It Begins: California Begins Indoctrinating Children Into The LGBT Lifestyle Against Parents Wishes

[TheProgressivePatriot]

The only thing the government should be involved in or should be allowed to be involved in is law's that are implemented regarding anti-discrimination based upon one's race or regarding one's physical disabilities only.. Laws pertaining to stopping criminal behaviours, anti-abuse law's etc. should be based on race or one's physical disabilities only, and these law's are not to be based upon ones sex, sexual identity, sexual preference or sexual behaviours.

I see, so not only do you not want children to learn to be respectful and accepting of all people who might be different, you also don't think that the law should address discrimination for anything other than race or disability. Seriously??

 

[beagle9]

The only thing the government should be involved in or should be allowed to be involved in is law's that are implemented regarding anti-discrimination based upon one's race or regarding one's physical disabilities only.. Laws pertaining to stopping criminal behaviours, anti-abuse law's etc. should be based on race or one's physical disabilities only, and these law's are not to be based upon ones sex, sexual identity, sexual preference or sexual behaviours.

I see, so not only do you not want children to learn to be respectful and accepting of all people who might be different, you also don't think that the law should address discrimination for anything other than race or disability. Seriously??

. The law doesn't have to have sex, sexual preference, sexual lifestyle or sexual identity to get the job done for all Americans. The adding of these things creates special classes and preferential treatments of groups or individuals above and beyond the rest. It is wrong, and always will be wrong.

 

[Aba Incieni]

In the interests of a fair and honest education, heteros should be taught as the overwhelming majority, and that homos are a mere sideshow to humanity.

It's for the children.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

The only thing the government should be involved in or should be allowed to be involved in is law's that are implemented regarding anti-discrimination based upon one's race or regarding one's physical disabilities only.. Laws pertaining to stopping criminal behaviours, anti-abuse law's etc. should be based on race or one's physical disabilities only, and these law's are not to be based upon ones sex, sexual identity, sexual preference or sexual behaviours.

I see, so not only do you not want children to learn to be respectful and accepting of all people who might be different, you also don't think that the law should address discrimination for anything other than race or disability. Seriously??

. The law doesn't have to have sex, sexual preference, sexual lifestyle or sexual identity to get the job done for all Americans. The adding of these things creates special classes and preferential treatments of groups or individuals above and beyond the rest. It is wrong, and always will be wrong.

First of all, you previously had said that there should be laws protecting racial minorities and the handicapped only. So how are they different as a class than gays, transpeople, women, etc.?? Seems rather inconsistent

Now you're saying that "the law doesn't have to have sex, sexual preference, sexual lifestyle or sexual identity to get the job done for all Americans" Seriously?? Kindly explain exactly how that would work.. The law protecting special classes is needed because they already exist as a class and there are people who will discriminate against them for being part of that class.. The goal is not preferential treatment. It is equal treatment which needs to be enforced.

Lastly laws against discrimination generally do not prohibit discrimination against specific racial groups, gays, women etc. They state that discrimination on the basis of race, sexual orientation, gender etc. is prohibited, so again, no one is getting preferential treatment.

.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

the non-child producing homos

Seriously????

This gay couple revealed that they were having triplets in the most adorable way

A gay couple revealed the news that they are expecting triplets and the way they did it was adorable.

Dads Jason Babcock, 30, and Adam Gentile, 31, took to Instagram to tell the world that their family is about to expand from one child to four.

 

[Aba Incieni]

the non-child producing homos

Seriously????

This gay couple revealed that they were having triplets in the most adorable way

A gay couple revealed the news that they are expecting triplets and the way they did it was adorable.

Dads Jason Babcock, 30, and Adam Gentile, 31, took to Instagram to tell the world that their family is about to expand from one child to four.

Homosexuality is a sex act. It does not produce children.

 

[beagle9]

The only thing the government should be involved in or should be allowed to be involved in is law's that are implemented regarding anti-discrimination based upon one's race or regarding one's physical disabilities only.. Laws pertaining to stopping criminal behaviours, anti-abuse law's etc. should be based on race or one's physical disabilities only, and these law's are not to be based upon ones sex, sexual identity, sexual preference or sexual behaviours.

I see, so not only do you not want children to learn to be respectful and accepting of all people who might be different, you also don't think that the law should address discrimination for anything other than race or disability. Seriously??

. The law doesn't have to have sex, sexual preference, sexual lifestyle or sexual identity to get the job done for all Americans. The adding of these things creates special classes and preferential treatments of groups or individuals above and beyond the rest. It is wrong, and always will be wrong.

First of all, you previously had said that there should be laws protecting racial minorities and the handicapped only. So how are they different as a class than gays, transpeople, women, etc.?? Seems rather inconsistent

Now you're saying that "the law doesn't have to have sex, sexual preference, sexual lifestyle or sexual identity to get the job done for all Americans" Seriously?? Kindly explain exactly how that would work.. The law protecting special classes is needed because they already exist as a class and there are people who will discriminate against them for being part of that class.. The goal is not preferential treatment. It is equal treatment which needs to be enforced.

Lastly laws against discrimination generally do not prohibit discrimination against specific racial groups, gays, women etc. They state that discrimination on the basis of race, sexual orientation, gender etc. is prohibited, so again, no one is getting preferential treatment.

.

. The reason race was thought to be protected by government in retrospect, is because it was that the citizens we're discriminating on the basis of a skin color as it were found at large. This absurdity was the hight of craziness in most people's minds (meaning the silent majority at the time). So the government with the well wishes of the citizens set out to change this idiocy. Laws were created.

Now after years of this, it has not gone perfect in it's results. Since then we have had blacks who desired vengence and power over equality, and for whom had then used these government protections, and it's power, to get that vengence wanted, and to gain power over their supposed white enemy. Otherwise therefore it was a misusing of the intent of government protections down the line in which they began using them to then set themselves (certain ones not all), up to use reverse discrimination to get back at their white enemies by way of government power in which was given to them. Basically it was that a door had been left unattended, and the devil just walked right on through it. This battle rages on today in the attempt to control the fall out.

Disabilities are a no brainer.

Sex is another slippery slope that can have unknown consequences by adding it into the frey over the years to come. I think the government should free itself from these things, and get back to being as justice should be for the citizens, and that is to be blind when it comes to justice, and deal with each case upon it's own individual merits. No groups should get special or preferential treatment by the government over the individual citizen's rights in this country any longer. It's 2018, and the government should get out of such things in the future. Apply the laws to everyone and with an equal yoke. No more, no less.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

The only thing the government should be involved in or should be allowed to be involved in is law's that are implemented regarding anti-discrimination based upon one's race or regarding one's physical disabilities only.. Laws pertaining to stopping criminal behaviours, anti-abuse law's etc. should be based on race or one's physical disabilities only, and these law's are not to be based upon ones sex, sexual identity, sexual preference or sexual behaviours.

I see, so not only do you not want children to learn to be respectful and accepting of all people who might be different, you also don't think that the law should address discrimination for anything other than race or disability. Seriously??

. The law doesn't have to have sex, sexual preference, sexual lifestyle or sexual identity to get the job done for all Americans. The adding of these things creates special classes and preferential treatments of groups or individuals above and beyond the rest. It is wrong, and always will be wrong.

First of all, you previously had said that there should be laws protecting racial minorities and the handicapped only. So how are they different as a class than gays, transpeople, women, etc.?? Seems rather inconsistent

Now you're saying that "the law doesn't have to have sex, sexual preference, sexual lifestyle or sexual identity to get the job done for all Americans" Seriously?? Kindly explain exactly how that would work.. The law protecting special classes is needed because they already exist as a class and there are people who will discriminate against them for being part of that class.. The goal is not preferential treatment. It is equal treatment which needs to be enforced.

Lastly laws against discrimination generally do not prohibit discrimination against specific racial groups, gays, women etc. They state that discrimination on the basis of race, sexual orientation, gender etc. is prohibited, so again, no one is getting preferential treatment.

.

. The reason race was thought to be protected by government in retrospect, is because it was that the citizens we're discriminating on the basis of a skin color as it were found at large. This absurdity was the hight of craziness in most people's minds (meaning the silent majority at the time). So the government with the well wishes of the citizens set out to change this idiocy. Laws were created.

Now after years of this, it has not gone perfect in it's results. Since then we have had blacks who desired vengence and power over equality, and for whom had then used these government protections, and it's power, to get that vengence wanted, and to gain power over their supposed white enemy. Otherwise therefore it was a misusing of the intent of government protections down the line in which they began using them to then set themselves (certain ones not all), up to use reverse discrimination to get back at their white enemies by way of government power in which was given to them. Basically it was that a door had been left unattended, and the devil just walked right on through it. This battle rages on today in the attempt to control the fall out.

Disabilities are a no brainer.

Sex is another slippery slope that can have unknown consequences by adding it into the frey over the years to come. I think the government should free itself from these things, and get back to being as justice should be for the citizens, and that is to be blind when it comes to justice, and deal with each case upon it's own individual merits. No groups should get special or preferential treatment by the government over the individual citizen's rights in this country any longer. It's 2018, and the government should get out of such things in the future. Apply the laws to everyone and with an equal yoke. No more, no less.

Well, lets see what we can decipher from this rant of word salad. I'll try to pull out the salient point. I'm only doing this because there is a ******* blizzard raging outside and I can't run or get to the gym which normally would be my priorities.

• It seems that the only classes of people that you think should be protected from discrimination are racial minorities, and disabled people . Interesting that you don't include women....hummmmmm. You don't suppose that discrimination can occur when -for instance and employer finds out that a person is gay, or when some mindless bigot mistakes a Hindu for a Muslim??
• You have disdain for blacks who you think are abusing their protections for "vengeance and power." Is that really a big issue that happens a lot? Please explain. You seem to be alluding to affirmative action.
• You have a dim view of race relations- and blame blacks for it
• You blather about justice being blind but that seems to include being blind to discrimination perpetrated by individuals and organization
• I tried to educate you on the issue of groups getting special treatment under the laws against discrimination but that does seem to have penetrated your skull. Again, laws are written to prohibit discrimination based on gender, race, sexual orientation etc. A straight white male has the same protections as a lesbian of color.

To be quite honest, I'm bored with this trip and beginning to glaze or.

 

[beagle9]

The only thing the government should be involved in or should be allowed to be involved in is law's that are implemented regarding anti-discrimination based upon one's race or regarding one's physical disabilities only.. Laws pertaining to stopping criminal behaviours, anti-abuse law's etc. should be based on race or one's physical disabilities only, and these law's are not to be based upon ones sex, sexual identity, sexual preference or sexual behaviours.

I see, so not only do you not want children to learn to be respectful and accepting of all people who might be different, you also don't think that the law should address discrimination for anything other than race or disability. Seriously??

. The law doesn't have to have sex, sexual preference, sexual lifestyle or sexual identity to get the job done for all Americans. The adding of these things creates special classes and preferential treatments of groups or individuals above and beyond the rest. It is wrong, and always will be wrong.

First of all, you previously had said that there should be laws protecting racial minorities and the handicapped only. So how are they different as a class than gays, transpeople, women, etc.?? Seems rather inconsistent

Now you're saying that "the law doesn't have to have sex, sexual preference, sexual lifestyle or sexual identity to get the job done for all Americans" Seriously?? Kindly explain exactly how that would work.. The law protecting special classes is needed because they already exist as a class and there are people who will discriminate against them for being part of that class.. The goal is not preferential treatment. It is equal treatment which needs to be enforced.

Lastly laws against discrimination generally do not prohibit discrimination against specific racial groups, gays, women etc. They state that discrimination on the basis of race, sexual orientation, gender etc. is prohibited, so again, no one is getting preferential treatment.

.

. The reason race was thought to be protected by government in retrospect, is because it was that the citizens we're discriminating on the basis of a skin color as it were found at large. This absurdity was the hight of craziness in most people's minds (meaning the silent majority at the time). So the government with the well wishes of the citizens set out to change this idiocy. Laws were created.

Now after years of this, it has not gone perfect in it's results. Since then we have had blacks who desired vengence and power over equality, and for whom had then used these government protections, and it's power, to get that vengence wanted, and to gain power over their supposed white enemy. Otherwise therefore it was a misusing of the intent of government protections down the line in which they began using them to then set themselves (certain ones not all), up to use reverse discrimination to get back at their white enemies by way of government power in which was given to them. Basically it was that a door had been left unattended, and the devil just walked right on through it. This battle rages on today in the attempt to control the fall out.

Disabilities are a no brainer.

Sex is another slippery slope that can have unknown consequences by adding it into the frey over the years to come. I think the government should free itself from these things, and get back to being as justice should be for the citizens, and that is to be blind when it comes to justice, and deal with each case upon it's own individual merits. No groups should get special or preferential treatment by the government over the individual citizen's rights in this country any longer. It's 2018, and the government should get out of such things in the future. Apply the laws to everyone and with an equal yoke. No more, no less.

Well, lets see what we can decipher from this rant of word salad. I'll try to pull out the salient point. I'm only doing this because there is a ******* blizzard raging outside and I can't run or get to the gym which normally would be my priorities.

• It seems that the only classes of people that you think should be protected from discrimination are racial minorities, and disabled people . Interesting that you don't include women....hummmmmm. You don't suppose that discrimination can occur when -for instance and employer finds out that a person is gay, or when some mindless bigot mistakes a Hindu for a Muslim??
• You have disdain for blacks who you think are abusing their protections for "vengeance and power." Is that really a big issue that happens a lot? Please explain. You seem to be alluding to affirmative action.
• You have a dim view of race relations- and blame blacks for it
• You blather about justice being blind but that seems to include being blind to discrimination perpetrated by individuals and organization
• I tried to educate you on the issue of groups getting special treatment under the laws against discrimination but that does seem to have penetrated your skull. Again, laws are written to prohibit discrimination based on gender, race, sexual orientation etc. A straight white male has the same protections as a lesbian of color.

To be quite honest, I'm bored with this trip and beginning to glaze or.

. Umm of course it includes women, minorities etc. but no longer should special treatment go out to groups that might abuse the special treatment, protections or privileges that are given to them as a group. This is what needs to end in most people's opinions, where as unfortunately there have been groups that turn these privileges against the citizens who are not afforded such privileges or protections in an even handed way.

I think the country has come a long, long way in helping people through law's in teaching them not to abuse each other maybe. I think after all the generational changes, the laws can apply equally to all without special recognitions needed or special treatments or programs needed beyond what has already been settled law.

Let the laws apply equally to all, and stop with the preferential treatments of groups is my opinion.

 

[beagle9]

Yeah I think I'M bored with this as well now. Peace to all.

 

[Moonglow]

the non-child producing homos

Seriously????

This gay couple revealed that they were having triplets in the most adorable way

A gay couple revealed the news that they are expecting triplets and the way they did it was adorable.

Dads Jason Babcock, 30, and Adam Gentile, 31, took to Instagram to tell the world that their family is about to expand from one child to four.

Homosexuality is a sex act. It does not produce children.

Try being a senior, we don't either, and damn well don't want to...

 

[Aba Incieni]

the non-child producing homos

Seriously????

This gay couple revealed that they were having triplets in the most adorable way

A gay couple revealed the news that they are expecting triplets and the way they did it was adorable.

Dads Jason Babcock, 30, and Adam Gentile, 31, took to Instagram to tell the world that their family is about to expand from one child to four.

Homosexuality is a sex act. It does not produce children.

Try being a senior, we don't either, and damn well don't want to...

If you're suggesting homos are feeble and impotent, I won't argue.

 

[Slyhunter]

Newsflash you idiots. No one is instructing sex ed for anal pounding or girly fisting, at all, that's is your lucid dream you keep injecting... This is an issue of footnotes in a book that are not sexually explicit, nor is there anything pornographic or whatever your devious, uptight, anal retentive logic can convulse over...

Carry on.. You people just make yourself look like stupid *****..But I enjoy laughing at you...

Michael d'Angelo was a child butt ******. Proof Catholics aren't Christian.

 

[Slyhunter]

The counter arguments have been that if Christianity or religion can't be taught in public schools, then how does all these other things get to be allowed inside of the curriculum ? The only thing the government should be allowed to do, is to make laws against the discrimination of any American citizens within the public space in which is controlled by the government through policing and such, and not to favor one ideology or religion over the other keeping the public sphere balanced and accessible to all without a government bias being involved.

Not sure why Cali would think that it needed such a thing unless the so called gender landscape there is changing faster than a speeding bullet. Sounds like an exodus may be on the way for those whose beliefs and religions don't allow for such things to take place against their teachings to their children. The Christian belief is to love the human being/sinner, but not the sin. Not sure what the future holds on all of this, but one things for sure, and that is that people aren't going to go along with any and everything, and they are going to have their views on life, their religions, cultures, lifestyles, and their accented languages. It will always be that way, and the only thing government can do is keep the citizenry from going to war with one another, and to make it known that people aren't going to always agree, and yet the nation is big enough to have freedom regardless of what people believe or don't believe in life.

Comparative religion can be, and is taught. That is different than teaching religion where mythology is presented as fact. Children are also taught that people of different religious and ethnic background have equal value . They are taught that discrimination based on race, religion, gender and being handicapped is wrong. Why is sexual orientation and gender identity different.? Oh right, the sex part.

Depends on your definition of Mythology.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

I see, so not only do you not want children to learn to be respectful and accepting of all people who might be different, you also don't think that the law should address discrimination for anything other than race or disability. Seriously??

. The law doesn't have to have sex, sexual preference, sexual lifestyle or sexual identity to get the job done for all Americans. The adding of these things creates special classes and preferential treatments of groups or individuals above and beyond the rest. It is wrong, and always will be wrong.

First of all, you previously had said that there should be laws protecting racial minorities and the handicapped only. So how are they different as a class than gays, transpeople, women, etc.?? Seems rather inconsistent

Now you're saying that "the law doesn't have to have sex, sexual preference, sexual lifestyle or sexual identity to get the job done for all Americans" Seriously?? Kindly explain exactly how that would work.. The law protecting special classes is needed because they already exist as a class and there are people who will discriminate against them for being part of that class.. The goal is not preferential treatment. It is equal treatment which needs to be enforced.

Lastly laws against discrimination generally do not prohibit discrimination against specific racial groups, gays, women etc. They state that discrimination on the basis of race, sexual orientation, gender etc. is prohibited, so again, no one is getting preferential treatment.

.

. The reason race was thought to be protected by government in retrospect, is because it was that the citizens we're discriminating on the basis of a skin color as it were found at large. This absurdity was the hight of craziness in most people's minds (meaning the silent majority at the time). So the government with the well wishes of the citizens set out to change this idiocy. Laws were created.

Now after years of this, it has not gone perfect in it's results. Since then we have had blacks who desired vengence and power over equality, and for whom had then used these government protections, and it's power, to get that vengence wanted, and to gain power over their supposed white enemy. Otherwise therefore it was a misusing of the intent of government protections down the line in which they began using them to then set themselves (certain ones not all), up to use reverse discrimination to get back at their white enemies by way of government power in which was given to them. Basically it was that a door had been left unattended, and the devil just walked right on through it. This battle rages on today in the attempt to control the fall out.

Disabilities are a no brainer.

Sex is another slippery slope that can have unknown consequences by adding it into the frey over the years to come. I think the government should free itself from these things, and get back to being as justice should be for the citizens, and that is to be blind when it comes to justice, and deal with each case upon it's own individual merits. No groups should get special or preferential treatment by the government over the individual citizen's rights in this country any longer. It's 2018, and the government should get out of such things in the future. Apply the laws to everyone and with an equal yoke. No more, no less.

Well, lets see what we can decipher from this rant of word salad. I'll try to pull out the salient point. I'm only doing this because there is a ******* blizzard raging outside and I can't run or get to the gym which normally would be my priorities.

• It seems that the only classes of people that you think should be protected from discrimination are racial minorities, and disabled people . Interesting that you don't include women....hummmmmm. You don't suppose that discrimination can occur when -for instance and employer finds out that a person is gay, or when some mindless bigot mistakes a Hindu for a Muslim??
• You have disdain for blacks who you think are abusing their protections for "vengeance and power." Is that really a big issue that happens a lot? Please explain. You seem to be alluding to affirmative action.
• You have a dim view of race relations- and blame blacks for it
• You blather about justice being blind but that seems to include being blind to discrimination perpetrated by individuals and organization
• I tried to educate you on the issue of groups getting special treatment under the laws against discrimination but that does seem to have penetrated your skull. Again, laws are written to prohibit discrimination based on gender, race, sexual orientation etc. A straight white male has the same protections as a lesbian of color.

To be quite honest, I'm bored with this trip and beginning to glaze or.

. Umm of course it includes women, minorities etc. but no longer should special treatment go out to groups that might abuse the special treatment, protections or privileges that are given to them as a group. This is what needs to end in most people's opinions, where as unfortunately there have been groups that turn these privileges against the citizens who are not afforded such privileges or protections in an even handed way.

I think the country has come a long, long way in helping people through law's in teaching them not to abuse each other maybe. I think after all the generational changes, the laws can apply equally to all without special recognitions needed or special treatments or programs needed beyond what has already been settled law.

Let the laws apply equally to all, and stop with the preferential treatments of groups is my opinion.

I explained why and how the laws against discrimination DO NOT afford anyone special protection, but you continue to blather about how they do, without even attempting a rebuttal. I 'm not wasting anymore time with this level of obtuseness.

 

[Aba Incieni]

. The law doesn't have to have sex, sexual preference, sexual lifestyle or sexual identity to get the job done for all Americans. The adding of these things creates special classes and preferential treatments of groups or individuals above and beyond the rest. It is wrong, and always will be wrong.

First of all, you previously had said that there should be laws protecting racial minorities and the handicapped only. So how are they different as a class than gays, transpeople, women, etc.?? Seems rather inconsistent

Now you're saying that "the law doesn't have to have sex, sexual preference, sexual lifestyle or sexual identity to get the job done for all Americans" Seriously?? Kindly explain exactly how that would work.. The law protecting special classes is needed because they already exist as a class and there are people who will discriminate against them for being part of that class.. The goal is not preferential treatment. It is equal treatment which needs to be enforced.

Lastly laws against discrimination generally do not prohibit discrimination against specific racial groups, gays, women etc. They state that discrimination on the basis of race, sexual orientation, gender etc. is prohibited, so again, no one is getting preferential treatment.

.

. The reason race was thought to be protected by government in retrospect, is because it was that the citizens we're discriminating on the basis of a skin color as it were found at large. This absurdity was the hight of craziness in most people's minds (meaning the silent majority at the time). So the government with the well wishes of the citizens set out to change this idiocy. Laws were created.

Now after years of this, it has not gone perfect in it's results. Since then we have had blacks who desired vengence and power over equality, and for whom had then used these government protections, and it's power, to get that vengence wanted, and to gain power over their supposed white enemy. Otherwise therefore it was a misusing of the intent of government protections down the line in which they began using them to then set themselves (certain ones not all), up to use reverse discrimination to get back at their white enemies by way of government power in which was given to them. Basically it was that a door had been left unattended, and the devil just walked right on through it. This battle rages on today in the attempt to control the fall out.

Disabilities are a no brainer.

Sex is another slippery slope that can have unknown consequences by adding it into the frey over the years to come. I think the government should free itself from these things, and get back to being as justice should be for the citizens, and that is to be blind when it comes to justice, and deal with each case upon it's own individual merits. No groups should get special or preferential treatment by the government over the individual citizen's rights in this country any longer. It's 2018, and the government should get out of such things in the future. Apply the laws to everyone and with an equal yoke. No more, no less.

Well, lets see what we can decipher from this rant of word salad. I'll try to pull out the salient point. I'm only doing this because there is a ******* blizzard raging outside and I can't run or get to the gym which normally would be my priorities.

• It seems that the only classes of people that you think should be protected from discrimination are racial minorities, and disabled people . Interesting that you don't include women....hummmmmm. You don't suppose that discrimination can occur when -for instance and employer finds out that a person is gay, or when some mindless bigot mistakes a Hindu for a Muslim??
• You have disdain for blacks who you think are abusing their protections for "vengeance and power." Is that really a big issue that happens a lot? Please explain. You seem to be alluding to affirmative action.
• You have a dim view of race relations- and blame blacks for it
• You blather about justice being blind but that seems to include being blind to discrimination perpetrated by individuals and organization
• I tried to educate you on the issue of groups getting special treatment under the laws against discrimination but that does seem to have penetrated your skull. Again, laws are written to prohibit discrimination based on gender, race, sexual orientation etc. A straight white male has the same protections as a lesbian of color.

To be quite honest, I'm bored with this trip and beginning to glaze or.

. Umm of course it includes women, minorities etc. but no longer should special treatment go out to groups that might abuse the special treatment, protections or privileges that are given to them as a group. This is what needs to end in most people's opinions, where as unfortunately there have been groups that turn these privileges against the citizens who are not afforded such privileges or protections in an even handed way.

I think the country has come a long, long way in helping people through law's in teaching them not to abuse each other maybe. I think after all the generational changes, the laws can apply equally to all without special recognitions needed or special treatments or programs needed beyond what has already been settled law.

Let the laws apply equally to all, and stop with the preferential treatments of groups is my opinion.

I explained why and how the laws against discrimination DO NOT afford anyone special protection, but you continue to blather about how they do, without even attempting a rebuttal. I 'm not wasting anymore time with this level of obtuseness.

Explain how these laws of equal protection omit classes being taught regarding the rights and history of heteros, specifically.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

First of all, you previously had said that there should be laws protecting racial minorities and the handicapped only. So how are they different as a class than gays, transpeople, women, etc.?? Seems rather inconsistent

Now you're saying that "the law doesn't have to have sex, sexual preference, sexual lifestyle or sexual identity to get the job done for all Americans" Seriously?? Kindly explain exactly how that would work.. The law protecting special classes is needed because they already exist as a class and there are people who will discriminate against them for being part of that class.. The goal is not preferential treatment. It is equal treatment which needs to be enforced.

Lastly laws against discrimination generally do not prohibit discrimination against specific racial groups, gays, women etc. They state that discrimination on the basis of race, sexual orientation, gender etc. is prohibited, so again, no one is getting preferential treatment.

.

. The reason race was thought to be protected by government in retrospect, is because it was that the citizens we're discriminating on the basis of a skin color as it were found at large. This absurdity was the hight of craziness in most people's minds (meaning the silent majority at the time). So the government with the well wishes of the citizens set out to change this idiocy. Laws were created.

Now after years of this, it has not gone perfect in it's results. Since then we have had blacks who desired vengence and power over equality, and for whom had then used these government protections, and it's power, to get that vengence wanted, and to gain power over their supposed white enemy. Otherwise therefore it was a misusing of the intent of government protections down the line in which they began using them to then set themselves (certain ones not all), up to use reverse discrimination to get back at their white enemies by way of government power in which was given to them. Basically it was that a door had been left unattended, and the devil just walked right on through it. This battle rages on today in the attempt to control the fall out.

Disabilities are a no brainer.

Sex is another slippery slope that can have unknown consequences by adding it into the frey over the years to come. I think the government should free itself from these things, and get back to being as justice should be for the citizens, and that is to be blind when it comes to justice, and deal with each case upon it's own individual merits. No groups should get special or preferential treatment by the government over the individual citizen's rights in this country any longer. It's 2018, and the government should get out of such things in the future. Apply the laws to everyone and with an equal yoke. No more, no less.

Well, lets see what we can decipher from this rant of word salad. I'll try to pull out the salient point. I'm only doing this because there is a ******* blizzard raging outside and I can't run or get to the gym which normally would be my priorities.

• It seems that the only classes of people that you think should be protected from discrimination are racial minorities, and disabled people . Interesting that you don't include women....hummmmmm. You don't suppose that discrimination can occur when -for instance and employer finds out that a person is gay, or when some mindless bigot mistakes a Hindu for a Muslim??
• You have disdain for blacks who you think are abusing their protections for "vengeance and power." Is that really a big issue that happens a lot? Please explain. You seem to be alluding to affirmative action.
• You have a dim view of race relations- and blame blacks for it
• You blather about justice being blind but that seems to include being blind to discrimination perpetrated by individuals and organization
• I tried to educate you on the issue of groups getting special treatment under the laws against discrimination but that does seem to have penetrated your skull. Again, laws are written to prohibit discrimination based on gender, race, sexual orientation etc. A straight white male has the same protections as a lesbian of color.

To be quite honest, I'm bored with this trip and beginning to glaze or.

. Umm of course it includes women, minorities etc. but no longer should special treatment go out to groups that might abuse the special treatment, protections or privileges that are given to them as a group. This is what needs to end in most people's opinions, where as unfortunately there have been groups that turn these privileges against the citizens who are not afforded such privileges or protections in an even handed way.

I think the country has come a long, long way in helping people through law's in teaching them not to abuse each other maybe. I think after all the generational changes, the laws can apply equally to all without special recognitions needed or special treatments or programs needed beyond what has already been settled law.

Let the laws apply equally to all, and stop with the preferential treatments of groups is my opinion.

I explained why and how the laws against discrimination DO NOT afford anyone special protection, but you continue to blather about how they do, without even attempting a rebuttal. I 'm not wasting anymore time with this level of obtuseness.

Explain how these laws of equal protection omit classes being taught regarding the rights and history of heteros, specifically.

Please explain why and how you have not noticed that I have been ignoring you stupidity, specifically

 

[Silhouette]

Michael d'Angelo was a child butt ******.

Yes, but was he "born that way"? Of course he wasn't. His orientation was learned; likely taught to him when he himself was molested as a boy..

 

[Aba Incieni]

. The reason race was thought to be protected by government in retrospect, is because it was that the citizens we're discriminating on the basis of a skin color as it were found at large. This absurdity was the hight of craziness in most people's minds (meaning the silent majority at the time). So the government with the well wishes of the citizens set out to change this idiocy. Laws were created.

Now after years of this, it has not gone perfect in it's results. Since then we have had blacks who desired vengence and power over equality, and for whom had then used these government protections, and it's power, to get that vengence wanted, and to gain power over their supposed white enemy. Otherwise therefore it was a misusing of the intent of government protections down the line in which they began using them to then set themselves (certain ones not all), up to use reverse discrimination to get back at their white enemies by way of government power in which was given to them. Basically it was that a door had been left unattended, and the devil just walked right on through it. This battle rages on today in the attempt to control the fall out.

Disabilities are a no brainer.

Sex is another slippery slope that can have unknown consequences by adding it into the frey over the years to come. I think the government should free itself from these things, and get back to being as justice should be for the citizens, and that is to be blind when it comes to justice, and deal with each case upon it's own individual merits. No groups should get special or preferential treatment by the government over the individual citizen's rights in this country any longer. It's 2018, and the government should get out of such things in the future. Apply the laws to everyone and with an equal yoke. No more, no less.

Well, lets see what we can decipher from this rant of word salad. I'll try to pull out the salient point. I'm only doing this because there is a ******* blizzard raging outside and I can't run or get to the gym which normally would be my priorities.

• It seems that the only classes of people that you think should be protected from discrimination are racial minorities, and disabled people . Interesting that you don't include women....hummmmmm. You don't suppose that discrimination can occur when -for instance and employer finds out that a person is gay, or when some mindless bigot mistakes a Hindu for a Muslim??
• You have disdain for blacks who you think are abusing their protections for "vengeance and power." Is that really a big issue that happens a lot? Please explain. You seem to be alluding to affirmative action.
• You have a dim view of race relations- and blame blacks for it
• You blather about justice being blind but that seems to include being blind to discrimination perpetrated by individuals and organization
• I tried to educate you on the issue of groups getting special treatment under the laws against discrimination but that does seem to have penetrated your skull. Again, laws are written to prohibit discrimination based on gender, race, sexual orientation etc. A straight white male has the same protections as a lesbian of color.

To be quite honest, I'm bored with this trip and beginning to glaze or.

. Umm of course it includes women, minorities etc. but no longer should special treatment go out to groups that might abuse the special treatment, protections or privileges that are given to them as a group. This is what needs to end in most people's opinions, where as unfortunately there have been groups that turn these privileges against the citizens who are not afforded such privileges or protections in an even handed way.

I think the country has come a long, long way in helping people through law's in teaching them not to abuse each other maybe. I think after all the generational changes, the laws can apply equally to all without special recognitions needed or special treatments or programs needed beyond what has already been settled law.

Let the laws apply equally to all, and stop with the preferential treatments of groups is my opinion.

I explained why and how the laws against discrimination DO NOT afford anyone special protection, but you continue to blather about how they do, without even attempting a rebuttal. I 'm not wasting anymore time with this level of obtuseness.

Explain how these laws of equal protection omit classes being taught regarding the rights and history of heteros, specifically.

Please explain why and how you have not noticed that I have been ignoring you stupidity, specifically

First explain why you think I haven't noticed.

It seems getting your own nonsense stuffed back in your face does not sit well with you.

#HeteroPride

 

[Silhouette]

#HeteroPride. Love it!