Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The author of that piece is now the Prime Minister's Official Spokesperson, so I'm thinking someone fudged with the numbers--a photoshop or something? If those numbers are real, they aren't comparing apples to apples, that's for sure.I seriously question these figures. Seriously.The U.S. has a violence rate of 466 crimes per 100,000 residents, Canada 935, Australia 920 and South Africa 1,609.
Prove them wrong. Either that or admit that facts are irrelevant to you, your mind is made and that's all that matters!
How can OL or ANYONE takes those figures seriously when the numbers for my nation are 100% BULLSHIT, so we need a further investigation then into the OTHER figures the same CRAP graph gives for Canada, Australia and South Africa. If # 2 my nation the figures are 100% BULLSHIT then perhaps ALL the other nations figures are also.
Very hinky numbers. We have half the violent crimes of Canada? CANADA?Gun related deaths per 100,000 population.
USA 12.21
UK 0.23
France 2.83
Canada 2.00
Sweden 1.6
Italy 1.31
Germany 1.17
Australia 0.9
Japan 0.6
Spain 0.31
With a population of 333546000 in the USA. That works out at 40,000 gun deaths per annum.
Coronavirus deaths in comparison work out at 98,000,- true that is more than twice as many, but gun deaths happen every year. Considering the lengths gone to, to stop Corona, isn't it time a total ban on guns was taken to bring the USA in line with what we consider to be a civilized society.
How do you claim a country is "civilized" when their violent crime rate is double that of ours?
The most violent country in Europe: Britain is also worse than South Africa and U.S.
By James Slack
UPDATED:18:14 EST, 2 July 2009
Britain's violent crime record is worse than any other country in the European union, it has been revealed.
Official crime figures show the UK also has a worse rate for all types of violence than the U.S. and even South Africa - widely considered one of the world's most dangerous countries.
The figures comes on the day new Home Secretary Alan Johnson makes his first major speech on crime, promising to be tough on loutish behavior.
The U.S. has a violence rate of 466 crimes per 100,000 residents, Canada 935, Australia 920 and South Africa 1,609.
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Grayling said: 'This is a damning indictment of this government's comprehensive failure over more than a decade to tackle the deep rooted social problems in our society, and the knock on effect on crime and anti-social behaviour.
Read more: Britain the most violent country in Europe and even worse than South Africa and U.S.
UK is violent crime capital of Europe
The United Kingdom is the violent crime capital of Europe and has one of the highest rates of violence in the world, worse even than America, according to new research.www.telegraph.co.uk
^^^^ The above is from 2009 and it's crap, a link from 2009 should not even be allowed to be posted as it is NOT even RELEVANT on ANY level.
Sorry the below after # 1 is horsecrap, I can tell you we are certainly NOT # 2, look where the figures are coming from the EU Commission and THE UNITED NATIONS, total horsecrap and also the article is from 2009
View attachment 340871
Trashing my nation with the above CRAP will NOT go unchallenged, so let's look at some actual figures and NOT the above SHIT. We have one of the LOWEST murder rates in the world - and yes we have approx 4.5 millions guns in private ownership I add.
View attachment 340875
View attachment 340877
Gun related deaths per 100,000 population.
USA 12.21
UK 0.23
France 2.83
Canada 2.00
Sweden 1.6
Italy 1.31
Germany 1.17
Australia 0.9
Japan 0.6
Spain 0.31
With a population of 333546000 in the USA. That works out at 40,000 gun deaths per annum.
Coronavirus deaths in comparison work out at 98,000,- true that is more than twice as many, but gun deaths happen every year. Considering the lengths gone to, to stop Corona, isn't it time a total ban on guns was taken to bring the USA in line with what we consider to be a civilized society.
You. Are. A. Nut.Comparing Democrats to what Chavez did in Venezuela is just plain silly. Enough horseshit.Yeah, and then they intentionally tanked their economy by manipulating the world oil market. Makes all the sense in the world.That's silly.Leftists want to disarm them NOT to prevent gun deaths but for OTHER sinister motives
Venezuela banned all firearms about 6 or 7 years ago and look where they are now.
They knew the shit they were about to pull would likely end up with armed resistance.
Witch of course is the same reason dems want guns banned.
How can you know that when we still have our guns?
And with the way you freaks acted during the corona spamdemic only enforces my point.
You're all a bunch of wanna be dictators.
You ignored my post about mag size and how most hunting rifles are designed for a limited number of bullets at a time. The one Markel showed above, the top rifle is a 5 + 1. The bottom gun is "dressed up" for warfare. If it's a 5 + 1, I'll be surprised. I couldn't find what it is--an AR maybe? You can buy 30 round mags for an AR, and more if you want.
You. Are. A. Nut.And with the way you freaks acted during the corona spamdemic only enforces my point.
You're all a bunch of wanna be dictators.
You ignored my post about mag size and how most hunting rifles are designed for a limited number of bullets at a time. The one Markel showed above, the top rifle is a 5 + 1. The bottom gun is "dressed up" for warfare. If it's a 5 + 1, I'll be surprised. I couldn't find what it is--an AR maybe? You can buy 30 round mags for an AR, and more if you want.
Still ignoring mag size....and ergonomic add ons to make it easier to kill lots more faster.You. Are. A. Nut.Comparing Democrats to what Chavez did in Venezuela is just plain silly. Enough horseshit.Yeah, and then they intentionally tanked their economy by manipulating the world oil market. Makes all the sense in the world.That's silly.Leftists want to disarm them NOT to prevent gun deaths but for OTHER sinister motives
Venezuela banned all firearms about 6 or 7 years ago and look where they are now.
They knew the shit they were about to pull would likely end up with armed resistance.
Witch of course is the same reason dems want guns banned.
How can you know that when we still have our guns?
And with the way you freaks acted during the corona spamdemic only enforces my point.
You're all a bunch of wanna be dictators.
You ignored my post about mag size and how most hunting rifles are designed for a limited number of bullets at a time. The one Markel showed above, the top rifle is a 5 + 1. The bottom gun is "dressed up" for warfare. If it's a 5 + 1, I'll be surprised. I couldn't find what it is--an AR maybe? You can buy 30 round mags for an AR, and more if you want.
And you forgot to mention the reason for the 2nd making all your other bullshit just that..bullshit.
And the Sacred Founding Fathers also were adamantly opposed to a standing army. Times change.
You. Are. A. Nut.Comparing Democrats to what Chavez did in Venezuela is just plain silly. Enough horseshit.Yeah, and then they intentionally tanked their economy by manipulating the world oil market. Makes all the sense in the world.That's silly.Leftists want to disarm them NOT to prevent gun deaths but for OTHER sinister motives
Venezuela banned all firearms about 6 or 7 years ago and look where they are now.
They knew the shit they were about to pull would likely end up with armed resistance.
Witch of course is the same reason dems want guns banned.
How can you know that when we still have our guns?
And with the way you freaks acted during the corona spamdemic only enforces my point.
You're all a bunch of wanna be dictators.
You ignored my post about mag size and how most hunting rifles are designed for a limited number of bullets at a time. The one Markel showed above, the top rifle is a 5 + 1. The bottom gun is "dressed up" for warfare. If it's a 5 + 1, I'll be surprised. I couldn't find what it is--an AR maybe? You can buy 30 round mags for an AR, and more if you want.
The second amendment wasnt written for hunting rifles. It was written to protect the right to own guns designed to kill people.
Still ignoring mag size....and ergonomic add ons to make it easier to kill lots more faster.
Of course. That is what all guns are for. And like I already said, times change. There is no way in hell the citizens of this country could withstand attack by our government armed with their AR's and hunting rifles. That is the most laughable argument of all. The Founders did not want a standing army because they did not want the central government having control of a military force they could use against the people. Well, guess what? If they wanted to, they sure as hell could now. Even if we had machine guns, it wouldn't matter.You. Are. A. Nut.Comparing Democrats to what Chavez did in Venezuela is just plain silly. Enough horseshit.Yeah, and then they intentionally tanked their economy by manipulating the world oil market. Makes all the sense in the world.That's silly.Leftists want to disarm them NOT to prevent gun deaths but for OTHER sinister motives
Venezuela banned all firearms about 6 or 7 years ago and look where they are now.
They knew the shit they were about to pull would likely end up with armed resistance.
Witch of course is the same reason dems want guns banned.
How can you know that when we still have our guns?
And with the way you freaks acted during the corona spamdemic only enforces my point.
You're all a bunch of wanna be dictators.
You ignored my post about mag size and how most hunting rifles are designed for a limited number of bullets at a time. The one Markel showed above, the top rifle is a 5 + 1. The bottom gun is "dressed up" for warfare. If it's a 5 + 1, I'll be surprised. I couldn't find what it is--an AR maybe? You can buy 30 round mags for an AR, and more if you want.
The second amendment wasnt written for hunting rifles. It was written to protect the right to own guns designed to kill people.
Have you considered...eating?Say you have two people that go on a diet. One guy is 100 lbs, and the other is 200 lbs.
After they go on a diet, the one guy is 150 lbs, and the other is 180 lbs.
Does the guy who gained 50 lbs, then claim his diet is working because he weights less than the 180 lbs guy?
No his diet was a failure. He gained 50 lbs. The other guy lost 20 lbs.
The guy who starts at 100 pounds probably needed to gain weight, and is better off, now at 150. At the time of my injury, last September, I was at about 150 pounds, and that was too light. I was healthier, a few years earlier, at about 170. Since my injury, I've lost more weight, and am down to around 135.
To get back to 150 would be a successful diet for me. To get back to 170, even better.
The left always leave out the intent of the 2nd.
Of course. That is what all guns are for. And like I already said, times change. There is no way in hell the citizens of this country could withstand attack by our government armed with their AR's and hunting rifles. That is the most laughable argument of all. The Founders did not want a standing army because they did not want the central government having control of a military force they could use against the people. Well, guess what? If they wanted to, they sure as hell could now. Even if we had machine guns, it wouldn't matter.You. Are. A. Nut.Comparing Democrats to what Chavez did in Venezuela is just plain silly. Enough horseshit.Yeah, and then they intentionally tanked their economy by manipulating the world oil market. Makes all the sense in the world.That's silly.Leftists want to disarm them NOT to prevent gun deaths but for OTHER sinister motives
Venezuela banned all firearms about 6 or 7 years ago and look where they are now.
They knew the shit they were about to pull would likely end up with armed resistance.
Witch of course is the same reason dems want guns banned.
How can you know that when we still have our guns?
And with the way you freaks acted during the corona spamdemic only enforces my point.
You're all a bunch of wanna be dictators.
You ignored my post about mag size and how most hunting rifles are designed for a limited number of bullets at a time. The one Markel showed above, the top rifle is a 5 + 1. The bottom gun is "dressed up" for warfare. If it's a 5 + 1, I'll be surprised. I couldn't find what it is--an AR maybe? You can buy 30 round mags for an AR, and more if you want.
The second amendment wasnt written for hunting rifles. It was written to protect the right to own guns designed to kill people.
The Second Amendment was written in a different time, long ago, and no longer applies for any of the reasons it was written.
The Second Amendment was written in a different time, long ago, and no longer applies for any of the reasons it was written.
Have you considered...eating?To get back to 150 would be a successful diet for me. To get back to 170, even better.
No. It is set in stone. The right to keep and bear arms, i.e. to possess and carry firearms, along with the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, is unalienable, and it existed long before the independence of United States or the ratification of the Bill of Rights.then there is a procedure by which the Constitution can be amended, to overturn the Second Amendment.
Of course. That is what all guns are for. And like I already said, times change. There is no way in hell the citizens of this country could withstand attack by our government armed with their AR's and hunting rifles. That is the most laughable argument of all. The Founders did not want a standing army because they did not want the central government having control of a military force they could use against the people. Well, guess what? If they wanted to, they sure as hell could now. Even if we had machine guns, it wouldn't matter.You. Are. A. Nut.Comparing Democrats to what Chavez did in Venezuela is just plain silly. Enough horseshit.Yeah, and then they intentionally tanked their economy by manipulating the world oil market. Makes all the sense in the world.That's silly.Leftists want to disarm them NOT to prevent gun deaths but for OTHER sinister motives
Venezuela banned all firearms about 6 or 7 years ago and look where they are now.
They knew the shit they were about to pull would likely end up with armed resistance.
Witch of course is the same reason dems want guns banned.
How can you know that when we still have our guns?
And with the way you freaks acted during the corona spamdemic only enforces my point.
You're all a bunch of wanna be dictators.
You ignored my post about mag size and how most hunting rifles are designed for a limited number of bullets at a time. The one Markel showed above, the top rifle is a 5 + 1. The bottom gun is "dressed up" for warfare. If it's a 5 + 1, I'll be surprised. I couldn't find what it is--an AR maybe? You can buy 30 round mags for an AR, and more if you want.
The second amendment wasnt written for hunting rifles. It was written to protect the right to own guns designed to kill people.
The Second Amendment was written in a different time, long ago, and no longer applies for any of the reasons it was written.
The author of that piece is now the Prime Minister's Official Spokesperson, so I'm thinking someone fudged with the numbers--a photoshop or something? If those numbers are real, they aren't comparing apples to apples, that's for sure.I seriously question these figures. Seriously.The U.S. has a violence rate of 466 crimes per 100,000 residents, Canada 935, Australia 920 and South Africa 1,609.
Prove them wrong. Either that or admit that facts are irrelevant to you, your mind is made and that's all that matters!
How can OL or ANYONE takes those figures seriously when the numbers for my nation are 100% BULLSHIT, so we need a further investigation then into the OTHER figures the same CRAP graph gives for Canada, Australia and South Africa. If # 2 my nation the figures are 100% BULLSHIT then perhaps ALL the other nations figures are also.
Well, both Ruger 14's. The bottom one is a Tactical Rifle. It has 30 different add-ons to enhance "performance." This is from Field and Stream on what a "Tactical Rifle" is.You. Are. A. Nut.And with the way you freaks acted during the corona spamdemic only enforces my point.
You're all a bunch of wanna be dictators.
View attachment 340895
You ignored my post about mag size and how most hunting rifles are designed for a limited number of bullets at a time. The one Markel showed above, the top rifle is a 5 + 1. The bottom gun is "dressed up" for warfare. If it's a 5 + 1, I'll be surprised. I couldn't find what it is--an AR maybe? You can buy 30 round mags for an AR, and more if you want.
THEY ARE THE SAME GUN!
The same action, the same mechanics, the same ballistic characteristics, they take the same magazines, the same ammunition. The only difference is in what furniture is installed on them—purely a cosmetic difference, that has no bearing on how suitable either is for any purpose, legitimate or otherwise.
If I'm not mistaken, both the guns ion that picture are Ruger MIni-14s. I could be wrong, but I know that that's a popular gun to depict in two widely-different cosmetic forms, in order to emphasize the abject ignorance of hoplophobic cretins such as yourself, who are so easily led to believe that a gun's cosmetic appearance has any bearing on it's suitability for legal or illegal uses.
Well then what are you worried about? Who IS going to attack us that you need to defend yourself from?Of course. That is what all guns are for. And like I already said, times change. There is no way in hell the citizens of this country could withstand attack by our government armed with their AR's and hunting rifles. That is the most laughable argument of all. The Founders did not want a standing army because they did not want the central government having control of a military force they could use against the people. Well, guess what? If they wanted to, they sure as hell could now. Even if we had machine guns, it wouldn't matter.You. Are. A. Nut.Comparing Democrats to what Chavez did in Venezuela is just plain silly. Enough horseshit.Yeah, and then they intentionally tanked their economy by manipulating the world oil market. Makes all the sense in the world.That's silly.Leftists want to disarm them NOT to prevent gun deaths but for OTHER sinister motives
Venezuela banned all firearms about 6 or 7 years ago and look where they are now.
They knew the shit they were about to pull would likely end up with armed resistance.
Witch of course is the same reason dems want guns banned.
How can you know that when we still have our guns?
And with the way you freaks acted during the corona spamdemic only enforces my point.
You're all a bunch of wanna be dictators.
You ignored my post about mag size and how most hunting rifles are designed for a limited number of bullets at a time. The one Markel showed above, the top rifle is a 5 + 1. The bottom gun is "dressed up" for warfare. If it's a 5 + 1, I'll be surprised. I couldn't find what it is--an AR maybe? You can buy 30 round mags for an AR, and more if you want.
The second amendment wasnt written for hunting rifles. It was written to protect the right to own guns designed to kill people.
The Second Amendment was written in a different time, long ago, and no longer applies for any of the reasons it was written.
Another dem who fails to grasp the fact that American troops will not be attacking American citizens.
Have you considered...eating?To get back to 150 would be a successful diet for me. To get back to 170, even better.
Alas, I can only eat so much. And the forced inactivity, due to my injury, has resulted in my appetite being less than before. And to make things even worse, I'm diabetic. The easiest and cheapest form of calories is in carbohydrates, but due to my diabetes, I cannot process carbohydrates as well as those who are not diabetic, and it is harmful for me to consume to much carbohydrate.
At least, given my need to be careful about excess carbs, it is fortunate for me that modern automobiles use fuel injection.
