Israel: Serial Terror-Bomber

[Phoenall]

Can’t see the full report so your link is rather pointless. Have a source that is open?

Are you saying the Wall Street Journal posts joke articles?

Some times YES

 

[Phoenall]

How do you know this? Do you work for the IDF ? Are you an informant for the IDF? No, you are a terrorist supporting propagandist who lies about Jews/Israel. You have no credibility.

When you drop a 2000 pound bomb in a residential neighborhood that takes out the entire block, that's not pin-point munitions going after a tunnel.

It is if the tunnel entrance is in the basement of a tower block in the centre of the residential neighbourhood.

 

[FA_Q2]

Can’t see the full report so your link is rather pointless. Have a source that is open?

Are you saying the Wall Street Journal posts joke articles?

That source is not open - it is behind a pay wall. Nowhere did I hint at stating it was a ‘joke’ article.

 

[Roudy]

Israel operates like America, other rogue NATO members and Saudi Arabia. It claims a divine right to terror-bomb other nations, groups and individuals at its discretion.

It calls naked aggression “self-defense.” It calls justifiable resistance “terrorism.” It willfully targets civilians. It invents reasons to justify its lawlessness. They ring hollow every time.

Since Obama launched lawless aggression against Syria in March 2011, Israel terror-bombed the country numerous times – always claiming military or national security justification.

Aggression is a war crime at all times under all circumstances. Israel is a serial offender.

In late April, IDF warplanes killed four people it called “armed terrorists” allegedly trying to plant bombs near Golan’s border between both countries.

The incident occurred in Israeli occupied Majdal Shams. An IDF spokesman claimed “terrorists” armed with explosives “were en route to imminent attack on our forces. Our air force neutralized the threat.”

No evidence corroborated Israel’s account of the incident. It does what it pleases. It invents reasons why post-facto. Often it neither confirms or denies attacks.

Netanyahu praised the “vigilance” of Israeli forces. Saying “(e)very attempt to attack Israeli soldiers or civilians will be met with a decisive response like this operation which thwarted the attack.”

Imagine if every country used warplanes, attack helicopters or heavy ground weapons to counter alleged homeland or border area threats – real or invented. Imagine communities being battlegrounds more than already.

Four deaths were reported this time – perhaps noncombatant civilians wrongfully accused.

Israel covertly collaborates with anti-Assad takfiri terrorists – arming them and treating their wounded.
Israel Serial Terror-Bomber RINF Alternative News Alternative Media

Israel wants nations and organizations it attacks denied the right of self-defense. It wants the right to terrorize them freely.

Since when is targeting children in schools " justifiable resistance "

"At least 44 civilians were killed, 227 injured at six U.N.-run schools during last summer’s conflict....
A U.N. report says that Israel killed at least 44 civilians and injured 227 others at six shelters the agency administered during last summer’s conflict in Gaza.....The new report says the worst single civilian death toll in its shelters occurred at the Jabalia Elementary Girls School on July 30, when four Israel Defense Forces artillery shells struck the school, killing 17 or 18 people. Witnesses told U.N. investigators that there was no nearby militant activity, the report said.

U.N. Says Israel Killed Civilians in Schools Gazans Hid Arms - WSJ

UN SAYS ISRAEL KILLED CIVILIANS IN SCHOOLS GAZANS HID ARMS IN

Do you even read the headlines of your links Abdul, here you are posting the evidence of hamas stashing rockets in the schools targeted by Israel while deny they did any such thing

Minor detail Fred The Nazi failed to mention.

 

[Billo_Really]

That source is not open - it is behind a pay wall. Nowhere did I hint at stating it was a ‘joke’ article.

Then what was your point? That it didn't happen?

 

[Billo_Really]

It is if the tunnel entrance is in the basement of a tower block in the centre of the residential neighbourhood.

Tunnel or no tunnel, the bombing was illegal and immoral.

 

[Billo_Really]

Some times YES

Shut up, troll.

 

[Roudy]

It is if the tunnel entrance is in the basement of a tower block in the centre of the residential neighbourhood.

Tunnel or no tunnel, the bombing was illegal and immoral.

I'd say not bombing it would be illegal and immoral. Maybe it's immoral for Palestinian animals to dig tunnels with the intent of killing innocent Israelis.

So shut the **** up!

 

[FA_Q2]

That source is not open - it is behind a pay wall. Nowhere did I hint at stating it was a ‘joke’ article.

Then what was your point? That it didn't happen?

My point is that there is no source to outline his point at this time. Come up with one instead of asking asinine questions that you know the answer to. I am not doing your homework for you.

It is if the tunnel entrance is in the basement of a tower block in the centre of the residential neighbourhood.

Tunnel or no tunnel, the bombing was illegal and immoral.

If there is a military asset (such as a tunnel used to launch attacks) then you are incorrect – it would be a legal target.

 

[Billo_Really]

My point is that there is no source to outline his point at this time.

God, you're so full of shit!

Tel Aviv Bombs Syria for Sixth Time in 18 months

Israel bombs Syria in attacks probably aimed at Hezbollah

Syria: Israeli jets bomb army facilities near Damascus airport

There, I just gave you 3 sources, moron.

Come up with one instead of asking asinine questions that you know the answer to.

I asked what your point was, fuckhead.

If you're going to be an asshole, then I'm going to treat you like one.

I am not doing your homework for you.

**** you!

If there is a military asset (such as a tunnel used to launch attacks) then you are incorrect – it would be a legal target.

And if its an economic one, then it is not.

 

[Billo_Really]

I'd say not bombing it would be illegal and immoral. Maybe it's immoral for Palestinian animals to dig tunnels with the intent of killing innocent Israelis.

So shut the **** up!

You're nothing but a foul-mouthed terrorist.

 

[FA_Q2]

My point is that there is no source to outline his point at this time.

God, you're so full of shit!

Tel Aviv Bombs Syria for Sixth Time in 18 months

Israel bombs Syria in attacks probably aimed at Hezbollah

Syria: Israeli jets bomb army facilities near Damascus airport

There, I just gave you 3 sources, moron.

No, moron, you did not give a single source that even remotely corroborates the comment I was responding to.
Interesting that you revert to name calling because you are incapable of actually following the conversation. Who is the moron at this point?

Come up with one instead of asking asinine questions that you know the answer to.

I asked what your point was, fuckhead.

If you're going to be an asshole, then I'm going to treat you like one.

Well, fuckhead, my point was obvious to anyone that has an IQ above 50 – the source was behind a paywall and he needed to supply something that was not if he wanted to
I was not the one to act like an asshole – you reverted to that asshattery the instant you thought you could get away with it. Likely because that is all you have.

I am not doing your homework for you.

**** you!

If there is a military asset (such as a tunnel used to launch attacks) then you are incorrect – it would be a legal target.

And if its an economic one, then it is not.

And then this does not even relate to the conversation at all. What a failure you have been in this thread. I wouldn’t bother responding though – I am going to ignore further posts you make in this thread until you come up with something that is worth more than the toilet paper I wipe my ass with. Act like a neanderthal and I will treat you as one so go pound sand.

 

[Humanity]

Can’t see the full report so your link is rather pointless. Have a source that is open?

Are you saying the Wall Street Journal posts joke articles?

Some times YES

 

[Phoenall]

It is if the tunnel entrance is in the basement of a tower block in the centre of the residential neighbourhood.

Tunnel or no tunnel, the bombing was illegal and immoral.

Not under the Geneva conventions that state any building used for military purpose is a valid legal target.

You really should get your facts right before posting and making an utter fool of yourself.

 

[Phoenall]

Some times YES

Shut up, troll.

Whats wrong dildo finding yourself to be a complete idiot because you post untruths all the time.

 

[Phoenall]

My point is that there is no source to outline his point at this time.

God, you're so full of shit!

Tel Aviv Bombs Syria for Sixth Time in 18 months

Israel bombs Syria in attacks probably aimed at Hezbollah

Syria: Israeli jets bomb army facilities near Damascus airport

There, I just gave you 3 sources, moron.

Come up with one instead of asking asinine questions that you know the answer to.

I asked what your point was, fuckhead.

If you're going to be an asshole, then I'm going to treat you like one.

I am not doing your homework for you.

**** you!

If there is a military asset (such as a tunnel used to launch attacks) then you are incorrect – it would be a legal target.

And if its an economic one, then it is not.

Of retaliation to terrorist attacks on Israel by hezbolla


Same goes for you, and we will do abetter jib of wiping you.

Your answer to everything, typical crack whore mentality

Over ruled by the military option if you read the Geneva conventions.

 

[Phoenall]

Can’t see the full report so your link is rather pointless. Have a source that is open?

Are you saying the Wall Street Journal posts joke articles?

Some times YES

Still waiting for you to produce just one of the many requested, until you do your demands will be ignored.

 

[fanger]

One of those included an UNRWA school incident in Jabalia that the UN says killed between 30 and 40 people. IDF officials claim the UN has confirmed that shells fired by Israeli forces landed outside the school compound.[90] The report accused Israel of "gross negligence" and also stated that allegations that militants had fired from within U.N. premises "were untrue, continued to be made after it ought to have been known that they were untrue, and were not adequately withdrawn and publicly regretted."
International law and the Gaza War 2008 09 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[Humanity]

Can’t see the full report so your link is rather pointless. Have a source that is open?

Are you saying the Wall Street Journal posts joke articles?

Some times YES

Still waiting for you to produce just one of the many requested, until you do your demands will be ignored.

Which link are you waiting for from me Phoney?

 

[Humanity]

It is if the tunnel entrance is in the basement of a tower block in the centre of the residential neighbourhood.

Tunnel or no tunnel, the bombing was illegal and immoral.

Not under the Geneva conventions that state any building used for military purpose is a valid legal target.

You really should get your facts right before posting and making an utter fool of yourself.