.

Oh, yeah. it would have been much better if he had the documents stored on a homebrewed unsecured server stashed in the bathroom of one of his abodes. And just to be safe, he could have someone bleachbit it, with a cloth or something.

How about if he'd stuck it up his ass? You'd like that, wouldn't you?

Don't project your kinks and fetishes upon moi, bub.

 

[Wyatt earp]

28 CFR § 17.22 - Classification of information; limitations.

The law also states that if there is a doubt, it should be classified in the lower category. It's also expressly illegal to classify in order to hide illegal activity, as well as to hide incompetence.


Opinions | I helped classify calls for two presidents. The White House abuse of the system is alarming.

Trump has put many conversations with foreign leaders in a highly protected server meant for top-secret info, and it is unlikely that all or even most of those discussions contained top-secret into. They could involve foreign election interference as well as deals for his Trump properties, which is illegal and cannot be classified.

Oh, yeah. it would have been much better if he had the documents stored on a homebrewed unsecured server stashed in the bathroom of one of his abodes. And just to be safe, he could have someone bleachbit it, with a cloth or something.

He should of just stuck it in his secretary's office, it wouldn't of been found till years later.....


Like whitewater.



.