Israel attacks civilians

[P F Tinmore]

specific link please

B. -- ' In occupied territories; ' protection is accorded to all persons who are not of the nationality of the occupying State.

International Humanitarian Law - Fourth 1949 Geneva Convention

While you're in a linking mood, show us the official map of Palestine as of today, 28.5.2012.

This is 1999. Is it new enough?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

specific link please

B. -- ' In occupied territories; ' protection is accorded to all persons who are not of the nationality of the occupying State.

International Humanitarian Law - Fourth 1949 Geneva Convention

Why link to the ICRC?

Link to the original document and try again.

 

[P F Tinmore]

specific link please

B. -- ' In occupied territories; ' protection is accorded to all persons who are not of the nationality of the occupying State.

International Humanitarian Law - Fourth 1949 Geneva Convention

Why link to the ICRC?

Link to the original document and try again.

Go ahead. Let me know what is different.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

B. -- ' In occupied territories; ' protection is accorded to all persons who are not of the nationality of the occupying State.

International Humanitarian Law - Fourth 1949 Geneva Convention

Why link to the ICRC?

Link to the original document and try again.

Go ahead. Let me know what is different.

It's your claim, still waiting for your proof.

Original sources only. Chop chop!

 

[P F Tinmore]

Why link to the ICRC?

Link to the original document and try again.

Go ahead. Let me know what is different.

It's your claim, still waiting for your proof.

Original sources only. Chop chop!

Find a Geneva Convention web site and I will take a look.

Until then I will trust the Red Cross as a reliable source.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Go ahead. Let me know what is different.

It's your claim, still waiting for your proof.

Original sources only. Chop chop!

Find a Geneva Convention web site and I will take a look.

Until then I will trust the Red Cross as a reliable source.

You're making this ridiculous, barbarous claim, and you've never looked at the original source in its entirety? Wow!

 

[P F Tinmore]

It's your claim, still waiting for your proof.

Original sources only. Chop chop!

Find a Geneva Convention web site and I will take a look.

Until then I will trust the Red Cross as a reliable source.

You're making this ridiculous, barbarous claim, and you've never looked at the original source in its entirety? Wow!

Knock yourself out.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Find a Geneva Convention web site and I will take a look.

Until then I will trust the Red Cross as a reliable source.

You're making this ridiculous, barbarous claim, and you've never looked at the original source in its entirety? Wow!

Knock yourself out.

You're the one promoting attacks on civilians. You're hopeless. And ignorant.

Try looking at the entire convention, not just the Red Cross interpretation of a tiny section.

 

[P F Tinmore]

You're making this ridiculous, barbarous claim, and you've never looked at the original source in its entirety? Wow!

Knock yourself out.

You're the one promoting attacks on civilians. You're hopeless. And ignorant.

Try looking at the entire convention, not just the Red Cross interpretation of a tiny section.

Picayune.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Knock yourself out.

You're the one promoting attacks on civilians. You're hopeless. And ignorant.

Try looking at the entire convention, not just the Red Cross interpretation of a tiny section.

Picayune.

Moron.

 

[Hossfly]

B. -- ' In occupied territories; ' protection is accorded to all persons who are not of the nationality of the occupying State.

International Humanitarian Law - Fourth 1949 Geneva Convention

While you're in a linking mood, show us the official map of Palestine as of today, 28.5.2012.

This is 1999. Is it new enough?

So Palestine is the blue areas, right?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

While you're in a linking mood, show us the official map of Palestine as of today, 28.5.2012.

This is 1999. Is it new enough?

So Palestine is the blue areas, right?

I thought it was the light tan.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

specific link please

B. -- ' In occupied territories; ' protection is accorded to all persons who are not of the nationality of the occupying State.

International Humanitarian Law - Fourth 1949 Geneva Convention

I love that the portion you quote is nowhere in the Fourth 1949 Geneva Convention.

 

[P F Tinmore]

specific link please

B. -- ' In occupied territories; ' protection is accorded to all persons who are not of the nationality of the occupying State.

International Humanitarian Law - Fourth 1949 Geneva Convention

I love that the portion you quote is nowhere in the Fourth 1949 Geneva Convention.

The main question was about the settlers: Are they civilians or not? According to the Geneva Accord they are not. Even according to the Israelis they are not.

When we reached the definition of civilians, we accepted the definition put forward by the Geneva Accord. The Israelis were surprised, as they did not expect that. We said that the settlers are not civilians and the answer was, yes, they are not.

A Dialogue with Hamas - Part 1 - Worldpress.org

Perhaps they know something that you do not.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

B. -- ' In occupied territories; ' protection is accorded to all persons who are not of the nationality of the occupying State.

International Humanitarian Law - Fourth 1949 Geneva Convention

I love that the portion you quote is nowhere in the Fourth 1949 Geneva Convention.

The main question was about the settlers: Are they civilians or not? According to the Geneva Accord they are not. Even according to the Israelis they are not.

When we reached the definition of civilians, we accepted the definition put forward by the Geneva Accord. The Israelis were surprised, as they did not expect that. We said that the settlers are not civilians and the answer was, yes, they are not.

A Dialogue with Hamas - Part 1 - Worldpress.org

Perhaps they know something that you do not.

There are settlers in Gaza?

Perhaps they're liars, like you.

 

[P F Tinmore]

I love that the portion you quote is nowhere in the Fourth 1949 Geneva Convention.

The main question was about the settlers: Are they civilians or not? According to the Geneva Accord they are not. Even according to the Israelis they are not.

When we reached the definition of civilians, we accepted the definition put forward by the Geneva Accord. The Israelis were surprised, as they did not expect that. We said that the settlers are not civilians and the answer was, yes, they are not.

A Dialogue with Hamas - Part 1 - Worldpress.org

Perhaps they know something that you do not.

There are settlers in Gaza?

Perhaps they're liars, like you.

Nobody mentioned settlers in Gaza.

 

[Billo_Really]

I love that the portion you quote is nowhere in the Fourth 1949 Geneva Convention.

That'll be $4.50 (+tax)

 

[Billo_Really]

Nobody mentioned settlers in Gaza.

This guy mentioned "settlers", but he wasn't referring to Gazan's...

the settlers must under no circumstances arouse the wrath of the natives ... 'Yet what do our brethren do in Palestine? Just the very opposite! Serfs they were in the lands of the Diaspora and suddenly they find themselves in unrestricted freedom and this change has awakened in them an inclination to despotism. They treat the Arabs with hostility and cruelty, deprive them of their rights, offend them without cause and even boast of these deeds; and nobody among us opposes this despicable and dangerous inclination ...'

= Zionist humanist, Ahad Ha'am

...he was referring to the migrating jews of Europe.

"Migrating Jews of Europe"?

That kind of sounds like a yiddish blue-grass band!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Perhaps they know something that you do not.

There are settlers in Gaza?

Perhaps they're liars, like you.

Nobody mentioned settlers in Gaza.

Then why are Gazan attacks on Israeli civilians justified by the GC?

Try this....

The Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949: Military Legal Resources (Federal Research Division: Customized Research and Analytical Services, Library of Congress)

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I love that the portion you quote is nowhere in the Fourth 1949 Geneva Convention.

That'll be $4.50 (+tax)

That's great.
Try showing me that from the original text.
Linked in my post above.
Good luck!