Israeli Exceptionalism: The Destabilizing Logic of Zionism

That is one mishapen head! Look at that beak, that noggin, and that hair lol.
I loved how South Park made her a 30 foot monster threatening all life on planet earth and the only person who could save the planet from total destruction was the lead singer of The Cure.
 
That is one mishapen head! Look at that beak, that noggin, and that hair lol.
I loved how South Park made her a 30 foot monster threatening all life on planet earth and the only person who could save the planet from total destruction was the lead singer of The Cure.

Funny how you nuzzle up to all the dime-a-dozen Nazi types here.
 
Jewish tribalism comes clean | The Electronic Intifada

The discomfort shown by Diaspora Jewry over the Israeli vision of Jewish identity derives in part from the fact Yehoshua happily exposes the double standard at the heart of Zionism. The Zionists demand a right for Jews to reinvent their identity in the age of the nation state while denying that same right to his Palestinian neighbours. Zionists like Yehoshua are having their cake and eating it.

Until the advent of Zionism at the turn of the twentieth century, Jews for whom their Jewishness mattered believed either that their identity was of a strictly religious nature or, if they were secular, that it was a meaningful marker of their ethnicity. In other words, Jews who wanted to identify themselves as Jews were either Jews in that they practised a religion called Judaism or they were Jews in that they believed they belonged to a distinct ethnic group.

But Zionism added a third possible category of Jewish identity. A Jew no longer had to regard the choice simply in terms of either-or: the Jew either as a believer in a Jewish God or as a member of a group that shared a biological inheritance.

Instead a Jew could identify himself as belonging to a “nation”, whose rights derived from but could never be entirely satisfied at either the biological or metaphysical level. For the Zionist (or at least almost all those who identify themselves today as such), Jewishness as a national identity needed also to be realised at the territorial level. At the minimum the Jews required a state where their sovereignty could be exercised.


And never mind who's state it was.

There was a reason that Henry Ford called the Jews "International".

World Jewish Congress

Notice the ad:
https://www.worldjewishcongress.org/en/donate_support

"Neo-Nazi" would include ANYONE who is critical or Judaism or Israeli policies, EXCEPT for another Jew, in which case he is called "self hating Jew".

What follows if one chooses to accept that definition? What you have then is absolute censorship of ANY Jew or Jewish organization for ANY reason.
Right? How many alternatives are there?


That would include mentioning the obvious hostility being exhibited by Pouty Doudy here.
Or does anyone doubt what this Kosher swashbuckler would like to do to anyone he doesn't like?

If what I am implying is not true, and if say for instance the keepers of this or any other political forum like it, might finally give in and provide a special thread where folks like Doudy could talk about and fantasize about dics and excrement to their hearts delight without being accused of trying to change the subject.
The fact that no such provisions are ever made suggests either trepidation to risk offending them or perhaps some bias. What other alternatives are there, unless one agrees that all criticism of Jews, Israel, or Judaism is necessarily a "conspiracy" being fomented by "Neo-Nazis".

We have witnessed with our own eyes the likes of people such as two different former Presidents of the US, one or two Presidential candidates, one prominent Evangelist, several Popes, and a couple of well known actors being so accused by the Jewish press.

The public seems to willingly accept the indictment regardless of who it is lodged against to the point that NO ONE is able to remain the public eye, nationally or locally who speaks without the Kosher seal of approval. Anyone who transgresses the rule who has managed to attain those heights is ALWAYS demoted, slandered, or banished into obscurity.

What conclusions can be reached from these observations that do not require one to become a "Nazi"?


https://jicny.com/aboutus
 
Last edited:
I call the attention of the unobservant to the fact that the following article is from a source made by Jews for Jewish consumption.

Pouty Doudy saying "sh1t" talking about "dics" does not alter that fact.

Neither does attempting to resurrect the ghosts of long departed German soldiers with whom he was never acquainted.

https://www.worldjewishcongress.org/en/donate_support

In their eyes the Jewish nation can exist independently of the state but, for most, it is only a theoretical nation — a folk — unless there is a concrete homeland in which Jewish national rights are embodied, Jewish interests can be asserted on the global stage, and to which Jews can turn in times of trouble.

This in essence is the view expounded by Yehoshua.

The new kind of Jewish identity was a strange hybrid from the outset. Zionists believed a Jewish state must exist for the Jews to be able to identify themselves as a nation but at the same time the only criteria by which to judge membership of this state were religious or ethnic, or both. In fusing the religious and ethnic identities, the Jewish nation became greater than the sum of its two parts.

One encounters this shape shifting definition of "Jew" in online debates and elsewhere.

Which definition they offer depends on which one serves them best in the particular situation.

It also serves as a constant source of confusion to ignorant gentiles who find it next to impossible to identify them.

It's hard to confront an invisible foe.

The vexation that one experiences in trying to get a Jew to be consistent in his definitions of words is also a source of amusement to the Jews who understand how they benefit from being able to operate incognito.

It's almost like being able to make oneself invisible and walk into any place of business, stick your hand in the till and then walk out undetected.

That practically sums up the function of the Federal Reserve.
 
Last edited:
Jewish tribalism comes clean | The Electronic Intifada

So for a Jew to claim citizenship of the Jewish state — to become an Israeli — he needs to prove either that he is a practising Jew or that he has inherited Jewish genes. This is the legal basis, the 1950 Law of Return, for determining who is admitted to the Jewish state.

No one should deny Jews the right to reinvent their identity and strive in so far as it is legal and moral to realise such an identity.

We know that not all Jews are "practicing" since many of them are atheists.

At the same time one can find "Jews" in various denominations of "Christian" institution.

Yet they will insist that "Jewish" is not a race.

This begs the question. How can one then inherit "Jewish genes"?


We understand also that Jews have ability to "reinvent" themselves also whether anyone suspects that they might do so for purposes of deception or not.
th


The Jews, being a law unto themselves, do not seek the approval of "Jewish" practices in any host nation where they settle. It's always been that way.


We also recognize that it is a political sin in the US to identify oneself as a white non-Jewish male or a person who actually believes in Christ for the purposes of asserting ones own rights, protecting his own interests, or expressing pride in or making a defense of his own heritage, culture, or religion.
It is understood in the popular Jew vernacular that to do so would be "racist".




A simpler definition of "Jew" would be to "a member of the Jewish SOCIO-POLITICAL UNION".

That would still provide them room for trophy wives, handy allies, and useful idiots as the occasion deems.

However, the Jews reject this definition for themselves because it would force them to register themselves as foreign agents and would subject them to the same regulations and restrictions that any For Profit organization faces under the laws they help engineer for everyone else.
 
Last edited:
Jewish tribalism comes clean | The Electronic Intifada

So in practice what has been the view of Zionists — advocates of a Jewish state for a Jewish nation — in relation to other distinct ethnic and religious groups who advocate a state for themselves?

Well for one thing, the Jews do NOT allow for such a thing as a "Christian" nation or an "Anglo-Saxon" nation. THOSE nations have been allocated for the coming Multicultural Paradise as conceived in the Jew World Order, or "Mashianic Age" (Messianic) if you prefer.


And more importantly what has been their attitude towards the national claims of the native inhabitants of Palestine, most of whom were displaced — either through fear or force — during the war of 1948 that established the Jewish state?

Today, these refugees and their descendants — as well as those who remained on their land and now fall under Israeli rule either inside Israel or in the occupied West Bank and Gaza — number more than eight million people. The overwheming majority identify themselves as Palestinians, a nation whose homeland was once known as Palestine.

Throughout Israel’s history, Zionists have been willing to ascribe ethnic and religious identities to the Palestinians but not a national identity.

We have heard the Jews and their gentile sychophants tell us that there "are no such things as Palestinians".

(And they call us nuts.)


As far as Israeli Jews are concerned, a Palestinian citizen of Israel who demands that his Palestinian identity be recognised automatically raises doubts about where his loyalties lie, the assumption being that he cannot be at once a Palestinian and loyal to Israel. Of course, no Jew would accept such an attribution of double loyalties in his own case. An American Jew, however Zionist, would denounce as anti-Semitic any suggestion that he is not always a loyal American citizen.

387428_432106636827112_382031077_n.jpg
 
Last edited:
Jewish tribalism comes clean | The Electronic Intifada

This Israeli counter-approach to the Palestinians’ assertion of a national identity is a useful — and well-developed — colonial strategy: simple “divide and rule”.

Jews have used the same strategy in the US with great effectiveness I might add.
For obvious reasons, Israel has prefered to contend with a Muslim resistance fighting for the return of the caliphate than to face the opposition of a national liberation movement.

As long as the US is willing to finance their war machine, why not?

So whereas the Zionist demands that the profound differences contained within the Jewish people — the ethnic cleavages separating Askhkenazi, Mizrahi, Ethiopian and Russian Jews, and the the religious cleavages between the Orthodox, the Haredim, the Conservative and Reform streams, and the secular — be ignored, he insists that the Palestinian cleavages not only be emphasised but used to preclude any Palestinian right to nationhood and a homeland.

Funny. Jews in the US insist on accentuating the same types of divisions among the Anglo Saxon and "Christian" population.

You don't exactly see them promoting peace and harmony on TV between our men and women do you?

What you are being exposed to now is an interracial love fest.

If you oppose that, you are a "Racist"!

Not so with the Jews who promote Jewish solidarity and tribalism.
Why are the Zionists so determined to refuse the Palestinians a right they demand for themselves?

Because the territorial homeland to which Palestinians lay claim has been under Israeli dominion for only a few decades. The Palestinians, like many other national groups in the colonial era, may not have had sovereignty in their homeland after centuries of occupation (in their case, by the Ottomans, Britain, Jordan, Egypt, and Israel) but it was nonetheless their homeland. After all, they could not have been occupied had they not been living there for generations.

By contrast, the Jews’ claim to nationhood in Palestine (rather than somewhere else) cannot be derived from either national or ethnic claims. Until the dispossession of the Palestinians began a century ago, the number of Jews living in Palestine had been minuscule for nearly 2,000 years. Their numbers were far higher almost everywhere else: in America, Europe and the rest of the Middle East.

They openly LIE about this little factoid.

Instead, Zionists seek legitimacy for their claim to Palestine from a religious claim: that the Jews were promised the land by God. This mostly unspoken assumption among Zionists has two problematic consequences.


More than that. It opens them up to the same kind of ridicule their atheist crowd constantly hurl at Christian believers
As usual, anything a Jew believes is accepted as "sensible" and "logical".

Only when a non-Jew believes in the supernatural does it become the object of derision.
To think otherwise is "anti-semitic".

So although the settlers have come to personify the aggressive craving for places holy to the Jewish people, they are only mirroring the irrational assumptions at the heart of Zionism’s reshaping of Jewish identity, of the kind expressed by secular intellectuals like Yehoshua.

Given this context, the international debate on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict applies a terrible double standard. While the West accepts the conflict as one between two rival nationalisms fighting for the same territority, it places the onus on the Palestinians (a dispersed non-people) to recognise Israel (a nation state), to such a degree that the international community is currently starving the Palestinians and their Hamas leadership into submission through sanctions.

But in truth, the conflict endures because Israel and its Zionist supporters refuse to recognise the Palestinians, and because they continue to act in bad faith in peace negotiations.

.....Just as Hasbarats like Pouty Dowdy act in bad faith with the tactics they employ, knowing full well that nowhere on the face of the earth have Jews overall enjoyed more power and privilege than in the US, the country whose demise they eagerly support by their own cowardly and greedy unwillingness to confront and denounce Jewish organized crime.
 
Jewish tribalism comes clean | The Electronic Intifada

So in practice what has been the view of Zionists — advocates of a Jewish state for a Jewish nation — in relation to other distinct ethnic and religious groups who advocate a state for themselves?

Well for one thing, the Jews do NOT allow for such a thing as a "Christian" nation or an "Anglo-Saxon" nation. THOSE nations have been allocated for the coming Multicultural Paradise as conceived in the Jew World Order, or "Mashianic Age" (Messianic) if you prefer.


And more importantly what has been their attitude towards the national claims of the native inhabitants of Palestine, most of whom were displaced — either through fear or force — during the war of 1948 that established the Jewish state?

Today, these refugees and their descendants — as well as those who remained on their land and now fall under Israeli rule either inside Israel or in the occupied West Bank and Gaza — number more than eight million people. The overwheming majority identify themselves as Palestinians, a nation whose homeland was once known as Palestine.

Throughout Israel’s history, Zionists have been willing to ascribe ethnic and religious identities to the Palestinians but not a national identity.

We have heard the Jews and their gentile sychophants tell us that there "are no such things as Palestinians".

(And they call us nuts.)


As far as Israeli Jews are concerned, a Palestinian citizen of Israel who demands that his Palestinian identity be recognised automatically raises doubts about where his loyalties lie, the assumption being that he cannot be at once a Palestinian and loyal to Israel. Of course, no Jew would accept such an attribution of double loyalties in his own case. An American Jew, however Zionist, would denounce as anti-Semitic any suggestion that he is not always a loyal American citizen.

387428_432106636827112_382031077_n.jpg
Where did you get this garbage from? Oh never mind "electronic inti-farta". Yup..so now this fart IslamoNazi site is claiming Henry Kissinger, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Michael Chertoff, and John Bolton are Israeli citizens? Ha ha ha ha

You got any proof of that, semi literate moron?
 
You need to start here, Dowdy

I call the attention of the unobservant to the fact that the following article is from a source made by Jews for Jewish consumption.

Pouty Doudy saying "sh1t" talking about "dics" does not alter that fact.

Neither does attempting to resurrect the ghosts of long departed German soldiers with whom he was never acquainted.

https://www.worldjewishcongress.org/en/donate_support

In their eyes the Jewish nation can exist independently of the state but, for most, it is only a theoretical nation — a folk — unless there is a concrete homeland in which Jewish national rights are embodied, Jewish interests can be asserted on the global stage, and to which Jews can turn in times of trouble.

This in essence is the view expounded by Yehoshua.

The new kind of Jewish identity was a strange hybrid from the outset. Zionists believed a Jewish state must exist for the Jews to be able to identify themselves as a nation but at the same time the only criteria by which to judge membership of this state were religious or ethnic, or both. In fusing the religious and ethnic identities, the Jewish nation became greater than the sum of its two parts.

One encounters this shape shifting definition of "Jew" in online debates and elsewhere.

Which definition they offer depends on which one serves them best in the particular situation.

It also serves as a constant source of confusion to ignorant gentiles who find it next to impossible to identify them.

It's hard to confront an invisible foe.

The vexation that one experiences in trying to get a Jew to be consistent in his definitions of words is also a source of amusement to the Jews who understand how they benefit from being able to operate incognito.

It's almost like being able to make oneself invisible and walk into any place of business, stick your hand in the till and then walk out undetected.

That practically sums up the function of the Federal Reserve.
 
Where did you get this garbage from? Oh never mind "electronic inti-farta". Yup..so now this fart IslamoNazi site is claiming Henry Kissinger, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Michael Chertoff, and John Bolton are Israeli citizens? Ha ha ha ha

You got any proof of that, semi literate moron?

Not exactly dummy. They are Jews. What's the difference?
Are you trying to convince me that they are any less "Israel first" than you are?!

They are supposed to be Semites. But so are the Arabs and Palestinians. How can an Arab be an "anti-semite". The most you can say is that they are opposed to the Jews of Israel. An honest person has to admit that at least some of those Arabs have a legitimate complaint. This is true even if one disagrees with their Islamic beliefs.

Being a Christian, I believe what Christ said, not Mohammed. That puts me at odds with Muslims on the plane of religious belief. But that does not negate my obligation to be even handed and fair in my judgements with them.

The truth is, that I do not agree with the Jews religiously anymore than I do the Muslims.

But it is the Jews who are the ones leading the procession to destroy the US. The Muslims appear to be opposed to the US mostly because of the unconditional support it gives Israel in the brutal way they are pushing Palestinians out of their homes.

I cannot in good conscience go along with that whether I agree religiously with either party or not.

In the meantime the Jews in the US are operating in a way which is as subversive to the US as the Israelis are acting against the Arabs.

What do you expect ?

You people want to muck with the Constitution, mock my heritage, destroy my race, assume a privileged status in society and force your will upon us on every social issue and then act just as cocky, arrogant, and insolent about it as you are here.

To top it off, when I object, you call me a Nazi.

I've known plenty of sociopaths in my time. This thing you call "Chutzbah" comes across the same way to me that they do :rude, inconsiderate, uncompromising, and intractably self-centered.

I don't cotton to those kind of personality traits in ANYONE> Jews are no exception.

I don't like your "multicultural" agenda any more than I like the Federal Reserve and the push for a globalist government by world banks run by Zionists.

How much simpler can I put it?




New Homeland Security Czar Is An Israeli Citizen



Chertoff's dual-nationality doesn't seem to have concerned a single U.S. senator - BlackListed News - Archive
DHS has a $32 billion budget, 180,000 employees, and jurisdiction over immigration, customs and transportation security, the Coast Guard, the Secret Service and the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

The question of Chertoff's dual-nationality doesn't seem to have concerned a single U.S. senator.

Many have wondered who let the detained suspected Israeli agents go back to Israel, immediately after 911. Apparently it was Michael Chertoff. (See Video Report: VIDEO: 911 Truckload of Explosives)

"Chertoff allowed scores of suspected Israeli terrorists and spies to quietly return to Israel . In several cases, Israeli suspects working for phoney moving companies, such as Urban Moving Systems from Weehawken, N.J., were caught driving moving vans which tested positive for explosives. On September 14, Dominic Suter, the owner of the moving company, which was found to be a Mossad front company, fled to Israel after FBI agents requested a second interview.

One group of 5 Israelis was seen on the roof of Urban Moving Systems videotaping and celebrating the destruction of the World Trade Center. These Israeli agents were returned to Israel on visa violations.

These Israeli suspects, and others, who had apparently transported explosives in the New York area, were allowed to return to Israel without being properly interrogated or their presence and activities in the United States having been vigorously investigated." (1)

It's clear where Chertoff's loyalty lies, now as then.

Controlled Press Hides Chertoff's Israeli Roots
Michael Chertoff, the new head of the Department of Homeland Security, was approved in a 98-0 vote in the U.S. Senate without the question of his Israeli roots – and nationality – even being raised.

On February 15, 2005, Michael Chertoff, an apparent dual national with Israeli roots, was sworn in as the second Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The new "homeland security czar," who oversees the U.S. Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services, seems to be hiding his own dual-national status – with the cooperation of the controlled press.

Although the media scrutinized Bernard Kerik, President George W. Bush's first choice to head DHS, and uncovered embarrassing details about his mother, there was no discussion of Chertoff's mother, who played a noteworthy role in the creation of the Zionist state in Palestine.

The omission of Chertoff's mother's Zionist past suggests that there is an effort by the media to conceal his ties to Israel and his status as a "de jure" Israeli national, by birth.

There's no doubt that all of the Heads of the DHS are in line politically with Chertoff.

The essential fact is that all of the people mentioned are Israel firsters.
Dual citizenship in some cases only underscores this point.

They all work for the Globalist elitist Zionist Banksters who care less about the US as a sovereign country or it's people than they do acquiring money and power for themselves and their cronies who want to usher in the "Mashianic Age".

It all amounts to the same thing. Of course no two of them are exactly alike. Who is? What's important is that the central plan to destroy the US through Balkenization and the destruction of it's economy coincides with the private ambitions of all of them.

For instance, the atheistic and secular humanist Jews don't really care if there are Jews who actually do believe the hype that they are "G-d's chosen people". Atheists and social Darwinists don't believe in the "Torah" anymore than they do that Christ rose from the dead. Your comrade "Daws101" admits as much.

All they care about is that the religious plan coincides neatly with their own ambitions. Otherwise all that "Tanach" Talmud junk is just as much superstitious hooey as Jesus Christ's words are to you.

My gripe with the run of the mill Jew is that they all seem to enjoy being privileged characters so much that they really aren't so concerned with "truth and justice" as they are with simply "getting over" and "making it".

There's nothing wrong with living high as long as it isn't gotten dishonestly or unfairly at the expense of others.
That's what I don't like about Jewish tribalism. They don't care who they hurt or how they go about it so long as they get the money. They demonstrate the same attitude in the way they are going about getting that little patch of desert exclusively for themselves.

Then US Jews have the gall to ram their "diversity" down OUR throats. US Jews have about as much respect for the wishes of white males and Christians as the Israelis do for the Palestinians.
 
The following is excerpted (for brevity) from Joseph Goebbel’s lead article from Das Reich. It sounds remarkably like one of this thread's more prolific posters.
The source: Die Zeit ohne Beispiel (Munich: Zentralverlag der NSDAP., 1941).

Goebbels on the Jews (July 1941)

Mimicry
by Joseph Goebbels

The Jews are masters at fitting in to their surroundings, without in any way changing their nature ... It is difficult to detect their sly and slippery ways. One has to be an experienced student of the Jews to recognize what is happening ... He is such an expert on twisting the truth that he can tell his innocent opponent the exact opposite of the truth even on the plainest matter in the world. He does this with such astonishing impudence that the listener becomes uncertain, at which point the Jew has usually won.

The Jews call this chutzpah ... Chutzpah is a typically Jewish expression that really cannot be translated into any other language, since chutzpah is a concept found only among the Jews. Other languages have not needed to invent such a word, since they do not know the phenomenon. Basically, it means unlimited, impertinent, and unbelievable impudence and shamelessness.

It was a system of public deception that, when applied long enough, lames a people both culturally and spiritually and over time strangles any kind of defense. Before National Socialism, Germany was in the midst of such deadly danger. Had our people not come to its senses at the last possible moment, our country would have been ripe for Bolshevism, the most devilish infection the Jews can bring upon a people.

Bolshevism, too, is an expression of Jewish chutzpah. Turbulent Jewish party leaders and clever Jewish capitalists managed the most shameless coup one can imagine. They mobilized the so-called proletariat to class struggle by ruthlessly exploiting real or imagined problems. Their goal was total Jewish domination. The crassest plutocracy used socialism to establish the crassest financial dictatorship. A world revolution was to expand this experiment from the Soviet Union to the rest of the world. The result would have been Jewish world domination...

The Jew is secure only when he can remain hidden. He loses his balance when he senses that someone sees through him. The experienced Jewish expert immediately sees in the insults and complaints the familiar Old Testament outbursts of hate. They have come our way so often that they have lost every element of originality. They are only of psychological interest to us. We wait calmly until Jewish rage has reached its epitome. Then they start falling apart. They spout nonsense, and suddenly betray themselves...

One could almost say that anyone with the Jews on his side has already lost. They are the best pillar of the coming defeat. They carry the seed of destruction. They hoped this war would bring the last desperate blow against National Socialist Germany and an awakening Europe. They will collapse. Already today we begin to hear the cries of the desperate and seduced peoples throughout the world:

“The Jews are guilty! The Jews are guilty!”

The court that will pronounce judgment on them will be fearful. We do not need to do anything ourselves. It will come because it must come.

Just as the fist of an awakened Germany has struck this racial filth, the fist of an awakened Europe will surely follow. Mimicry will not help the Jews then. They will have to face their accusers. The court of the nations will judge their oppressor.

Without pity or forgiveness, the blow will strike. The world enemy will fall, and Europe will have peace.
 
Last edited:
Jewish tribalism comes clean | The Electronic Intifada

So in practice what has been the view of Zionists — advocates of a Jewish state for a Jewish nation — in relation to other distinct ethnic and religious groups who advocate a state for themselves?

Well for one thing, the Jews do NOT allow for such a thing as a "Christian" nation or an "Anglo-Saxon" nation. THOSE nations have been allocated for the coming Multicultural Paradise as conceived in the Jew World Order, or "Mashianic Age" (Messianic) if you prefer.


And more importantly what has been their attitude towards the national claims of the native inhabitants of Palestine, most of whom were displaced — either through fear or force — during the war of 1948 that established the Jewish state?

Today, these refugees and their descendants — as well as those who remained on their land and now fall under Israeli rule either inside Israel or in the occupied West Bank and Gaza — number more than eight million people. The overwheming majority identify themselves as Palestinians, a nation whose homeland was once known as Palestine.

Throughout IsraelÂ’s history, Zionists have been willing to ascribe ethnic and religious identities to the Palestinians but not a national identity.

We have heard the Jews and their gentile sychophants tell us that there "are no such things as Palestinians".

(And they call us nuts.)


As far as Israeli Jews are concerned, a Palestinian citizen of Israel who demands that his Palestinian identity be recognised automatically raises doubts about where his loyalties lie, the assumption being that he cannot be at once a Palestinian and loyal to Israel. Of course, no Jew would accept such an attribution of double loyalties in his own case. An American Jew, however Zionist, would denounce as anti-Semitic any suggestion that he is not always a loyal American citizen.

387428_432106636827112_382031077_n.jpg

John Bolton? Really? :lol::lol::lol:
 
Jewish tribalism comes clean | The Electronic Intifada

So in practice what has been the view of Zionists — advocates of a Jewish state for a Jewish nation — in relation to other distinct ethnic and religious groups who advocate a state for themselves?

Well for one thing, the Jews do NOT allow for such a thing as a "Christian" nation or an "Anglo-Saxon" nation. THOSE nations have been allocated for the coming Multicultural Paradise as conceived in the Jew World Order, or "Mashianic Age" (Messianic) if you prefer.




We have heard the Jews and their gentile sychophants tell us that there "are no such things as Palestinians".

(And they call us nuts.)


As far as Israeli Jews are concerned, a Palestinian citizen of Israel who demands that his Palestinian identity be recognised automatically raises doubts about where his loyalties lie, the assumption being that he cannot be at once a Palestinian and loyal to Israel. Of course, no Jew would accept such an attribution of double loyalties in his own case. An American Jew, however Zionist, would denounce as anti-Semitic any suggestion that he is not always a loyal American citizen.

387428_432106636827112_382031077_n.jpg

John Bolton? Really? :lol::lol::lol:
bolton is an ancient and revered name in jewish history just like McCaffery, Chang or Mothershed.:lol:
 
Bolshevism, too, is an expression of Jewish chutzpah. Turbulent Jewish party leaders and clever Jewish capitalists managed the most shameless coup one can imagine. They mobilized the so-called proletariat to class struggle by ruthlessly exploiting real or imagined problems. Their goal was total Jewish domination. The crassest plutocracy used socialism to establish the crassest financial dictatorship. A world revolution was to expand this experiment from the Soviet Union to the rest of the world. The result would have been Jewish world domination...

So? What is it that was said here that was incorrect?
This sounds like an accurate description of what's happening as we speak.

The only point I disagree with is that this man counted his chickens before they hatched. He sized up a victory for Germany prematurely, I suppose not anticipating that the same cadre of financial wizards who stabbed Germany in the back during WWI were about to do the same thing again.

He foolishly underestimated their power to control the US Golem.


For the umpteenth time, race isn't the real issue here. Ideology is.

Race is an issue inasmuch as people (like you) use it in ways which are calculated to inflame people against one another and as an affront to those who would rather live without your meddling and interference in their personal lives.

The Semitic ethnicity is an issue only insofar as you use it as a shield to deflect attention away from unethical and illicit financial practices and as a means of foisting Marxism on an unwary public in the name of "equality" and to introduce totalitarianism into the US government whereby your minority can gain complete control of a majority.

Talmudism is a poisonous ideology which sprang from the "brood of vipers" called the Pharisees.

One calling attention to modern Talmudism/Bolshevism/Neo-Conservatism/"Liberalism" is called "anti-semitic".

The only way to avoid being charged with this is to pretend that they don't see it happening or if they do, that they don't know who's chiefly behind it all.

Beware of the Leaven of the Pharisees
After giving a parable on stewardship Jesus ends it with “you cannot serve God and Mammon” Luke 16:14 Jesus points out “Now the Pharisees, who were lovers of money, also heard all these things, and they derided Him.” Then Jesus scolded them saying “what is highly esteemed among men is an abomination in the sight of God.” When you see men always talk about their earthly prosperity, boast in the abundance of goods they own, how successful they are, claiming it is God blessing them, they are disguising worldliness under spiritual language.

Their Pharisees religion became VERY profitable, and they became rich off of it. They controlled the Temple grounds and “made merchandise” of the people, selling doves (a poor persons offering) for the sacrifice at excessive prices. The common people brought the lambs as their first fruits but the Pharisees would tell people their offering or sacrifice was not good enough; they would take theirs and then sell them another sacrificial animal at a high price. The same spirit of greed is in the Church today; you can never give enough. When you sow your seed and reap that is not your harvest but it is to be sown again. These sheep-shearers are so masterful in their speech they can fleece the flock before they pronounce baaa. Jesus drove the moneychangers off God’s property, but today we invite them in and we support them. Why? Because some actually hope and believe they can prosper by giving them their hard earned money no matter how large the amount is.

That last line is not much different than the superstitious JUDEO-xtians who take OLD Testament verses OUT OF CONTEXT and misapply them to today's political and social scene. Some of them have profited handsomely by doing so:
th


AIPAC bought this man a Leer Jet so I've heard.

Then Jesus spoke to the multitudes and to His disciples, saying: “The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat.” Therefore whatever they tell you to observe, that observe and do, but do not do according to their works; for they say, and do not do.” For they bind heavy burdens, hard to bear, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.” But all their works they do to be seen by men. They make their phylacteries broad and enlarge the borders of their garments.” They love the best places at feasts, the best seats in the synagogues, “greetings in the marketplaces, and to be called by men, 'Rabbi, Rabbi.' (Matt 23:1-7)

They were the rulers of the people, they made the rules. They told the people how to obey the Bible but Jesus said not to copy their actions.

Mathew 16
11 How is it that ye do not perceive that I spake not to you concerning bread? But beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees. 12 Then understood they that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the teaching of the Pharisees and Sadducees.
 
Last edited:
Bolshevism, too, is an expression of Jewish chutzpah. Turbulent Jewish party leaders and clever Jewish capitalists managed the most shameless coup one can imagine. They mobilized the so-called proletariat to class struggle by ruthlessly exploiting real or imagined problems. Their goal was total Jewish domination. The crassest plutocracy used socialism to establish the crassest financial dictatorship. A world revolution was to expand this experiment from the Soviet Union to the rest of the world. The result would have been Jewish world domination...

So? What is it that was said here that was incorrect?
This sounds like an accurate description of what's happening as we speak.

The only point I disagree with is that this man counted his chickens before they hatched. He sized up a victory for Germany prematurely, I suppose not anticipating that the same cadre of financial wizards who stabbed Germany in the back during WWI were about to do the same thing again.

He foolishly underestimated their power to control the US Golem.
[/QUOTE]

Woo. Holston admits he concurs with Goebbels. Nazi see - Nazi do.
I'm shocked I tell you ... shocked!

Joseph Goebbels - Propaganda Principles
 
Back
Top Bottom