montelatici
Gold Member
- Feb 5, 2014
- 18,686
- 2,133
- 280
I feel deeply over the Syrian refugees. For they are the ones trapped between the forces of Assad & ISIS. Unfortunately radical Islamists all over the world have made it difficult for peace loving countries like the USA & our allies to take a chance on granting them citizenship.
Let us be aware of what has happened to France with a growing Muslim population.
A majority of the people of Syria including a majority of Sunnis (the secular Sunnis) supported the government before the civil war and now. The Government of Syria was a secular one, the opposition are Islamists supported by the Saudi Wahabis, their allies and, unfortunately, the U.S.
"Most Syrians back President Assad, but you'd never know from western media
Assad's popularity, Arab League observers, US military involvement: all distorted in the west's propaganda war...."
Most Syrians back President Assad – but you'd never know from western media | Jonathan Steele
Instead of simply cutting and pasting from the web, you might want to take the time to try and understand that OPO's, (Other People's Opinions), might serve your agenda of promoting propaganda, but it leaves you as little more than an accomplice to the propaganda of others.
The little dalliance in Syria had it's beginnings early in 2011 with the emergence of a democracy movement. In typical dictator fashion, Assad sought to nip that in the bud with sweeping force of arms and a bit of arrest and torture thrown in. The fun just escalated from there.
But yeah, who would deny that "Most Syrians Support Assad" when those Syrians are on the business end of an Assad barrel bomb.
Note the use of gargantuan font and bold colors.
Just a fact Hollie. Most Syrians supported and continue to support the legitimate Government of Syria.
The demonstrations had nothing to do with democracy, they were Islamists.
“I have seen from the beginning armed protesters in those demonstrations … they were the first to fire on the police. Very often the violence of the security forces comes in response to the brutal violence of the armed insurgents” – Jesuit priest Father Frans Van der Lugt, January 2012, Homs Syria
A double story began on the Syrian conflict, at the very beginning of the armed violence in 2011, in the southern border town of Daraa. The first story comes from independent witnesses in Syria, such as the late Father Frans Van der Lugt in Homs. They say that armed men infiltrated the early political reform demonstrations to shoot at both police and civilians. This violence came from sectarian Islamists. The second comes from the Islamist groups (‘rebels’) and their western backers, including the Washington-based Human Rights Watch. They claim there was ‘indiscriminate’ violence from Syrian security forces to repress political rallies and that the ‘rebels’ grew out of a secular political reform movement.
Careful study of the independent evidence, however, shows that the Washington-backed ‘rebel’ story, while widespread, was part of a strategy to delegitimise the Syrian Government, with the aim of fomenting ‘regime change’. To understand this it is necessary to study the outbreak of the violence in Daraa, in March 2011. Central to that insurrection were shipments of arms from Saudi Arabia to Islamists at the al Omari mosque.
Daraa 2011: Syria’s Islamist Insurrection in Disguise