iceberg
Diamond Member
- May 15, 2017
- 36,788
- 14,921
- 1,600
If Twitter isn't a platform then ending their section 230 protection will have no effect.The world disagrees. I now factcheck you.You can't. You have allowed them to enjoy platform status which prevents your legal recourse.It is when they are calling you a liar.I'm not letting anyone do anything.Yet you are letting social media do exactly that.Right because yo can't have it both waysSocial media giants have agreed, in exchange for liability immunity, to not censor content creators,What law?
No social media provider is capable of violating your freedom of speech rights so they can censor anyone they want to for any reason.
But you don't want them to do that right?
Why doesn't the company that owns the social media site have the right to dispute anything that any user says?
If you people don't like what the social media company does don't use it.
which Facebook is not. Facebook is merely a publisher, like a phone book is.
The Big Tech Boys agreed to a certain set of rules which they now want to ignore. It's pretty simple.
FAct checking is not censorship
Twitter commenting on a post is not censorship
Then sue for libel and see what the courts think
And FYI all politicians are liars. If Trump wrote an EO every time someone called him a liar there'd be millions of them
Oops. Der it is.
I have done no such thing.
They are not a platform and never have been.
Platforms Are Not Publishers
The essential value of the internet is conversation, not content—and journalists need to embrace it.www.theatlantic.com
The world is wrong. Just like you are.
So what's your problem then? Other than total ignorance of the topic.