Israel's Legal Right To Exist

You have been shown to make fraudulent claims over and over again. Pal'istan was a geographic area, not your silly, invented "country of Disney.., Pal'istan".

Here in the Great Satan we have a geographic area called the "Bible Belt". It's nothing more than a geographic area.

So true. And what legal right do the Pali squatters have to live on Israel's land?


The Covenant of the League of Nations

ARTICLE 22.
To those colonies and territories which as a consequence of the late war have ceased to be under the sovereignty of the States which formerly governed them and which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation and that securities for the performance of this trust should be embodied in this Covenant.

Certain communities formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire have reached a stage of development where their existence as independent nations can be provisionally recognized subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a Mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone. The wishes of these communities must be a principal consideration in the selection of the Mandatory."

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations

However, we know that "certain communities" (Arab colonizers / squatters), were never able to "stand alone". Their incompetence and ineptitude was never intended to block a more modern, educated society from seeking self-determination.

You're letting your bias and ignorance of history, and your rabid Jew hatreds, be a vehicle to promote your inability to do anything but cut and paste the same articles across multiple threads without understanding the underlying context.
What a Delusional Little Creature You Are,Hollie
I don't see that at all. I see an educated person who knows what they are talking about. As for you. Socrates said that when the debate is lost slander becomes the tool of the loser.
What a Delusional Little Ass You are Jere=Jerry=Gerald/Jeremiah=Good Jewish name,all I can say to you..."You Can Lead A Horse To Water,But You Can't Make It Drink"....Slander I don't do....Facts Only...theliq
 
Last edited:
The Covenant of the League of Nations

ARTICLE 22.
To those colonies and territories which as a consequence of the late war have ceased to be under the sovereignty of the States which formerly governed them and which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation and that securities for the performance of this trust should be embodied in this Covenant.

Certain communities formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire have reached a stage of development where their existence as independent nations can be provisionally recognized subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a Mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone. The wishes of these communities must be a principal consideration in the selection of the Mandatory."

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations

However, we know that "certain communities" (Arab colonizers / squatters), were never able to "stand alone". Their incompetence and ineptitude was never intended to block a more modern, educated society from seeking self-determination.

You're letting your bias and ignorance of history, and your rabid Jew hatreds, be a vehicle to promote your inability to do anything but cut and paste the same articles across multiple threads without understanding the underlying context.
What a Delusional Little Creature You Are,Hollie
I don't see that at all. I see an educated person who knows what they are talking about. As for you. Socrates said that when the debate is lost slander becomes the tool of the loser.

Educate
What does a unilateral declaration by one party in 1948 have to do with the legal right of the inhabitants of Palestine, as stated in the Covenant of the League of Nations of 1919, specifically "....inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation.."?

A non sequitur from you as usual.

Across the Islamist world, we see a pattern of (Islamist) "peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world".

That's not surprising as the Islamist world has never been able to claw its way out of its 7th century world view.

There is no reason to expect that the rest of the relevant, 1st world should now, or in the past, expect Islamism to be anything other than a yoke around the neck of humanity.

Pointless apologetics from you for Islamist incompetence.

There was a time when Muslim contributions to mankind & civilization were enormous. Who in their right mind can deny the brilliant minds & writings of Avicenna, Averroes & the Mu'tazilites of centuries ago? And today we have Palestinians to replace them.

So, the Palestinians, living under Jew occupation are expected to not only struggle for their freedom, but also make Nobel Prize winning advancements. Good one MJ. You truly are a master at idiocy.
The Arabs in Gaza are struggling for their freedom? Who is keeping them from their freedom? Why can't they leave and go back to the lands they came from, their parents came from, Saudi Arabia, Egypt.......who's keeping them from their freedom? It certainly isn't the Israelis.
Considering the Palestinians have been in Palestine for 5000 years rather makes your post Irrelevent,how is downtown Tel-Aviv these days,theliq...ps there is such irony in your last post...because The Palestinians were the only people who gave Jews,compassion and a safe haven for generations....until they realised too late the Synthetic Jews like you and the rest of the Zionist Terrorists intended to eliminate them...YOU TRIED SO HARD TO DO...BUT FAILED THANKFULLY.....not forgetting that Christians tried to eliminate Jews for millennia,yet you suck up to them ....Forget Socrates.......I say ...Once a LIAR always a LIAR,hey Jere,and what's it like to be a Complete TOOL...
 
Last edited:
The Covenant of the League of Nations

ARTICLE 22.
To those colonies and territories which as a consequence of the late war have ceased to be under the sovereignty of the States which formerly governed them and which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation and that securities for the performance of this trust should be embodied in this Covenant.

Certain communities formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire have reached a stage of development where their existence as independent nations can be provisionally recognized subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a Mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone. The wishes of these communities must be a principal consideration in the selection of the Mandatory."

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations

However, we know that "certain communities" (Arab colonizers / squatters), were never able to "stand alone". Their incompetence and ineptitude was never intended to block a more modern, educated society from seeking self-determination.

You're letting your bias and ignorance of history, and your rabid Jew hatreds, be a vehicle to promote your inability to do anything but cut and paste the same articles across multiple threads without understanding the underlying context.
What a Delusional Little Creature You Are,Hollie
I don't see that at all. I see an educated person who knows what they are talking about. As for you. Socrates said that when the debate is lost slander becomes the tool of the loser.

Educate
What does a unilateral declaration by one party in 1948 have to do with the legal right of the inhabitants of Palestine, as stated in the Covenant of the League of Nations of 1919, specifically "....inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation.."?

A non sequitur from you as usual.

Across the Islamist world, we see a pattern of (Islamist) "peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world".

That's not surprising as the Islamist world has never been able to claw its way out of its 7th century world view.

There is no reason to expect that the rest of the relevant, 1st world should now, or in the past, expect Islamism to be anything other than a yoke around the neck of humanity.

Pointless apologetics from you for Islamist incompetence.

There was a time when Muslim contributions to mankind & civilization were enormous. Who in their right mind can deny the brilliant minds & writings of Avicenna, Averroes & the Mu'tazilites of centuries ago? And today we have Palestinians to replace them.

So, the Palestinians, living under Jew occupation are expected to not only struggle for their freedom, but also make Nobel Prize winning advancements. Good one MJ. You truly are a master at idiocy.
The Arabs in Gaza are struggling for their freedom? Who is keeping them from their freedom? Why can't they leave and go back to the lands they came from, their parents came from, Saudi Arabia, Egypt.......who's keeping them from their freedom? It certainly isn't the Israelis.
Oh jeese. :eusa_doh: Stupid post of the day.
 
However, we know that "certain communities" (Arab colonizers / squatters), were never able to "stand alone". Their incompetence and ineptitude was never intended to block a more modern, educated society from seeking self-determination.

You're letting your bias and ignorance of history, and your rabid Jew hatreds, be a vehicle to promote your inability to do anything but cut and paste the same articles across multiple threads without understanding the underlying context.
What a Delusional Little Creature You Are,Hollie
I don't see that at all. I see an educated person who knows what they are talking about. As for you. Socrates said that when the debate is lost slander becomes the tool of the loser.

Educate
What does a unilateral declaration by one party in 1948 have to do with the legal right of the inhabitants of Palestine, as stated in the Covenant of the League of Nations of 1919, specifically "....inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation.."?

A non sequitur from you as usual.

Across the Islamist world, we see a pattern of (Islamist) "peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world".

That's not surprising as the Islamist world has never been able to claw its way out of its 7th century world view.

There is no reason to expect that the rest of the relevant, 1st world should now, or in the past, expect Islamism to be anything other than a yoke around the neck of humanity.

Pointless apologetics from you for Islamist incompetence.

There was a time when Muslim contributions to mankind & civilization were enormous. Who in their right mind can deny the brilliant minds & writings of Avicenna, Averroes & the Mu'tazilites of centuries ago? And today we have Palestinians to replace them.

So, the Palestinians, living under Jew occupation are expected to not only struggle for their freedom, but also make Nobel Prize winning advancements. Good one MJ. You truly are a master at idiocy.
The Arabs in Gaza are struggling for their freedom? Who is keeping them from their freedom? Why can't they leave and go back to the lands they came from, their parents came from, Saudi Arabia, Egypt.......who's keeping them from their freedom? It certainly isn't the Israelis.
Considering the Palestinians have been in Palestine for 5000 years rather makes your post Irrelevent,how is downtown Tel-Aviv these days,theliq...ps there is such irony in your last post...because The Palestinians were the only people who gave Jews,compassion and a safe haven for generations....until they realised too late the Synthetic Jews like you and the rest of the Zionist Terrorists intended to eliminate them...YOU TRIED SO HARD TO DO...BUT FAILED THANKFULLY.....not forgetting that Christians tried to eliminate Jews for millennia,yet you suck up to them ....Forget Socrates.......I say ...Once a LIAR always a LIAR,hey Jere,and what's it like to be a Complete TOOL...

Eh Theliq, 5000 years ago Palestinians were Jews. Thank you for acknowledging Israel's legal right to exist.
 
What a Delusional Little Creature You Are,Hollie
I don't see that at all. I see an educated person who knows what they are talking about. As for you. Socrates said that when the debate is lost slander becomes the tool of the loser.

Educate
Across the Islamist world, we see a pattern of (Islamist) "peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world".

That's not surprising as the Islamist world has never been able to claw its way out of its 7th century world view.

There is no reason to expect that the rest of the relevant, 1st world should now, or in the past, expect Islamism to be anything other than a yoke around the neck of humanity.

Pointless apologetics from you for Islamist incompetence.

There was a time when Muslim contributions to mankind & civilization were enormous. Who in their right mind can deny the brilliant minds & writings of Avicenna, Averroes & the Mu'tazilites of centuries ago? And today we have Palestinians to replace them.

So, the Palestinians, living under Jew occupation are expected to not only struggle for their freedom, but also make Nobel Prize winning advancements. Good one MJ. You truly are a master at idiocy.
The Arabs in Gaza are struggling for their freedom? Who is keeping them from their freedom? Why can't they leave and go back to the lands they came from, their parents came from, Saudi Arabia, Egypt.......who's keeping them from their freedom? It certainly isn't the Israelis.
Considering the Palestinians have been in Palestine for 5000 years rather makes your post Irrelevent,how is downtown Tel-Aviv these days,theliq...ps there is such irony in your last post...because The Palestinians were the only people who gave Jews,compassion and a safe haven for generations....until they realised too late the Synthetic Jews like you and the rest of the Zionist Terrorists intended to eliminate them...YOU TRIED SO HARD TO DO...BUT FAILED THANKFULLY.....not forgetting that Christians tried to eliminate Jews for millennia,yet you suck up to them ....Forget Socrates.......I say ...Once a LIAR always a LIAR,hey Jere,and what's it like to be a Complete TOOL...

Eh Theliq, 5000 years ago Palestinians were Jews. Thank you for acknowledging Israel's legal right to exist.
I know MJ that Jews originated as part Arab,but that aside,your last sentence should read "I,MJ,ACKNOWLEDGE PALESTINE'S LEGAL RIGHT TO EXIST"

I don't believe anyone on here really believes that Israel should not exist....the problem you have is that Israel is full of Barbarous SYNTHETIC ZIONIST JEWS and SETTLERS who have no real claim to this Land as they are JUST A LOAD OF CONVERTS TO JUDIASM....but the first priority is to the Semitic PALESTINIANS TO HAVE THE FREEDOM OF A FREE PALESTINE.st
 
277 pages and nobody has yet to show where Israel legally acquired any land.
 
277 pages and nobody has yet to show where Israel legally acquired any land.
And Tinnie my Friend...There could be another 234,567,890.000,0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000recurring posts.

NO ONE COULD SHOW ANY LEGALITY, Tinnie because it was ALL STOLEN...steve,trust you and the family are well Tinnie.
 
277 pages and nobody has yet to show where Israel legally acquired any land.

Its been demonstrated half a dozen times. You just don't like the answer.

Israel legally "acquired land" the exact same way Syria, Jordan, Iraq and Lebanon did. Treaties of Lausanne and Sevres. San Remo Resolution. Mandate for Palestine.

If you want to argue that Israel couldn't have "acquired land" through those legal instruments, then you have to argue that the others didn't either.

There is no possible legal argument to claim that the others all did and Israel did not. If you had one you would have brought it by now.
 
So true. And what legal right do the Pali squatters have to live on Israel's land?


The Covenant of the League of Nations

ARTICLE 22.
To those colonies and territories which as a consequence of the late war have ceased to be under the sovereignty of the States which formerly governed them and which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation and that securities for the performance of this trust should be embodied in this Covenant.

Certain communities formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire have reached a stage of development where their existence as independent nations can be provisionally recognized subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a Mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone. The wishes of these communities must be a principal consideration in the selection of the Mandatory."

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations

However, we know that "certain communities" (Arab colonizers / squatters), were never able to "stand alone". Their incompetence and ineptitude was never intended to block a more modern, educated society from seeking self-determination.

You're letting your bias and ignorance of history, and your rabid Jew hatreds, be a vehicle to promote your inability to do anything but cut and paste the same articles across multiple threads without understanding the underlying context.
What a Delusional Little Creature You Are,Hollie
I don't see that at all. I see an educated person who knows what they are talking about. As for you. Socrates said that when the debate is lost slander becomes the tool of the loser.
What a Delusional Little Ass You are Jere=Jerry=Gerald/Jeremiah=Good Jewish name,all I can say to you..."You Can Lead A Horse To Water,But You Can't Make It Drink"....Slander I don't do....Facts Only...theliq
Try to stay on topic, Liq. I realize it will reduce your input substantially but that might just be a good thing all things considered...
 
277 pages and nobody has yet to show where Israel legally acquired any land.

Its been demonstrated half a dozen times. You just don't like the answer.

Israel legally "acquired land" the exact same way Syria, Jordan, Iraq and Lebanon did. Treaties of Lausanne and Sevres. San Remo Resolution. Mandate for Palestine.

If you want to argue that Israel couldn't have "acquired land" through those legal instruments, then you have to argue that the others didn't either.

There is no possible legal argument to claim that the others all did and Israel did not. If you had one you would have brought it by now.

No, the inhabitants of Syria, Jordan, Iraq and Lebanon acquired land. The land of the Muslim and Christian inhabitants of Palestine, who represented 95% of the population in 1921, was not acquired by the inhabitants, but by people living in Europe and other continents and territories. It was a colonial venture for non-resident colonists who replaced the native inhabitants. Much different.
 
However, we know that "certain communities" (Arab colonizers / squatters), were never able to "stand alone". Their incompetence and ineptitude was never intended to block a more modern, educated society from seeking self-determination.

You're letting your bias and ignorance of history, and your rabid Jew hatreds, be a vehicle to promote your inability to do anything but cut and paste the same articles across multiple threads without understanding the underlying context.
What a Delusional Little Creature You Are,Hollie
I don't see that at all. I see an educated person who knows what they are talking about. As for you. Socrates said that when the debate is lost slander becomes the tool of the loser.

Educate
What does a unilateral declaration by one party in 1948 have to do with the legal right of the inhabitants of Palestine, as stated in the Covenant of the League of Nations of 1919, specifically "....inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation.."?

A non sequitur from you as usual.

Across the Islamist world, we see a pattern of (Islamist) "peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world".

That's not surprising as the Islamist world has never been able to claw its way out of its 7th century world view.

There is no reason to expect that the rest of the relevant, 1st world should now, or in the past, expect Islamism to be anything other than a yoke around the neck of humanity.

Pointless apologetics from you for Islamist incompetence.

There was a time when Muslim contributions to mankind & civilization were enormous. Who in their right mind can deny the brilliant minds & writings of Avicenna, Averroes & the Mu'tazilites of centuries ago? And today we have Palestinians to replace them.

So, the Palestinians, living under Jew occupation are expected to not only struggle for their freedom, but also make Nobel Prize winning advancements. Good one MJ. You truly are a master at idiocy.
The Arabs in Gaza are struggling for their freedom? Who is keeping them from their freedom? Why can't they leave and go back to the lands they came from, their parents came from, Saudi Arabia, Egypt.......who's keeping them from their freedom? It certainly isn't the Israelis.
Considering the Palestinians have been in Palestine for 5000 years rather makes your post Irrelevent,how is downtown Tel-Aviv these days,theliq...ps there is such irony in your last post...because The Palestinians were the only people who gave Jews,compassion and a safe haven for generations....until they realised too late the Synthetic Jews like you and the rest of the Zionist Terrorists intended to eliminate them...YOU TRIED SO HARD TO DO...BUT FAILED THANKFULLY.....not forgetting that Christians tried to eliminate Jews for millennia,yet you suck up to them ....Forget Socrates.......I say ...Once a LIAR always a LIAR,hey Jere,and what's it like to be a Complete TOOL...
There is no such thing as a Palestinian. Those people are Arab and Egyptian invaders who don't belong in Israel. I do not say that to provoke you to anger but the truth does prove to anger those who hate the truth. The greater question should be, Why do you hate the truth so much? Why try to rewrite history that anyone with a minimal amount of research can uncover as propaganda? Don't you see the futility of what you are doing?

Why not redeem the time, buy a KJV Bible and work out your salvation, Liq? What you are doing isn't working for you and you know it. Israel is a sovereign nation and a Jewish State and while your Arab school books may deny this reality and even refuse to put Israel on their maps (in their school books), Israel is a reality!

Your Islamic school teachers did you no favors by keeping the truth from you. You owe it to yourself to learn the truth so that you can stop what you are doing and move on with your life.
 
However, we know that "certain communities" (Arab colonizers / squatters), were never able to "stand alone". Their incompetence and ineptitude was never intended to block a more modern, educated society from seeking self-determination.

You're letting your bias and ignorance of history, and your rabid Jew hatreds, be a vehicle to promote your inability to do anything but cut and paste the same articles across multiple threads without understanding the underlying context.
What a Delusional Little Creature You Are,Hollie
I don't see that at all. I see an educated person who knows what they are talking about. As for you. Socrates said that when the debate is lost slander becomes the tool of the loser.

Educate
What does a unilateral declaration by one party in 1948 have to do with the legal right of the inhabitants of Palestine, as stated in the Covenant of the League of Nations of 1919, specifically "....inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation.."?

A non sequitur from you as usual.

Across the Islamist world, we see a pattern of (Islamist) "peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world".

That's not surprising as the Islamist world has never been able to claw its way out of its 7th century world view.

There is no reason to expect that the rest of the relevant, 1st world should now, or in the past, expect Islamism to be anything other than a yoke around the neck of humanity.

Pointless apologetics from you for Islamist incompetence.

There was a time when Muslim contributions to mankind & civilization were enormous. Who in their right mind can deny the brilliant minds & writings of Avicenna, Averroes & the Mu'tazilites of centuries ago? And today we have Palestinians to replace them.

So, the Palestinians, living under Jew occupation are expected to not only struggle for their freedom, but also make Nobel Prize winning advancements. Good one MJ. You truly are a master at idiocy.
The Arabs in Gaza are struggling for their freedom? Who is keeping them from their freedom? Why can't they leave and go back to the lands they came from, their parents came from, Saudi Arabia, Egypt.......who's keeping them from their freedom? It certainly isn't the Israelis.
Oh jeese. :eusa_doh: Stupid post of the day.

So you don't want to admit that the Muslim nations / Hamas and other terror groups are responsible for holding their own people there in order to continue to use them as political pawns? That is understandable considering it shifts the blame from Israel to your own people. It's called failure to take responsibility. Stupid post of the day? Only to those who don't want to take responsibility for their own actions.
 
277 pages and nobody has yet to show where Israel legally acquired any land.

Its been demonstrated half a dozen times. You just don't like the answer.

Israel legally "acquired land" the exact same way Syria, Jordan, Iraq and Lebanon did. Treaties of Lausanne and Sevres. San Remo Resolution. Mandate for Palestine.

If you want to argue that Israel couldn't have "acquired land" through those legal instruments, then you have to argue that the others didn't either.

There is no possible legal argument to claim that the others all did and Israel did not. If you had one you would have brought it by now.

No, the inhabitants of Syria, Jordan, Iraq and Lebanon acquired land. The land of the Muslim and Christian inhabitants of Palestine, who represented 95% of the population in 1921, was not acquired by the inhabitants, but by people living in Europe and other continents and territories. It was a colonial venture for non-resident colonists who replaced the native inhabitants. Much different.
Acquired? You meant acquired by murder and theft, didn't you? Can you read? Read this sign from the Jewish Community of Hebron:

6a0120a610bec4970c01b7c8797eb5970b.png
 
15th post
277 pages and nobody has yet to show where Israel legally acquired any land.

Its been demonstrated half a dozen times. You just don't like the answer.

Israel legally "acquired land" the exact same way Syria, Jordan, Iraq and Lebanon did. Treaties of Lausanne and Sevres. San Remo Resolution. Mandate for Palestine.

If you want to argue that Israel couldn't have "acquired land" through those legal instruments, then you have to argue that the others didn't either.

There is no possible legal argument to claim that the others all did and Israel did not. If you had one you would have brought it by now.

No, the inhabitants of Syria, Jordan, Iraq and Lebanon acquired land. The land of the Muslim and Christian inhabitants of Palestine, who represented 95% of the population in 1921, was not acquired by the inhabitants, but by people living in Europe and other continents and territories. It was a colonial venture for non-resident colonists who replaced the native inhabitants. Much different.
Acquired? You meant acquired by murder and theft, didn't you? Can you read? Read this sign from the Jewish Community of Hebron:

6a0120a610bec4970c01b7c8797eb5970b.png

Inform yourself before posting nonsense:

" It is legally owned by Haim Hanegbi, one of the founders of Matzpen, a revolutionary socialist and anti-Zionist organization. Hanegbi inherited the land from his grandfather, Rabbi Haim Bajayo, the Sephardi rabbi of the Jewish community in Hebron. Hanegbi, needless to say, opposes the Jewish settlement in Hebron. He does not want his grandfather’s land back and most certainly does not want to give it to Hebron’s settlers."

Conflicting Property Rights in Hebron & Jerusalem
 
barenakedislam. photo jeremiah?
Nope. Photo is not from barenakedislam.com

Netanyahu: UN Silent About Jews Being Massacred, Expelled from West Bank, Eastern Jerusalem - Never Again Canada

Netanyahu: UN Silent About Jews Being Massacred, Expelled from West Bank, Eastern Jerusalem
6a0120a610bec4970c01b7c8797eb5970b.png

Not to mention the nearly one million Jews who were killed or forced out of Arab lands in 1948 and had all their property stolen from them.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu took to Facebook to provide context regarding the historical, religious and legal Jewish connections to the West Bank and eastern Jerusalem, lands baselessly declared occupied Palestinian territory in the text of last week’s anti-Israel UN Security Council resolution.

Netanyahu slammed the UN for its “silence” in the face of Arab massacres and expulsions of Jews from the West Bank and eastern Jerusalem, events that, he wrote, explain why no Jews were living in those territories when Israel was founded in 1948.



timeline-of-the-arab-and-israel-conflict-7-638.jpg


Some of the holiest sites in Judaism are located in those areas, including the Western Wall and Temple Mount in Jerusalem’s Old City; the Cave of the Patriarchs and Matriarchs in Hebron, which was home to the oldest continuous Jewish community in the world until the Jews of Hebron were massacred and expelled; the Tomb of Rachel in Bethlehem; and Joseph’s Tomb in Nablus or biblical Shechem.

Netanyahu accused the UN of having “no legal justification for its decisions” on the status of the West Bank and eastern Jerusalem. Instead, he argued, the UN possessed “only ignorance and malice” in its designation of those territories.

He explained the British Mandate for Palestine, later adopted by the UN and still legally binding, called for the “establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.”
______________
Thanks for asking!
 
The matter of Israel's right to exist is not even a question. Perhaps the real question that should be posed is, "Does the UN have a right to exist?" To that I respond with an unequivocal no. The UN has been used as a weapon against Israel. The UN has no right to exist. It should be abandoned immediately.
 
Back
Top Bottom