Is Trump Biodegradable?

[22lcidw]

Why are you still pleasuring yourself with Pelosi when you have your Trump?

Her family needs to die.

 

[jknowgood]

Of course, ones hope so, but Trump has been resolute and relentless in his denial and defiance of accepted science, especially medical and environmental. He dismisses experts in every academic discipline if their empirical data conflicts with his irrational dogma.

Putting aside the comfort that human biology affords us in this matter, the cost of imposed and enforced ignorance in anthropogenic climate change will be monumental, compounded by the human suffering that will, inevitably, result from Trump’s contempt for science and love of dirty fuels.

View attachment 1120474
​

There is virtual global consensus among the most qualified in climatology, but that expert unanimity is treated with contempt by Trump because many of those experts are foreign, from all parts of the globe, and acknowledged by every other nation on earth.

​

When the Trump regime declared two weeks ago that it would largely disregard the economic cost of climate change as it sets policies and regulations, it was just the latest step in a multi-pronged effort to erase global warming from the American agenda.​

​

But Trump is doing more than just turning a blind eye to the fact that the planet is growing hotter. He is weakening the country’s capacity to understand global warming and to prepare for its consequences.​

​

The administration has dismantled climate research, firing some of the nation’s top scientists, and gutted efforts to chart how fast greenhouse gases are building up in the atmosphere and what that means for the economy, employment, agriculture, health and other aspects of American society. The government will no longer track major sources of greenhouse gases, data that has been used to measure the scale and identify sources of the problem for the past 15 years.​

​

“We’re not doing that climate change, you know, crud, anymore,” Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins [a Trump sycophant with no climatological qualifications] told Fox Business on May 8…​

​

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/19/climate/trump-climate-denial.html​

​

Climate and environment updates:
Climate change adds month of extreme heat for 4 billion people

View attachment 1120482
"She called science 'crud!'
I like that!"



​

Trump did listen and did what Fauci recommended at the beginning of covid. Worse mistake he made.

 

[jknowgood]

You can contemplate Pelosi to your heart's content, but you do understand that climate change is not created by the Chinese to make American manufacturing non-competitive, I hope.

We were suppose to be gone over 20 years ago, as predicted by you loons. We are here and still thriving. Every climate change prediction has been wrong.

 

[jknowgood]

Her family needs to die.

Don't count out Paul's gay lover, to finish the job he started.

 

[Meathead]

Why are you still pleasuring yourself with Pelosi when you have your Trump?

I can't pleasure myself thinking about Pelosi since I am neither a gerontophile nor a necrophile. I can only assume that TDS excites you in a rather perverse way.

 

[Dragonlady]

You can bow down to the Climate Change Alarmists if you want. The rest of us who actually think for ourselves reject the FAKE SCIENCE that you gobble up like a good goldfish.

You're not "thinking for yourself" at all. You're paying out $200 billion dollars a year for the economic damage done by large scale climate catastrophies. You can't buy wind insurance in Tornado Alley, or flood insurance in Florida. The moronic denial of what we're all witnessing with our own eyes is irrational, at best.

When I was growing up in the 1950's, my father made a skating rink in our back yard every winter. My brothers and brother-in-law, all played shinny out there all winter long. My friends and I went sledding on the hill over by the high school every weekend. There were few wildfires.

When my two oldest were little kids in the 1970's, we lived near the local ski club where they went for skiing lessons on Saturday. It was really hilly out there, and it was in the snow belt, so they had lots of "snow days" where we lived.

By the 1990's, when my youngest was born, there wasn't much snow in the winter. We only had enough snow for sledding once or twice. And the only winter it was cold enough to make a ice rink in our back yard was the winter Mt. Pinatubo blew and we had an extra cold winter due to the ash in the air.

These days, we don't get enough snow in Southern Ontario to ski or sled. There's barely any skiing south of Toronto. Chicopee, Glen Eden, and London Ski Club are the only southern clubs still open and that's because they have snowmaking equipment. My youngest has only been sledding or skiing at our cottage in the Muskoka's near Huntsville, The family sold that cottage in 2000.

Today, I'm worried about wildfires near Thunder Bay, because my grandson lives there, close to the woods.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Of course, ones hope so, but Trump has been resolute and relentless in his denial and defiance of accepted science, especially medical and environmental. He dismisses experts in every academic discipline if their empirical data conflicts with his irrational dogma.

Putting aside the comfort that human biology affords us in this matter, the cost of imposed and enforced ignorance in anthropogenic climate change will be monumental, compounded by the human suffering that will, inevitably, result from Trump’s contempt for science and love of dirty fuels.

View attachment 1120474
​

There is virtual global consensus among the most qualified in climatology, but that expert unanimity is treated with contempt by Trump because many of those experts are foreign, from all parts of the globe, and acknowledged by every other nation on earth.

​

When the Trump regime declared two weeks ago that it would largely disregard the economic cost of climate change as it sets policies and regulations, it was just the latest step in a multi-pronged effort to erase global warming from the American agenda.​

​

But Trump is doing more than just turning a blind eye to the fact that the planet is growing hotter. He is weakening the country’s capacity to understand global warming and to prepare for its consequences.​

​

The administration has dismantled climate research, firing some of the nation’s top scientists, and gutted efforts to chart how fast greenhouse gases are building up in the atmosphere and what that means for the economy, employment, agriculture, health and other aspects of American society. The government will no longer track major sources of greenhouse gases, data that has been used to measure the scale and identify sources of the problem for the past 15 years.​

​

“We’re not doing that climate change, you know, crud, anymore,” Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins [a Trump sycophant with no climatological qualifications] told Fox Business on May 8…​

​

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/19/climate/trump-climate-denial.html​

​

Climate and environment updates:
Climate change adds month of extreme heat for 4 billion people

View attachment 1120482
"She called science 'crud!'
I like that!"



​

We'll pass. Glowarm is just another propaganda hoax delivered to us by the same party that thinks men can have babies. NO THANKS.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Why are the consensus of global climatologists and international scientific associations, and the recognition of its economic impact, "fake"?

Even if you must believe whatever Trump tells you, where is his data analysis and refutation?

Unknowable changes causing unknowable expenses.

Sounds very solid to me.

DURR

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If you need to fantasize that the world's climatologists and scientific authorities are all complicit in a vast, pervasive and enduring conspiracy to challenge your conviction that you can poop into the heavens with impunity, you can agree with Trump that it is all part of a Chinese scam to make American manufacturing non-competitive, certainly.

I would never fantasize about "erratic" weather.

That fantasy is all on your side of the issue.

How many trillions should we waste to reduce CO2 by a little?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You're not "thinking for yourself" at all. You're paying out $200 billion dollars a year for the economic damage done by large scale climate catastrophies. You can't buy wind insurance in Tornado Alley, or flood insurance in Florida. The moronic denial of what we're all witnessing with our own eyes is irrational, at best.

When I was growing up in the 1950's, my father made a skating rink in our back yard every winter. My brothers and brother-in-law, all played shinny out there all winter long. My friends and I went sledding on the hill over by the high school every weekend. There were few wildfires.

When my two oldest were little kids in the 1970's, we lived near the local ski club where they went for skiing lessons on Saturday. It was really hilly out there, and it was in the snow belt, so they had lots of "snow days" where we lived.

By the 1990's, when my youngest was born, there wasn't much snow in the winter. We only had enough snow for sledding once or twice. And the only winter it was cold enough to make a ice rink in our back yard was the winter Mt. Pinatubo blew and we had an extra cold winter due to the ash in the air.

These days, we don't get enough snow in Southern Ontario to ski or sled. There's barely any skiing south of Toronto. Chicopee, Glen Eden, and London Ski Club are the only southern clubs still open and that's because they have snowmaking equipment. My youngest has only been sledding or skiing at our cottage in the Muskoka's near Huntsville, The family sold that cottage in 2000.

Today, I'm worried about wildfires near Thunder Bay, because my grandson lives there, close to the woods.

You're paying out $200 billion dollars a year for the economic damage done by large scale climate catastrophies.

How many billions would have happened without AGW?
How do you know?

 

[80zephyr]

You're not "thinking for yourself" at all. You're paying out $200 billion dollars a year for the economic damage done by large scale climate catastrophies. You can't buy wind insurance in Tornado Alley, or flood insurance in Florida. The moronic denial of what we're all witnessing with our own eyes is irrational, at best.

When I was growing up in the 1950's, my father made a skating rink in our back yard every winter. My brothers and brother-in-law, all played shinny out there all winter long. My friends and I went sledding on the hill over by the high school every weekend. There were few wildfires.

When my two oldest were little kids in the 1970's, we lived near the local ski club where they went for skiing lessons on Saturday. It was really hilly out there, and it was in the snow belt, so they had lots of "snow days" where we lived.

By the 1990's, when my youngest was born, there wasn't much snow in the winter. We only had enough snow for sledding once or twice. And the only winter it was cold enough to make a ice rink in our back yard was the winter Mt. Pinatubo blew and we had an extra cold winter due to the ash in the air.

These days, we don't get enough snow in Southern Ontario to ski or sled. There's barely any skiing south of Toronto. Chicopee, Glen Eden, and London Ski Club are the only southern clubs still open and that's because they have snowmaking equipment. My youngest has only been sledding or skiing at our cottage in the Muskoka's near Huntsville, The family sold that cottage in 2000.

Today, I'm worried about wildfires near Thunder Bay, because my grandson lives there, close to the woods.

Show me on this graph where humanity has made the climate warmer?

 

[schmidlap]

I recognize that there are zealots who believe whatever Trump tells them about anything and everything, even if it contradicts a scientific consensus in a matter in which the convicted felon has no expertise whatever, and so, if he lashes out at science, they don't expect a reasoned, rational refutation from him.

It's much like his braying that Black immigrants are eating their neighbors' pet cats and dogs without any credible evidence.

To me, they're obviously baseless lies, but to his worshipers they're gospel truth.

 

[Dragonlady]

Show me on this graph where humanity has made the climate warmer?

View attachment 1120582

What the fuck piece of shit is this? No link, no bona fides, no idea what this is or what you think others are supposed to do with it.

Take you useless denial and stick it up your ass.

 

[westwall]

Why are the consensus of global climatologists and international scientific associations, and the recognition of its economic impact, "fake"?

Even if you must believe whatever Trump tells you, where is his data analysis and refutation?

Consensus is the language of POLITICS.

Not science, moron. That's why anytime a twerp, like you trots out that word we ignore it, because it is baseless, and non scientific.

DURRRRRR

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

What the fuck piece of shit is this? No link, no bona fides, no idea what this is or what you think others are supposed to do with it.

Take you useless denial and stick it up your ass.

Has your carbon tax cooled the planet yet?

How much does it cost you every year?

 

[Dragonlady]

Consensus is the language of POLITICS.

Not science, moron. That's why anytime a twerp, like you trots out that word we ignore it, because it is baseless, and non scientific.

DURRRRRR

No, idiot. "Consensus" is the word that is used because there are people in the scientific field who are being paid by fossil fuel companies to produce studies to cast doubt on results of the studies demonstrating the effect of carbon emissions on heat retention in the atmosphere.

Just like the scientists who produced studies the tobacco companies paid for which said that smoking was good for your health. They even paid doctors to promote smoking to their patients. And the doctors took their money and poisoned their patients.

 

[Meathead]

What the fuck piece of shit is this? No link, no bona fides, no idea what this is or what you think others are supposed to do with it.

Take you useless denial and stick it up your ass.

Old fat women often have anger issues. Deal with it.

 

[Etymology gaslight]

Of course, ones hope so, but Trump has been resolute and relentless in his denial and defiance of accepted science, especially medical and environmental. He dismisses experts in every academic discipline if their empirical data conflicts with his irrational dogma.

Putting aside the comfort that human biology affords us in this matter, the cost of imposed and enforced ignorance in anthropogenic climate change will be monumental, compounded by the human suffering that will, inevitably, result from Trump’s contempt for science and love of dirty fuels.

View attachment 1120474
​

There is virtual global consensus among the most qualified in climatology, but that expert unanimity is treated with contempt by Trump because many of those experts are foreign, from all parts of the globe, and acknowledged by every other nation on earth.

​

When the Trump regime declared two weeks ago that it would largely disregard the economic cost of climate change as it sets policies and regulations, it was just the latest step in a multi-pronged effort to erase global warming from the American agenda.​

​

But Trump is doing more than just turning a blind eye to the fact that the planet is growing hotter. He is weakening the country’s capacity to understand global warming and to prepare for its consequences.​

​

The administration has dismantled climate research, firing some of the nation’s top scientists, and gutted efforts to chart how fast greenhouse gases are building up in the atmosphere and what that means for the economy, employment, agriculture, health and other aspects of American society. The government will no longer track major sources of greenhouse gases, data that has been used to measure the scale and identify sources of the problem for the past 15 years.​

​

“We’re not doing that climate change, you know, crud, anymore,” Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins [a Trump sycophant with no climatological qualifications] told Fox Business on May 8…​

​

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/19/climate/trump-climate-denial.html​

​

Climate and environment updates:
Climate change adds month of extreme heat for 4 billion people

View attachment 1120482
"She called science 'crud!'
I like that!"



​

Climate change is a joke.
They should have called it
Everybody else is wealth reallocation.
I thought al gore invented this hoax.

No idea how much CO2 there is displacement of icebergs
Or even the difference between sea level rise and erosion.

Yeah these are the astro stars
I want to Hitch my wagon to.

Lazy science hypocrite bandits

can't snatch up
beachfront property fast enough.

Stop trashing our cities

 

[westwall]

No, idiot. "Consensus" is the word that is used because there are people in the scientific field who are being paid by fossil fuel companies to produce studies to cast doubt on results of the studies demonstrating the effect of carbon emissions on heat retention in the atmosphere.

Just like the scientists who produced studies the tobacco companies paid for which said that smoking was good for your health. They even paid doctors to promote smoking to their patients. And the doctors took their money and poisoned their patients.

No you stupid twat, consensus has nothing to do with science.

I AM a scientist, you're an uneducated buffoon.

 

[BluesLegend]

It's been the same story for at least 2000 years. Control the masses first, then gain power and riches for yourself.

Well the Dem leaders have become crazy wealthy on government salaries.