"Israeli policies don't affect anti-Semitism"

[Roudy]

It seems as though Defeat67 is attempting to blame Jews for his hatred towards them.

Which of course is a common theme repeated by anti semites for hundreds of years.

"The Jews make people hate them" said the Nazis.

 

[Sally]

Now how would you know what the ordinary Christian in the U.S. thinks about Kerry? You want to blame it on one group of Christians, but don't take into consideration the other Christians in the U.S. As for nut cases, in case you don't notice, the nut cases are murdering innocent people all over the Middle East in the name of their religion. Perhaps that doesn't bother you.

 

[Roudy]

Vast majority of American public (which are Christians) and both houses of Congress strongly support Israel. Can't handle it? Too friggin' bad.

 

[aris2chat]

How about all the Christians who have negative thoughts about Kerry and feel he is pushing to get a Nobel Prize. Does it put these Christians in a bad light to have their opinion of Kerry?

What's your point? That some nutcase Apocolyptic Christians hate Kerry because they want a world war to start in Israel to bring forth the Anti-Christ and Jesus' final resurrection?

I'm not interested. This is about peace and ending anti-semitism.

So they are nutcases? Proof?

You are just keep posting (shooting) from the hip without thinking before you post.
I'm sure some are zealots and misinformed fanatical, but those types exist in all religions.
I don't believe in an apocalypse to come, but some really do. The only apocalypse would be over population, man made nuclear disaster or a global pandemic, not some god sent decimation and tribulation, or vs.

Some people might think Islam, and all muslims, is nuts, but voicing such things are not helpful to any discussion.

 

[Phoenall]

People do not see things that are as obvious as the nose on your face.

Why are you deflecting when you have been proven wrong yet again

Do you ever feel as though you are conversing with Lewis Carroll?

More like the angel Gabriel that no one else can see and hear.

 

[Phoenall]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Yes, it is quite plain that the Palestinian People, as a culture, have a Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID). A case of multiple personalities with one portion exhibiting the symptoms of the Islamic Jihadist and Radicalized Fedayeen; and the other face presenting the ever discontent and perpetual victimized features of an unproductive and leaderless society --- unable to control the combative face, and unwilling to accept the conditions they cannot change. Neither faction willing to compromise in the name of peace in exchange for a new environment more conducive to a prosperous economy.

People do not see things that are as obvious as the nose on your face.

(COMMENT)

No one really cares when the terrorist two factions began its clash with its twin as a terrorist. All that is seen is that the Palestinian would rather continue the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict then to change in the direction of peace. Soon, it will not matter if it is HAMAS or Fatah that comes out on top. They are both detrimental to regional security and peace.

Most Respectfully,
R

You completely missed the point.

Perhaps you should read the quote and not read into the quote.

It is because we in the west are cognitive that we can read things many ways at the same time, and we put this to the test all the time. So the reply was valid and met with many peoples POV. Because it did not meet with your narrow POV it was wrong.

 

[Phoenall]

Folks have accused John Kerry of anti-Semitism because of his push for a Israel Palestine peace deal.

The funny thing about this accusation is that it hurts Jews, portrays Jews in a bad light, and increases anti-Semitism.

COWFLOP it shows that the US administration under Obama is inherently racist and anti semitic. When he goes the country will stop appeasing the east and build up it strength again

 

[Phoenall]

How about all the Christians who have negative thoughts about Kerry and feel he is pushing to get a Nobel Prize. Does it put these Christians in a bad light to have their opinion of Kerry?

What's your point? That some nutcase Apocolyptic Christians hate Kerry because they want a world war to start in Israel to bring forth the Anti-Christ and Jesus' final resurrection?

I'm not interested. This is about peace and ending anti-semitism.

Isn't it iran that have been trying to engineer the islamic version of the end times. Seems that the war in Syria is so the prophesy can come true and the 13 imam can rise out of a well in homs

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Yes, it is quite plain that the Palestinian People, as a culture, have a Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID). A case of multiple personalities with one portion exhibiting the symptoms of the Islamic Jihadist and Radicalized Fedayeen; and the other face presenting the ever discontent and perpetual victimized features of an unproductive and leaderless society --- unable to control the combative face, and unwilling to accept the conditions they cannot change. Neither faction willing to compromise in the name of peace in exchange for a new environment more conducive to a prosperous economy.


(COMMENT)

No one really cares when the terrorist two factions began its clash with its twin as a terrorist. All that is seen is that the Palestinian would rather continue the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict then to change in the direction of peace. Soon, it will not matter if it is HAMAS or Fatah that comes out on top. They are both detrimental to regional security and peace.

Most Respectfully,
R

You completely missed the point.

Perhaps you should read the quote and not read into the quote.

It is because we in the west are cognitive that we can read things many ways at the same time, and we put this to the test all the time. So the reply was valid and met with many peoples POV. Because it did not meet with your narrow POV it was wrong.

No, he just missed the point.

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Nonsense!

You completely missed the point.

Perhaps you should read the quote and not read into the quote.

It is because we in the west are cognitive that we can read things many ways at the same time, and we put this to the test all the time. So the reply was valid and met with many peoples POV. Because it did not meet with your narrow POV it was wrong.

No, he just missed the point.

(QUESTION)

What is the point I missed?

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Nonsense!

It is because we in the west are cognitive that we can read things many ways at the same time, and we put this to the test all the time. So the reply was valid and met with many peoples POV. Because it did not meet with your narrow POV it was wrong.

No, he just missed the point.

(QUESTION)

What is the point I missed?

Most Respectfully,
R

Jees, Rocco, it is only two sentences.

The division between Fatah and Hamas began in 2006, when Hamas won the Palestinian legislative elections. In the following year, clashes erupted between Fatah and Hamas, leaving Hamas in control of the Strip and Fatah in control of parts of the occupied West Bank.

What does it tell you?

 

[Indeependent]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Nonsense!

No, he just missed the point.

(QUESTION)

What is the point I missed?

Most Respectfully,
R

Jees, Rocco, it is only two sentences.

The division between Fatah and Hamas began in 2006, when Hamas won the Palestinian legislative elections. In the following year, clashes erupted between Fatah and Hamas, leaving Hamas in control of the Strip and Fatah in control of parts of the occupied West Bank.

What does it tell you?

That the leaders of each of these "organizations" want to buy their wives a castle in France.

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Yes, what does it say about the Palestinian?

P F Tinmore, et al,

Nonsense!

No, he just missed the point.

(QUESTION)

What is the point I missed?

Most Respectfully,
R

Jees, Rocco, it is only two sentences.

The division between Fatah and Hamas began in 2006, when Hamas won the Palestinian legislative elections. In the following year, clashes erupted between Fatah and Hamas, leaving Hamas in control of the Strip and Fatah in control of parts of the occupied West Bank.

What does it tell you?

(COMMENT)

You speak of "the division" (squabbling and conflict - clashes erupted) between (two factions) "Fatah and Hamas" (a case of multiple personalities within the Palestinians).

It is a very clear example of the former Turkish community (Article 22) that have not reached a time - such as they are able to stand alone.

And, as I said, the internal domestic conflict is such that the world will not really care which one overcomes the other. They are both detrimental to regional peace and security. Right now, Fatah is favored over HAMAS; but, that is merely pitting the Fedayeen against the Jihadist. But in reality, they are all Palestinians with DID.

No, I didn't miss the point at all. What you might think is important is not necessarily the important or the salient point as I see it. It was a short statement about a people that cannot properly exercise self-rule or self-government in such a way that it is productive for its people.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Yes, what does it say about the Palestinian?

P F Tinmore, et al,

Nonsense!


(QUESTION)

What is the point I missed?

Most Respectfully,
R

Jees, Rocco, it is only two sentences.

The division between Fatah and Hamas began in 2006, when Hamas won the Palestinian legislative elections. In the following year, clashes erupted between Fatah and Hamas, leaving Hamas in control of the Strip and Fatah in control of parts of the occupied West Bank.

What does it tell you?

(COMMENT)

You speak of "the division" (squabbling and conflict - clashes erupted) between (two factions) "Fatah and Hamas" (a case of multiple personalities within the Palestinians).

It is a very clear example of the former Turkish community (Article 22) that have not reached a time - such as they are able to stand alone.

And, as I said, the internal domestic conflict is such that the world will not really care which one overcomes the other. They are both detrimental to regional peace and security. Right now, Fatah is favored over HAMAS; but, that is merely pitting the Fedayeen against the Jihadist. But in reality, they are all Palestinians with DID.

No, I didn't miss the point at all. What you might think is important is not necessarily the important or the salient point as I see it. It was a short statement about a people that cannot properly exercise self-rule or self-government in such a way that it is productive for its people.

Most Respectfully,
R

No, it doesn't say that.

 

[Roudy]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Nonsense!


(QUESTION)

What is the point I missed?

Most Respectfully,
R

Jees, Rocco, it is only two sentences.

The division between Fatah and Hamas began in 2006, when Hamas won the Palestinian legislative elections. In the following year, clashes erupted between Fatah and Hamas, leaving Hamas in control of the Strip and Fatah in control of parts of the occupied West Bank.

What does it tell you?

That the leaders of each of these "organizations" want to buy their wives a castle in France.

And then get aids and die.

 

[Hossfly]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Yes, what does it say about the Palestinian?

Jees, Rocco, it is only two sentences.



What does it tell you?

(COMMENT)

You speak of "the division" (squabbling and conflict - clashes erupted) between (two factions) "Fatah and Hamas" (a case of multiple personalities within the Palestinians).

It is a very clear example of the former Turkish community (Article 22) that have not reached a time - such as they are able to stand alone.

And, as I said, the internal domestic conflict is such that the world will not really care which one overcomes the other. They are both detrimental to regional peace and security. Right now, Fatah is favored over HAMAS; but, that is merely pitting the Fedayeen against the Jihadist. But in reality, they are all Palestinians with DID.

No, I didn't miss the point at all. What you might think is important is not necessarily the important or the salient point as I see it. It was a short statement about a people that cannot properly exercise self-rule or self-government in such a way that it is productive for its people.

Most Respectfully,
R

No, it doesn't say that.

It's to be understood, Ralph.

 

[toastman]

I commend Rocco for putting up with Tinmores immaturity

 

[Billo_Really]

I commend Rocco for putting up with Tinmores immaturity

What does that have to do with the thread topic in the OP?

 

[Hossfly]

I commend Rocco for putting up with Tinmores immaturity

What does that have to do with the thread topic in the OP?

Go-get-bent.

 

[Phoenall]

You completely missed the point.

Perhaps you should read the quote and not read into the quote.

It is because we in the west are cognitive that we can read things many ways at the same time, and we put this to the test all the time. So the reply was valid and met with many peoples POV. Because it did not meet with your narrow POV it was wrong.

No, he just missed the point.

No he just missed the point that you saw, he hit the point the rest of the board saw on the head.