Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Relevance?NO, it doesn't do a good job at all. It's very inaccurate.
For one thing, it NEVER mentions the just under one million people from many Arab League nations - who were beggared and ejected by the AL nations.
Patently false. http://www.ochaopt.org/documents/ocha_opt_movement_access_2009_november_english.pdfThe whole 'second-class citizen' bit is crap, too. THERE ARE NO 'Jew only' ROADS. License plates are not issued on the basis of religion.
So the Palestinians are supposed to just accept the short end of the stick or be faced with relocation and violence. Gotcha.The video also doesn't discuss the actual history of the Mandate - the various treaties, etc - the fact that Transjordan was split off from the initial mandate. AND it doesn't mention the fact that the Palestinians REFUSED to create their state back in '47.
Because they already had land and a home.As for the poor Palestinian refugees - WHY DIDN'T THE ARAB LEAGUE NATIONS JUST GIVE THEM THE LANDS THEY'D GRABBED FROM THEIR FORMER JEWISH CITIZENS???? That land amounts to an area several times the size of Israel 'proper'.....
Seems like a separate discussion.If 'land grabs' are so very terrible - why aren't the Arab League states being pressured to make reparation for what they stole?
Again a separate discussion.If being 'second class citizens' is so terrible - why aren't the Arab League states being told to stop discriminating against Palestinians in terms of citizenship, jobs, human rights?
It is always amuses me- They call the people of Gaza and Judea and Samaria "Palestinian refugees".
I'm sorry, but.....what?
Palestinian refugees? But of what state? Palestine? There was never a Palestine to start with.
Oh, you mean, maybe refugees of the Palestine we agree on, in the 1967 borders.
But then...It means they're refugees in the same lands which are to be in a future Palestinian state.
So they are refugees of the same place they sit in?
That makes sense as much as people calling me an "Israeli refugee" or calling the people of London "Britian refugees" or Americans "New-York refugees".
So....What is that all about?
It is always amuses me- They call the people of Gaza and Judea and Samaria "Palestinian refugees".
I'm sorry, but.....what?
Palestinian refugees? But of what state? Palestine? There was never a Palestine to start with.
Oh, you mean, maybe refugees of the Palestine we agree on, in the 1967 borders.
But then...It means they're refugees in the same lands which are to be in a future Palestinian state.
So they are refugees of the same place they sit in?
That makes sense as much as people calling me an "Israeli refugee" or calling the people of London "Britian refugees" or Americans "New-York refugees".
So....What is that all about?
You can spin this anyway you like but the fact of the matter is that indigenous people were displaced to form a Jewish State.
It is always amuses me- They call the people of Gaza and Judea and Samaria "Palestinian refugees".
I'm sorry, but.....what?
Palestinian refugees? But of what state? Palestine? There was never a Palestine to start with.
Oh, you mean, maybe refugees of the Palestine we agree on, in the 1967 borders.
But then...It means they're refugees in the same lands which are to be in a future Palestinian state.
So they are refugees of the same place they sit in?
That makes sense as much as people calling me an "Israeli refugee" or calling the people of London "Britian refugees" or Americans "New-York refugees".
So....What is that all about?
You can spin this anyway you like but the fact of the matter is that indigenous people were displaced to form a Jewish State.
can you define "INDiGENOUS PEOPLE"??
You can spin this anyway you like but the fact of the matter is that indigenous people were displaced to form a Jewish State.
can you define "INDiGENOUS PEOPLE"??
People who lived in the area before they were invaded and pushed out by European Zionists.
can you define "INDiGENOUS PEOPLE"??
People who lived in the area before they were invaded and pushed out by European Zionists.
Dennis Prager, Not a Pallywood-made video.
People who lived in the area before they were invaded and pushed out by European Zionists.
Dennis Prager, Not a Pallywood-made video.
The fact that there has never been a Palestinian state doesn't change the fact that Palestinians were pushed out of the area and continue being pushed out of the West Bank today.
Relevance?NO, it doesn't do a good job at all. It's very inaccurate.
For one thing, it NEVER mentions the just under one million people from many Arab League nations - who were beggared and ejected by the AL nations.
Patently false. http://www.ochaopt.org/documents/ocha_opt_movement_access_2009_november_english.pdfThe whole 'second-class citizen' bit is crap, too. THERE ARE NO 'Jew only' ROADS. License plates are not issued on the basis of religion.
So the Palestinians are supposed to just accept the short end of the stick or be faced with relocation and violence. Gotcha.
Because they already had land and a home.
Seems like a separate discussion.If 'land grabs' are so very terrible - why aren't the Arab League states being pressured to make reparation for what they stole?
Again a separate discussion.If being 'second class citizens' is so terrible - why aren't the Arab League states being told to stop discriminating against Palestinians in terms of citizenship, jobs, human rights?
Relevance?NO, it doesn't do a good job at all. It's very inaccurate.
For one thing, it NEVER mentions the just under one million people from many Arab League nations - who were beggared and ejected by the AL nations.
Patently false. http://www.ochaopt.org/documents/ocha_opt_movement_access_2009_november_english.pdfThe whole 'second-class citizen' bit is crap, too. THERE ARE NO 'Jew only' ROADS. License plates are not issued on the basis of religion.
So the Palestinians are supposed to just accept the short end of the stick or be faced with relocation and violence. Gotcha.
Because they already had land and a home.
Seems like a separate discussion.If 'land grabs' are so very terrible - why aren't the Arab League states being pressured to make reparation for what they stole?
Again a separate discussion.If being 'second class citizens' is so terrible - why aren't the Arab League states being told to stop discriminating against Palestinians in terms of citizenship, jobs, human rights?
It is always amuses me- They call the people of Gaza and Judea and Samaria "Palestinian refugees".
I'm sorry, but.....what?
Palestinian refugees? But of what state? Palestine? There was never a Palestine to start with.
Oh, you mean, maybe refugees of the Palestine we agree on, in the 1967 borders.
But then...It means they're refugees in the same lands which are to be in a future Palestinian state.
So they are refugees of the same place they sit in?
That makes sense as much as people calling me an "Israeli refugee" or calling the people of London "Britian refugees" or Americans "New-York refugees".
So....What is that all about?
You can spin this anyway you like but the fact of the matter is that indigenous people were displaced to form a Jewish State.
People who lived in the area before they were invaded and pushed out by European Zionists.
Dennis Prager, Not a Pallywood-made video.
The fact that there has never been a Palestinian state doesn't change the fact that Palestinians were pushed out of the area and continue being pushed out of the West Bank today.