Is this REALLY what you believe???

[Mr. Shaman]

A prime example of liberal intolerance, the inability to accept that others may actually not agree with them for perfectly legitimate reasons, the inability to create an argument not based on ad homs, strawmen and outright lies, and, of course, abject partisan bigotry.

It's not the disagreement... it's the vitriol and venom... but thanks for playing.

On the contrary... liberals often take personal exception to people not agreeing with them, and usually assume its because the other person is racist, sexist, etc.

Not true.

I've always allowed for the possibility they're ("conservatives") ill-educated, which....more-often-than-not.....is a fact....and, they brag about it! For too-many.....there's (at least) a sense of uniqueness, being ignorant-White-trash.....and, there's no (actual) work, required.​

 

[Mr. Shaman]

It's not the disagreement... it's the vitriol and venom... but thanks for playing.

On the contrary... liberals often take personal exception to people not agreeing with them, and usually assume its because the other person is racist, sexist, etc, as thet's "the only way" someone -could- disagree with them - at which point, as you see from the quoted excerpt, the vitriol and vemom flows freely.

Well, perhaps if your side wouldn't come on like a three dollar whore all the time and speak reasonably without the marxist bullshit, without the Nanny state bullshit, without throwing the founding fathers(and your opinion of what they stood for) in our faces...

Dream ON!!!!!​

 

[Steelplate]

Yeah... you're right Shaman... too much to ask.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Ahhhh.... What a satisfying feeling to post the links of a radical racist creedist leftwing lunatic, watch all the usual suspects come out and meltdown defending a hate filled screed which is pretty much indefensible in it's hatred.
I don't know what else to say after under 8 hours of sleep getting 7 pages of hysteria from the left.

Not surprisingly, they refuse to take responsibility for their terrible behavior and - wait for it - try to blame the GOP for said behaviour by invoking the classic playground "you started it!" line.

 

[Katzndogz]

What ever the beliefs of liberals and conservatives are, and whatever side might be right, or more right than wrong is immaterial. Clearly the two sides have grown so far apart and that division so deep and acrimonious that there is no point left to compromise. The nation's future is to break apart. The sooner the better.

 

[Nosmo King]

Do you believe Democrats, specifically Liberal Democrats are, in reality, Socialists?

Depends. Many such people here equate any government spoending - military, police, fire, courts, etc - to socialism; as they support this spending, they are, by their own definition, sociaists.

Beyond that, many look for the state to own/control as much of the means of producing and distributing wealth as possible, and are very supportive of the redistribution of wealth thue the wefare state - and so, are unquestionably socialists.

Do you believe that those who are concerned with the viability of our natural resources and ecology are, specifically, environmental whack jobs?

Unquestionably, some are.

Do you believe that Americans who are homosexual do not deserve access to the same laws and protections provided by the marriage license?

Poorly phrased question. The limitation you described is not exclusive to homosexuals.

Are all unemployed American workers lazy, unmotivated Welfare leeches unworthy of public aid?

Unquestionably, some are.

Then I suggest that the OP wasn't so far fetched after all.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Do you believe Democrats, specifically Liberal Democrats are, in reality, Socialists?

Depends. Many such people here equate any government spoending - military, police, fire, courts, etc - to socialism; as they support this spending, they are, by their own definition, sociaists.

Beyond that, many look for the state to own/control as much of the means of producing and distributing wealth as possible, and are very supportive of the redistribution of wealth thue the wefare state - and so, are unquestionably socialists.


Unquestionably, some are.


Poorly phrased question. The limitation you described is not exclusive to homosexuals.

Are all unemployed American workers lazy, unmotivated Welfare leeches unworthy of public aid?

Unquestionably, some are.

Then I suggest that the OP wasn't so far fetched after all.

Because...?

 

[Nosmo King]

Depends. Many such people here equate any government spoending - military, police, fire, courts, etc - to socialism; as they support this spending, they are, by their own definition, sociaists.

Beyond that, many look for the state to own/control as much of the means of producing and distributing wealth as possible, and are very supportive of the redistribution of wealth thue the wefare state - and so, are unquestionably socialists.


Unquestionably, some are.


Poorly phrased question. The limitation you described is not exclusive to homosexuals.


Unquestionably, some are.

Then I suggest that the OP wasn't so far fetched after all.

Because...?

Because all you see is the spending. (as if YOU earned enough to pay taxes). You don't, or can't appreciate the humanity of those with aspirations Conservatives seek to crush.

 

[Steelplate]

Btw shooter... your sigline does nothing more than prove the point of the OP. Self righteous pride for your side... demonizing your opposition.

 

[Unkotare]

What ever the beliefs of liberals and conservatives are, and whatever side might be right, or more right than wrong is immaterial. Clearly the two sides have grown so far apart and that division so deep and acrimonious that there is no point left to compromise. The nation's future is to break apart. The sooner the better.

Fuck you, you hysterical douchebag. Get the fuck out of my country, we don't need screeching little girls like you around.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Then I suggest that the OP wasn't so far fetched after all.

Because...?

Because all you see is the spending. (as if YOU earned enough to pay taxes). You don't, or can't appreciate the humanity of those with aspirations Conservatives seek to crush.

How on earth does that conclusion follow from my post?

And then, doesn't your response - "You don't, or can't appreciate the humanity of those with aspirations Conservatives seek to crush" - only serve to support -my- assertion that liberals often take personal exception to people not agreeing with them, and usually assume its because the other person is racist, sexist, etc, as thet's "the only way" someone -could- disagree with them - at which point, the vitriol and vemom flows freely...?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Btw shooter... your sigline does nothing more than prove the point of the OP. Self righteous pride for your side... demonizing your opposition.

I'm sorry that you don't like the fact that you have proven my assertion - but there's nothing -I- can do about that.

 

[Nosmo King]

Because...?

Because all you see is the spending. (as if YOU earned enough to pay taxes). You don't, or can't appreciate the humanity of those with aspirations Conservatives seek to crush.

How on earth does that conclusion follow from my post?

And then, doesn't your response - "You don't, or can't appreciate the humanity of those with aspirations Conservatives seek to crush" - only serve to support -my- assertion that liberals often take personal exception to people not agreeing with them, and usually assume its because the other person is racist, sexist, etc, as thet's "the only way" someone -could- disagree with them - at which point, the vitriol and vemom flows freely...?

Your default position on Socialism, for example. Any government spending is Socialism? Cops, firefighters, schools, roads all forming a Socialist system? That reduces all political science to two choices: Anarchy or Socialism. This obfuscates the question, eliminates serious intellectual discourse and provides a simple, but tragically flawed argument that could only appeal to those lacking the education and intellectual agility to grasp complex questions such as politics.

Dismissing environmental concerns as wacky clears the decks for unrepentant exploitation of nature and mankind all to pursue greater profits benefiting only a few humans while ruining life for others.

These attitudes, prevailent among contemporary American Conservatives re-enforce the assertions of the OP that Conservatives would rather hate than think.

 

[Amelia]

Time to stop trying to be nice to people who are not nice.

The republican party is the racist party and you can tell that by the votes of color in this country.

The republican answer to why this fact exsists is always an insult to the people of color.

That is racism

Did you vote for Harry Reid when you lived in Nevada?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Because all you see is the spending. (as if YOU earned enough to pay taxes). You don't, or can't appreciate the humanity of those with aspirations Conservatives seek to crush.

How on earth does that conclusion follow from my post?

And then, doesn't your response - "You don't, or can't appreciate the humanity of those with aspirations Conservatives seek to crush" - only serve to support -my- assertion that liberals often take personal exception to people not agreeing with them, and usually assume its because the other person is racist, sexist, etc, as thet's "the only way" someone -could- disagree with them - at which point, the vitriol and vemom flows freely...?

Your default position on Socialism, for example. Any government spending is Socialism? Cops, firefighters, schools, roads all forming a Socialist system? That reduces all political science to two choices: Anarchy or Socialism. This obfuscates the question, eliminates serious intellectual discourse and provides a simple, but tragically flawed argument that could only appeal to those lacking the education and intellectual agility to grasp complex questions such as politics.

I suggest you go back and re-read my post.

Dismissing environmental concerns as wacky clears the decks for unrepentant exploitation of nature and mankind all to pursue greater profits benefiting only a few humans while ruining life for others.

I suggest you go back and re-read my post.

These attitudes, prevailent among contemporary American Conservatives re-enforce the assertions of the OP that Conservatives would rather hate than think.

Once you go back and re-read my post, I will allow you to revise your statement.

 

[Steelplate]

Btw shooter... your sigline does nothing more than prove the point of the OP. Self righteous pride for your side... demonizing your opposition.

I'm sorry that you don't like the fact that you have proven my assertion - but there's nothing -I- can do about that.

Like I said... straight from Slimebaugh... accuse others of what you yourself are doing.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Btw shooter... your sigline does nothing more than prove the point of the OP. Self righteous pride for your side... demonizing your opposition.

I'm sorry that you don't like the fact that you have proven my assertion - but there's nothing -I- can do about that.

Like I said... straight from Slimebaugh... accuse others of what you yourself are doing.

:yawn:
I'm sorry - you're done.
You said so yourself.

 

[Big Fitz]

Time to stop trying to be nice to people who are not nice.

The republican party is the racist party and you can tell that by the votes of color in this country.

The republican answer to why this fact exsists is always an insult to the people of color.

That is racism

Did you vote for Harry Reid when you lived in Nevada?

I thought she lived in California now. I guess she is wherever the spirit of racism is alive and well in the hearts of all people (save white people), like the buttermilk of human... stupidity. It sure ain't kindness.

 

[Amelia]

Time to stop trying to be nice to people who are not nice.

The republican party is the racist party and you can tell that by the votes of color in this country.

The republican answer to why this fact exsists is always an insult to the people of color.

That is racism

Did you vote for Harry Reid when you lived in Nevada?

I thought she lived in California now. I guess she is wherever the spirit of racism is alive and well in the hearts of all people (save white people), like the buttermilk of human... stupidity. It sure ain't kindness.

She does now. She moved back to California last year after spending 15 years in Nevada.

So she had a chance to vote for Harry Reid two or three times, but she said in another thread that she wouldn't vote for a Mormon.

 

[Uncensored2008]

How do you feel about Christianity and the Crusades,

Without the Crusades there would be no Western Civilization, no enlightenment, no America.

I can see why you wish they never happened.

or Islams wars of conquest? Do you hate religion? Or the great explorers exploitation of native people, hate the early capitalists too?

Conquest is exploitation?

No wonder you voted for Obama.