Is There Scientific Evidence Supporting the Floor of Noah?

[Hollie]

You are correct. Any website that claims mankind and T-Rex existed at the same time is bullshit.

If you want to believe that the entire scientific community is in on some conspiracy, and a handful of plucky evangelists are out to save us from their lies, by all means do so. It doesn't change the fact that T-Rex and man never co-existed.

He is correct, but you are wrong. Atheists/agnostics are usually wrong.

The evidence has been provided. You cannot rebut the mountains of evidence. Yet, you provided no evidence of birds from dinosaurs. Little birds coming from very large dinosaurs. I think we can file this under "faith-based" mythology now.

Actually, the fact that dinosaurs never co-existed with man has nothing to do with atheism. It has everything to do with evidence and if has a great deal to do with the panic that grips religious extremists when their beliefs are confounded. They get angry, emotive, and lash out in emotional outbursts.

 

[james bond]

No you wouldn't, you lying little freak. Nor would you consider or understand it, if someone were stupid enough to waste their time spoonfeeding it to you.

Ad hominem arguments are fallacies, so you lose and are wrong again.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Ad hominem arguments are fallacies

It wasn't an argument, you insufferable dumbass. You know, you use that term more than any fool i have ever tripped over, yet you clearly have no idea what it means. To the shock of absolutely nobody, for sure....

 

[Wyatt earp]

I'm talking physical evidence not opinion like evo is based on,,,

and in fact you have seen them but chose to question if the man had legal rights to have such evidence and refused to talk about the evidence itself,,,

I saw no evidence. You say you posted links, but with 45 pages on this thread and as much on another of the same topic, I did not see them.

that would explain a lot since it was on several different threads you ignored it,,,

this isnt our first rodeo now is it,,,

remember the one you had to run away from because I wouldnt let you put words in my mouth???

lets face it your religion has corrupted your mind to the point you just cant see whats in front of you if it goes against the teachings,,,

I ran away from a thread? lol No, I don't remember that.

I remember embarrassing you a few times and refusing to let you misquote me.


The simple truth is that T-Rex was extinct long before man showed up.

I guess you can prove that???

and why are you holding to just T-rex???

are you saying other dinos did coexist with humans???


and I have never quoted you so you sir are a LIAR,,,

No dinosaurs coexisted with humans, you freak. They were separated by at least 60 million years. Good god you shameless little troll, small children know this.

Small children also knows the climate has always changed and the bullshit weather reports saying it's the hottest or coldest day evah!!!!!



Btw: 200 million year old Crocs have a common ancestor to the dinosaur




.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Small children also knows the climate has always changed

Because climate scientists taught them that, genius...do you have ANY idea how dumb you sound, when you vomit that idiotic talking point?

 

[WinterBorn]

You are correct. Any website that claims mankind and T-Rex existed at the same time is bullshit.

If you want to believe that the entire scientific community is in on some conspiracy, and a handful of plucky evangelists are out to save us from their lies, by all means do so. It doesn't change the fact that T-Rex and man never co-existed.

I'm talking physical evidence not opinion like evo is based on,,,

and in fact you have seen them but chose to question if the man had legal rights to have such evidence and refused to talk about the evidence itself,,,

I saw no evidence. You say you posted links, but with 45 pages on this thread and as much on another of the same topic, I did not see them.

that would explain a lot since it was on several different threads you ignored it,,,

this isnt our first rodeo now is it,,,

remember the one you had to run away from because I wouldnt let you put words in my mouth???

lets face it your religion has corrupted your mind to the point you just cant see whats in front of you if it goes against the teachings,,,

I ran away from a thread? lol No, I don't remember that.

I remember embarrassing you a few times and refusing to let you misquote me.


The simple truth is that T-Rex was extinct long before man showed up.

I guess you can prove that???

and why are you holding to just T-rex???

are you saying other dinos did coexist with humans???


and I have never quoted you so you sir are a LIAR,,,

The original comment that started this was about whether I would run from a T-Rex. And that is what I posted when you said there were mountains of evidence that said I was wrong when I said that humans never lived in the same time period with a T-Rex.

No, you did not actually quote me. You misquoted me.

 

[progressive hunter]

I'm talking physical evidence not opinion like evo is based on,,,

and in fact you have seen them but chose to question if the man had legal rights to have such evidence and refused to talk about the evidence itself,,,

I saw no evidence. You say you posted links, but with 45 pages on this thread and as much on another of the same topic, I did not see them.

that would explain a lot since it was on several different threads you ignored it,,,

this isnt our first rodeo now is it,,,

remember the one you had to run away from because I wouldnt let you put words in my mouth???

lets face it your religion has corrupted your mind to the point you just cant see whats in front of you if it goes against the teachings,,,

I ran away from a thread? lol No, I don't remember that.

I remember embarrassing you a few times and refusing to let you misquote me.


The simple truth is that T-Rex was extinct long before man showed up.

I guess you can prove that???

and why are you holding to just T-rex???

are you saying other dinos did coexist with humans???


and I have never quoted you so you sir are a LIAR,,,

The original comment that started this was about whether I would run from a T-Rex. And that is what I posted when you said there were mountains of evidence that said I was wrong when I said that humans never lived in the same time period with a T-Rex.

No, you did not actually quote me. You misquoted me.

ok we can stay with t-rex,,,you have no proof but I do,,,

and I have never misquoted you either,,,

 

[WinterBorn]

I saw no evidence. You say you posted links, but with 45 pages on this thread and as much on another of the same topic, I did not see them.

that would explain a lot since it was on several different threads you ignored it,,,

this isnt our first rodeo now is it,,,

remember the one you had to run away from because I wouldnt let you put words in my mouth???

lets face it your religion has corrupted your mind to the point you just cant see whats in front of you if it goes against the teachings,,,

I ran away from a thread? lol No, I don't remember that.

I remember embarrassing you a few times and refusing to let you misquote me.


The simple truth is that T-Rex was extinct long before man showed up.

I guess you can prove that???

and why are you holding to just T-rex???

are you saying other dinos did coexist with humans???


and I have never quoted you so you sir are a LIAR,,,

The original comment that started this was about whether I would run from a T-Rex. And that is what I posted when you said there were mountains of evidence that said I was wrong when I said that humans never lived in the same time period with a T-Rex.

No, you did not actually quote me. You misquoted me.

ok we can stay with t-rex,,,you have no proof but I do,,,

and I have never misquoted you either,,,

You have proof that the T-Rex was alive alongside humans? No.

And yes, you did quote me and you did misquote me.

 

[progressive hunter]

that would explain a lot since it was on several different threads you ignored it,,,

this isnt our first rodeo now is it,,,

remember the one you had to run away from because I wouldnt let you put words in my mouth???

lets face it your religion has corrupted your mind to the point you just cant see whats in front of you if it goes against the teachings,,,

I ran away from a thread? lol No, I don't remember that.

I remember embarrassing you a few times and refusing to let you misquote me.


The simple truth is that T-Rex was extinct long before man showed up.

I guess you can prove that???

and why are you holding to just T-rex???

are you saying other dinos did coexist with humans???


and I have never quoted you so you sir are a LIAR,,,

The original comment that started this was about whether I would run from a T-Rex. And that is what I posted when you said there were mountains of evidence that said I was wrong when I said that humans never lived in the same time period with a T-Rex.

No, you did not actually quote me. You misquoted me.

ok we can stay with t-rex,,,you have no proof but I do,,,

and I have never misquoted you either,,,

You have proof that the T-Rex was alive alongside humans? No.

And yes, you did quote me and you did misquote me.

LIAR!!!

 

[MarathonMike]

I haven't read the whole thread but I seem to recall that there was evidence of a wooden ship at the top of Mt Ararat.

 

[Marion Morrison]

We just did. Rock does not bend, but we find it bent all around the world. It also goes to show that the Earth is young. Even the rocks in your head are bent.

Ohhhh...I see. You’re one of those ‘earth is 6000 years old’ fellas. Well I have debated your ilk before, so I’ll just bow out now. You can’t debate just plain stoopit.

So what makes GOD stupid? And it is possible that the age of the earth is off by a few thousand years perhaps, but not 100's of millions and billions. This is simply a ridicules attempt to replace THE CREATOR of all things with enough T I M E.

God is stupid. He made plants before sunlight.

Where does that put you?

Smarter than him, obviously.

You're a ******* tard for suggesting a human being is smarter than God. Seriously. Were you born that stupid, or did you have to work at it? Are your parents from Alabama, or Palatka?

 

[Yarddog]

There does seem to be overwhelming evidence that certain proofs are being systematically ignored or redefined or hidden, in order to eliminate possible "confusion".

one theory is that the mediteranian overflowed into the black sea valley about 7000 years ago. perhaps to people living there it would have seemed as though the flood covered the whole earth, or the whole earth that they knew.

Black Sea deluge hypothesis - Wikipedia

 

[Borillar]

I suppose that Noah had to have a floor. What else would he walk on?

 

[james bond]

Ad hominem arguments are fallacies

It wasn't an argument, you insufferable dumbass. You know, you use that term more than any fool i have ever tripped over, yet you clearly have no idea what it means. To the shock of absolutely nobody, for sure....

Then let's call it a fallacy statement. If you admit that it wasn't an argument, then it's just your worthless assertion which was still fallacious. In other words, you are the DUMBASS making stupid statements. We all know that.

 

[Capri]

I get "this crap" from books. The last one, from which I got the 2.75 billion years, was written by a physicist with his PhD from MIT. Not crap.
Estimates of the age of the universe vary. From the last book I read on the subject, 2.75 billion was an estimate accepted as valid by cosmologists. It's been a few years so that may have changed.
There is a center of the universe. It's the point from which the universe originated. The universe is expanding at a measurable rate. Extrapolating from that rate, the origin point has been identified.
Time doesn't flow at a constant rate throughout the universe. On Earth, the planet is billions of years old but measuring from elsewhere would result in a different age. Using the chi spiral, that age at the center of the universe would be about 6000 years.

No it wasn't. And who cares if it was? The age of the earth is based on mountains of empirical evidence, not the wishful thinking of a paid liar trying to sell books.

Not by more than about 5%, they don't. You are just making stuff up.

00% wrong. Complete and utter horseshit. You literally just made up that nonsense.

No it hasnt. That is not how it works. You are making stuff up and embarrassing yourself.

No it wouldn't. Complete nonsense that you also just made up.

I double-checked what I wrote earlier and the book from which I got the information. I mistyped the 2 in 2.75 and subsequently copied my own error. It should have been 4.75 billion years for the estimated age of Earth. My apologies.

Regardless of my typo, however, everything I said about the center of the universe and time is accurate, based on the work of cosmologists, and from books for laypeople about cosmology written by legitimate scientists. You're not discussing the topic but, rather, just claiming I made it up and being insulting.

The universe is expanding.
Using the rate of expansion, the origin point of the universe can be estimated mathematically.
Time flows at different rates in different locations.
The age of Earth is different at the universe's origin point than it is on the planet.
Using chi for the ratio, the age of Earth at the origin point of the universe would be approximately an age that conforms with calculations based on the Old Testament.

If you or anyone would like to converse about that, please, let's.
If you've nothing to offer but contradiction, accusation, or insult, please don't bother.

 

[Hollie]

I get "this crap" from books. The last one, from which I got the 2.75 billion years, was written by a physicist with his PhD from MIT. Not crap.
Estimates of the age of the universe vary. From the last book I read on the subject, 2.75 billion was an estimate accepted as valid by cosmologists. It's been a few years so that may have changed.
There is a center of the universe. It's the point from which the universe originated. The universe is expanding at a measurable rate. Extrapolating from that rate, the origin point has been identified.
Time doesn't flow at a constant rate throughout the universe. On Earth, the planet is billions of years old but measuring from elsewhere would result in a different age. Using the chi spiral, that age at the center of the universe would be about 6000 years.

No it wasn't. And who cares if it was? The age of the earth is based on mountains of empirical evidence, not the wishful thinking of a paid liar trying to sell books.

Not by more than about 5%, they don't. You are just making stuff up.

00% wrong. Complete and utter horseshit. You literally just made up that nonsense.

No it hasnt. That is not how it works. You are making stuff up and embarrassing yourself.

No it wouldn't. Complete nonsense that you also just made up.

I double-checked what I wrote earlier and the book from which I got the information. I mistyped the 2 in 2.75 and subsequently copied my own error. It should have been 4.75 billion years for the estimated age of Earth. My apologies.

Regardless of my typo, however, everything I said about the center of the universe and time is accurate, based on the work of cosmologists, and from books for laypeople about cosmology written by legitimate scientists. You're not discussing the topic but, rather, just claiming I made it up and being insulting.

The universe is expanding.
Using the rate of expansion, the origin point of the universe can be estimated mathematically.
Time flows at different rates in different locations.
The age of Earth is different at the universe's origin point than it is on the planet.
Using chi for the ratio, the age of Earth at the origin point of the universe would be approximately an age that conforms with calculations based on the Old Testament.

If you or anyone would like to converse about that, please, let's.
If you've nothing to offer but contradiction, accusation, or insult, please don't bother.

I’m not sure what “chi” is or how that will lead anyone to some point in space that defines the point of the initial expansion of the universe.

A quick search of two of the leading research universities would refute the “chi” claim.

Where is the centre of the universe?

https://www.nap.edu/read/6024/chapter/3

Aside from the above, there is still irrefutable evidence of a very ancient planet and solar system.

 

[WinterBorn]

I ran away from a thread? lol No, I don't remember that.

I remember embarrassing you a few times and refusing to let you misquote me.


The simple truth is that T-Rex was extinct long before man showed up.

I guess you can prove that???

and why are you holding to just T-rex???

are you saying other dinos did coexist with humans???


and I have never quoted you so you sir are a LIAR,,,

The original comment that started this was about whether I would run from a T-Rex. And that is what I posted when you said there were mountains of evidence that said I was wrong when I said that humans never lived in the same time period with a T-Rex.

No, you did not actually quote me. You misquoted me.

ok we can stay with t-rex,,,you have no proof but I do,,,

and I have never misquoted you either,,,

You have proof that the T-Rex was alive alongside humans? No.

And yes, you did quote me and you did misquote me.

LIAR!!!

Wow.

Thanks for playing.

 

[progressive hunter]

I guess you can prove that???

and why are you holding to just T-rex???

are you saying other dinos did coexist with humans???


and I have never quoted you so you sir are a LIAR,,,

The original comment that started this was about whether I would run from a T-Rex. And that is what I posted when you said there were mountains of evidence that said I was wrong when I said that humans never lived in the same time period with a T-Rex.

No, you did not actually quote me. You misquoted me.

ok we can stay with t-rex,,,you have no proof but I do,,,

and I have never misquoted you either,,,

You have proof that the T-Rex was alive alongside humans? No.

And yes, you did quote me and you did misquote me.

LIAR!!!

Wow.

Thanks for playing.

figures you think this is a game,,,

maybe thats why lying doesnt matter to you,,,

 

[WinterBorn]

The original comment that started this was about whether I would run from a T-Rex. And that is what I posted when you said there were mountains of evidence that said I was wrong when I said that humans never lived in the same time period with a T-Rex.

No, you did not actually quote me. You misquoted me.

ok we can stay with t-rex,,,you have no proof but I do,,,

and I have never misquoted you either,,,

You have proof that the T-Rex was alive alongside humans? No.

And yes, you did quote me and you did misquote me.

LIAR!!!

Wow.

Thanks for playing.

figures you think this is a game,,,

maybe thats why lying doesnt matter to you,,,

So you maintain you never quoted me? Are you making the claim about this thread or ever?

 

[progressive hunter]

ok we can stay with t-rex,,,you have no proof but I do,,,

and I have never misquoted you either,,,

You have proof that the T-Rex was alive alongside humans? No.

And yes, you did quote me and you did misquote me.

LIAR!!!

Wow.

Thanks for playing.

figures you think this is a game,,,

maybe thats why lying doesnt matter to you,,,

So you maintain you never quoted me? Are you making the claim about this thread or ever?

you said I misquoted you,,,pick one and stick with it