...Ramos was summing up his original questions before he was then going to ask them but as usual T-Rump interrupted before he could complete them...
Well, that's one way of looking at it.
...Oh, and if you are gullible enough to believe those inane responses then you deserve to have a liar like T-Rump as your mouthpiece...
Nope. I don't believe he will deport 11-12 million. But I believe he'll come around to suggest "Self-Deportation Industrial Strength", rather than "Lite", as Romney tried.
Nope. If he senses that Self-Deportation Industrial Strength will make a Wall unnecessary, then he wont' advocate trying to build it. Give it time.
Nope. I don't have any faith in his lightweight response to date; I simply want him to keep up the pressure on the other Pubs, to take harsh action against the Illegals.
...1. It would take a constitutional amendment to overturn the 14th...
Or dividing "jurisdiction of the United States" into convenient subsets (police jurisdiction vs. citizenship jurisdiction, etc.), then re-try the issue in the courts using that angle.
Obtain a ruling that Illegal Aliens are (1) under police (law-enforcement) jurisdiction but (2) NOT under citizenship jurisdiction, and we have the Magic Key to the problem.
The US Constitution is not a suicide pact.
And there's
ALWAYS an angle, for the imaginative and bold.
...2. Deporting 11 million people would be crime against humanity especially given that some of them are children with American citizenship and the parents of children who are American citizens...
Disagree about the crime against humanity opinion, and, if your Opposition gets the chance, they're going to put that to the test, as well.
And, in the final analysis, those parents should have thought of that before they trespassed into our country and tried to dig themselves in like tics.
They should not be rewarded with a path to citizenship; otherwise, we commit suicide by encouraging future and even larger tidal waves of invaders.
...3. You obviously never understood what Ramos was saying because he pointed out that the wall would be meaningless in the light of illegals reaching the USA by train...
Details... details... obstructive details... and lions and tigers and bears, oh my.
Hand-in-hand with any Wall would be the attendant and accompanying New and Improved spectrum of Controlled Access Portals - including portals for trains.
...Furthermore that wall would be a treaty violation which is something that neither you nor T-Rump are aware of...
No problem. Repudiate whatever treaty covers such things; in whole or in part; as needed; to remove the Constitutional obstruction.
...Simply because T-Rump says that he wants to do something doesn't mean that it is feasible or even realistic...
Agreed.
...T-Rump was just pandering to racists like yourself.
1. I'm not a racist.
2. I don't advocate racist behaviors on the part of Americans; in whole or in part.
3. "Mexican" is not a race.
4. It is not racism to sound the alarm over an invasion of 12,000,000 Illegal Aliens, and to agree with one's countrymen, that those Invaders should go home.
5. Durable in-it-for-the-long-run Anti-Illegals cannot afford to be bogged down by charges of racism, so they rarely (if ever) manifest or support any such behaviors.
6. Durable in-it-for-the-long-run Anti-Illegals must develop and sustain the courage to take the brickbats and phony accusations of racism and bigotry in pursuit of their objective.
7. I have no illusions about Trump's ability to deliver on some of what he is proposing; at least not in the whole; but I am enjoying the renewed stern response to the Illegals.